logo
#

Latest news with #GeorgeGascon

The Menendez brothers got a major win in their fight for freedom. But it's not over yet.
The Menendez brothers got a major win in their fight for freedom. But it's not over yet.

Yahoo

time17-05-2025

  • Yahoo

The Menendez brothers got a major win in their fight for freedom. But it's not over yet.

A judge's ruling to resentence Erik and Lyle Menendez last week gave the siblings something they've not had in more than three decades: a chance that they could leave the Southern California prison where they're incarcerated. The brothers, who had been serving life sentences without the possibility of parole after a pair of sensational trials ended with convictions for their parents' 1989 murder, can seek their release from California's parole board after Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Michael Jesic found they do not pose an 'unreasonable risk' if released from prison. Jesic resentenced the siblings to 50 years to life, endorsing the recommendation of former Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascon and denying the position of his successor, Nathan Hochman, who opposed their resentencing. Here's what could happen next in the case, which highlighted a debate over a key issue in the criminal justice system — rehabilitation — and gained renewed attention after a Netflix miniseries and documentary about their lives. Jesic's ruling allows Erik, 54, and Lyle, 57, to make their case for freedom at a hearing aimed at determining whether they're suitable for parole. Those proceedings are scheduled for June 13 — a date previously set aside for hearings in a separate effort seeking clemency from California Gov. Gavin Newsom, according to a spokesperson for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, which oversees the parole system. 'Since the ruling makes them immediately eligible for parole consideration as youth offenders, it is the Board's intent to convert the June 13, 2025, clemency hearings to initial parole suitability hearings,' Scott Wyckoff, executive officer of Board of Parole Hearings, stated in a letter obtained by the Los Angeles Times. In an email, the corrections department spokesperson said the board is allowing people to raise objections to the change. Although the hearings are no longer for clemency, the brothers' application with the governor remains active. If the parole hearing takes place, parole commissioners will be tasked with determining whether the brothers pose an unreasonable risk of danger. Prosecutors, victims' relatives and others can weigh in on the question. Hochman told reporters Wednesday that someone from the district attorney's office will attend. That representative's level of participation will likely be dictated by the parole board, he said. Even if the commissioners find the brothers suitable for parole, that 'proposed' decision is subject to Newsom's approval. Asked Wednesday what he would do if the board recommends parole, Newsom declined to answer but said he often refers recommendations to the full parole board for review. He can also reverse a recommendation, he told reporters. 'Obviously, I have great respect for their judgment and the very relatively small percentage of parole applications they actually approve,' he said. Newsom said the process of determining whether someone is eligible for clemency or parole is similar. As part of the siblings' clemency application, the governor asked the board to determine whether the brothers pose an unreasonable risk of danger if released. Part of that evaluation has already been made public. During resentencing proceedings, Hochman said forensic psychologists found that the brothers posed a 'moderate' risk of committing violence outside prison. Those findings were based in part on psychological evaluations and recent prison violations, Hochman said. A lawyer for the brothers, Mark Geragos, has downplayed the violations — which include using smuggled cellphones after the resentencing proceedings were initiated — and said they do not constitute a 'superstrike,' or the kind of serious crime that could suggest they pose an unreasonable risk. Hochman opposed the brothers' release in part because of the evaluation. He also said they had not taken full responsibility for their crimes and cited 16 'unacknowledged lies' that he said the brothers told about the murders for decades. He reiterated that position during a news conference Wednesday. 'If they can deal with the issues that cause their risk level to be increased and then finally come clean with all their lies, fraud and deceit, then they should be appropriate candidates for parole,' he said. Speaking after their resentencing, the brothers said they had taken full responsibility and offered no justification for killing their mother, Kitty, or their father, Jose, on Aug. 20, 1989. At trial and in media interviews afterward, including in a 2017 interview with 'Dateline,' the brothers said they killed their parents in self-defense after Lyle confronted his father about sexually abusing his younger brother and Jose appeared to threaten him. Prosecutors have long disputed this account. They described the killings as calculated and horrific — Lyle Menendez reloaded his shotgun before shooting his mother in the face — and motivated by financial gain. Speaking Tuesday, Lyle Menendez told the court that he was 'deeply ashamed' of who he was 35 years ago. The brothers have also sought their freedom through a third path — a petition that seeks to overturn their convictions based on what the brothers' defense attorneys have described as new evidence in the case. The petition, which includes a photocopied letter that Erik said he wrote to a cousin and which Geragos has said confirms Jose's abuse of the younger sibling months before, was filed after the release of Peacock's 'Menudo + Menendez: Boys Betrayed,' which included a former member of the Puerto Rican boy band accusing Jose Menendez of raping him. (Peacock is owned by NBCUniversal, the parent company of NBC News.) At the time, Jose Menendez was an executive with RCA Records, which had a multialbum contract with the band. Hochman has said the evidence does not meet the standard required for a judge to order a new trial and that he opposes the petition. This article was originally published on

Menendez brothers face key hearing in life sentence reduction bid
Menendez brothers face key hearing in life sentence reduction bid

Free Malaysia Today

time14-05-2025

  • Free Malaysia Today

Menendez brothers face key hearing in life sentence reduction bid

The brothers could be released immediately or be considered for parole following the hearing. (California department of corrections/AP pic) LOS ANGELES : Lyle and Erik Menendez face a Los Angeles court on Tuesday for a key hearing in their bid to cut short the life prison terms they are serving for the shotgun murders of their parents in their Beverly Hills home 35 years ago. Defence lawyers are seeking a reduced sentence for the brothers, now 57 and 54, that would allow for their immediate release or make them eligible to be considered for parole. The outcome could hinge on fresh defence evidence in support of the brothers' assertion since the early days of the sensational case that they had been sexually abused by their father, a record company and entertainment industry executive. It was uncertain whether the defendants themselves would be physically present for the proceedings or watch via video hookup, as they have during previous hearings, from the San Diego prison where they are incarcerated. Former Los Angeles county district attorney George Gascon petitioned for a re-sentencing last fall, citing the new sexual abuse evidence and the brothers' clean prison records. Gascon reasoned that the pair had paid their debt to society and should be eligible for parole under the state's youthful offender statute since they were younger than 26 at the time of their offense. But, Gascon's successor as DA, Nathan Hochman, has opposed the re-sentencing since taking office, arguing that the brothers have yet to fully acknowledge and accept responsibility for the killings. The brothers were found guilty in 1996 of first-degree murder and sentenced to two consecutive life in prison terms without the possibility of parole for shooting to death their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez, on Aug 20, 1989, as the couple watched television in the family room of their home. The conviction capped the second of two highly publicised trials – the first ended in a hung jury – focusing attention on the darker sides of wealth and privilege. Before their arrest, the brothers had claimed to have come home from the movies to find their parents slain by intruders. At trial, they admitted to committing the killings but insisted they did so out of fear that their parents were about to kill them following years of sexual abuse by the father and emotional battering by their mother. Lyle was 21 and Erik was 18 at the time. Prosecutors argued that the murders were coldly calculated and motivated by greed, namely the brothers' desire to inherit their parents' multimillion-dollar fortune. The result of the re-sentencing hearing, expected to last two days, could turn on new defence evidence, including a letter Erik Menendez purportedly wrote to a cousin eight months before the killings, in which he described sexual abuse by his father. The defence also points to allegations by a member of the 1980s pop band Menudo who said he was abused by Jose Menendez. The allegations were highlighted in a 2023 Peacock documentary series about the case, which also gained renewed public interest from a nine-part Netflix drama and a documentary film last fall. Some members of the Menendez family have supported the brothers' release, including the sisters of Jose and Kitty Menendez. One notable exception was, Milton Anderson, the brother of Kitty Menendez, who died recently. Anderson had repeatedly opposed his nephews' release and disputed the abuse claims. Separately, governor Gavin Newsom, who has the power to commute their sentences, has asked the parole board to consider whether the Menendez brothers would represent a public safety risk if released.

Menendez brothers resentenced as experts blast 'indefensible' bid for killers freedom
Menendez brothers resentenced as experts blast 'indefensible' bid for killers freedom

Fox News

time14-05-2025

  • Fox News

Menendez brothers resentenced as experts blast 'indefensible' bid for killers freedom

LOS ANGELES – In a bombshell decision, Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Michael Jesic slashed the Menendez brothers' original life-without-parole terms to 50 years-to-life, making Erik and Lyle eligible for parole. Judge Michael Jesic ruled Tuesday that both brothers received a reduced sentence of 50 years to life with the opportunity for parole for the 1989 shotgun murders of their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez. "I'm not suggesting they should be released [on parole]. That's not for me to decide," he said. Their fate now lies in the hands of the parole board and Calif. Gov. Newsom. Former Assistant U.S. Attorney Neama Rahmani told Fox News Digital that Erik and Kyle Menendez "will likely be freed in a matter of months," adding that he does not expect "the parole board or Governor Newsom" to block their release. Rahmani noted that the resentencing decision rests on whether the brothers pose "an unreasonable risk of committing another violent crime," and he believes the evidence weighs heavily in their favor. Pointing to Judge Jesic's ruling, Rahmani explained that because former LA County District Attorney George Gascon initiated the resentencing request, new LA DA Nathan Hochman "couldn't pull it back," and the court could only deny resentencing if the risk threshold wasn't met. "That wasn't the case," he said, saying that "prison guards and other inmates testified that they were model prisoners." Rahmani also highlighted the unprecedented support from the Menendez family, observing that "every living family member of Jose and Kitty Menendez also supported their release, which is something that never happens. Victims do not support resentencing." Judge Jesic made this point while handing down the reduced sentences, saying he had given a lot of thought to the sentence, while acknowledging "the horrific crimes the brothers committed." He added that he was "equally shocked by letters of support he received from prison officials" who spoke highly of the brothers' actions behind bars, calling it "remarkable." Jesic stated the original sentence of life without parole was appropriate, but given the change in state law allowing for resentencing, Jesic said, "They've done enough over 35 years to get that chance." Rahmani stressed that such broad victim-family backing made it all but impossible for the current district attorney to derail the process. "The bottom line is that there was too much support for the Menendez brothers, both inside and outside the courtroom, for Hochman to prevent their resentencing," he said. It just goes to show the power of a Netflix series." He added that "the Menendez brothers should send Netflix and former LA County DA Gascon nice cards this holiday season." The resentencing hearing comes after the brothers filed a habeas corpus petition in May 2023 citing new evidence of sexual assault. Former Los Angeles County DA George Gascon then filed a motion for resentencing in October 2024. Both filings follow the passage of AB 600, a California law allowing for resentencing of long-convicted inmates to align with current law. Gascon recommended resentencing the brothers to 25 years to life for each count of first-degree murder, so a total of 50 years to life for each brother. Because of their age at the time of the murders, that sentence would make them eligible for parole. Gascon cited "a deeper understanding of the complexities surrounding sexual violence" and "Erik and Lyle's continuous rehabilitative efforts." During the morning session on Tuesday, three Menendez family members were called to the stand by the defense to try and convince the judge that the brothers had shown remorse and had been rehabilitated. All three witnesses were asked whether they thought their male cousins would in fact commit another heinous crime. "There is no chance," Anamaria Baralt said. "I would bet my life on it." "They are not going to commit a [serious crime]. Because they have too many plans to give back to the world," Tamara Goodall said. "Absolutely. No. None. They are extremely remarkable people now," Diane Hernandez said. SIGN UP TO GET TRUE CRIME NEWSLETTER Mark Geragos, the attorney for the Menendez brothers, said the family's unified plea for the brothers' resentencing is a "unicorn." The brothers, now 57 and 54, were dressed in blue jail garb, and flashed big grins following their resentencing, and waved to family and friends in attendance. Erik and Lyle Menendez appeared in court via video camera from the San Diego prison where they are incarcerated and were each given a chance to address the court prior to their sentencing. Each brother spoke for about 10 minutes and offered full admission to the crimes. Lyle Menendez spoke first and took responsibility for the cold-blooded killing of his parents in their Beverly Hills mansion in 1989. GO HERE FOR REAL-TIME UPDATES FROM THE FOX TRUE CRIME HUB "I take full responsibility. I killed my parents. I made the choice to kill my mom and dad in their own home." "I made the choice to make a mockery of the justice system. I offer no excuse and I don't blame my parents," he said. "I was impulsive and immature, and I bottled up my own emotions and anger. I was scared, but also filled with rage," he continued. "Had I had the coping skills and trusted others, I would have not done this. Even after I killed him (Jose), I still heard his voice." "I'm deeply ashamed for what I did," he said. After his older brother addressed the court, Erik Menendez spoke, expressing his "profound sorrow." "I fired all five rounds at my parents and went back to reload. I lied to police. I lied to my family. I'm truly sorry," he said. "My actions were criminal, selfish and cowardly. I take full responsibility. I am truly sorry. My parents should be alive. There can never be full healing for my crime," he continued. Geragos took a victory lap following the bombshell ruling for the killers brothers' resentencing. "I never thought two years later we'd be standing here after 35 years with this wonderful family that I have grown to love like my own family," Geragos said. "And now we see the pot at the end of the rainbow, so to speak." Following the judge's decision, LA District Attorney Hochman shared his response to the ruling and said "Justice should never be swayed by spectacle." "The decision to resentence Erik and Lyle Menendez was a monumental one that has significant implications for the families involved, the community, and the principles of justice," Hochman said in a news release. "Our office's motions to withdraw the resentencing motion filed by the previous administration ensured that the Court was presented with all the facts before making such a consequential decision. "The case of the Menendez brothers has long been a window for the public to better understand the judicial system. This case, like all cases — especially those that captivate the public — must be viewed with a critical eye. Our opposition and analysis ensured that the Court received a complete and accurate record of the facts. Justice should never be swayed by spectacle." The brothers remain in prison, but are now eligible for parole. Both Lyle and Erik are already scheduled to appear before the board on June 13th as part of a comprehensive risk assessment report (CRA) ordered by California Governor Gavin Newsom, who is considering the brothers' clemency request – a separate potential path to freedom. Fox News is told the two types of parole hearings cannot be combined. The parole board is expected to submit its clemency recommendation to Newsom on the June date. Newsom can also commute their sentence at any time.

Menendez brothers can be resentenced over their parents' 1989 murders, judge rules
Menendez brothers can be resentenced over their parents' 1989 murders, judge rules

SBS Australia

time14-05-2025

  • SBS Australia

Menendez brothers can be resentenced over their parents' 1989 murders, judge rules

Lyle and Erik Menendez, who have served 35 years in prison for the 1989 murders of their parents in their Beverly Hills home, were ruled eligible for parole by a Los Angeles judge at a re-sentencing hearing on Wednesday. The brothers, now 57 and 54, who appeared for the re-sentencing proceeding via live video feed from prison in San Diego, will remain incarcerated for the time being. Under California law, they become immediately eligible for parole, but the state parole board must still consider the case and decide when and whether they actually deserve to be released. "They [the brothers] had tears and they were smiling," Menendez attorney Cliff Gardner told Los Angeles television station KNBC-TV, relaying what he saw from the video link in court immediately after the ruling. The outcome capped a day-long hearing in which several relatives, a retired judge and a former fellow inmate testified in support of defence efforts to shorten the brothers' sentence to time already served, or at least gain parole eligibility. Former district attorney George Gascon petitioned for a re-sentencing in 2024, citing new evidence purported to bolster the brothers' claims that they were molested and a prison record showing they had achieved rehabilitation while incarcerated. Gascon said the pair had paid their debt to society and should be eligible for parole under the state's youthful offender statute since they were younger than 26 at the time of their offence. Lyle was 21 and Erik was 18. But Gascon's successor as district attorney, Nathan Hochman, opposed the re-sentencing after taking office earlier this year, arguing the brothers have yet to fully acknowledge and accept responsibility for the killings.

Menendez brothers face key hearing in bid to reduce life sentences for murder
Menendez brothers face key hearing in bid to reduce life sentences for murder

Reuters

time13-05-2025

  • Reuters

Menendez brothers face key hearing in bid to reduce life sentences for murder

LOS ANGELES, May 13 (Reuters) - Lyle and Erik Menendez face a Los Angeles court on Tuesday for a key hearing in their bid to cut short the life prison terms they are serving for the shotgun murders of their parents in their Beverly Hills home 35 years ago. Defense lawyers are seeking a reduced sentence for the brothers, now 57 and 54, that would allow for their immediate release or make their eligible to be considered for parole. The outcome could hinge on fresh defense evidence in support of the brothers' assertion since the early days of the sensational case that they had been sexually abused by their father, a record company and entertainment industry executive. It was uncertain whether the defendants themselves would be physically present for the proceedings or watch via video hookup, as they have during previous hearings, from the San Diego prison where they are incarcerated. Former Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascon petitioned for a re-sentencing last fall, citing the new sexual abuse evidence and the brothers' clean prison records. Gascon reasoned that the pair had paid their debt to society and should be eligible for parole under the state's youthful offender statute since they were younger than 26 at the time of their offense. But Gascon's successor as DA, Nathan Hochman, has opposed the re-sentencing since taking office, arguing that the brothers have yet to fully acknowledge and accept responsibility for the killings. The brothers were found guilty in 1996 of first-degree murder and sentenced to two consecutive life in prison terms without the possibility of parole for shooting to death their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez, on August 20, 1989, as the couple watched television in the family room of their home. The conviction capped the second of two highly publicized trials - the first ended in a hung jury - focusing attention on the darker sides of wealth and privilege. Before their arrest, the brothers had claimed to have come home from the movies to find their parents slain by intruders. At trial they admitted to committing the killings but insisted they did so out of fear that their parents were about to kill them following years of sexual abuse by the father and emotional battering by their mother. Lyle was 21 and Erik was 18 at the time. Prosecutors argued that the murders were coldly calculated and motivated by greed, namely the brothers' desire to inherit their parents' multimillion-dollar fortune. The result of the re-sentencing hearing, expected to last two days, could turn on new defense evidence, including a letter Erik Menendez purportedly wrote to a cousin eight months before the killings in which he described sexual abuse by his father. The defense also points to allegations by a member of the 1980s pop band Menudo who said he was abused by Jose Menendez. The allegations were highlighted in a 2023 Peacock documentary series about the case, which also gained renewed public interest from a nine-part Netflix drama and a documentary film last fall. Some members of the Menendez family have supported the brothers' release, including the sisters of Jose and Kitty Menendez. One notable exception, Milton Anderson, the brother of Kitty Menendez, who died recently. Anderson had repeatedly opposed his nephews' release and disputed the abuse claims. Separately, Governor Gavin Newsom, who has the power to commute their sentences, has asked the parole board to consider whether the Menendez brothers would represent a public safety risk if released.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store