Researchers Pit Stone Age Seafaring Skills Against One of Earth's Fiercest Currents
Using replicas of tools that existed in the Japanese Archipelago during the Upper Paleolithic (around 50,000 to 10,000 years ago), researchers in Japan built a dugout canoe and used it to traverse the 68.4-mile-wide (110-kilometer) strait between Taiwan and Yonaguni Island, including the powerful Kuroshio current, in around 45 hours. The successful voyage represents a possible way people in present-day Taiwan may have traveled to the islands tens of thousands of years ago.
'Our 7.5-meter-long dugout, manufactured with edge-ground stone axes, was speedy and durable enough to cross this strait,' the researchers wrote in the study, published today in Science Advances. 'This supports the early development of functional boats, such as dugouts, while our experiment also highlighted that this type of sea travel was possible only for experienced paddlers with advanced navigational skills.'
One of the greatest challenges to studying prehistoric seafaring is the fact that such ancient water vessels made of organic material, such as wood, have long since disintegrated. Without direct archaeological evidence, the next best way to shed light on how ancient people did things is through experimental archaeology—identifying possible approaches to bygone endeavors by physically replicating them in a simulated historical context.
University of Tokyo anthropologist Yousuke Kaifu and his co-authors have been attempting to reach the Ryukyu Islands à-la Paleolithic—without modern navigation technologies like GPS or compasses—since 2013. Before their successful voyage in 2019, they had experimented with reed-bundle rafts and bamboo rafts, neither of which were successful in crossing the Kuroshio Current. The winning design was a canoe made from a hollowed-out and polished Japanese cedar tree with a fire-charred interior, which carried five crew members.
'Given the absence of archaeological remains of Pleistocene watercraft, we narrowed down the possible Paleolithic seagoing craft by referencing the Holocene archeological and ethnographic records and considering the material availability, technological limitations of the time, and the voyaging capabilities of each craft,' the researchers explained. The Holocene, which began some 11,700 years ago, is the current time period. 'We also aimed to investigate travel time, amount of efforts required, and other realities of Paleolithic ocean crossing for the first South Ryukyu islanders.'
In this spirit, the team developed computer models to simulate what such a crossing may have been like with Late Pleistocene oceanic conditions. According to the simulations—which also integrated data collected during the experimental voyage—the prehistoric journey's success would have been determined by the starting point (ideally, calm bays), directional strategy (first paddle east-southeast, then northeast), and navigational skills (using the stars and Sun).
Furthermore, 'our separate numerical simulation study suggests that this type of boat could also travel to Yonaguni Island from a different northern departure point in Taiwan (Taroko) across both the modern and Late Pleistocene oceans,' they added. 'Paleolithic people are often regarded as 'inferior' among the general public, primarily due to their 'primitive' culture and technology. In sharp contrast, our [work] highlighted that they accomplished something extraordinary with the rudimentary technology available to them at the time.'
While such experimental projects can't replace direct archaeological evidence, the study joins a host of recent hands-on approaches offering creative theories in the absence of direct material evidence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
2 days ago
- Tom's Guide
You'll live, die and repeat watching this Tom Cruise sci-fi action movie on Peacock this weekend
When looking for a movie to watch this weekend, look no further than "Edge of Tomorrow," which was just added to Peacock at the beginning of the month. Some movies, you have to be in the right mood to watch. Others, you need to have just the right home theater setup to enjoy. But this sci-fi action movie can be enjoyed anywhere, and it might just be Tom Cruise's last great performance in a movie that wasn't a sequel to one of his many other roles. I'm not being hyperbolic either when I say that this movie can be watched anywhere. The first time I watched it was on a plane, and I had a blast. To be fair, action movies are the perfect plane movies, but this movie is just as enjoyable in the comfort of your own home, too. I'm not the only one who loves "Edge of Tomorrow" either. While the movie arguably underwhelmed at the box office, bringing in just enough money for Hollywood accounting to still declare it a bust, thanks to a massive $178 million budget. But that spending paid off with critics and audiences alike — it scored a 91% fresh rating from critics on Rotten Tomatoes and a nearly identical 90% from audiences. So if you're subscribed to Peacock, this is the movie to watch this weekend across all the best streaming services. It's one of the best action movies of the 2010s, and more importantly, it's just fun to watch. "Edge of Tomorrow" is based on the Japanese light novel "All You Need Is Kill." It's set in a near-future version of Earth, where an alien race known as "Mimics" has conquered most of continental Europe, forcing humanity to unite into a global military force, known as the United Defense Force (UDF). The UDF still struggles against the mimics, though, until Sergeant Rita Vrataski (Emily Blunt) leads the UDF to victory at the Battle of Verdun. This sparks confidence in the UDF, which, led by General Brigham (Brendan Gleeson), decides to invade France to reclaim the country. But when Brigham orders Major William Cage (Cruise), a public relations officer with no combat experience, to cover the invasion, the cowardly major tries to blackmail the general to avoid the dangerous assignment. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Peacock Premium offers hit original shows, NBCUniversal movies and live sports, all starting at $10.99 a month. That backfires spectacularly, with Cage now demoted to Private and forced to serve with the infantry in the invasion. The move is intended to get Cage killed, which it does, but not before he's bathed in the blood of an "Alpha" Mimic — causing him to awake back in England just before the invasion. At this point, the movie really begins, with Cruise stuck in an endless cycle of waking up, getting thrown into battle and getting killed. But he starts to improve with each death, as he retains the memories from his past lives even after his deaths. This is one of two things that make "Edge of Tomorrow" work. First, there is the action, which is well executed and well paced. The movie is just 113 minutes long, giving it little time to linger in one place too long, and despite being very heavy on the CGI, it looks good, including the combat between the CGI Mimics against humans in CGI battle suits. In another movie, this would have looked cheap at the time and aged terribly, but the time and money invested in this movie's visual effects still pays off to this day. But the other thing that makes this sci-fi movie work is that the time travel element is fun, a welcome plot device rather than a paradox-laden rabbit hole to dive into. I won't spoil exactly how the time loop functions, which is revealed later in the movie, but when you realize what's happening, you don't question whether or not it works or not you just strap yourself in for the rest of the ride. So go stream "Edge of Tomorrow" on Peacock now, and enjoy. Malcolm has been with Tom's Guide since 2022 and has been covering the latest in streaming shows and movies since 2023. He's not one to shy away from a hot take, including that "John Wick" is one of the four greatest films ever made. Here's what he's been watching lately:
Los Angeles Times
4 days ago
- Los Angeles Times
The start of California's fire season has moved up 6 weeks since 1990 thanks to climate change
You are not imagining it. Fire season in California is indeed starting earlier and lasting longer in virtually every region of California than it did two decades ago, researchers have found, thanks largely to human-caused climate change. In the Sierra Nevada, fire season starts about 24 days earlier than it did in the early 1990s. In the Northern Basin and Range region, which runs along the northernmost border with Nevada, it's 31 days earlier. And in the Cascade Range, which runs into Oregon, fire season now begins 46 days earlier than it once did, according to a study published this week in the journal Science Advances. 'Anecdotally, those of us living here have this sense that it's been happening sooner,' said Amanda Fencl, a Berkeley-based water specialist who directs climate science for the climate and energy program at the Union of Concerned Scientists and was not directly involved with the research. 'This is really an important study to quantify just how soon and where it is shifting, and to what extent.' Although the number of people living in California has grown by roughly 27% since the early 1990s, human-ignited fires have dropped significantly during that time, enabling the researchers to rule out human-caused blazes as the source of the additional burn days. Rather, the most significant factors shoving fire season forward are climate-related, they found: an earlier snowmelt and increased drying of soils and flammable vegetation as average temperatures rise. 'The main driver is the climate and meteorological conditions,' said Gavin D. Madakumbura, a UCLA postdoctoral researcher and the study's lead author. The effect is particularly pronounced in Northern California, where, in some regions, fire has become a near-constant threat. 'It's often said we no longer [have] a wildfire season, but that wildfire season is all year, and that's tied to warming temperatures,' said James Thorne, a UC Davis landscape ecologist who was not involved with the research. Definitively linking longer fire seasons to anthropogenic climate change, as this paper does, is 'a study I've been hoping someone would do for a long time,' he said. California is already on pace to see more fires and significantly more burned acreage than it did last year. More than 220,000 acres have burned in the state as of mid-July, almost 100,000 acres more than California has seen on average at this point in the year over the last five years, according to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. That total does not include the 96,000 acres burned in the Gifford fire, which was 15% contained as of Thursday, nor three different fires that started Monday in Southern California that together have burned more than 2,800 acres and are not yet contained. It's also the worst year on record for fire-related economic damages. In 2018, the year the Camp fire destroyed the town of Paradise and killed more people than any wildfire in California history, wildfire damages statewide were an estimated $148.5 billion. The Palisades and Eaton fires in January may have caused up to $164 billion in damages, a UCLA study found. Times staff writer Grace Toohey contributed to this report.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Earth's 'oldest' impact crater is much younger than previously thought, new study finds
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. This article was originally published at The Conversation. The publication contributed the article to Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights. Ever been late because you misread a clock? Sometimes, the "clocks" geologists use to date events can also be misread. Unravelling Earth's 4.5-billion-year history with rocks is tricky business. Case in point: the discovery of an ancient meteorite impact crater was recently reported in the remote Pilbara region of Western Australia. The original study, by a different group, made headlines with the claim the crater formed 3.5 billion years ago. If true, it would be Earth's oldest by far. As it turns out, we'd also been investigating the same site. Our results are published in Science Advances today. While we agree that this is the site of an ancient meteorite impact, we have reached different conclusions about its age, size and significance. Let's consider the claims made about this fascinating crater. One impact crater, two versions of events Planetary scientists search for ancient impacts to learn about Earth's early formation. So far, nobody has found an impact crater older than the 2.23-billion-year-old Yarrabubba structure, also in Australia. (Some of the authors from both 2025 Pilbara studies were coauthors on the 2020 Yarrabubba study.) The new contender is located in an area called North Pole Dome. Despite the name, this isn't where Santa lives. It's an arid, hot, ochre-stained landscape. The first report on the new crater claimed it formed 3.5 billion years ago, and was more than 100 kilometers in diameter. It was proposed that such a large impact might have played a role in forming continental crust in the Pilbara. More speculatively, the researchers also suggested it may have influenced early life. Our study concludes the impact actually happened much later, sometime after 2.7 billion years ago. This is at least 800 million years younger than the earlier estimate (and we think it's probably even younger; more on that in a moment). We also determined the crater was much smaller – about 16km in diameter. In our view, this impact was too young and too small to have influenced continent formation or early life. So how could two studies arrive at such different findings? Subtle clues of an impact The originally circular crater is deeply eroded, leaving only subtle clues on the landscape. However, among the rust-colored basalts are unique telltale signs of meteorite impact: shatter cones. Shatter cones are distinctive fossilized imprints of shock waves that have passed through rocks. Their unique conical shapes form under brief but immense pressure where a meteorite strikes Earth. Both studies found shatter cones, and agree the site is an ancient impact. This new crater also needed a name. We consulted the local Aboriginal people, the Nyamal, who shared the traditional name for this place and its people: Miralga. The "Miralga impact structure" name recognizes this heritage. Determining the timing of the impact The impact age was estimated by field observations, as neither study found material likely to yield an impact age by radiometric dating – a method that uses measurements of radioactive isotopes. Both studies applied a geological principle called the law of superposition. This states that rock layers get deposited one on top of another over time, so rocks on top are younger than those below. The first group found shatter cones within and below a sedimentary layer known to have been deposited 3.47 billion years ago, but no shatter cones in younger rocks above this layer. This meant the impact occurred during deposition of the sedimentary layer. Their observation seemed to be a "smoking gun" for an impact 3.47 billion years ago. As it turns out, there was more to the story. Our investigation found shatter cones in the same 3.47 billion-year-old rocks, but also in younger overlying rocks, including lavas known to have erupted 2.77 billion years ago. The impact had to occur after the formation of the youngest rocks that contained shatter cones, meaning sometime after the 2.77-billion-year-old lavas. At the moment, we don't know precisely how young the crater is. We can only constrain the impact to have occurred between 2.7 billion and 400 million years ago. We're working on dating the impact by isotopic methods, but these results aren't yet in. Smaller than originally thought We made the first map showing where shatter cones are found. There are many hundreds over an area 6km across. From this map and their orientations, we calculate the original crater was about 16km in diameter. A 16km crater is a far cry from the original estimate of more than 100km. It's too small to have influenced the formation of continents or life. By the time of the impact, the Pilbara was already quite old. A new connection to Mars Science is a self-policing sport. Claims of discovery are based on data available at the time, but they often require modification based on new data or observations. While it's not the world's oldest, the Miralga impact is scientifically unique, as craters formed in basalt are rare. Most basalts there formed 3.47 billion years ago, making them the oldest shocked target rocks known. Prior to impact, these ancient basalts had been chemically altered by seawater. Sedimentary rocks nearby also contain the earliest well-established fossils on Earth. Such rocks likely covered much of early Earth and Mars. This makes the Miralga impact structure a playground for planetary scientists studying the cratered surface (and maybe early life) of Mars. It's an easily accessible proving ground for Mars exploration instruments and imagery, right here on Earth. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. Solve the daily Crossword
