Israeli rights groups accuse Israel of genocide in Gaza conflict
B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights Israel released reports at a press conference, alleging 'coordinated, deliberate action to destroy Palestinian society in the Gaza strip.'
'The report we are publishing today is one we never imagined we would have to write,' said Yuli Novak, B'Tselem's executive director.
'The people of Gaza have been displaced, bombed and starved, left completely stripped of their humanity and rights.'
Physicians for Human Rights Israel highlighted the destruction of Gaza's healthcare system, stating, 'Israel's actions have destroyed Gaza's healthcare infrastructure in a manner that is both calculated and systematic.'
Israel has repeatedly denied genocide allegations, including a case brought by South Africa at the International Court of Justice.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu dismissed the claims as 'outrageous,' while government spokesperson David Mencer called the latest accusations 'baseless.'
'There is no intent, (which is) key for the charge of genocide ... it simply doesn't make sense for a country to send in 1.9 million tons of aid, most of that being food, if there is an intent of genocide,' Mencer said.
Israel's military also rejected the reports, stating it follows international law and takes measures to avoid civilian harm, while accusing Hamas of using civilians as 'human shields.'
The war in Gaza began after Hamas-led fighters attacked Israeli communities on October 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages.
Israel's subsequent offensive has killed nearly 60,000 Palestinians, mostly civilians, according to Gaza health officials.
The genocide accusation carries deep weight in Israel, given the term's origins in response to the Holocaust.
Israeli officials have previously called such allegations libellous and antisemitic.
International scrutiny over Gaza's humanitarian crisis has intensified, with UN agencies warning of severe food shortages.
Israel maintains it allows sufficient aid but blames distribution failures on the UN.
Public opinion in Israel has slowly shifted as images of suffering in Gaza emerge, though many still hold Hamas responsible.
'The Israeli perception is: 'what do you want from us? It's Hamas' fault,'' said Oren Persico of The Seventh Eye.
Dani Dayan, chairman of Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial, argued against the genocide label but urged recognition of civilian suffering.
'Their anguish is real, and our moral tradition obligates us not to turn away from it,' he wrote. - AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Frustration drives 3 Israel allies towards recognising Palestine
When Spain, Ireland and Norway announced in May last year that they would recognise a Palestinian state, Israel's closer allies dismissed the move as unhelpful to solving the crisis in Gaza. While France, Britain and Canada stressed their support for establishing two states with recognised borders as the long-term solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict, they were wary of being seen to reward Hamas, of damaging relations with Israel and Washington, and of squandering diplomatic capital. "I will not do an 'emo tional' re co gnition," French President Emmanuel Macron said at the time. But as Israeli restrictions on aid escalated Gaza's humanitarian crisis and a two-month truce ended in March, talks began in earnest that would lead three of the Group of Seven major Western economies to set out plans to recognise a Palestinian state in September. "The possibility of atwo-state solution is being eroded before our eyes... that has been one of the factors that has brought us to this point to try to reverse, with partners, this cycle," Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Thursday. France and Saudi Arabia formed a plan to have more Western countries move towards Palestinian recognition while Arab states would be pushed to take a stronger line against Hamas. The pair wanted their proposals to gain acceptance at a United Nations conference in June, but they struggled to gain traction, and the meeting was then postponed due to Israeli airstrikes on Iran and amid intense US diplomatic pressure. The strikes led to a pause in public criticism of Israel from Western allies, and Arab states were hard to win round, but discussions continued behind the scenes. Macron, Carney and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer were communicating with each other regularly by phone and texts in June and July, according to a Canadian source with direct knowledge of the events. Canada was wary of acting alone and Britain wanted to ensure any move would have maximum impact, but Macron was more strident. Alarm was growing about images of starving children and fears were mounting that Israel's Gaza offensive, combined with settler attacks on Palestinians in the West Bank, would further undermine any chance of creating a sovereign Palestinian state. On July 24, Macron made a surprise announcement that France would recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September. Macron spoke with Starmer and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz two days later to discuss a "sustainable route to a two-state solution", according to Starmer's spokesperson, just before the prime minister was due to meet Trump in Scotland. With Trump, Starmer pressed the case to do more to help Gaza, although, according to Trump, he never explicitly said a recognition plan was on the cards. However, Trump has since criticised such moves as "re ward i n g Hamas". With Trump still in Britain on Tuesday, opening a golf course, Starmer recalled his cabinet from their summer break to get approval for his recognition plan. Britain would recognise a Palestinian state in September unless there was a ceasefire and a lasting peace plan from Israel. Like Macron, Starmer gave Carney a few hours' warning. Once Britain and France had moved, Canada felt it had to follow suit, according to the Canadian source. "International cooperation is essential to securing lasting peace and stability in the Middle East and Canada will do its best to help lead that effort," Carney said on Wednesday, six days after Macron's announcement. More than three-quarters of the 193 members of the UN General Assembly already independently recognise a Palestinian state. But the opposition of the US, with its veto power on the UN Security Council, means the UN cannot admit Palestine as a full member — a move that would effectively recognise a Palestinian state at global level. However, Richard Gowan, who is UN director at the International Crisis Group, said the declarations mattered "precisely because we are seeing some big US allies catching up with the bulk of the Global South on the Palestinian question at the UN". "That makes it a little harder for Israel to write off the pro-recognition camp as irrelevant." The writers are from Reuters
The Sun
6 hours ago
- The Sun
Iran demands US accountability for nuclear site attacks in future talks
TEHRAN: Iran stated on Monday that holding the United States accountable for attacks on its nuclear sites would be a key condition in any future negotiations, while rejecting the possibility of direct talks with Washington. The US joined Israel in striking Iranian nuclear facilities in June, disrupting ongoing discussions about Tehran's atomic program. Foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei emphasised that demanding compensation for the military aggression against Iran's peaceful nuclear facilities would be a non-negotiable topic in potential talks. When asked about direct negotiations with the US, Baqaei responded firmly, 'No.' The conflict began in mid-June when Israel launched unprecedented strikes on Iranian nuclear and military sites, including residential areas, over 12 days. US forces later targeted nuclear facilities at Fordo, Isfahan, and Natanz. These attacks derailed high-level talks that had resumed in April, marking the first significant engagement between Iran and the US since Washington abandoned the 2015 nuclear deal. Following the strikes, Iran suspended cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and demanded security guarantees before resuming negotiations. The US dismissed Tehran's compensation demands as 'ridiculous.' Baqaei reiterated Iran's commitment to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty but criticised the IAEA for its 'politicised and unprofessional approach.' He confirmed that an IAEA deputy chief would visit Iran within 10 days but stressed that the delegation would only engage in technical discussions, with no access to nuclear sites. Ebrahim Azizi, head of Iran's parliamentary national security commission, reinforced this stance, stating that no foreign inspections would be permitted. Meanwhile, Iran has signalled a 'new form' of cooperation with the IAEA, following a recent meeting with European diplomats from Germany, Britain, and France—parties to the 2015 nuclear deal. The European trio has threatened sanctions if Iran fails to comply with uranium enrichment limits and UN inspections. Tehran insists its nuclear program is peaceful and rejects sanctions as illegal. - AFP
Sinar Daily
9 hours ago
- Sinar Daily
Gaza's Airdrop Ordeal: Humanitarian Aid or a Squid Game Show?
THINK of the infamous glass bridge scene in Squid Game: a line of desperate contestants, suspended high above the ground, forced to choose between panels of glass - one tempered, the other a death trap. Each step is a gamble. Behind them, time is ticking; ahead, only fear. Below, death awaits. Now shift that image to Gaza. Barefoot children, limping fathers and hollow-eyed mothers race beneath parachuting aid packages in an open-air prison. The skies rain not salvation, but risk - boxes that might fall safely or crash onto a crowd. Each run is a gamble. There is no courage here, only desperation. No winners, only survivors or casualties. The world watches - entertained, horrified or indifferent. But this is no game. Aid packages falling from the sky over Gaza - parachutes drifting in cinematic slow motion, filmed from military aircraft and broadcast with dramatic flair - might seem like a gesture of compassion. But the reality is far darker. This is not humanitarianism - it's a performance. And for Palestinians, it's beginning to feel like a deadly game show. This handout photo taken over Gaza and released on August 1, 2025 by the Spanish Ministry of Defence shows the release of humanitarian aid from a Spanish Air Force Airbus A400M Atlas airplane over Gaza. (Photo by HANDOUT / Spain Defence Ministry / AFP) On July 27 this year, Israeli aircraft began dropping aid into northern Gaza after announcing limited daily pauses in its offensive. But almost immediately, the truth broke through the façade: the airdrops injured several Palestinians, according to Al Jazeera. Crates fell in chaotic fashion, endangering the very people they were supposedly meant to help. The image of people sprinting across bombed-out streets, risking injury or death just to grab a bag of rice, is chilling. It resembles something out of Squid Game, where survival becomes sport, and the powerless must scramble for basic needs under the watchful eye of the powerful. Dangerous, Chaotic, and Deeply Insufficient Each airdrop delivers only a symbolic fraction of what is actually needed. Gaza is home to over two million people. Yet scattered pallets, with no distribution system, are expected to feed entire communities. Worse still, aid packages often land in dangerous zones, the sea or inaccessible areas. Several Palestinians have died trying to retrieve them. This is not aid. This is a deadly lottery. The weakest lose. The desperate suffer. And the powerful film it. Nine-year-old malnourished Palestinian girl Mariam Dawwas is carried by her mother in the Rimal neighbourhood in Gaza City on August 2, 2025. The World Health Organisation warned on July 27 that malnutrition was reaching "alarming levels" in Gaza. (Photo by Omar AL-QATTAA / AFP) Israel Prefers Airdrops - But Why? In a stunning moment of irony, Israel publicly announced that it would allow foreign governments to airdrop aid into Gaza. Think about that: the same state that bombs aid convoys and blocks trucks at land crossings is now saying, 'Go ahead - toss food from the air.' Why approve airlifts but restrict trucks? Because airdropping aid allows Israel to control the narrative. It gets to appear cooperative, while continuing to restrict the kind of aid that actually reaches people effectively. Allowing airdrops is a way to avoid allowing real access. It creates an illusion of generosity, while avoiding pressure to lift the siege, stop the bombing or allow UN convoys through. It's not a humanitarian breakthrough - it's a carefully calculated performance. Airdrops Are Political Theatre As shown in viral social media critiques like this one, airdrops serve more as PR (public relations) tools than real relief efforts. The visuals - parachutes over war-torn neighbourhoods - make headlines. But the deeper truth is hidden: the same governments staging these drops are often the ones supplying weapons, blocking ceasefire resolutions or criminalising pro-Palestinian advocacy. You can't bomb a population and expect applause for dropping them snacks. Airdrops sanitise brutality - making it easier for the global public to consume images of 'help' instead of confronting the real images of occupation, starvation and slaughter. TOPSHOT - French military personnel load an aircraft with humanitarian aid in Jordan, before an airdropping operation over the Gaza Strip on August 2, 2025. (Photo by Ahmad GHARABLI / AFP) Airdrops Dehumanise Palestinians Palestinians are not props in an action film. They are not waiting for Hollywood-style rescues from the sky. They are a people - with agency, rights and dignity, being deliberately starved, bombed and cut off from the world. Reducing them to aerial aid recipients strips them of that humanity. It shifts the narrative from one of occupation, apartheid and genocide to one of vague 'tragedy,' as if this were a natural disaster rather than a deliberate act. These stunts reduce Palestinians to figures in a crisis simulation. They are not contestants in a survival show. They are a people enduring displacement, starvation and bombardment. Their dignity is stripped away when they are forced to chase parachutes for food while the world claps from a distance. Humanitarian aid should empower - not humiliate. But these airdrops do the opposite. They turn survival into spectacle, while world powers refuse to address the root cause: a brutal siege and a military campaign that has devastated Gaza's civilian population. Gaza Needs Ceasefire - Not Cameras If the international community is serious about saving lives, it must demand: An immediate and lasting ceasefire Fully opened land crossings for medical and food aid Unimpeded humanitarian access led by neutral agencies Accountability for war crimes And above all, justice for Palestinians, not photo ops Until that happens, these airdrops remain what they truly are: A PR stunt for the complicit and an insult to the oppressed. In Gaza, aid should fall through borders - not from the sky. And certainly not like it's a scene out of a Squid Game show. Revda Selver is Friends of Palestine Public Relation and Media Executive. The views expressed in this article are his own and do not necessarily reflect those of Sinar Daily.
