Denied higher pension, retirees' association pleads CJI to intervene
Nagpur: Alleging grave injustice to lakhs of retired persons, Employees Pension (EPS-1995) Coordination Committee has written to Chief Justice of India Bhushan Gavai seeking his intervention after a Supreme Court bench dismissed a key petition filed by
Powergrid Retired Employees' Association
related to EPS-95.
The committee claimed the Supreme Court verdict has denied rightful pension benefits to senior citizens who retired before September 1, 2014.
In a letter dated May 20, the committee's national general secretary Prakash Pathak and national legal advisor Dada Tukaram Zode have demanded "sympathetic intervention" from the CJI, citing "arbitrary and unjust treatment" by a Supreme Court bench, which, they alleged, failed to address core grievance regarding misinterpretation of earlier apex court orders.
"For the first time since 2004, we are not getting justice from the top court," said Pathak, referring to a decades long legal struggle to secure higher pension based on actual salary. "Till 2016, 10 special leave petitions (SLPs) filed by Employees' Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) were rejected. But since 2019, the trend has reversed against the pensioners."
The letter points to Kerala high court's 2018 verdict, which held EPFO's pension scheme amendments illegal — a decision later upheld by the apex court in April 2019.
However, the committee alleged that subsequent review petitions and SLPs filed by the EPFO and the Centre were processed in an "inconsistent" manner, with fresh benches taking up matters already decided by three-judge benches.
The association particularly flagged a paragraph — 44(v) — in the November 4, 2022 judgment by the top court. "The EPFO later misused this paragraph to issue circulars dated December 29, 2022, and January 25, 2023, which effectively excluded pre-2014 retirees from the benefit of higher pension, triggering around 77 subsequent legal applications — all of which were dismissed," said the association.
"This pension scheme is meant for social welfare and security in the old age of workers. The court should protect such right to life," the letter reads. It also claims that dismissal of Powergrid staffers plea was done "without considering facts and merits," causing distress to elderly pensioners across the country.
The committee has also enclosed a copy of an earlier letter addressed to the apex court, expressing dismay over the verdict. Seeking urgent remedial action, the committee has requested the CJI to examine the case for fairness and consider an appropriate inquiry "in the interest of justice to pensioners across the country."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
EPS, Murugan say Stalin using delimitation issue as a diversionary tactic
EPS, Murugan say Stalin using delimitation issue as a diversionary tactic Times News Network Chennai: AIADMK general secretary Edappadi K Palaniswami said on Friday the AIADMK will never allow Tamil Nadu 's representation in Parliament to be reduced. Hitting back at chief minister M K Stalin for alleging that AIADMK was silent on the Centre's Census plans, thereby complicit in BJP's plans to reduce TN's parliamentary representation, EPS said that Stalin should stop using the delimitation row as a distraction to hide his "govt's failures and scams.'' "We will never allow our representation to be reduced or our voice to be silenced. In 2027, or whenever delimitation may come, AIADMK — back in power — will fiercely defend Tamil Nadu's rightful voice and future," he said on X. Alleging that Stalin speaks of fair delimitation while presiding over the most unfair, corrupt, and dynastic regime Tamil Nadu has ever seen, EPS demanded that the CM should first delimit corruption. "First, delimit the TASMAC loot. Delimit the drug mafia. Delimit illicit liquor. Delimit rowdyism. Delimit the corruption of your ministers. And most importantly, delimit your family's arrogance and stranglehold over Tamil Nadu," he said. "The people of Tamil Nadu are tired of your drama and crocodile tears," he added. Union minister L Murugan also said Stalin should stop using the issue to divert people's attention. "Stalin has begun scaremongering to hide his govt's failure to control crimes," he said. Murugan said that even after Union Home Minister Amit Shah clarified that TN would not be affected by the delimitation exercise, Stalin was constantly trying to play politics through a bundle of lies. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages , and quotes !
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Congress favouring Andhra Pradesh govt, says Harish
1 2 Hyderabad: Senior BRS leader and former irrigation minister T Harish Rao alleged that chief minister A Revanth Reddy and minister Uttam Kumar Reddy had failed to protect Telangana's water interests while favouring the Andhra Pradesh govt. He criticised irrigation minister Uttam Kumar Reddy for allegedly misleading the public on key irrigation projects and cooperating with the TDP govt in Andhra Pradesh, thereby compromising the interests of Telangana. "Why did the Telangana cabinet not discuss the Godavari-Banakacherla link scheme on Thursday? Was there any issue more important than that? Though the AP govt was going ahead with the project without any approvals, the Telangana govt, on the other hand, is making no effort to halt it," Harish Rao said while addressing the media at Dubbak on Friday. Harish Rao vowed that BRS would take the fight to New Delhi and even approach the Supreme Court to protect the water rights if the state govt continued to neglect the issue. "Even in temporary allocations of Krishna waters, Telangana utilised 65 TMC less water than its share, leaving 6.5 lakh acres parched in Nalgonda, Mahabubnagar and other districts. Why did the state govt remain silent while Andhra Pradesh allegedly diverted 400 TMC of Godavari water illegally," the former minister questioned. He also criticised the BJP leaders from Telangana for not raising their voices against the AP's 'water theft' and reiterated that the BRS would approach the Supreme Court if the state govt failed to act. Harish Rao alsodismissed chief minister A Revanth Reddy's claim that Kaleshwaram was collapsing, arguing that key projects such as Gandhamalla, Mallannasagar, and Ranganayak Sagar depend on it. He challenged the chief minister to explain how water would reach Gandhamalla if Kaleshwaram were truly defunct. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages , and quotes !
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump administration asks Supreme Court to pause mass layoffs at Education Department
President Donald Trump's administration on Friday asked the Supreme Court to pause a court order to reinstate Education Department employees who were fired in mass layoffs as part of his plan to dismantle the agency. The Justice Department's emergency appeal to the high court said U.S. District Judge Myong Joun in Boston exceeded his authority last month when he issued a preliminary injunction reversing the layoffs of nearly 1,400 people and putting the broader plan on hold. Joun's order has blocked one of the Republican president's biggest campaign promises and effectively stalled the effort to wind down the department. A federal appeals court refused to put the order on hold while the administration appealed. The judge wrote that the layoffs 'will likely cripple the department.' But Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote on Friday that Joun was substituting his policy preferences for those of the Trump administration. The layoffs help put in the place the 'policy of streamlining the department and eliminating discretionary functions that, in the administration's view, are better left to the states,' Sauer wrote. He also pointed out that the Supreme Court in April voted 5-4 to block Joun's earlier order seeking to keep in place Education Department teacher-training grants. The current case involves two consolidated lawsuits that said Trump's plan amounted to an illegal closure of the Education Department. One suit was filed by the Somerville and Easthampton school districts in Massachusetts along with the American Federation of Teachers and other education groups. The other suit was filed by a coalition of 21 Democratic attorneys general. The suits argued that layoffs left the department unable to carry out responsibilities required by Congress, including duties to support special education, distribute financial aid and enforce civil rights laws. Trump has made it a priority to shut down the Education Department, though he has acknowledged that only Congress has the authority to do that. In the meantime, Trump issued a March order directing Education Secretary Linda McMahon to wind it down 'to the maximum extent appropriate and permitted by law.' Trump later said the department's functions will be parceled to other agencies, suggesting that federal student loans should be managed by the Small Business Administration and programs involving students with disabilities would be absorbed by the Department of Health and Human Services. Those changes have not yet happened. The president argues that the Education Department has been overtaken by liberals and has failed to spur improvements to the nation's lagging academic scores. He has promised to 'return education to the states.' Opponents note that K-12 education is already mostly overseen by states and cities. Democrats have blasted the Trump administration's Education Department budget, which seeks a 15% budget cut including a $4.5 billion cut in K-12 funding as part of the agency's downsizing.
