
Kim Kardashian is ready to confront 'gang' accused of robbing her at gun-point in £8.5million Paris jewellery heist as she prepares to testify in court
Kim Kardashian is ready to 'confront' the gang who are accused of tying her up in a £8.5million jewellery heist.
Kardashian, 44, was alone in the penthouse of a £13,500-a-night Paris hotel in October 2016 when two men disguised as policemen burst in and put a gun to her head, spending 49 minutes stealing millions of pounds worth of jewellery.
The traumatised reality TV star was bound and gagged during the ordeal and later fled the country by private jet after speaking to French detectives, telling in recent years how she thought she would be killed by the robbers.
There have been delays in the case being brought to court, with blame being placed on the priority of high-profile terrorist trials, but she is now finally set to give evidence.
The trial began on April 28 and, ahead of Kardashian giving testimony on May 13, her lawyers have told how she is ready to 'confront' those accused of attacking her.
'She is committed to attending in person the trial and to confronting those who attacked her,' her French lawyers Leonor Hennerick and Jonathan Mattout told AFP.
'She will do so with dignity and courage.'
The lawyers, who are representing Kardashian alongside her American counsel Michael Rhodes, declined to comment on the content of her upcoming testimony.
'We want to give everyone the opportunity to hear her testimony in her own words so we won't be commenting on the substance of what she will say,' they added.
They also said that Kardashian 'is genuinely grateful for the way in which the French authorities conducted the investigation that led to the discovery of the persons facing charges in this trial'.
'Throughout the process, the utmost respect and consideration has been given for Ms. Kardashian,' they said.
The raid took place at the height of Paris Fashion Week while Kardashian was still married to rapper Kanye West, and £8.5million worth of jewellery was stolen, including her 18.88 carat diamond engagement ring.
As they fled, one robber dropped a platinum cross adorned with diamonds that was found the next morning.
A career criminal known as 'Old Omar' is accused of masterminding the heist that was France's highest value robbery in a decade and threatened the city's reputation as the ultimate high-class tourism destination.
The advanced age of Omar - real name Aomar Ait Khedache, at 68 - and his right-hand man Yunice Abbas, at 72, has led the gang to be known as the 'Grandpa Robbers'.
Omar's 79-year-old mistress Christiane 'Cathy' Glotin is also accused of helping them launder the gem haul after she was tracked travelling to Europe's diamond capital Antwerp.
Both men have admitted taking part in the robbery as their DNA was found on the ties used to bind Kardashian's hands and feet 'like a saucisson', as it is known in French slang.
While Khedache has admitted to tying up Kardashian, he has disputed claims that he was the mastermind behind the robbery.
In fact, Abbas has even written a book about his involvement, unambiguously entitled: 'I Kidnapped Kim Kardashian.'
However, it is the extent of their involvement – and the part eight others accused played in the organisation of the multi-million-pound heist – that will be determined during the four-week trial.
Gary Madar, the brother of Kardashian's Paris driver, is accused of providing the tip-off that the star would be alone on the night of the robbery as her bodyguard was accompanying her sister Kourtney to a nightclub.
Madar, a celebrity fixer, is alleged to have bragged to Florian 'Flo' Heroui, the owner of a Paris bar frequented by underworld figures, that he could provide details about a 'very rich American' who was coming for Paris Fashion Week.
But in court, Madar's lawyer retorted with: 'The whole world knew sir. She has 350million followers.'
Abbas has admitted he did not know who Kim Kardashian was before the robbery, simply telling the terrified concierge of the Hotel de Pourtales to take him to 'the American rapper's wife'.
Old Omar's son Harminy Ait Khedache, known as 'La Boule' [the ball], is accused of tailing the reality TV star's limousine as she was driven around the city.
Didier Dubreucq, whose nickname is 'Blue Eyes', is accused of being one of the two men who entered Kim's penthouse and put a gun to her head.
Marc-Alexandre Boyer, Marc Boyer and Francois Delaporte are all accused of taking part in the robbery by procuring weapons, vehicles and false identity documents.
However, two men arrested for their part in the heist will not stand trial.
Pierre 'Big Pierrot' Bouianere, 72 - believed to be the robber who dropped the diamond encrusted platinum cross outside the hotel - has been ruled 'unfit' to stand trial as he is suffering from Alzheimer's.
And Marceau Baum-Gertner, a notorious Parisian fence of stolen goods who was originally charged with the 'concealment of gold, jewels and watches' after he was tracked to Antwerp, has died.
A six-member jury will assist three judges to determine the role each defendant played in possibly Paris' most high-profile heist in modern times.
With sentences of up to 20 years in jail expected, many of the 'Grandpa Robbers' are likely to die behind bars if convicted.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
My brother got my name tattooed on his FACE – people think ‘it screams unemployment' & has ‘ruined his chances at love'
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A WOMAN has left people gobsmacked after showing off her brother's new tattoo. Jozie Rorebeck explained that her sibling, Riley Rorebeck, recently surprised her with a forehead inking dedicated to her. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 A woman has gone viral after showing off her brother's new tattoo Credit: TikTok/jozierorebeck 3 Not only did people say it would "ruin his chances at love", but others questioned how he would ever find employment with such a bold inking Credit: TikTok/jozierorebeck 3 Jozie claimed that Riley wanted his inking in the same place as rapper Lil Pepp Credit: Getty - Contributor Eager to show off the jaw-dropping tattoo tribute, Jozie took to social media to give her followers a close-up look at the inking, leaving many totally stunned. Alongside a short clip that has now gone viral, Jozie wrote: 'My brother got my name tatted on his face.' She then added: 'I'll absolutely never go to bed questioning if I'm loved EVER again.' To share his affection for his sister, the young man who already has tattoos on his arms and hands, got his sibling's name inked on his forehead. Jozie, who described Riley as her 'ride or die' explained that the placement of the tattoo was to replicate a similar inking to a famous American rapper and singer-songwriter. She confirmed that Riley wanted it in the same place and in an identical front as Lil Pepp, who has the 'Crybaby', his fourth mixtape, inked above his eyebrow. It comes eight years after the death of the artist, who was a rising star in the music industry. But the TikTok clip, which was posted under the username @jozierorebeck just two days ago, has clearly left many open-mouthed, as it has quickly gone viral and amassed 1.3 million views. It has also racked up 174,400 likes, 1,566 comments and 6,717 shares. But social media users have been left totally divided by the man's large face tattoo. I never have to buy clothes as I've got them tattooed on & love it but trolls totally disagree While some thought it was 'adorable', others claimed it had ruined not only his chances at finding a partner, but also at securing a job too. One user gushed: 'Literally so sweet.' A second agreed: 'This is genuinely so adorable.' Whilst someone else chimed in: 'This is the sweetest thing ever.' But at the same time, not everyone was as complimentary, as one person said: 'Any sister in their right mind would never let their brother do that to themselves.' RIP his job applications TikTok user To this, Jozie replied and confirmed: 'My family and I had no idea he was doing this.' Meanwhile, another hater gasped: 'A face tat for your sis is crazy.' A third begged: 'Please say that's a temporary tattoo.' Which tattoos hurt the most? Depending on what part of your body you choose to ink, tattoos can range significantly in terms of pain levels. Some of the most painful areas are those where the skin tends to be thinner or closer to the bone. Each area has specific factors which contribute to the level of pain. Ribcage: Thin skin, little muscle, and many nerve endings. Feet and ankles: Many bones, tendons, and nerve endings close to the surface. Hands and fingers: Many bones, tendons, and nerve endings, resulting in increased pain during tattooing. Knuckles can be especially painful. Spine: Proximity of the spinal cord and nerve endings makes it sensitive. Tattooing directly over the vertebrae can be especially painful. Knees and elbows: Thin skin and little padding between the skin and the underlying bones. Armpits and groin: High concentration of nerve endings and lymph nodes. Neck and throat: Thin and sensitive skin, with many nerve endings and blood vessels close to the surface. Source: Tatt2Away Someone else questioned: 'Is he never planning on having a wife or kids??' Similarly, another hater claimed: 'Ruined his chances at love.' Not only this, but others shared their concern for Riley's future career, as one user slammed: 'RIP his job applications,' and another suggested: 'Screams unemployment.' Unlock even more award-winning articles as The Sun launches brand new membership programme - Sun Club


Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
The human cost of dictatorship: a happy ending but this Belarusian family's life is forever changed
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... It is believed to have been as much a surprise to his family as to the rest of the world. Last weekend, political prisoner Siarhei Tsikhanouski, along with 13 other people held captive in Belarusian jails, was suddenly released after five years, following secret negotiations by American diplomats. Video footage showed him exiting a black car straight into the arms of his wife, Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, who was waiting for him in Lithuania, where she has been living in exile since 2020. He has since recounted how guards had put a black bag over his head, before putting him in a minibus with other prisoners, with no idea where he was going, or why. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Tsikhanouski was imprisoned in May 2020, two days after he announced his intention to stand in the Belarusian presidential elections against dictator Alexander Lukashenko, who has ruled the country since 1994. Taken under a technicality of 'organising riots' and 'inciting hatred', no one knew whether his incarceration would be short-lived, or if anyone would ever see him again. READ MORE: How an innocent trip to Belarus made me realise the fragility of press freedom He has since been held in solitary confinement for most of the past five years. His wife had not heard any news of him at all for the past two years – until this week. Forced to sleep on bare tiles on the floor of his dark, unheated cell, he had to wake up to exercise every two hours during the night to ensure his body temperature did not drop dangerously low. When he spoke at Sunday's press conference, his voice sounded strange: creaky, presumably due to lack of use, with only the cell walls to speak to for so long. He said his daughter, who was just four when he was captured, had not known who he was when she was reunited with him last Saturday evening. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad I can't say I'm surprised. Half his previous weight, his head shaved and face exhausted, Mr Tsikhanouski was almost unrecognisable from the strong, smiling, affable man who became the face of opposition Belarusian politics through his popular YouTube channels. Exiled Belarusian opposition leader Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya. I interviewed Ms Tsikhanouskaya three years ago, when I was working as world editor for The Scotsman. The war in Ukraine, when Belarus became a key ally of Russian leader Vladimir Putin, had begun six months earlier, dashing hopes of potential political change in the former Soviet nation. On her first visit to Scotland to hold meetings with Holyrood politicians, including the then First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, I had a chance to sit down with Ms Tsikhanouskaya in a cafe on Edinburgh's Royal Mile, where I tried to get to know the extraordinary woman who stepped fearlessly into her husband's place after his imprisonment. Then, she told me she was doing what she could to keep her husband's memory alive, filling their apartment with photographs of him and constantly talking to both their daughter and the couple's son, now 15, about their father. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Yet, watching the weekend's footage, I couldn't help thinking that Ms Tsikhanouskaya has changed as much as her husband in the five years he has been missing – if not more. Exiled Belarusian opposition leader Sviatlana Tikhanovskaya (R) and her husband Siarhei Tikhanovsky, Belarusian opposition activist released from a Belarusian prison, with a photograph on Mr Tikhanovsky before he was imprisoned. | AFP via Getty Images A former languages teacher, Ms Tsikhanouskaya had stayed at home with her children for ten years before Mr Tsikhanouski's imprisonment. Suddenly, she found herself at the head of the pro-democracy movement in Belarus, going head-to-head with Mr Lukashenko in an election which she is widely believed to have won, with 60 per cent of the vote. Mr Lukashenko, however, didn't agree and she was forced to flee the country with her family, eventually setting up an opposition government in exile in Lithuania. "I was an ordinary person who didn't care about the policy of the Belarusian government,' she told me in October 2022, as plain-clothes police officers wearing ear pieces scanned the cafe for potential threats from the next table. 'I took care of my family. I wasn't involved in politics and didn't want to be. I didn't want to understand how everything works, how our foreign policy works, who are our friends and our enemies. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Lukashenko was sure that I was doing this for fun, because who would vote for a woman? Nobody. For a housewife with no political background?' Suddenly, she found herself meeting heads of state from across the globe, holding high-level meetings about democracy and human rights. Shortly after her husband's release, she travelled to the Netherlands, to take part in a Nato summit at The Hague. The couple's reunion was not one I would expect even Mr Tsikhanouski had imagined. A couple of hours after his arrival in Lithuania, the pair were filmed hosting the other newly released prisoners at their home, with a formal press conference the next day. Of course, he knew his wife had stood in the elections and left Belarus: until two years ago, he was receiving semi-regular visits from his lawyer. However, he cannot have envisaged the scale of her current status on the world stage. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad That the woman who in her own words, stayed at home to 'care for her family' until her husband's imprisonment, is now a globally recognised politician must come as a shock. She travels the globe, her social media accounts demonstrating the hard work and effort put into raising the profile of the plight of Belarus. She has had to sacrifice family time. She told me she often only sees her children for one day a week, a stark contrast to the time before her husband's imprisonment, when she admits she spent 'all [her] time' with them. It is hard not to compare the couple to Russian dissident Alexei Navalny and his wife, Yulia. She has also taken on the political cause fought by her husband – against Putin. Yet the end to their story is very different: Mr Navalny died in an Arctic Circle prison over a year ago. Mr Tsikhanouskaya has said he believes he owes his life to Mr Navalny's plight. 'When Alexei Navalny died, I thought, that'll probably be me soon…' he said. 'And then something changed. It was clear that someone at the top said, 'Make sure he doesn't die here. We don't need that problem.''


Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
M3GAN 2.0 review: 'an amusing reflection of the current moment'
Sign up to our Arts and Culture newsletter, get the latest news and reviews from our specialist arts writers Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... M3GAN 2.0 (15) ★★★ In the two years since satirical sci-fi horror comedy M3GAN came out, a lot of the generative AI tech its killer toy-bot plot was riffing on has become worryingly commonplace. It's appropriate, then, that its outré sequel M3GAN 2.0 has undergone an exponential upgrade in keeping with its title. If the first film operated in a speculative sweet-spot somewhere between getting in under the wire and being late to the party (turncoat robots and humanity-destroying AI have, after all, been a staple of cinema for decades), the new film's goofily preposterous plot is so outlandish it manages to make a weirdly trenchant mockery of our current chaotic reality, right down to the fact it opens with an AI-powered attack on Iran by an incompetent American government agency that hasn't thought through the destabilising consequences of its actions. Gemma (Allison Williams) and M3GAN in M3GAN 2.0, directed by Gerard Johnstone. | Contributed As accidentally tasteless as that sounds, the film quickly returns us to the world of the first film where M3gan's chastened inventor, Gemma (Allison Williams), has volte-faced into becoming a public evangelist for responsible tech restrictions while simultaneously trying to take a more hands-on approach to parenting Cady (Violet McGraw), the orphaned, now-teenaged, niece she mistakenly left to the care of the over-zealous M3gan doll first time round (M3gan is once again partly played by teenage dancer Amie Donald and voiced by Jenna Davis). Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad As the film opens, that murderous robo-protector now exists in cyberspace only, her body having been destroyed and her source code supposedly erased. But when a US military-sanctioned cyborg assassin ripped off from M3gan goes rogue (she's called Amelia and is played by Ivanna Sakhno), Gemma – with Cady's help – has to reboot, rebuild and reprogram her original creation to take it down, Terminator 2-style. M3GAN in M3GAN 2.0 directed by Gerard Johnstone | Contributed Once again directed by Gerard Johnstone and produced by horror maestros James Wan and Jason Blum, the film certainly isn't shy about embracing its influences, paying blatant tongue-in-cheek homage to the aforementioned T2 (and the Matrix) as it morphs into a full-scale action extravaganza. Consequently, it sacrifices the slasher movie element that made the first film such a hoot, though mercifully not the campiness, which provides waves of weirdness that ensure that, while M3GAN 2.0 is no candidate for greatness, it is, in its own bizarre way, an amusing reflection of the current moment.