Portobello residents threaten to sue Edinburgh Council over parking plan
However, campaigners are threatening legal action if the scheme moves forward in its current form at the Traffic Regulation Order Sub-Committee's meeting this autumn.
In a letter to councillors, the group has accused the local authority of advancing a 'procedurally flawed, substantively unsound, and potentially unlawful' plan.
READ MORE: Heritage groups join forces to save rundown studio owned by former renowned designer
Residents and traders argue that the proposal lacks public support, is built on unreliable data, and would inflict lasting damage on the local economy.
They added that in the council's 2021 informal consultation on the plans, a 'clear majority' expressed opposition to CPZ and have accused the council of disregarding public opinion.
One of the campaign's organisers, Nikki Middleton, has accused Edinburgh council of not consulting residents in Joppa over the proposed CPZ plans.
She said: 'Not only did the vast majority of people consulted reject the proposals, but the Council ran the consultation during the chaos of the Covid-19 pandemic, when travel and parking patterns were completely unrepresentative. How is that a fair reflection of public opinion?
'The council also failed to consult Joppa residents at all, despite extending the CPZ boundary to include this area.
'Drawing lines on a map without considering those communities undermines people's voices and is not a fair representation. These are not just technical errors – they represent a fundamental disregard for transparency and democracy.'
(Image: Supplied)
The group have also raised concerns regarding the lack of documentation of a public meeting held in May this year at Portobello Town Hall.
Campaigners said the meeting was attended by more than 500 residents and business owners, many of whom voiced strong opposition to the plan directly to the council's transport convener, councillor Stephen Jenkinson.
However, they claim that no formal minutes were taken and say the decision further 'undermines transparency and public confidence' in the council's democratic engagement with the community.
Local resident Jane Grant, who is owner of the Velvet Easel Gallery and chair of the Portobello Traders Association, said: 'The surveys were conducted during major roadworks and the height of the tourist season, when Portobello's popularity as a seaside destination creates unusual, short-term parking pressure.
'Basing permanent changes on data gathered in such distorted conditions is not only methodologically flawed, it's legally questionable.'
The community group has also criticised the council for ignoring existing alternatives already in place.
Since January 2024, citywide enforcement of pavement parking, double parking, and obstruction at dropped kerbs has been in effect.
(Image: Supplied)
Double-yellow lines have also been introduced at known pinch points such as Marlborough Street and Regent Street.
Campaigners argue these measures already directly address any concerns raised during consultation without resorting to the sweeping restrictions of a CPZ.
Local businesses have voiced particularly strong opposition. Karen Mackay, the owner of Cahoots, an independent store supporting local designers and artisan makers, said: 'This scheme is a direct threat to local businesses, it will kill footfall, disrupt deliveries, and drive our customers elsewhere.'
'We've worked hard to bring life back to the High Street with independent shops, cafés, and services, and now the council wants to sabotage that progress. If these businesses start closing down, it's not just livelihoods that are at stake – it's access to essential amenities for local people.
'We've seen the damage these schemes have done in places like Leith. Why is the council determined to repeat the same mistakes here?'
The letter concludes with a list of demands, including an immediate halt to the CPZ proposal, a rejection of the consultation and survey data, and a fresh consultation process that includes all affected areas.
The group has also called for full disclosure of the financial, legal, and traffic modelling used to justify the plan.
A petition opposing the CPZ has already attracted more than 1300 signatures.
Traffic regulation order (TRO) sub-committee convener councillor Margaret Graham said: 'We've received a letter from this group and will now take the time to consider its contents.
'The proposed Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ) for Portobello is intended to ease parking pressures in the area. The traffic regulation order advertising period ended in late May 2025 and all objections to the proposals will be presented to a future TRO sub-committee. Members will consider all the available evidence before coming to a decision on the scheme.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Councils warn new funding formula will ‘devastate' children's services
Planned changes to the way funding allocations for children's services are calculated would have a 'devastating impact' on key services in London and beyond, councils have warned. They say the new approach, which is part of adjustments to the process of setting authorities' overall annual core funding, risks 'dramatically underestimating levels of need' across the country. The Government is consulting on plans to alter the way the distribution of core council funding is set from 2026/27. A key element of this is the use of a new formula which determines funding levels for individual councils' children's services using various measures, with the aim of distributing funding based on relative needs. The children's services formula alone would cover about a quarter of the overall £30 billion that would be distributed using the new overall approach. Modelling of the impact of the changes by London Councils, which represents 32 boroughs and the City of London, found £1.5 billion would be redistributed away from the capital's boroughs over three years if the children's services formula was the only change. The analysis showed that if all planned financial protections and overall changes to formulae, some of which benefit London authorities, come into effect, councils in the capital would lose £700 million over the period. Research by the National Children's Bureau found the new 'unique' formula for children's services 'has questionable overall robustness and accuracy' because of a lack of testing and metrics that 'are not correlated with need'. The study concluded that the proposed data sources to be used do not include housing costs, which are particularly high in London, resulting in funding allocations being skewed. It also said that the proposed measure of child health is 'subjective' and a more 'objective' measure, such as figures on special educational needs and disability, would capture a broader range of need. The proposed metrics relating to housing occupation and parents' level of education were also identified as problematic measures. The new formula is also said to assume London's demand for children's services has decreased by nearly 40%, despite a collective overspend of budgets by more than £150 million in each of the previous two years. London boroughs claimed the children's formula has been developed 'behind closed doors' with insufficient scrutiny or testing. Claire Holland, the newly elected chairwoman of London Councils and Labour leader of Lambeth Council, said: 'We welcome the Government's intention to reform council funding since this is long overdue, and it is critical that funding is distributed fairly and efficiently on the basis of need. 'However, it's clear there are serious issues with the proposed children's services formula, which risks dramatically underestimating levels of need in London and other parts of the country. This would have a devastating impact on our ability to deliver vital local services, particularly for our most vulnerable children and young people. 'A more accurate approach to assessing local levels of need is in everyone's interests. It will help create a funding system that is robust, provides councils with the resources they need and, following 14 years of structural underfunding, restores long-term financial stability to boroughs and the wider local government sector. 'The consultation is an essential opportunity to re-examine the formula, and we are keen to work with the Government to develop a model that is accurate and robust.' James Shutkever, social care programme lead at the National Children's Bureau, added: 'At a time of increased pressure on children's services departments across the country the relative needs formula is a crucial tool for fair distribution of funding to ensure that children, young people and their families get the support that they need and deserve. 'However, our research raises significant concerns about the robustness of the Government's proposed methodology for the funding formula. 'We urge the Government to consider the recommendations set out in the report and refine its proposals. This will help to ensure that the formula lives up to its name and is based on need.'
Daily Record
5 hours ago
- Daily Record
Kate Garraway 'sells second home for £1.5 million' after care debt struggle
Kate Garraway has reportedly sold a property in London for £1.5 million. Broadcaster Kate Garraway has reportedly sold her second home after being burdened with "excessive unpayable debt" due to caring for her late husband Derek Draper. It's understood she recently offloaded a London property for £1.5 million. At 58, Kate has openly discussed the financial strain caused by looking after Derek, who passed away at the age of 56 last year. She is believed to have been grappling with debts as high as £800,000 for his care and has also been settling debts linked to his business Astra Aspera, which ceased operations in 2022, reports the Mirror. Reports now indicate that Kate has parted with her second home, located in North London. This development follows rumours about her continuing role on Good Morning Britain amidst forthcoming changes at ITV. The Sun claims that Kate owned a flat in North London, which fetched £1.5 million on the market, although it was "heavily mortgaged". A source mentioned that she had held onto the property as a "financial safety net". The source conveyed to the publication: "Kate takes paying off the debts very seriously and she's always said she'd go to any lengths to achieve that. This is just part of that commitment, even if it does mean she's had to lose the flat which she actually purchased years ago before meeting Derek and before they bought a family home together. Like many people, she was keeping it as a financial safety net which she thought she wouldn't have to use so soon." The Daily Mail has reported that the property, which is reportedly in the midst of being sold, was a three-bedroom townhouse located in North London. The publication claims it was previously available for rent at £6,750 per month before being put on the market. The Mirror has gathered that the residence in question was indeed a house and not a flat, and it's understood that the property has already found a buyer. Last year, there were worries that Kate might be forced to sell the home where she resides with her two children. However, The Mail indicates that this situation may have been circumvented by the sale of her second property. Derek passed away in January of the previous year after battling health issues for some time, including an extended hospital stay during the Covid pandemic. Kate has openly discussed the financial burden of Derek's care following his hospitalisation. For instance, in a documentary aired last year, she mentioned that the costs were "more than" her ITV salary. She pointed out: "Unlike the NHS, state-funded social care is only available to people with the highest needs and the lowest means." Earlier this year, while reflecting on the hurdles she faced, she shared on Good Morning Britain: "One of the overriding ones until he went back into intensive care before he passed away, was dealing with the funding of care. At the time of his death, there were two appeals that hadn't been heard for funding. "It kept on getting pushed back and pushed back. In the meantime, and I'm lucky I've got an incredible job which is well paid, I was having to fund the situation. Now I've got excessive unpayable debt because of it, and if I'm in that position, what else are people going to be?".
Daily Mirror
6 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Kate Garraway sells home 'for over £1 million' after revealing care debt struggle
Good Morning Britain host Kate Garraway, who has spoken previously about the cost of having cared for her late husband Derek Draper, is said to have sold a property Broadcaster Kate Garraway is said to sold her second home after being left with "excessive unpayable debt" through caring for her late husband Derek Draper. She's reportedly sold a property in London for £1.5 million recently. Kate, 58, has previously spoken about the financial impact of having looked after Derek, who died, aged 56, last year. She's said to have been facing a debt of up to £800,000 for his care and has reportedly been paying off debts related to his company Astra Aspera, which shut down in 2022. It's now been reported that Kate has sold her second home, which is said to be in North London. The news comes following speculation over her future on Good Morning Britain amid upcoming changes at ITV. According to the Sun, Kate had a property, which it described as a flat, in North London that recently sold for £1.5 million, but it's said to have been "heavily mortgaged". A source added that she had been keeping the property as a "financial safety net". The source told the outlet: "Kate takes paying off the debts very seriously and she's always said she'd go to any lengths to achieve that. This is just part of that commitment, even if it does mean she's had to lose the flat which she actually purchased years ago before meeting Derek and before they bought a family home together. Like many people, she was keeping it as a financial safety net which she thought she wouldn't have to use so soon." The Daily Mail instead reports that the property, which it claims is in the process of being sold, was a three-bed townhouse in North London. It states that it had been up for rent for £6,750-a-month prior to going up for sale. The Mirror understands that it was a house, rather than a flat, that has been on the market. We also understand that the property has already been sold. There were concerns last year that Kate would have to sell the home she's lived in with her two children. The Mail however suggests that this appears to have been avoided though by the apparent selling of her second home. Derek died in January last year following health issues in recent years, including having been hospitalised for over a year during the Covid pandemic. Kate's spoken about the cost of his care in the years since he was hospitalised. In a documentary last year, for example, she said that it was "more than" her salary from ITV. She added: "Unlike the NHS, state-funded social care is only available to people with the highest needs and the lowest means." Earlier this year, whilst discussing the challenges she had faced, she said on Good Morning Britain: "One of the overriding ones until he went back into intensive care before he passed away, was dealing with the funding of care. At the time of his death, there were two appeals that hadn't been heard for funding. "It kept on getting pushed back and pushed back. In the meantime, and I'm lucky I've got an incredible job which is well paid, I was having to fund the situation. Now I've got excessive unpayable debt because of it, and if I'm in that position, what else are people going to be?"
