
Nicușor Dan wins Romanian presidential election in dramatic comeback
Pro-West independent candidate Nicusor Dan staged a dramatic comeback on Sunday to win the Romanian presidential elections with a firm 54% of the votes.
His contender, hard-right candidate George Simion, with 46% of votes, at first refused to concede in an unprecedented political thriller which transfixed and polarised the country on NATO's eastern flank, but then relented, congratulating Dan on his victory late on Sunday night.
'It's a bitter feeling, but this election is just the beginning," Simion said, congratulating his opponent.
Romanians have chosen to continue their current pro-Western course by turning out in record numbers to vote for the unassuming mayor of Bucharest and against the nationalist doctrines represented by Simion and his ally Calin Georgescu.
But the deep divisions in fractured Romanian society, represented by the small difference in the votes, mean that future president Dan faces a massive challenge to reunite the country and address the looming economic turmoil gripping Romania.
But Romania's choice brings a substantial sigh of relief for the EU, Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova, at a crucial time for all, also because president-elect Dan will work with the current pro-West majority in parliament.
Campaigning on an anti-corruption and reformist platform, pledging honesty and decency, Dan has not only beaten the hard-right Simion but also the entire Romanian political establishment in the two rounds of the presidential re-run after the Constitutional Court annulled the previous presidential vote held in November and December 2024, setting off an unprecedented, destabilising political crisis.
Dan's campaign also received a boost in the only national presidential debate hosted by Euronews Romania, which was seen as the turning point of the political battle for the presidency.
Addressing the jubilant crowds waving Romanian and EU flags in central Bucharest, Dan proclaimed that 'from tomorrow, Romania begins a new stage.'
His message was clear and not addressed to the political parties but to the civil society of Romania, while calling for national reconciliation.
'We need specialists for public policies, the civil society and new people in politics,' Dan announced.
'My message to those who lost today, our full respect to those who had another option. We have to build Romania together, regardless of political options, with the Romanians in Romania, diaspora, (Republic of) Moldova and the Romanians in the neighbouring countries,' Dan said. At the same time, his supporters chanted 'unity'.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy congratulated Dan and said Ukraine is "looking forward to further developing the strategic partnership between our friendly nations for the sake of their stability, security and prosperity."
French President Emmanuel Macron, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, European Council President Antonio Costa, European Parliament President Roberta Metsola, and other leaders also congratulated Dan.
A record turnout of 11 million Romanians, or 64%, in Romania and the diaspora, marked by fear and resentment, has turned the page on a six-month-long political turmoil sparked by the annulled presidential elections.
Earlier on Sunday, Simion declared himself "Romania's new president" at his party's gathering in the Romanian parliament in Bucharest before the official count began.
"A new era is born tonight. It is time for an epoch in which Romania be democratic, Christian and rich. So help us God," Simion announced.
"We are the clear winners of these elections. We claim the victory in the name of the Romanian people. It is the victory of the humiliated Romanian people," he said.
"It does not matter which side each of us has been in these elections, this is democracy, we now need to shake hands.'
Simion also thanked the Romanian diaspora, whom he visited extensively over the last days of the presidential campaign earlier this week.
"I owe today's victory to the Romanian diaspora. You Romanian who left abroad, you must know that only with you we can make Romania great among the states of the free world."
"I don't promise miracles, but I promise to be among you," he concluded.
Simion then left the stage to the sound of Village People's "YMCA," one of US President Donald Trump's favourite tracks on his 2024 campaign trail.
In the last hours of the voting, Romania's foreign, interior and defence ministries denounced what they called 'Russian interference,' warning voters about a fake news campaign rolled out on Telegram, TikTok and other social media platforms.
The Romanian foreign ministry spokesperson Andrei Tarnea said on X Sunday that 'once again we see the distinctive signs of Russian interference (…) to influence the electoral process.
"This was expected," he added.
In a coordinated move, the three ministries revealed that a fake video published on Sunday 'falsely claims that French troops in Romania secretly wear Romanian gendarmerie uniforms to intervene internally,' has been linked directly to Russia.
Telegram founder Pavel Durov revealed that he refused a request from 'a Western country', which he didn't name, to 'silence' the conservative voices in Romania.
'Telegram will not restrict the liberties of Romanian users, nor will it block their political channels', Durov said.
Learn more from Euronews Romania's live coverage of the presidential election repeat's runoff here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
23 minutes ago
- Euronews
EU targets US 'Big Beautiful Bill' over tax provision in tariff talks
The EU is wrangling over a provision of Donald Trump's so-called "Big Beautiful Bill" for the US budget that could see European companies taxed higher than others in retaliation for certain taxes imposed on US enterprises overseas, the vice-chair of the European Parliament's tax subcommittee has told Euronews. The German European People's Party MEP Markus Ferber said the European Commission has raised the proposed legislation—already approved by the House of Representatives—in ongoing tariff negotiations with the Trump administration. 'We are concerned because within this 'One Big Beautiful Bill' there are special taxes aimed at jurisdictions that impose taxes on the US,' Ferber told Euronews. He added that jurisdictions like the EU, which have already implemented the OECD agreement establishing a global minimum tax of 15% on multinationals, are directly targeted. 'It could also affect member states that have introduced a digital services tax,' he noted. The OECD agreement, approved by 140 countries - though as yet unratified by the US - introduced a global minimum tax of 15% on the profits of multinational companies, regardless of where those profits are declared, with effect from 1 January 2024. The EU has transposed the agreement into law and applies it to multinationals operating within the Union, to the ire of the Trump administration. Meanwhile countries such as Denmark, Portugal and Poland have implemented digital services taxes targeting US tech giants, while others are in the process of creating one. The US is now looking to retaliate against taxes it deems unfair through a provision of the "Big Beautiful Bill' which would hit foreign investors with a bump in US income tax by five percent points each year, potentially taking the rate up to 20%, in addition to existing taxes. The Commission is concerned, officials said. According to Ferber, the EU executive has put this provision of the US budget bill on the negotiating table. 'But we are not sure yet that the US agreed to put it in the basket,' the MEP said. For several weeks, the EU and the US have been discussing a resolution to the trade dispute that has been ongoing since mid-March. The US impose 50% tariffs on EU steel and aluminium, 25% on cars and 10% on all EU imports. For its part, the EU has prepared countermeasures targeting around €115 billion worth of US products. These measures are either suspended until July or still awaiting approval by EU member states.


Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Top defence CEO touts need for €100 billion euro EU defence fund
EU countries pooling tens of billions of their defence spending into a joint EU fund could help finance necessary flagship projects and close capability gaps faster, the incoming head of Europe's largest defence industry association told Euronews, recognising it would however require political leadership. Micael Johansson, the CEO of Swedish defence and security company Saab, said on Wednesday that steps taken by the European Commission to turbocharge defence spending in the EU go in the right direction but that more needs to be done to facilitate countries and companies developing and acquiring new systems together. The EU executive's 'Readiness 2030' plan for defence, unveiled in March, relies on two main financial pillars: the relaxation of fiscal rules for defence spending which the Commission estimated could see €650 billion poured into the sector over the coming four years; and a €150 billion loan instrument called SAFE. Johansson, who will from 15 June take the helm of the Aerospace, Security and Defence Industries Association of Europe (ASD) which represents some 4,000 companies, said that these financing options remain primarily in the hands of each government and based on their own immediate needs. "Maybe it's wishful thinking, but if countries actually would be prepared to spend portions of their defence budget into a fund (...) that would create a common fund which could be worked upon in terms of launching flagship projects," he told Euronews on the sidelines of a European Defence and Security Summit in Brussels. He suggested that the European Defence Industrial Programme (EDIP), a regulation first tabled in early 2024 that is still making its way through the EU lawmaking process, could be the right place for this fund. The regulation currently plans for €1.5 billion from the EU budget to be spent on strengthening the European defence industrial base over the 2025-2027 period, but Johansson said that in order to finance big projects, "a hundred billion euros" might be more appropriate. He acknowledged however that this "is a big step". "I don't really know how to accomplish that. It's political decisions, of course". Defence is a hugely sensitive topic that falls under national competencies in the EU, with member states fiercely protective of their homegrown champions in the sector. But this has led to a deeply fragmented market, suboptimal interoperability between the different systems and an industry less agile to respond to crises. The EU and its member states, 23 of which are also NATO allies, are currently scrambling to plug holes in the bloc's defences and have identified seven priority capability areas including ammunition, drone and anti-drone systems, air defence, military mobility, and electronic warfare among others. European companies will be able to meet most of the continents' needs, Johansson said, but lag behind their US counterparts in some key areas such as integrated air missile systems, long-range strike capabilities, and autonomous systems like sophisticated, high-end drones. With Washington increasingly sending mixed messages over its long-term commitment to Europe's defence as it seeks to pivot some of its resources in the Indo-Pacific region, these "flagship" projects could benefit from a more European approach and joint financing, Johnasson said. This could be through member states or companies creating so-called coalitions of the willing to develop common systems. "But this is not easy because there is a trade-off between national sovereignty and creating interdependencies," he told Euronews. The Commission's defence proposal plans for more collaboration between member states with several of them required to pool their orders together in order to access financing through the SAFE instrument. The EU executive is meanwhile set to unveil a new proposal next week for the defence sector aimed at slashing red tape.

LeMonde
3 hours ago
- LeMonde
'A Palestinian state, or what else? Israeli opposition cannot remove the question from the table'
For more than a decade, after the collapse of the peace process launched by the Oslo Accords in 1993, politics faded from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Negotiation gave way, at regular intervals, to the clash of arms, culminating in the explosion of violence on October 7, 2023, and the events that followed in Gaza, which had already been under a harsh Israeli blockade since 2007. The cost of international inaction – waiting for a renewed Palestinian leadership and an Israeli government willing to consider a potential diplomatic initiative to emerge out of nowhere – is now clear. It is counted in hundreds of Israeli deaths, tens of thousands of Palestinian deaths and tens of billions of dollars: the estimated sum needed to make Gaza viable and livable again, if the war ever stops ravaging the narrow strip. This inaction has also led to a deterioration of how Israel's Western allies are perceived, as they are unable to defend the same principles when it comes to the war in Ukraine as they are in the conflict unfolding in the Palestinian territories. Such a horrific toll should have brought diplomacy back to the forefront, yet the conference jointly organized by France and Saudi Arabia, from June 17 to 20 at the United Nations, to revive the two-state solution – that is, the creation of a Palestinian state alongside Israel – has mainly fueled doubts. At this stage, it is unclear how the United States, without whom nothing has ever been possible regarding Israel, views the initiative, or whether the conference is aiming for any tangible result without which it would amount to failure.