logo
‘System collapse:' Trump budget cuts threaten AAPI nonprofits in Bay Area

‘System collapse:' Trump budget cuts threaten AAPI nonprofits in Bay Area

Growing up low-income in the Mission District in the 2000s, Gina Gutierrez never felt going to college was an option.
But in her junior year, Gutierrez met a college adviser from the Japanese Community Youth Council who made her believe she could become the first in her family to attend college. He helped her secure a full ride to San Francisco State, where she graduated in 2011.
'I don't think I would have gone to college if it wasn't for my JCYC adviser intentionally supporting me,' said Gutierrez, now the program director for JCYC's college access programs.
But that program — along with many services run by Asian American organizations in the Bay Area — could be eliminated now that federal funds that pay for it are at risk. The Trump administration has aggressively pursued federal budget downsizing.
Millions of dollars in federal funds awarded in grants and contracts to Asian American nonprofits in the Bay Area have been cut already or are at risk. Money to help older Asian American adults learn to use digital technology, combat anti-Asian hate and advise low-income tenants facing eviction funding are just some of the funds being slashed.
At least five AAPI-serving organizations based in San Francisco have already been notified of at least $5.6 million in federal grant terminations or slated cuts based on Trump's proposed budget.
That includes a $2 million grant that the Department of Justice terminated last month for Stop AAPI Hate, the nonprofit formed in the aftermath of the pandemic, which comprised a third of its 2026-27 budget, said Rose Lee, a spokesperson for the group. Lee called the termination a 'direct attack on our ability to fight anti-AAPI hate and serve our communities.'
Trump boasted in a White House press release that his proposed budget, released May 2, reduced non-defense discretionary spending by 23% from 2025, while increasing the Department of Homeland Security's budget by 65% for 'repelling the invasion of our border.'
Congress decides on discretionary spending each year while mandatory spending is dictated by laws and includes outlays for Social Security and Medicare programs.
Trump administration officials justified the cuts as saving taxpayer money through defunding 'the harmful, woke Marxist agenda.'
'For decades, the biggest complaint about the Federal Budget was wasteful spending and bloated bureaucracy,' said Russ Vought, director of the White House Office of Management and Budget. 'But over the last four years, Government spending aggressively turned against the American people and trillions of our dollars were used to fund cultural Marxism, radical Green New Scams, and even our own invasion.'
But nonprofits that have relied on federal grants and funding to maintain a social safety net said the federal government is cutting essential services.
Cally Wong, executive director of the API Council, a 57-member coalition of nonprofit organizations in San Francisco, said the situation is 'scary,' and she is taking stock of how many members have already experienced cuts or are expecting cuts given the congressional budget proposals.
'I think you're going to see a system that's going to collapse,' she said.
California Senators Adam Schiff and Alex Padilla both said they are 'using every tool' to fight back against the Trump administration's proposed reduction in services.
'Unfortunately, the Trump administration has prioritized funding cuts across federal agencies specifically meant to uplift historically marginalized groups like the AAPI community,' Padilla said. Democrats have argued that Trump's budget cuts are funding tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans while Trump said it would reduce taxes for all Americans.
Malcolm Yeung, executive director of Chinatown Community Development Center, which owns and manages about 3,600 units of affordable housing for 6,000 people across the city, said the federal government has withheld about $85,000 of what's called 'continuum of care' HUD funding to support services for formerly homeless people at one building. To get the funding, San Francisco must agree to federal demands on immigration and diversity, equity and inclusion. City Attorney David Chiu has filed a lawsuit to challenge the move, which he called 'illegal' demands.
Yeung said the nonprofit is drawing from its financial reserves to make up for the cuts but that solution is 'not sustainable if the cuts scale up.'
Under Trump's proposed budget, the nonprofit is also expecting to lose about $530,000 in community development block grants, which paid for youth job readiness training, services for single-room occupancy hotel residents and tenants at Chinatown's Ping Yuen public housing complex as well as housing counselling to help tenants facing eviction or hazardous housing conditions.
Trump officials justified a $3.3 billion reduction in block grant funding by saying it is 'poorly targeted' and 'used for a variety of projects that the Federal Government should not be funding, such as improvement projects at a brewery, a plaza for concerts, and skateboard parks,' according to a budget document.
Yeung is most concerned about potentially losing a significant chunk of the $35 million it receives annually in U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development rental housing operating subsidies.
'I think we're in a bigger moment of change than is being discussed,' Yeung said. 'For real people out there, they built their lives around a form of federal government invested in social safety nets that help people to live.'
Chinese Culture Center, a legacy institution in San Francisco Chinatown, was notified in April that the National Endowment for the Humanities was terminating a $115,000 grant to document Chinatown's cultural heritage, executive director Jenny Leung said. Leung said the project would have recorded Chinatown's intangible cultural assets, such as local Cantonese opera groups, hobby artists, and oral storytelling, that often aren't preserved in formal archives.
The termination letter said that the project 'no longer effectuates the agency's needs and priorities,' Leung said. The nonprofit also was told that an almost $200,000 Institute of Museum and Library Services grant for training workers and a $50,000 grant for an Artists in Residence program were being revoked, the result of a Trump executive order to reduce federal bureaucracy that Trump 'deems unnecessary.' Twenty one states sued over the order. Although the grants were technically reinstated due to a preliminary injunction this week, the Trump administration is appealing and Leung said she isn't counting on the funds being actually disbursed.
Leung said she is adjusting to a new reality where federal grants — which comprised up to 30% of the nonprofit's funding — may be gone.
'I'm anticipating half of the nonprofits in the next three to five years will not be there,' she said. 'I think it'll have a very devastating effect on the API community.'
Winnie Yu, chief programs officer at the nonprofit Self Help for the Elderly, said she thinks the federal government has signaled it does not prioritize funding services for older adults.
'What we fear is that more cuts are coming,' Yu said. Her nonprofit, which is about 22% federally funded, already lost a grant for $200,000 annually for four years to help low-income Asian American older adults learn to use digital technology.
Japanese Community Youth Council will lose $2.6 million in funding from the Department of Education under President Trump's current proposed budget.
That money funds about 30 staff who provide college advising and preparation services for about 3,000 San Francisco public school students annually, a majority of whom are low-income youth who will be the first in their families to graduate from college.
Gutierrez, the program director for JCYC's college access programs, said that the program she now runs made her success possible. Right as she was starting her junior year in high school, her mom died. One of her brothers was in prison and the other was suffering from bipolar disorder. She was taken in by an aunt. She imagined she'd have to start work right out of high school. Instead, she went to college thanks to the help she got in writing her scholarship application essay.
'We really do change students' lives,' Gutierrez said. 'Programs like these are truly valuable. They are a force to be reckoned with and if we lose something like that, it's going to drastically affect the community, students and possibly generations ahead.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

From Washington: The Congressional Clash Over DC Crime, Redistricting
From Washington: The Congressional Clash Over DC Crime, Redistricting

Fox News

time11 minutes ago

  • Fox News

From Washington: The Congressional Clash Over DC Crime, Redistricting

This week, President Trump invoked a section of the Home Rule Act, enabling a federal takeover of the D.C. police department. He stated that the move was necessary to restore safety and combat violence in our nation's capital. FOX News Senior Congressional Correspondent Chad Pergram explains the authority the Act grants to both the President and Congress, and how Republican lawmakers might take further action to support this effort. Later, he looks ahead to the midterms and discusses how the ongoing redistricting battle could impact election outcomes. Later, Congressman Troy Downing (R-MT) explains why he's pushing legislation to overturn limitations on coal, and why it's a necessary power source for America to win the race on artificial intelligence. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit

Donald Trump's Approval Rating Plummets With Millennials
Donald Trump's Approval Rating Plummets With Millennials

Newsweek

time41 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump's Approval Rating Plummets With Millennials

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's approval rating has plummeted with millennials, hitting its lowest level of the year in August, according to new polling. According to YouGov/Economist polling, in June, 40 percent of millennials approved of Trump's job performance while 53 percent disapproved—a net rating of -13 points. That slid to 41-57 (-16) in July before plunging to 33-56 (-23) in August. The figures show a 10-point drop in net approval in just two months, underscoring growing dissatisfaction among millennials as the 2025 political season intensifies. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty Why It Matters Trump, who has long highlighted strong polling at rallies and press events, now faces slipping approval ratings that could weaken his influence and hurt Republican prospects in the 2026 midterms. After returning to the White House in January with solid numbers, his support has eroded amid economic concerns, tariff backlash and political discontent. Trump and former Vice President Kamala Harris have turned to podcasts and digital outreach to court millennials, a generation wary of legacy media and traditional messaging. Millennials are defined generally as people born from 1981 to 1996. The generation has overtaken baby boomers as the largest age demographic, according to the Pew Research Center. What To Know The poll shows that Trump's declining popularity among millennials is being driven by worsening views on the economy and inflation. "Millennials have yet to see the sweeping national renewal Trump promised," Thomas Gift, an associate professor of political science and director of the Centre on US Politics at University College London, told Newsweek. On the economy, Trump's approval among millennials slipped from 36 percent approval and 52 percent disapproval in June to 38 percent approval and 54 percent disapproval in August, showing that approval and disapproval has edged up the same. Inflation also appears to be a particular weak spot. Approval in this area dropped from 33 percent in June to 27 percent in August, while disapproval rose from 58 percent to 60 percent. The shift suggests heightened concern among younger voters about persistent price pressures. That comes as inflation rose to 2.7 percent in June despite Trump's previous promise to end inflation on day one of his second term. "Starting on day one, we will end inflation and make America affordable again, to bring down the prices of all goods," he said during a rally in Bozeman, Montana, in August 2024. President Donald Trump speaks at the Kennedy Center on August 13, 2025, in Washington. President Donald Trump speaks at the Kennedy Center on August 13, 2025, in Washington. Alex Brandon/AP Meanwhile, job growth slowed sharply in July, with just 73,000 new jobs added—down from 147,000 the previous month, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. After last month's jobs report was published, Trump fired BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer. In a post, Trump accused McEntarfer—without offering evidence—of rigging the numbers to harm his administration. But that move by Trump was not popular among millennial voters, with only 16 percent saying the decision was justified. There are also concerns about Trump's tariff program. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick predicted $50 billion in monthly revenue from the new import taxes, which came into effect this month. But JPMorgan warned that 60 percent of the increased costs are expected to be passed on to American consumers through higher prices. "On the consumer side, many remain burdened by rising prices under his tariffs, while housing in particular continues to be out of reach for a generation still struggling to get a foothold on the economic ladder," said Gift. According to Federal Reserve data, millennials own less than two-thirds of the real estate that baby boomers owned at the same age. But it's not all bad news for Trump. His handling of immigration remains a relative bright spot with this age group. Approval rose from 33 percent to 41 percent over the same period, while disapproval fell from 58 percent to 50 percent, marking an 8-point net improvement. Throughout his second term, Trump has aggressively expanded immigration enforcement—launching mass deportation operations, increasing raids in sanctuary cities and reviving thousands of old deportation cases. His administration has also dramatically scaled up detention capacity, allocating $45 billion to expand ICE facilities and construct large-scale temporary camps, including a facility in Florida nicknamed "Alligator Alcatraz." But while Trump has continued to push the hardline immigration agenda that helped him win support in 2024, polls indicate that backing for those policies is fading across other demographic groups. Gallup polling from last month showed that 30 percent of Americans now say immigration levels should be reduced, down from 55 percent in 2024. Support for maintaining or increasing immigration has risen across the board, including among Republicans. More broadly, the number of Americans who view immigration as a "good thing" has reached an all-time high of 79 percent, the same poll shows, reversing a steady decline during Joe Biden's presidency and surpassing levels from Trump's first term. What Happens Next Trump's new nominee to run the BLS, E.J. Antoni, chief economist at the conservative Heritage Foundation, hinted at suspending the monthly release of jobs data. August's numbers are due to be published the first week of September.

Americans Fear End of Social Security as They Know It
Americans Fear End of Social Security as They Know It

Newsweek

time41 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Americans Fear End of Social Security as They Know It

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Seven in 10 Americans worry that Social Security won't be there for them when they retire, according to new survey from the Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies (TCRS). TCRS is a division of Transamerica Institute (TI), a nonprofit, private operating foundation, and conducts one of the largest and longest-running annual retirement surveys of its kind. For generations, Social Security, which celebrated its 90th anniversary on August 14, has formed the bedrock of retirement income for tens of millions of Americans, and also pays out benefits to disabled people and survivors of deceased workers. However, despite its enduring popularity and importance, it faces a looming insolvency crisis that lawmakers have less than 10 years to solve. The survey from TCRS, which polled 10,009 adults above the age of 18 between September 11 and October 17, 2024, found that among non-retirees, 71 percent agreed with the statement: "I am concerned that when I am ready to retire, Social Security will not be there for me." Almost nine in 10 Americans (87 percent) have one or more greatest retirement fears, ranging from health to financial. The top two greatest fears are declining health that would require long-term care (39 percent) followed by Social Security being reduced or ceasing to exist in the future (37 percent). According to the latest report from the Social Security Trustees, the program's two trust funds—the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) and Disability Insurance (DI) funds—are projected to reach insolvency by 2034. At that point, benefits would be funded solely through incoming payroll taxes, triggering an automatic cut of around 21 percent unless Congress takes action. While several options have been tabled by lawmakers to fix the issue, such as The Fair Share Act and raising the retirement age, no meaningful progress has been made. Doug Carey, founder of WealthTrace and a chartered financial planner, told Newsweek that the main driver of fears around Social Security's longevity is this political inaction. "I believe it's the political climate and the lack of action over many administrations," he said. "Most politicians do not want to touch benefits since they believe it will only hurt their reputation and reelection chances now. That is why this keeps getting pushed into the future until it simply has to be addressed." Stock image/file photo: An elderly woman holding an empty wallet. Stock image/file photo: An elderly woman holding an empty wallet. GETTY The study also revealed Americans are concerned about seeing their personal savings through their post-working years. Sixty-three percent of Americans said they either believe they won't save enough to meet their needs by the time they retire or, if already retired, they failed to save enough—28 percent "strongly agree" and 35 percent "somewhat agree" with that statement. And for nearly a third of Americans—32 percent—Social Security is expected to be their primary source of retirement income. That compares with 29 percent who expect to rely primarily on retirement accounts, 12 percent on other savings and investments, and 11 percent on continued work. Only 9 percent see a company-funded pension as their main income source. The survey also showed that reliance on Social Security is even greater among retired women with six in 10 women retirees (59 percent) indicating it is their primary source of income, compared with 47 percent of men retirees. For those not yet retired, 29 percent of women and 22 percent of men said Social Security was their expected primary source of retirement income. Carey added that many Americans are already adjusting their retirement plans based on the assumption of reduced benefits. "What many people are doing is simply assuming their benefits will be cut by anywhere from 25 percent to 50 percent. They can then plan accordingly by retiring later, saving more, or changing their planned spending in retirement," he said. Some, Carey noted, choose to claim benefits early at age 62 to "lock in" payments, believing they are less likely to be reduced once started. Jackson Ruggiero, co-founder of told Newsweek that the poll's findings are unsurprising. "The program is facing real financial challenges, but just as importantly, people don't trust Congress to fix it in time," he said. "Because of this uncertainty, many people are changing how they plan for retirement. Younger workers especially are focusing more on personal savings through 401(k)s and IRAs, and some are assuming they'll get little or nothing from Social Security. That's understandable, but also a bit extreme." Looking forward, Ruggiero advised a balanced approach for those concerned about their retirement savings and the future of Social Security. "Plan like your benefits might be reduced, not gone. Save what you can now, take advantage of employer retirement plans, and if possible, delay taking Social Security to get a bigger monthly check," he said. Both experts agreed on one point—Congress is moving too slowly to fix the looming insolvency dilemma. "They are doing nothing, and I predict they won't do anything until the year where it's clear Social Security benefits will have to be cut. Currently that is 2033," Carey warned. This is not the first time Social Security has faced a funding cliff. In the early 1980s, the trust funds were similarly close to depletion. Lawmakers responded with reforms that included faster payroll tax increases, a gradual rise in the retirement age, and taxation of some Social Security benefits. "Social Security has served as the cornerstone of retirement income since its establishment nine decades ago. It provides millions of older Americans with guaranteed income, so that they can retire with greater financial security," Catherine Collinson, CEO and president of Transamerica Institute, said. "With the estimated depletion of the Social Security trust funds looming large, now is the time for policymakers to identify reforms that can help ensure the program's sustainability for the next 90 years."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store