Algeria is expressing concern over the terrorism accusations directed at the Polisario Front
The opening session was attended by General Said Chengriha, Chief of Staff of the Army and Deputy Minister of Defense. In his speech, the general, dressed in military uniform, asserted that «Algeria does not tolerate any compromise in the fight it has led against terrorism, in accordance with the republic's laws».
«Thanks to its people, its army, and its institutions, Algeria has triumphed over terrorism and developed a unique experience in combating and preventing this scourge, both operationally and through the adoption of an inclusive and multidimensional approach», he emphasized.
Algeria is particularly concerned by calls, including from President Donald Trump, to designate the Polisario as a terrorist entity. The Algerian government has been hosting the Front's armed militias on its territory for 50 years. Morocco has consistently reaffirmed Algeria's responsibility for the actions carried out by the Polisario from Algerian soil. This claim is now being championed by American think tanks with ties to the Trump administration.
Three months prior to the forum on the «geopolitics of terrorism in the shadow of new global changes», presided over by General Said Chengriha, President Abdelmadjid Tebboune announced that his country had not supplied weapons to the Polisario. «The Sahrawis are requesting weapons that we are refraining from providing for the time being», he declared in an interview with a French media outlet. These remarks were made shortly after Donald Trump was inaugurated as President of the United States.
Since then, the situation has evolved. In addition to reports accusing the separatist movement of terrorism, a "minister" of the Polisario publicly called last week for the commission of terrorist acts against tourists and investors visiting Western Sahara.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Morocco World
an hour ago
- Morocco World
Trump Administration to Require ‘Good Moral Character' as New Criteria for Citizenship
Rabat – The US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has expanded its criteria for determining 'good moral character' in naturalization applications, deepening scrutiny on lawful behavior and positive societal contributions. Announced in a USCIS memo on Friday, the new policy requires officers to take what they call a 'holistic approach' in evaluating applicants' fitness for citizenship. This includes not only the absence of criminal conduct but also active indicators of community involvement, tax compliance, stable employment, and family ties in the US. The Trump administration's updated framework allows officers to consider 'any other acts' that deviate from what is expected of an average American citizen—even if those acts are technically legal. This marks a significant shift from previous guidelines that focused largely on criminal offenses and conditional legal disqualifiers such as multiple DUI convictions. Applicants must now show their character is 'commensurate with the standards of average citizens' in their local community. USCIS claims the goal is to reward applicants' 'positive attributes,' but immigration advocates warn it could be used to target dissent or discriminate against culturally specific behaviors. Critics argue the move opens the door to political subjectivity in naturalization decisions. Stanford University's student newspaper and the American Association of University Professors have filed lawsuits accusing the administration of targeting non-citizens who express pro-Palestinian views. 'This could increase denials by torturing the definition of good moral character to encompass extremely harmless behavior,' Doug Rand, a former USCIS official under the Biden administration, told the press . USCIS has also hinted that naturalized citizens, including high-profile figures like Elon Musk or NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, could face denaturalization proceedings under the expanded interpretation of eligibility violations. Naturalization applicants, primarily green card holders with at least 3 to 5 years of US residency, must pass English and civics exams alongside moral character evaluations. This is no simple task as naturalized citizens make up over half of America's foreign-born population, wit between 600,000 and 1 million immigrants become US citizens each year. The new policy could significantly alter the path to citizenship for thousands, particularly as stringent and often scrutinized immigration enforcement remains a central theme in Trump's campaign strategy.
Morocco World
4 hours ago
- Morocco World
European Leaders Alarmed as Trump Says ‘Ceasefire Not Needed' for Peace in Ukraine
Casablanca – Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky arrived in Washington on Monday for high-stakes talks with President Donald Trump, joined by a coalition of European leaders determined to preserve trans-Atlantic unity amid intensifying tensions over the war in Ukraine. On the eve of the meeting, Trump signaled that Ukraine must accept some of Russia's demands in order to end the conflict, including formally ceding Crimea to Moscow and ruling out NATO membership. The remarks added to the fueling the concerns in Europe that Washington could be aligning more closely with Russian President Vladimir Putin. However, during one of the meetings, Trump said the United States and its European allies were committed to providing Ukraine with robust protection against Russian aggression. 'When it comes to security, there's going to be a lot of help,' Trump told reporters. Zelensky welcomed the reassurances as 'a major step forward,' revealing that Kyiv has offered to purchase some $90 billion worth of American weapons. Yet, Trump's statements at the high-profile meeting were still full of mixed messages. When asked whether he would pressure Moscow into halting the fighting, Trump shockingly suggested that negotiations could continue even as battles rage. 'I don't think you need a ceasefire,' Trump boldly said. 'I know that it might be good to have, but I can also understand strategically why… one country or the other wouldn't want it,' the US president said in a vague diplomatic tone referring to Russia's demands. 'You have a ceasefire and they rebuild… and you know, maybe they don't want that.' The president added that he would have a phone call with Putin after the meetings in which they 'may or may not have a trilat (trilateral agreement). If we don't have a trilat, the fighting continues.' Growing sense of panic from European allies The presence of several European heads of state in Washington further demonstrated the unease across the Atlantic. European officials wanted to ensure that Zelensky would not be pressured into a deal that could permanently weaken Ukraine's sovereignty and undermine NATO's credibility. A senior European diplomat described a sense of panic among European allies after Trump abruptly shifted from demanding a ceasefire before negotiations to pushing for immediate territorial concessions. Following his bilateral with Zelensky, Trump convened European leaders, including EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who stressed the need for a 'just and lasting peace' and the return of Ukrainian children deported to Russia. Macron called for 'boots on the ground' to guarantee security, while Starmer framed the talks as vital to Europe's own safety. 'With Trump abandoning the ceasefire requirement, but offering no clear deterrents against Russia, we are at a dangerous moment for the alliance,' said retired US Admiral James Stavridis, former NATO supreme commander. European Council President Antonio Costa announced that EU leaders will hold a video call Tuesday afternoon to review the White House talks. The discussions are expected to shape Europe's strategy ahead of a possible Putin-Zelensky summit later this year. Read also: Next Time in Moscow?: What You Need to Know About Trump-Putin Alaska Summit Tags: Donald TrumpEurope and UkraineUkraine russia warVolodymyr Zelenskyy
Ya Biladi
4 hours ago
- Ya Biladi
SADC summit in Madagascar backs Polisario
DR During the Southern African Development Community (SADC) summit on August 17 in Madagascar, the organization reaffirmed its commitment to the memorandum of understanding signed on April 2 with the Polisario. «The Summit reiterated its solidarity with the people of Western Sahara in their quest for self-determination. In this regard, it welcomed the signing of the agreement between the SADC and Western Sahara/Democratic Sahrawi Arab Republic (RASD)», stated paragraph 15 of the joint communiqué. The summit also underscored «the complementarity of the United Nations-led process for the self-determination of Western Sahara» and stressed the importance of aligning the implementation of the SADC-RASD protocol with the efforts of both the United Nations and the African Union. This position echoes the communiqué from the SADC foreign ministers' meeting held on July 24 and 25 in Tanzania. On April 2, Elias M. Magosi, Secretary-General of the SADC, and Bah El Mad Abdellah, Polisario's representative in Botswana, signed a memorandum of understanding aimed at «realizing the decisions adopted by the SADC heads of state and government in August 2019, as well as the Declaration on the SADC Solidarity Conference with the RASD held in March 2019 in Pretoria, South Africa». However, this agreement faced immediate condemnation from Malawi, the Union of Comoros, Zambia, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Eswatini. These nations are seeking to distance themselves from South African influence, having recognized Moroccan sovereignty over the Sahara by establishing consulates in Laâyoune or Dakhla. This renewed support from the SADC comes just three weeks after a meeting on July 27 in South Africa, held on the sidelines of the «summit of liberation movements», between the Polisario representative and the presidents of South Africa, Namibia, Zimbabwe, and Mozambique.
