The Billionaire Hoarders: How the Wealthy Became Our Biggest Threat
It happens every few generations. It's what drove the fascist oligarchs of the Confederacy to reach out and try to conquer the entire United States in the 1860s. It caused the robber barons to murder union organizers and ultimately crash America into the Republican Great Depression in the early decades of the twentieth century. And it's why wages have been stagnant while billionaires' wealth has exploded in the years since the Reagan revolution.
What I'm talking about here is the rise of greedy oligarchs who are driven by an identifiable mental illness: what's either a subset of obsessive-compulsive disorder or a defect in impulse control called 'hoarding syndrome.'
Because most hoarders never invite people into their homes, it's an almost invisible illness. But, as Drs. Randy Frost and Gail Steketee write in their book Stuff: Compulsive Hoarding and the Meaning of Things:
Recent studies of hoarding put the prevalence rate at somewhere between 2 and 5 percent of the population. That means that six million to fifteen million Americans suffer from hoarding that causes them distress or interferes with their ability to live.
That's tough enough; people afflicted with hoarding syndrome are often tortured by their obsession and socially embarrassed to the point of removing themselves from all but the most essential social situations. They're functionally invisible. But from a societal point of view, they're generally only harming themselves: Hoarding syndrome is considered a psychiatric condition, not a crisis for democracy itself.
With one giant exception: morbidly rich people who are also afflicted with hoarding syndrome but don't live in or even close to poverty.
When people with hoarding syndrome are born with or come into massive wealth, suddenly what was once a personal, psychiatric issue can become a crisis for all of society.
Like Scrooge McDuck of Disney comics fame, instead of filling their mansions with old newspapers, tin cans, and balls of string, they obsessively fill their money bins, overseas bank accounts, and investment portfolios with billions of dollars.
And then, driven to continuously hoard more and more money—that now being the object of their addiction—they reach out to use the power of government itself to redirect more and more cash into their greedy hands.
As historian and political scientist Michael Parenti notes:
Wealth becomes addictive. Fortune whets the appetite for still more fortune. There is no end to the amount of money one might wish to accumulate, driven onward by the auri sacra fames, the cursed hunger for gold.
So the money addicts grab more and more for themselves, more than can be spent in a thousand lifetimes of limitless indulgence, driven by what begins to resemble an obsessional pathology, a monomania that blots out every other human consideration.
It blots out their concern for their fellow humans. It blots out their willingness to take climate science seriously. It blots out their ability to see the damage they're doing to their own country and its democratic institutions.
Ultimately, they don't care about the damage they do to society; such considerations are overwhelmed by their obsession. They don't care how many children must grow up in poverty or even die young to support their massive wealth. They don't care about destroying everybody else's future, so long as they can get more, more, more money!
We defeated Confederate oligarchs with this disease back in 1865. We beat money hoarders back again after the Republican Great Depression with FDR's New Deal and LBJ's Great Society. We thought we were safe, as the middle class grew from around 10 percent of us to around two-thirds of us (with a single paycheck!) by the late 1970s.
But then, in 1978, in the Bellotti decision written by 'Powell Memo' author Lewis Powell himself, five corrupt Republicans on the Supreme Court ruled that money is actually 'free speech' and corporations are 'persons.' It floated Reagan into office in 1981 on a tsunami of oil and banking industry money. Five other corrupted SCOTUS Republicans doubled down on that bizarre ruling in 2010 with Citizens United, creating an entirely new form of corrupt political bribery via something they created out of thin air that is called a SuperPAC.
As a result, today these morbidly rich hoarders shovel small amounts (millions) into the pockets of captured politicians who then provide them with tax breaks, profit-driving deregulation, and government subsidies that return billions to them. And the impact on average Americans over the past 47 years that we've been living in the Reagan revolution has been dramatic.
While every other developed country in the world offers free or nearly free health care to its citizens; free or nearly free education, including college; and almost universal unionization and a high minimum wage, we're stuck living in the nation these billionaires have forced on us just to satisfy their own avaricious obsession with more, more, more money:
—Almost 30 million Americans lack health insurance altogether, and 43 percent of Americans are so badly under-insured that any illness or accident costing them more than $1,000 in co-pays or deductibles would wipe them out.
—Almost 12 percent of Americans, over 37 million of us, live in dire poverty, and 60 percent of us live in poverty: 201 million Americans. According to OECD numbers, while only 5 percent of Italians and 11 percent of Japanese workers toil in low-wage jobs, as CBS News reports, 'for the bottom 60% of U.S. households, a minimal quality of life is out of reach.' (And low-income Japanese and Italians have free health care and college.)
—More than one in five Americans—21 percent—are illiterate. By fourth grade, a mere 35 percent of American children are literate at grade level, as our public schools have suffered from a sustained, four-decade-long attack by Republicans at both state and federal levels to pay for tax cuts for billionaires.
—Fully a quarter of Americans (26 percent) suffer from a diagnosable mental illness in any given year: Over half of them (54 percent) never receive treatment and, because of cost and a lack of access to mental health care, of the 46 percent who do get help, the average time from onset of symptoms to the first treatment is 11 years.
—Every day in America, an average of 316 people are shot and 110 die from their wounds. Gun violence is now the leading cause of death for American children, a situation not suffered by the children of any other country in the world.
And these are just the tip of the iceberg of statistics about how Americans suffer from Reagan's 40-year-long GOP war on working-class and poor people that has managed to make America the nation with the world's largest number of the world's wealthiest billionaires.
—Almost half (44 percent) of American adults carry student debt, a burden virtually unknown in any other developed country in the world (dozens of countries actually pay their young people to go to college).
—Americans spend more than twice as much for health care and pharmaceuticals as citizens of any other developed country. We pay $11,912 per person per year for health care; it's $5,463 in Australia, $4,666 in Japan, $5,496 in France, and $7,382 in Germany (the most expensive country outside of us).
And we don't get better health or a longer lifespan for all the money; instead, it's just lining the pockets of rich insurance, pharma, and hospital executives and investors, with hundreds of billions in profits every year going to the morbidly rich. 'Dollar Bill' McGuire, the former CEO of UnitedHealth, for example, took over a billion dollars in compensation.
—The average American life expectancy is 78.8 years: Canada's is 82.3, Australia's is 82.9, Japan's is 84.4, France's is 83.0, and Germany's is 81.3.
—Our public schools are an underfunded mess, as are our highways and public transportation systems. While every other developed country in the world has high-speed train service, we still suffer under a privatized rail system that prevents Amtrak from running even its most modern trains at anything close to their top speeds.
In the 42 years since the start of the Reagan revolution, bought-off politicians have so altered our tax code that fully $51 trillion has moved from the homes and savings of working-class Americans into the money bins of the morbidly rich money hoarders.
As a result, America today is the most unequal developed nation in the world and the situation gets worse every day: Many of our billionaires are richer than any pharaoh or king in the history of the world, while a family lifestyle that could be comfortably supported by a single income in 1980 takes two people working full-time to maintain today.
In the years since the Supreme Court first began down this road in 1976, the GOP has come to be entirely captured by this handful of mentally ill billionaires and the industries that made them rich.
As a result, Republican politicians refuse to do anything about the slaughter of our schoolchildren with weapons of war; ignore or ridicule the damage fossil fuel–caused global warming is doing to our nation and planet; and continue to lower billionaire and corporate taxes every time they get full control of the federal or a state government.
All because our courts and politicians, now well captured by right-wing billionaires, refuse to do anything about the ravages of hoarding syndrome among the very wealthy.
Solving this problem won't be easy but also isn't complicated. Just like we did with the robber barons, the first step is to identify and publicize the problem of mentally ill people among the morbidly rich having seized control of our political system.
We did this before.
As President Grover Cleveland—the only Democrat elected during that post–Civil War period—proclaimed in his 1887 State of the Union address:
As we view the achievements of aggregated capital, we discover the existence of trusts, combinations, and monopolies, while the citizen is struggling far in the rear or is trampled to death beneath an iron heel. Corporations, which should be the carefully restrained creatures of the law and the servants of the people, are fast becoming the people's masters.
And as FDR pointed out when he began to pull America out of the Republican Great Depression:
For out of this modern civilization economic royalists carved new dynasties. New kingdoms were built upon concentration of control over material things.… It was natural and perhaps human that the privileged princes of these new economic dynasties, thirsting for power, reached out for control over Government itself.
FDR took on those 'economic royalists' and defeated them. He explicitly called them out when the Democratic Party renominated him for president in 1936 in Philadelphia: 'These economic royalists complain that we seek to overthrow the institutions of America,' Roosevelt said. 'What they really complain of is that we seek to take away their power.'
He paused for a moment, then thundered, 'Our allegiance to American institutions requires the overthrow of this kind of power!'
The crowd roared, delighted that he'd turned back the Republican Great Depression and put millions to work while undoing the climate-destroying Dust Bowl by creating, among other three-letter agencies, the Civilian Conservation Corps, or CCC, to plant millions of trees across the country. And he raised the top tax rate on the obscenely wealthy back up to 90 percent, while stopping an effort to kidnap him and turn the government fascist.
'In vain,' Roosevelt said, 'they seek to hide behind the Flag and the Constitution. In their blindness they forget what the Flag and the Constitution stand for. Now, as always, they stand for democracy, not tyranny; for freedom, not subjection; and against a dictatorship by mob rule and the over-privileged alike.'
Cleveland's and Roosevelt's work now falls to us, as a new generation of obsessively money-hoarding robber barons have emerged from Reagan's tax cuts and these horrible Supreme Court decisions. It's thus now our job to educate the American people about the mental illness that's frozen our economy and is dismantling our democracy.
Our task in this time of crisis is to create a societal consensus across America that we're done indulging these wealthy pampered babies' every desire, and begin the serious reforms necessary to put an end to this crisis and, like in the 1890s and 1930s, break up monopolies and raise their damn taxes so we can begin to pay down our nation's debt and rebuild the middle class.
It'll take a few years, in all probability, but it's been done before. We can do it again.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fan-Favorite Actress From Beloved Disney Movie Dies at 86
Fan-Favorite Actress From Beloved Disney Movie Dies at 86 originally appeared on Parade. Disney fans all over the world are mourning the death of Renée Victor, who most famously voiced the character Abuelita in Disney's heartwarming — and, at times, heartwrenching — animated film, Coco. Per a statement to Deadline, Victor died surrounded by family in Sherman Oaks, California, on Thursday, May 30. The actress, who had lymphoma, was 86 years old at the time of her passing. "Renee is perhaps best known as the voice of 'Abuelita' in Disney's 2017 blockbuster Coco,' her daughters Raquel and Margo said in part in a statement at the time. 'Renee was loved by so many & had fans all over the world. Her memory will be cherished by all who knew her.' In addition to lending her voice to the 2017 Disney animated blockbuster Coco, she was also famous for her character Lupita on 22 episodes of Weeds. Victor also had recurring roles on Snowpiercer, Dead to Me, and With Love. As for her most famous film, Victor voiced Miguel's (Anthony Gonzalez) grandmother, daughter of the titular character Mama Coco — Miguel's great-grandmother. Though Abuelita is a loving and doting grandmother to her family, she also has a strict rule in the household: no music, even going as far as to smash Miguel's guitar. The "no music" policy has been passed down from Abuelita's own grandmother (Mama Coco's mom Imelda), after Imelda's musician husband left her and Coco to continue his music career. Fans shared their heartbreak at Victor's passing. "Renée Victor brought heart, soul, and strength to every role — especially as Abuelita in Coco," one person praised on X (formerly known as Twitter). "Her voice echoed through generations, reminding us of love, tradition, and family. Rest in peace." "Thank you for giving us Abuelita," another fan wrote. "Rest in peace, Renée Victor. Your voice lives on in our hearts." A third supporter referenced the Miguel's Day of the Dead adventure, in which he reunited with his relatives who had passed on. "Abuelita is now in the Land of the Dead with Mama Coco, Mama Imelda, Papa Hector and the rest of her familia's relatives," they penned. "But we always remember the good times." Fan-Favorite Actress From Beloved Disney Movie Dies at 86 first appeared on Parade on Jun 1, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Jun 1, 2025, where it first appeared.


The Hill
13 minutes ago
- The Hill
Here's where normal people can still buy homes, according to real estate data
(NEXSTAR) – If you've given up on home ownership, you're not alone. The dream has grown unaffordable and unrealistic for Americans in many major cities. 'The rapid rise in home values coupled with the doubling of mortgage rates caused the cost of owning a home to soar. Unfortunately, incomes just haven't kept up. That lowered affordability everywhere,' said Zillow senior economist Orphe Divounguy. But if you look closely, some pockets of America are still considered 'affordable' to the average family. In a data analysis shared with Nexstar, Zillow identified which cities are affordable by determining where the median-income family is able to spend less than one-third of their income on housing costs. If you're able to scrape together a 20% down payment, several dozen metro areas remain affordable for a median family looking to buy. However, most people don't have that much cash sitting around in the bank. When you set the target to a more reasonable 10% down payment, only 11 metro areas are still considered 'affordable': Most places that still rank as affordable are found in the Midwest and the South, where zoning codes tend to be more lenient and builders have been able to respond to rising demand more quickly. 'At the start of the pandemic, when residential mobility increased, home values in the Midwest, Great Lakes region and more inland South shot up just as fast as the rest of the country, and even faster in some metros. But home values in these regions — for the most part — were relatively less expensive to begin with,' Divounguy said. 'So even with all that growth, many of them are still relatively more affordable, especially if you have access to a large down payment.' If you're looking for the lowest prices overall, Redfin recently released a list of 10 major metro areas where homes are still under $300,000. Those willing to relocate to Detroit will find some of the best deals. The median sale price there is $180,000. As mentioned before, if prospective homebuyers are able to put a larger payment down up-front, their real estate prospects expand. Cincinnati, Indianapolis and Oklahoma City all become affordable to a median-income family with a 20% down payment. (See the full list at the bottom of this story.) For now, a few Upstate New York cities remain on the list, but that could soon change, according to Divounguy. Buffalo has been one of the hottest housing markets in the country the past couple years and supply isn't keeping up with demand. 'Strong job growth in the area has far outstripped new permits, and inventory of homes is nearly half what it was before the pandemic. Buffalo was previously one of the most accessible large cities in the nation. Now a mortgage for a typical home there is unaffordable for a family making the median household income, even with a 20% down payment.'
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Voter ID, proof of citizenship and attacks on mail voting could backfire on GOP
Are Republicans the new infrequent voters? In a new Catalist study, researchers say yes. Big shifts may be coming in both political campaigning and election laws. Unlike misreported 'horse race' polls during election season, the Catalist study is public opinion polling done right. Catalist collects comprehensive data from a sample featuring a broad cross-section of Americans. This includes panel data, in which the same people are repeatedly interviewed over time to see how their opinions change. Political campaigns and academics both consider the for-profit firm to be a gold standard for well-collected data. The Catalist study found that in 2024, Democratic support increased markedly among frequent voters, that is, voters who regularly participate in elections. Support for Donald Trump surged among infrequent voters, including a growing coalition — particularly of men — that was far more diverse than Trump's traditional base of older, white voters. Frequent voters could also be called 'self sufficient' voters. They do not need much help from campaigns or get out the vote drives, and are less likely to be influenced by either. Frequent voters are more likely to make up their minds on their own, without reference to advertising or candidate appearances and well in advance of the election. They are more likely to be abreast of any changes in election laws, to keep their voter registrations up to date, to go to the right polling place, and to have the right documentation — such as state-issued photo ID — without needing prompts or reminders. In recent decades, Democrats have invested heavily in get-out-the-vote or GOTV efforts, otherwise known as the 'ground game,' particularly in battleground states and districts. These target infrequent voters. In 2024, the Trump campaign countered with more investment of their own in GOTV, and it paid off handsomely. If the Democrats' base is now made up mostly of self-sufficient, unpersuadable voters, both parties' strategies will shift. Democrats will have to target infrequent voters more carefully, in order to avoid accidentally mobilizing more Republicans. Meanwhile, Republicans will increase their investment in the ground game more generally. They face major challenges. This spring, I attended the post-election symposium at the Dole Institute of Politics at KU, where panelists speculated that some voters in battleground states, such as Arizona and Wisconsin, simply voted for Trump and then left the rest of their ballots blank, enabling Democratic candidates for U.S. Senate to win. This behavior is consistent with infrequent voting, and the election results from these states suggest that the Dole panelists were at least partially correct in both. What about election laws? For decades, Republicans have backed new laws that may lower turnout among infrequent voters, including photo ID and proof of citizenship laws, the latter enthusiastically championed by Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach. Since 2020, Republicans have added crackdowns on dropbox and mail-in voting, such as the new Kansas law eliminating the grace period for mail ballots. What if the voters disenfranchised by these crackdowns are now mostly Republicans? Well before 2024, and despite Democrats' objections, political science research has consistently shown that photo ID laws have little impact on election results. Photo ID requirements may lower voter turnout by an average of about 2%, but those numbers include roughly equal numbers of Democratic and Republican voters. It is well-documented that these laws are unnecessary — there is no widespread election fraud. But with these recent changes, restrictive laws may hurt the Republican vote share. Conspiracy theories notwithstanding, GOP legislators may want to do some serious soul-searching before passing any more voting restrictions. Michael A. Smith is a professor of political science and chair of social sciences at Emporia State University.