JK Rowling blasts the National as ‘anti-women'
Taking to Twitter, Rowling defended Sex Matters – which intervened in the For Women Scotland gender case – after remarking scathingly: 'For Women Scotland is a feminist campaigning group. You appear to be an anti-woman newspaper.' And she's not the only one left unimpressed by the pro-indy paper's choice of language. For Women Scotland have waded into the conversation, pondering under Rowling's post:
I do wonder if the head of Newsquest is aware that this smear – which lawyers suggested, only last night, amounts to defamation – is routine in the National.
Oo er. The separatist bulletin is certainly no stranger to controversy. It fell foul of the Scottish press pack after one of its reporters first wrongly reported that Alba party members had verbally abused First Minister John Swinney inside the cathedral where Alex Salmond's funeral was taking place – before secondly shirking responsibility by claiming that of the journalists there, 'we had all mistaken inside for outside'. Cue a rather miffed response from the Beeb's Scotland editor, who indignantly wrote back that: 'It is not true to say 'we had ALL mistaken inside for outside'. At no point did I hear any jeering inside nor did I hear anyone suggest there was any.' It just goes from bad to worse, eh?
And Mr S would remind readers that the secessionist journal managed to rather successfully annoy even its own columnists after it printed an Anglo-bashing splash last year before of the Euros final between England and Spain. Ahead of the match, the newspaper decided to depict a rather large red-faced, bare-chested, tattooed England fan as a football being launched into the air by Spanish midfielder Rodri. 'Time for revenge!' the cover screamed, 'Our message to Spain: Save us from an England win (or we'll never hear the end of it!)'. It prompted one of its own columnists, ex-SNP MP Joanna Cherry, to tweet: 'No. I really don't like this at all' – while SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn slammed the design for its 'xenophobia'. The National's editor eventually rowed back – but it was too little too late…
At the time of writing, the piece remains online with its language unchanged. Will the National be forced to U-turn once again, with the help of FWS's little legal reminder? Stay tuned…
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
19 minutes ago
- BBC News
Policing minister 'shocked' over brazen shoplifting in Hull
Policing Minister Dame Diana Johnson has told of her shock at the "brazen boldness" of a shoplifter she witnessed in Diana told BBC Breakfast she was in Marks & Spencer when "a man came in and took a really large bunch of flowers" before walking MP for Kingston upon Hull North and Cottingham, who said she immediately told a shop assistant what had happened, urged others who saw shoplifting to report comes after the Home Office announced funding for increased police presence in 500 town centres across the country to deter crime and anti-social behaviour. Dame Diana said the recent surge in shoplifting was "unacceptable", and insisted the government was "clamping down" on part of its Safer Streets campaign, the government said it planned to assign named local officers to neighbourhoods and increase police ranks by 13,000 by Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said police forces will recruit 3,000 extra neighbourhood officers and PCSOs over the next 12 months in an attempt to end the policing "postcode lottery".But Dame Diana stressed that retailers also had a role to play by increasing shop security and making sure goods were not left easily accessible to to increases in assaults against shop workers, the Crime and Policing Bill proposes a new offence of assaulting a shop Conservatives criticised Labour's plans and claimed the government was "leaving communities at the mercy of criminal gangs".Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: "The government likes to talk tough, but the reality is they are releasing criminals in our communities whilst failing to grip the border crisis."[The Labour] announcement comes without a single extra pound of new funding whilst they are actually cutting 1,300 officers." Listen to highlights from Hull and East Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here. Download the BBC News app from the App Store for iPhone and iPad or Google Play for Android devices
Times
19 minutes ago
- Times
Clearing system to rescue students whose universities go bust
Students at universities that go bust could be helped to find new courses through a bespoke clearing-style system, The Times has learnt. Some universities in England are millions of pounds in deficit and said to be at risk of collapse. Dundee University was given a £22 million bailout by the Scottish government in June, with a pledge of a further £40 million if a credible restructuring plan can be agreed. The Office for Students (OfS), the university regulator for England, is drawing up plans to redistribute students at any institutions that go under. • A-level results day 2025: full guide to Ucas clearing Baroness Smith of Malvern, the skills minister, told The Times: 'I don't want to see any university in a position where it risks having to close but if that were to be the case, the priority would be the continuity of study for students.' She confirmed plans to set up a system akin to clearing, used by school-leavers to find university places. 'I don't think this [closure] should happen but students could not just, part-way through a course, not be able to complete it,' she said. The OfS said in its business plan for the next academic year: 'We will engage with Ucas [the admissions service] on the potential for a bespoke clearing system for students in the case of the closure of their provider.' The OfS said it would oversee cases where there is a significant risk of institutional closure and put in place 'student protection directions'. It would work with universities and the government to implement a 'validator of last resort' for students if a university closes, such as having another one validate their degrees. OfS analysis suggests 43 per cent of English universities will prove to have been in deficit in 2024-25. Experts and insiders have warned that some are in a very precarious position. Domestic tuition fees will rise by £285 a year this year, the first increase since 2017. The number of international students, who pay much higher fees, has have fallen sharply, depriving universities of critical income. Universities say they face rising costs, including the support struggling students, maintaining their estate and the rise in employers' national insurance contributions. Thousands of academics have been made redundant in the past year. Smith said the financial challenge in higher education had been ignored by the last government for too long, prompting her to ask the OfS to prioritise financial sustainability. Of tuition fees increasing to £9,535, she said: 'Obviously it is an increased investment that we're asking students to make but there's even more that we can do to be clear to people that this is very different from any other loan that you will have in your life. The benefit of your higher education will in almost every circumstance outweigh the cost of repaying your loan.' The government said in May that universities would be named and shamed if they gave vice-chancellors big pay packages while delivering poor outcomes for students. Smith added: 'It's a tough old job running a university but as with any other part of the public sector — or near public sector — you also have a responsibility, particularly at a time when you may be making others in the place redundant, to be sensible about what the senior leadership is being paid. 'I wouldn't expect a vice-chancellor to be making a plea for poverty and financial challenge while at the same time not recognising it in their own pay.' Ministers are considering a 6 per cent levy on international students, which comes after changes in visa rules led to a downturn in overseas applicants. Universities say this will cost them millions of pounds in lost revenue. Asked about the message to international students, Smith, who was home secretary under Gordon Brown, said: 'I think we already are very welcoming. We have a world-class higher education system, we have a good deal for international students. 'What we'll be clear about is that if you're coming to the UK to study you will be the brightest and the best and you'll be coming to take advantage of our higher education system, not to take advantage of our immigration system.'
Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Biological sex of 10,000 university applicants not known as many now 'prefer not to say'
The biological sex of almost 10,000 university applicants is not known as thousands now 'prefer not to say' or 'use another term', new data shows. Figures from admissions body Ucas show almost 5,000 applicants chose each option this year, instead of ticking 'male' or 'female'. The two new categories for online university applications were introduced a year ago, in a bid to be more inclusive of trans and non-binary students. Ucas has previously defended the decision, saying it is 'important that institutions know how their students identify.' However, Professor Alice Sullivan, a sociologist from University College London, said the figures proved vital data was being lost. She told the Daily Mail: 'The different experiences and choices of girls and boys as they leave school and apply for university are a key determinant of later outcomes, including employment and income. 'The substantial loss of data on sex will lead to a loss of accuracy in research on these questions. 'Replacing clear data collection on sex with a 'gender' variable which confuses sex and gender identity is unjustifiable. 'Sex and gender identity are distinct, and data on each of these should be collected via separate questions. Muddling the two does not provide accurate data on either.' This year, 4,660 selected 'I use another term', while 4,980 selected 'prefer not to say' – each making up just under 1 per cent of the total number of applicants. In 2022, when the new system was announced, Professor Sullivan led 70 academics in writing an open letter saying it would lead to an 'erosion of sex-based data' in education that will make it 'impossible to track trends over time'. Professor Sullivan published a Government-commissioned review in March, which highlighted the harms of failing to collect data on biological sex. Stephanie Davies-Arai, director at Transgender Trend, said: 'Sex is a key data variable for research, yet this data has been lost for almost 10,000 students because of the nonsense of 'gender identity.' 'Having been taught in school to doubt biological reality, it is hardly surprising that so many university applicants are confused about whether they are male or female. 'How many other young people are equally confused? 'This should be a wake-up call for the Department for Education to get gender identity teaching out of schools.' The two new categories were first introduced in 2024, when 5,820 ticked 'I use another term' and 4,920 ticked 'prefer not to say'. Ucas was approached for comment and they confirmed the figures are correct.
