Menendez brothers face key hearing in life sentence reduction bid
The brothers could be released immediately or be considered for parole following the hearing. (California department of corrections/AP pic)
LOS ANGELES : Lyle and Erik Menendez face a Los Angeles court on Tuesday for a key hearing in their bid to cut short the life prison terms they are serving for the shotgun murders of their parents in their Beverly Hills home 35 years ago.
Defence lawyers are seeking a reduced sentence for the brothers, now 57 and 54, that would allow for their immediate release or make them eligible to be considered for parole.
The outcome could hinge on fresh defence evidence in support of the brothers' assertion since the early days of the sensational case that they had been sexually abused by their father, a record company and entertainment industry executive.
It was uncertain whether the defendants themselves would be physically present for the proceedings or watch via video hookup, as they have during previous hearings, from the San Diego prison where they are incarcerated.
Former Los Angeles county district attorney George Gascon petitioned for a re-sentencing last fall, citing the new sexual abuse evidence and the brothers' clean prison records.
Gascon reasoned that the pair had paid their debt to society and should be eligible for parole under the state's youthful offender statute since they were younger than 26 at the time of their offense.
But, Gascon's successor as DA, Nathan Hochman, has opposed the re-sentencing since taking office, arguing that the brothers have yet to fully acknowledge and accept responsibility for the killings.
The brothers were found guilty in 1996 of first-degree murder and sentenced to two consecutive life in prison terms without the possibility of parole for shooting to death their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez, on Aug 20, 1989, as the couple watched television in the family room of their home.
The conviction capped the second of two highly publicised trials – the first ended in a hung jury – focusing attention on the darker sides of wealth and privilege.
Before their arrest, the brothers had claimed to have come home from the movies to find their parents slain by intruders.
At trial, they admitted to committing the killings but insisted they did so out of fear that their parents were about to kill them following years of sexual abuse by the father and emotional battering by their mother. Lyle was 21 and Erik was 18 at the time.
Prosecutors argued that the murders were coldly calculated and motivated by greed, namely the brothers' desire to inherit their parents' multimillion-dollar fortune.
The result of the re-sentencing hearing, expected to last two days, could turn on new defence evidence, including a letter Erik Menendez purportedly wrote to a cousin eight months before the killings, in which he described sexual abuse by his father.
The defence also points to allegations by a member of the 1980s pop band Menudo who said he was abused by Jose Menendez. The allegations were highlighted in a 2023 Peacock documentary series about the case, which also gained renewed public interest from a nine-part Netflix drama and a documentary film last fall.
Some members of the Menendez family have supported the brothers' release, including the sisters of Jose and Kitty Menendez. One notable exception was, Milton Anderson, the brother of Kitty Menendez, who died recently. Anderson had repeatedly opposed his nephews' release and disputed the abuse claims.
Separately, governor Gavin Newsom, who has the power to commute their sentences, has asked the parole board to consider whether the Menendez brothers would represent a public safety risk if released.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Trump threatens ‘heavy force' as nationwide protests grow over immigration crackdown, LA troops hit 4,700
LOS ANGELES, June 12 — Protests against Donald Trump's harsh immigration policies spread yesterday across the United States despite a military-backed crackdown in Los Angeles and threats by the hard-right Republican president to use 'heavy force.' In Los Angeles, where the unrest began last Friday, an overnight curfew intended to keep people out of the downtown area was largely effective, with police arresting around 25 people who had refused to leave. Officers patrolled near government buildings, and storekeepers boarded up windows to protect against vandalism. But the area was quiet Wednesday. 'I would say for the most part everything is hunky dory right here at Ground Zero,' protester Lynn Sturgis, 66, a retired school teacher, told AFP. 'Our city is not at all on fire, it's not burning down, as our terrible leader is trying to tell you.' Around 1,000 troops from the 4,700 that Trump ordered to the city were actively guarding facilities and working alongside ICE agents, said Scott Sherman, Deputy Commanding General Army North, who is leading operations. The rest—including 700 active duty Marines—were mustering, or undergoing training in dealing with civil disturbances, he said. The Pentagon has said the deployment will cost taxpayers $134 million. The mostly peaceful protests ignited over a sudden escalation in efforts to apprehend migrants who were in the country illegally. Pockets of violence—including the burning of self-driving taxis and hurling stones at police—triggered a massive response from authorities using tear gas and other crowd-control weapons. Trump won the election last year partly on promises to combat what he claims is an 'invasion' by undocumented migrants. He is now seizing the opportunity to make political capital, ordering the California National Guard to deploy despite Governor Gavin Newsom's objections, the first time a US president has taken such action in decades. 'If our troops didn't go into Los Angeles, it would be burning to the ground right now,' Trump insisted on social media Wednesday. The White House doubled down on that rhetoric. 'President Trump will never allow mob rule to prevail in America,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told a briefing. Governor Newsom, a Democrat, has charged that Trump is seeking to escalate the confrontation for political gain. 'Democracy is under assault right before our eyes,' he said in a televised address late Tuesday. 'California may be first, but it clearly won't end here.' Protesters hold signs during a protest against federal immigration operations at Pershing Square in downtown Los Angeles yesterday. — AFP pic Nationwide protests growing Despite Trump's threats to deploy the National Guard to other Democratic-run states over the objections of governors, protesters appear undeterred. Thousands marched in New York and Chicago late Tuesday. Republican Texas Governor Greg Abbott announced he was deploying the state's National Guard to counter a protest announced for San Antonio on Wednesday. Demonstrations were also planned Wednesday in New York, Seattle and Las Vegas ahead of what organizers say will be a nationwide 'No Kings' movement on Saturday, when Trump will attend a highly unusual military parade in the US capital. In a speech at an Army base on Tuesday, Trump warned that any protests during the Washington parade would face 'very heavy force.' The parade, featuring warplanes and tanks, has been organized to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the founding of the US Army but also happens to be the day of Trump's 79th birthday. The last large military parade in Washington was in 1991 after the first Gulf War. 'Inflamed' situation The Trump administration is painting the protests as a violent threat to the nation, requiring military force to support regular immigration agents and police. On Tuesday he cited a 'full-blown assault on peace, on public order and national sovereignty' from a 'foreign enemy.' Protesters and the beleaguered Democratic opposition party say Trump is manufacturing a crisis that has little to do with expelling criminals in the US illegally. Newsom said Trump 'inflamed' the situation and went 'well beyond his stated intent to just go after violent and serious criminals. His agents are arresting dishwashers, gardeners, day laborers and seamstresses.' Footage obtained by AFP on Wednesday shows what appears to be federal agents ramming a car in the Boyle Heights area of Los Angeles. Some kind of smoke device is deployed and masked men with assault weapons order a man from the car, leaving what witnesses said was his wife and two children badly shaken. — AFP
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Harvey Weinstein found guilty again as #MeToo figurehead faces new verdicts
NEW YORK, June 12 — Disgraced Hollywood titan Harvey Weinstein was found guilty of one sexual assault at his retrial yesterday and not guilty of another, with jurors still considering a rape charge after hearing graphic testimony from his alleged victims. Weinstein was retried for offenses against two women, Jessica Mann whom he is alleged to have raped, and Miriam Haley whom he was found to have sexually assaulted, alongside new charges of assaulting ex-model Kaja Sokola. He was found not guilty of those new charges at the tense proceeding in a Manhattan court yesterday. Delivering the verdict of the seven women and five men of the jury on the Haley count, the foreman said: 'Guilty.' He shook his head when he was asked for a verdict on the rape of Mann, and said 'not guilty' on the Sokola count. Weinstein looked on impassively, seated in a wheelchair and wearing a dark suit as he has done throughout the six weeks of hearings. But later, the 73-year-old appeared to mutter 'Not true' as he was wheeled out of court. Following the verdict, Haley told reporters that the defense's 'victim shaming and deliberate attempts to distort the truth was exhausting and at times dehumanising.' 'But today's verdict gives me hope, hope that there is new awareness around sexual violence and that the myth of the 'perfect victim' is fading.' Threats The verdicts came after a dramatic morning in which tensions in the jury deliberation room spilled into the open. The foreman had told the judge Curtis Farber he could not continue after facing threats. 'One other juror made comments to the effect 'I'll meet you outside one day',' the judge said quoting the foreman, adding there was yelling between jurors. After Weinstein's lawyer Arthur Aidala heatedly demanded a mistrial over the jury rupture, Weinstein himself addressed the court, deploying a commanding voice reminiscent of the heyday of his Hollywood power. 'We've heard threats, violence, intimidation — this is not right for me... the person who is on trial here,' he said. 'My lawyers, the District Attorney's lawyers can fight all they want, (but) this is my life that's on the line and it's not fair.' 'It's time, it's time, it's time your honour, to say this trial is over,' Weinstein added. The judge responded that while unusual, disputes between jurors were not unheard of, before pressing on to hear the jury's partial verdict. Genesis of 'MeToo' The Oscar-winner's conviction is a vindication for Haley, whose complaint in part led to the initial guilty verdict in 2020, and helped spur the 'MeToo' movement that saw an outpouring of allegations from prominent women who were abused by men. Weinstein underwent a spectacular fall from his position astride the world of Hollywood and show business in 2017 when the first allegations against him exploded into public view. The movement upended the film industry, exposing the systemic exploitation of young women seeking to work in entertainment, and provoking a reckoning on how to end the toxic culture. More than 80 women accused Weinstein of sexual misconduct in the wake of the global backlash against men abusing positions of power. Weinstein's original 2020 conviction, and the resulting 23-year prison term, was thrown out last year after an appeals court found irregularities in the way witnesses were presented. Throughout the trial that began on April 15, Weinstein's sharp-suited attorney argued that the context had shifted since the first proceedings. While the 'MeToo' movement was 'the most important thing in society' back them, 'I think people's heads are in a different place right now,' Aidala said. Any sentence will be in addition to the 16-year term Winstein is already serving after being convicted in California of raping a European actress over a decade ago. Weinstein, the producer of box office hits like Pulp Fiction and Shakespeare in Love, did not take the stand during his retrial, but did acknowledge in an interview he acted 'immorally.' The retrial played out with far less public attention than the initial proceedings, when daily protests against sexual violence were staged outside the court. This time, the case was eclipsed by the blockbuster trial of hip-hop mogul Sean 'Diddy' Combs taking place at an adjacent courthouse. — AFP
Malay Mail
13 hours ago
- Malay Mail
What are the ‘less lethal' weapons law enforcement is using to control LA protests?
WASHINGTON, June 11 — Law enforcement officials in Los Angeles began deploying 'less lethal' munitions on Sunday as they clashed with crowds protesting federal immigration raids. 'Less lethal' or 'less-than-lethal' weapons are designed to cause pain and discomfort, normally to disperse hostile crowds, but have caused serious injury and death in the past. Here is a list of the less lethal weapons that have been deployed in Los Angeles in recent days, according to Reuters witnesses, the Los Angeles Police Department, and a police expert who has been monitoring the protests. Sponge rounds Media outlets, and a reporter hit in the leg by a projectile on Sunday, have said LAPD officers have been firing rubber bullets, a metal casing covered in rubber. In fact, the LAPD do not use rubber bullets, the department told Reuters. Instead, the LAPD uses foam rounds, a condensed sponge projectile. They resemble a hard Nerf ball, said Spencer Fomby, a retired police captain and less lethal weapons instructor. One version, which has a plastic body with a hard foam nose, is fired from a 40mm launcher and usually aimed directly at a target. A second version, fired from a 37mm launcher, disperses five foam baton rounds toward the ground in front of a hostile crowd once an unlawful assembly has been declared, before bouncing up into the crowd. It is not to be fired directly at individuals, the LAPD said. Both are designed to cause pain on impact without penetrating the skin. Police are forbidden from aiming sponge rounds at the head, neck, groin, and spine. A law enforcement officer carries sponge rounds. — Reuters pic Bean bag rounds Bean bag rounds are normally 37mm cloth bags filled with 1.4 oz of lead or rubber pellets. They are fired from shotguns and spread out as they fly toward the intended target. They are designed not to penetrate the skin but to cause an impact hard enough to render a target temporarily immobile. Flash bangs Flash bangs, otherwise known as 'distraction devices' or 'noise flash diversionary devices,' produce an ear-piercing bang and bright light to disorient targets by temporarily disrupting their sight and hearing. They are often used to target protesters who have become violent in a section of a crowd, Fomby said, and also to allow police to enter a section of a crowd to extract offenders. One type of flash bang device that has been used in Los Angeles is the 40mm aerial flash bang. These are launched into the air and ignite above the heads of protesters. A member of law enforcement fires non-lethal munitions during a rally. — Reuters pic Tear gas Tear gas, one of the most common riot control tools, is designed to temporarily incapacitate people by causing excessive irritation to the eyes, nose, lungs, and skin. It can cause temporary blindness, streaming eyes and nose, coughing, chest tightness, and difficulty breathing. Tear gas canisters usually contain CS gas, a chemical compound, or OC gas, which stands for oleoresin capsicum, the active ingredient in pepper spray. Pepper spray Pepper spray, which has similar impacts as tear gas, is sprayed from a handheld canister and is often used when police come into close quarters with rioters or are engaged in hand-to-hand encounters. It mainly irritates the eyes, causing temporary blindness. Pepper balls Pepper balls mirror the effects of pepper spray, but are delivered in a projectile similar to a paintball. On impact, it bursts open, releasing powdered OC into the air. Police often do not fire pepper balls directly at a person, but at street signs, onto buildings or into the ground to cause them to burst open. A Los Angeles County Sheriff's deputy holds a non-lethal weapon during a standoff by protesters and law enforcement. — Reuters pic Baton Known as the oldest less lethal weapon, the baton has been used for crowd control for decades. Police officers have been using batons to push and strike protesters in recent days. — Reuters
