logo
Why F1 may benefit from Mohammed Ben Sulayem's V8 push

Why F1 may benefit from Mohammed Ben Sulayem's V8 push

Yahoo6 days ago
It was on the morning of the glitzy season launch at London's O2 Arena in February when Formula 1 lost its collective head. There, it's said, during an F1 Commission meeting, Christian Horner – Red Bull's then team principal – set his smartphone in the middle of the table.
'Bring back V10s' hissed the voice at the other end of the line: former F1 'ringmaster' Bernie Ecclestone. And, lo, the herd began its charge in that direction, only to crash upon the indifference of F1's engine manufacturers during a crunch meeting ahead of the Bahrain GP.
But FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem, one of those who got rather ahead of themselves on that chilly February day in London, still believes in the principle of a return to natural aspiration and set out his stall during a media briefing ahead of the British GP in July.
The new plan accommodates reservations expressed by the majority of the engine manufacturers during the Bahrain summit: that V10s were unsuitable on many levels, not least the road-relevance front; and some form of electrification would have to be included to provide synergies with road car technologies.
It's a debate which has been raging between paddock insiders for many years: should F1 slavishly mirror road car trends or should it adopt a so-called 'set controls for the heart of the sun' policy, focusing completely on noise and power even if it alienates the manufacturers? Many purists espouse the latter but acknowledge the many practical problems, such as what would happen to the manufacturer-based teams and who would actually build the engines.
V8s, as now espoused by Ben Sulayem, are more acceptable to the manufacturers since many of them still have engines of that configuration somewhere in the range. At the same time the idea of internal combustion is undergoing something of a renaissance, owing to new technologies and developments in the global trading picture.
A Ford DFV V8 engine in the back of a Brabham BT49
For a long time the direction of travel in the car industry has been towards full electrification, pushed by government legislation. But a significant proportion of consumers remain resistant, viewing electric cars as too expensive (and, of course, there are those who fear their genitals may fall off if they are seen driving anything other than a car with a loud, noisy and powerful internal combustion engine).
Faced with this and an influx of cheaper, state-subsidised vehicles exported from China, the western car industry is beginning to panic. Former Renault Group boss Luca de Meo admitted as much before he quit.
So there is still room for the internal combustion engine, provided the new generation of synthetic fuels can be produced at scale for a reasonable cost.
Assuming F1 did return to a V8 engine format, there would be details to work out regarding size and the proportion of electrification. Next year the split will be 50:50 but this has proved controversial, and the technical formula has had to be adapted to embrace adaptive aerodynamic devices to mitigate potential power shortfalls on the straights. It's understood that the solution envisioned by the FIA is to move to an 80:20 ratio in favour of the ICU, or even 90:10.
The new format would be introduced when the 2026 technical package has run its course, most likely 2030, though the president has suggested it could be earlier.
"We need to do it soon,' he said at Silverstone. 'You need three years, so hopefully by 2029 we have something there.'
2026 Formula 1 rules
Ben Sulayem has also talked about achieving radical cost savings by standardising components including the gearbox and the hybrid system. Former president Max Mosley tried to drive through something along these lines at the end of 2008, during the global financial crisis, running a tender process for a homologated drivetrain (ultimately won by Cosworth and Hewland). An additional wrinkle of the plan was to open up new grid spots and have those teams using the standard powertrain effectively running in a championship tier of their own, with a budget cap.
But that idea was ultimately too complicated and lost impetus when Mosley stood down. Jean Todt, the next president, let it die entirely.
There is an argument to say gearboxes are expensive to design, develop and build, and are no longer performance differentiators, so having a standardised component isn't necessarily a negative. There may be grumblings about whoever wins the putative tender but F1 has been here before, when McLaren Applied Technologies won the contract to supply the whole grid with homologated Engine Control Units. Fears of inequality and skulduggery proved unfounded.
Standardised hybrid components may be more difficult for the engine manufacturers to digest – but, equally, this is also an 'invisible' system so far as the audience is concerned and if it can be made less expensive, it will find support. The FIA's position is that cost saving remains one of the most important factors even at a time when F1 is thriving commercially – because that situation could change at any time based on geopolitics and the global economy.
'As the FIA we are the moderators during the discussion of the regulations, mindful to contain costs and create a level playing field for all,' FIA single-seater director Nikolas Tombazis told Motorsport.com earlier this year.
'There is some strong resistance at times, as you would expect, from teams or PU manufacturers protecting their interests or investment. Cost-cutting and level of technological freedom are at loggerheads with each other. It is not easy to have both.
'The PU manufacturers came [to discussion regarding the 2026 regulations] with many proposals for cost-cutting on a number of items relating to the engine. They centred on simplification, eliminating certain materials, processes and technologies.
'The amount of cost-cutting we've achieved is not as much as we would all have liked. While we are in a very healthy position as a sport, financially and in terms of popularity, we should never be complacent about that: cost-cutting should always have a high priority.'
The Formula One Championship-winning Power Units: Mercedes-AMG F1 M09 EQ Power+ (2018), Mercedes-AMG F1 M08 EQ Power+ (2017), Mercedes-Benz PU106C Hybrid (2016), Mercedes-Benz PU106B Hybrid (2015), Mercedes-Benz PU106A Hybrid (2014)
'Many of the manufacturers produce V8s in their cars, so commercially it's correct,' said Ben Sulayem at Silverstone. 'How much is it? The target is more than 50 percent [cheaper] in everything.'
This could be achieved not just through standardising parts but also mandating cheaper materials. It's known, for instance, that the FIA wanted to move to aluminium pistons but the engine manufacturers, having initially supported the idea, U-turned en masse.
Another issue F1 faces in its drive towards 'net zero' is the cost of the fully sustainable fuel which will be mandatory next year, said to be in the region of $275-$300 per litre. This reflects both the R&D investment which has had to go into developing these fuels and the energy-intensive means of production. As yet there is no solution to the problem of producing at scale and to a reasonable cost.
Since all the teams have commercial fuel-and-lubes supply deals, the question of who actually absorbs those costs is tricky to unpick – and likely to differ depending on how individual deals are structured. Which is why another of Ben Sulayem's proposals is likely to face resistance: a single fuel supplier.
What goes in the tank is less of a performance differentiator than it used to be – a chemical composition close to pump fuel is now prescribed, as is a sustainable element – but fuel brands still rely on performance for their storytelling. Shell, for instance, has built the identity of its VPower blend around its partnership with Ferrari.
Would the story survive if the Ferrari were to become a mere mobile billboard for the likes of Shell, while the go-juice sloshing around inside had a rather different provenance? Perhaps – after all, we live in an age of profound superficiality.
Ultimately if costs can be reduced as much as the president would like, the grid as a whole will benefit – and few will care whether you have a tiger in your tank or not.
Read Also:
Why F1 drivers don't like Pirelli's wet tyres, and how it plans to fix them
To read more Motorsport.com articles visit our website.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Delayed start at Belgian Grand Prix highlights Formula 1's challenge with racing in the rain
Delayed start at Belgian Grand Prix highlights Formula 1's challenge with racing in the rain

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Delayed start at Belgian Grand Prix highlights Formula 1's challenge with racing in the rain

Of all the thousands of pieces of equipment that Formula 1 hauls around the world, few are used less often than the full wet tire. They stayed piled up in stacks, not on the cars, on Sunday as drivers sat out a rain delay of more than an hour to the start of the Belgian Grand Prix. It wasn't because F1 cars lack grip in heavy rain. Manufacturer Pirelli says the full wet tires can cope with that. The problem is that drivers behind can't see through the spray, and the first attempt to start Sunday's race on time illustrated the problem. Even crawling around at formation lap pace with only Lando Norris and the safety car ahead, eventual winner Oscar Piastri said he 'couldn't see a thing,' adding, 'you can only imagine what it's like for the guys at the back.' When the race started, it was behind the safety car at low speed before the all-clear to go racing. Like all of the drivers, Piastri was using the intermediate tires, which are recommended for light rain or a drying track, when he eventually passed Norris for the win. 'The past few years, particularly here, we've given the (governing body) FIA feedback that we would much rather be on the safe side than risk anything,' Piastri said. 'If you were to be picky, maybe we could have done one less formation lap (behind the safety car), but in the grand scheme of things, if that's one lap too early, is it worth it? No.' Visibility is a particular concern at Spa, a fast track with a history of serious accidents. They include Anthoine Hubert's death in a Formula 2 crash in dry conditions in 2019 and another fatal accident claiming the life of Dutch teenage driver Dilano van 't Hoff in a junior series in the rain in 2023. 'I have to say that on a track like this, with what happened historically, I think you cannot forget about it. For that reason I would rather be safe than (start) too early," said Charles Leclerc, who finished third Sunday and who was friends with Hubert since childhood. Under the current F1 design regulations in place since 2022, cars have ground-effect aerodynamics which use the floor to generate grip but can also throw up more spray. If there's enough rain for the full wet tires to be faster than the intermediates, it's likely the race will be stopped because of poor visibility anyway. There was a reminder of the importance of visibility this month at the British Grand Prix when Isack Hadjar collided with Kimi Antonelli's car from behind while driving in the Italian's trail of spray. 'I didn't see him,' Hadjar said. 'He just appeared out of nowhere, man. Oh my God.' ___ AP auto racing:

Padraig Harrington wins Senior British Open for his second senior major title this year
Padraig Harrington wins Senior British Open for his second senior major title this year

Fox Sports

timean hour ago

  • Fox Sports

Padraig Harrington wins Senior British Open for his second senior major title this year

Associated Press BERKSHIRE, England (AP) — Padraig Harrington was so focused on his game that he didn't notice a leaderboard or see Rory McIlroy walking in the gallery Sunday at the Senior British Open. He closed with a 3-under 67 to win his second senior major of the year. Staked to a two-shot lead, Harrington made eagle on the first hole on the Old Course at Sunningdale and no one got closer than two shots the rest of the way as he became the fifth player with a Senior British Open and a British Open title. He won by three shots over Thomas Bjorn (67) and Justin Leonard (68). 'I'm thrilled to have won but very satisfied that I've won a Senior Open with my two Opens,' Harrington said. 'The fact that only five people have ever done it is quite special. I'm quite proud that I've managed to survive this long in the game.' He joined Darren Clarke, Tom Watson, Gary Player and Bob Charles as players to have won the British Open and the senior version. McIlroy walked around for a bit on the London-area course, though it wasn't much of a show. Harrington seized control late in the third round and never gave anyone much of a chance. Bjorn made a late charge to get within two shots, but that ended with a bogey on the 16th. "The only time I saw a leaderboard was on 18," said Harrington, who said he asked his caddie for an update on the 17th hole. 'Was fully focused on what I was doing. The Irishman was surprised to hear McIlroy, who is building a home in London, was at Sunningdale for the final round. 'I didn't see him out there. Was he out there?' Harrington said. 'I had the head down all day. I never saw anybody. I had no idea.' Harrington now has 11 titles on the PGA Tour Champions, and he has won multiple times each of the last four seasons. He won the U.S. Senior Open last month at The Broadmoor. And he nearly won the Senior PGA Championship at Congressional until a late two-shot swing gave the title to Angel Cabrera. ___ AP golf:

Padraig Harrington wins Senior British Open for his second senior major title this year
Padraig Harrington wins Senior British Open for his second senior major title this year

Washington Post

timean hour ago

  • Washington Post

Padraig Harrington wins Senior British Open for his second senior major title this year

BERKSHIRE, England — Padraig Harrington was so focused on his game that he didn't notice a leaderboard or see Rory McIlroy walking in the gallery Sunday at the Senior British Open. He closed with a 3-under 67 to win his second senior major of the year. Staked to a two-shot lead, Harrington made eagle on the first hole on the Old Course at Sunningdale and no one got closer than two shots the rest of the way as he became the fifth player with a Senior British Open and a British Open title. He won by three shots over Thomas Bjorn (67) and Justin Leonard (68). 'I'm thrilled to have won but very satisfied that I've won a Senior Open with my two Opens,' Harrington said. 'The fact that only five people have ever done it is quite special. I'm quite proud that I've managed to survive this long in the game.' He joined Darren Clarke, Tom Watson, Gary Player and Bob Charles as players to have won the British Open and the senior version. McIlroy walked around for a bit on the London-area course, though it wasn't much of a show. Harrington seized control late in the third round and never gave anyone much of a chance. Bjorn made a late charge to get within two shots, but that ended with a bogey on the 16th. 'The only time I saw a leaderboard was on 18,' said Harrington, who said he asked his caddie for an update on the 17th hole. 'Was fully focused on what I was doing. The Irishman was surprised to hear McIlroy, who is building a home in London, was at Sunningdale for the final round. 'I didn't see him out there. Was he out there?' Harrington said. 'I had the head down all day. I never saw anybody. I had no idea.' Harrington now has 11 titles on the PGA Tour Champions, and he has won multiple times each of the last four seasons. He won the U.S. Senior Open last month at The Broadmoor. And he nearly won the Senior PGA Championship at Congressional until a late two-shot swing gave the title to Angel Cabrera. ___ AP golf:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store