Footsie closes above 9,000 for first time as round-the-clock trading idea sparks fierce City debate
The UK index climbed 20.87 points, or 0.2 per cent to end the session at 9012.99.
It is up by more than 10 per cent for the year to date.
The Footsie reached the milestone even as politicians and City grandees worry that it is losing its relevance as a global financial centre.
Reforms over the past couple of years have so far failed to revive valuations enough to spare the exchange from being raided by foreign predators.
Some think it should follow rival exchanges in New York, which are already planning to bring in 24-hour or extended trading hours – but opinion in the Square Mile is divided.
Record close: The FTSE 100 climbed 21 points, or 0.2% to end the session at 9013. It is up by more than 10% for the year to date.
The Financial Times reported that parent company London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) was considering the move.
Michael Healy, managing director of trading platform IG, said 24-hour trading would be 'a welcome and overdue step in the right direction' for the exchange.
He said: 'If London wants to reclaim its place as a leading global financial centre, it must lead on this.'
But Michael Brown at broker Pepperstone said it could have a 'negative impact' on liquidity with trading volumes spread over a longer period resulting in more volatility.
He added that there was 'very little clamour for such a move'.
LSEG declined to comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
2 minutes ago
- Metro
My flatmate pays rent and bills but never buys shared household essentials
Everyone who's lived in houseshares has a few flatmate horror stories, from the ridiculously noisy to the chronically cleaning-averse. But sometimes it's a bit more nuanced, and one small habit can turn an otherwise great situation into a resentment-fuelled nightmare. That's the case for Jen, 28, from Manchester, who got in touch about bringing up an awkward issue — as well as being the only one in her flat who replaces household essentials, she's also footing the bill for them all. In this week's Money Problem, personal finance journalist and consumer champion, Sarah Davidson, shares her perspective. If you've got a money problem you'd like Sarah to look into, fill in this online form or email providing as much detail about your situation as possible. No issue is too big or small, and all submissions will be treated with the strictest confidence. I've lived with Becky* for the last five months, after my old flatmate moved out and the landlord brought her in as a replacement. For the most part, it's a good situation – we're not friends as such, but we occasionally hang out, and are both the same level of clean and quiet. You can access completely fee-free mortgage advice with London & Country (L&C) Mortgages, a partner of Metro. Customers benefit from: – Award winning service from the UK's leading mortgage broker – Expert advisors on hand 7 days a week – Access to 1000s of mortgage deals from across the market Unlike many mortgage brokers, L&C won't charge you a fee for their advice. Find out how much you could borrow online Mortgage service provided by London & Country Mortgages (L&C), which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (registered number: 143002). The FCA does not regulate most Buy to Let mortgages. Your home or property may be repossessed if you do not keep up repayments on your mortgage. The issue is that although she pays her share of rent and bills on time, stuff like milk, toothpaste, and kitchen and toilet roll are left to me – and it really adds up. When she first moved in, we discussed shared essentials and agreed that we'd each get what was needed as and when, then split the cost. Ever since though, I'm the only one who's actually replaced anything, and my texts asking her to transfer half the cash go ignored. I've tried to mention it in conversation too, but she brushes it off saying she'll sort then never does. While I know I could just stop buying things or get them for myself, I can't handle having to go without or spend my life hiding washing up liquid in my room. I also don't want to start a full-blown argument about it, as we have to live together for at least until her lease (12 months) ends. Is there any way I can bring this up without it ending badly? How. Annoying. I think your problem will resonate with most people who have lived with roommates at some point in their lives. There's always one who eats your bread and never buys milk. But I agree with you, life's too short to keep loo roll under your bed instead of in the bathroom where it belongs. So, how to fix this 'without it ending badly'. First question – what does ending badly look like to you? It sounds like you're uncomfortable with confrontation and the 'full blown argument' is what you're worried about. Second question – what would a good ending look like? Ideally, you want Becky to contribute 50/50 to the household essentials without having to nag her. The answer (and I think you know this) is to talk to her about it. Not in passing and not by text. You also need to be clear, up front, about what outcome you are seeking at the end of the conversation. Before you get to this stage, though, I'd arm yourself with some facts. Make a list of the household essentials you share. Be specific about exactly how much is used collectively each month and write it down – two rolls of kitchen paper, half a bottle of washing up liquid, two pints of milk a week. Whatever it is, if you're both using it, it goes onto the list. Go back through receipts or check a supermarket online and put a price on each of those items. Again, write it down so you've got your monthly total. Is it a reasonable number? What could come off that list? Next time you find yourself having a chat in the kitchen and neither of you is in a rush to go anywhere, ask her if she's got half an hour in the next couple of days to sit down and go through your household expenses. Suggest she make a list of what she's got for the house over the past six months (approximately) and cost it up. Book a time, make a cup of tea and sit down with your lists. Tot it up, agree what you're both using and are happy to split and put a number on it. You both need to agree that this is what needs to be kept aside at start of the month, every month. Be accountable – the best way to do this is to keep track of spending and make sure you're both aware of the running total at all times. When I was a student, we had a jar in the kitchen and stuck cash in it once a week. When it ran out we all stuck a bit more in, and if there was any left over we got a takeaway together. Things have moved on a bit since then. but there are some fantastic apps that make things really easy to track. Splitwise is great, particularly if you're the one who does most of the shopping. It will keep a running total of what you've spent and she'll be able to see exactly what she owes you. You can pay each other back through the app by connecting your bank account securely or using PayPal. App-only banks Monzo and Revolut have a similar function, though you'll both need to have your own accounts. And budgeting app Emma is also a good option, allowing you to pay someone using a QR code you generate on your phone. There are plenty of others too. One word of caution: be mindful of the fact she might be struggling with money and that's why she's relying on you. This isn't fair, but it is something you and she may have to manage. Perhaps it can help to suggest shopping somewhere cheaper or cutting back on certain things. More Trending Ultimately though, you need to come to an agreement that's realistic for you both and make it as easy as possible to stick to. Personally (as long as you can afford to) I'd swallow my frustration up to now, wipe the slate clean and start afresh. It'll clear the air and there's no way she can claim unfairness. Sarah Davidson is an award-winning financial editor and head of research at WPB . View More » Got a money worry or dilemma? Email Do you have a story to share? Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@ MORE: Sending one polite email can get a free hotel upgrade – trust me MORE: What I Own: At 22 and 23, we bought a run-down London four-bed for £910,000 MORE: I pay £480 for my rent and bills in London — I've saved £5,000 in less than a year Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.
The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
Business news live: FTSE 100 to open near record high and latest bitcoin price after fall
The FTSE 100 rose to new highs once again last week, tipping the scales well above 9,100 points after a particularly strong day on Thursday which saw the likes of BT Group rise ten per cent. The British companies index is up more than 11 per cent this year, outpacing the key US benchmarks. Meanwhile, key upcoming UK economy data this week includes mortgage approvals and the Nationwide House Price Index. Additionally, there is likely to be more news emerging on how the government may tackle pension reform, amid debate over what age the state pension should be and whether the tax relief rate on pension contributions may be altered. In other markets, bitcoin fell towards the end of last week, from the highs above $123,000 down to around $115,000, with gold also retreating as investors took a risk-on approach once more.
Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Could I give £250 gifts to 400 people who then pay them to my daughters to beat inheritance tax on £100,000?
I am one of the people that will be adversely affected by Rachel Reeves' unwarranted raid on unused pension pots. Currently, this change will mean an additional inheritance tax charge of about £270,000 for me, if I died. I have been looking at the gifting rules and the sums you can give away are measly, £3,000 each year, or unlimited £250 gifts but only one per person. However, if I can gift £250 free of IHT to as many people as I wish, could I do that and then those people all give the money to my two daughters? So, could I gift a total of £100,000 to 400 different people and they each in turn make £250 gifts to my daughters, giving them £50,000 each and thus avoiding inheritance tax? R.J, via email Harvey Dorset, of This is Money, replies: Recent changes mean that considerably more people are in line to incur inheritance tax bills on their estates in the years to come. Pensions are set to fall into the inheritance tax net from 2027, meaning that many will find their estate is worth well above the inheritance tax allowance. Inheritance tax receipts recently increased to £8.2billion from April 2024 to March 2025, more than £800million higher than the same period a year before. One of the main ways to go about reducing a potential IHT bill is to make the most of gifting allowances to lower the value of your estate. However, the current gifting allowances have been in place since the mid 1980s, with a maximum total annual inheritance tax-free gift limit of £3,000. This has made it all the harder to meaningfully reduce the size of an estate by using this allowance. On top of the £3,000 annual allowance, which can only be given to one recipient, the rules stipulate that you can give as many £250 gifts to whomever you like. This is where your novel solution comes in. If you can find 400 willing participants – something I dare say you might have trouble with – why can't you give them each £250 to then gift to your two daughters? Unfortunately, as David Denton, tax expert at Quilter Cheviot, discusses below, you might not have found the genius solution that you might think. Luckily though, there are other options that might be available to help you pass your wealth to your two daughters. David Denton, tax expert at Quilter Cheviot, replies: As the tax burden hits a recent high and rumours swirl of more tax rises to come, it is understandable that consumers may wish to find ways to reduce their tax bill. However, the tax authorities are rightly switched on to the potential for abuse of the system and people finding what they think to be new and novel ways to avoid tax. Some may be legitimate but for the vast majority they are likely to cause more problems than it is worth. The UK introduced the 'General Anti–Abuse Rule' (GAAR) in 2013 and this is designed to target those taxpayers who avoid paying tax in ways that are not in the spirit of the rules, despite some aspects being potentially legal. Abusive arrangements can include as a series of pre–ordained steps, where HMRC would look at the overall effect of the series or combination of transactions in order to identify the real purpose. The GAAR applies to a number of personal taxes, including inheritance tax, so if enough tax was at risk, it could come into effect here given there is a pre–planned element and involves a number of people. Instead you should be looking at how they can use the rules to still make substantial gifts. For example, should you expect to live for another seven years then it may be worth making a gift above the £3,000 limit as a potentially exempt transfer. After seven years of being gifted these assets will no longer be taken into account on death and be free from inheritance tax. There are other possibilities for exempt gifts, such as marriage gifts, which can be up to £5000, according to the relationship between the donor and recipient. Finally there is also the option of making gifts out of surplus income, where the gift is part of your normal expenditure and leaves you able to maintain your usual standard of living. These gifts can come from salary, dividends, pension income or rental income, so it does give you some options that are very much within the rules of the UK tax system.
