Tariffs drive some health plans to hike premiums
Health insurers are starting to notify states that tariffs will drive up the premiums they plan to charge individual and small group market enrollees next year.
Why it matters: The Trump administration's trade policy is adding another layer of uncertainty for health costs as Congress considers Medicaid cuts and is expected to sunset enhanced subsidies for Affordable Care Act coverage.
"There are sort of a perfect storm of factors that are driving prices up," said Sabrina Corlette, research professor at Georgetown's Center on Health Insurance Reforms.
The big picture: Health insurers calculate monthly premiums in advance of each year based on the expected price of goods and services and projected demand for them.
Tariffs announced by President Trump are expected to drive up the cost of prescription drugs, medical devices and other medical products and services. Some of that difference ultimately would be passed down to enrollees.
Where it stands: A handful of health insurers administering individual and small group plans have already explicitly told state regulators that tariffs are forcing plans to raise enrollee premiums more than they otherwise would next year, KFF policy analyst Matt McGough wrote in an analysis published Monday.
Independent Health Benefits Corporation told New York regulators in a filing last month that it plans to raise premiums for its individual market enrollees 38.4% next year.
About 3% of that is directly due to tariffs, based on projections of how much they'll increase drug prices and the use of imported drugs, Frank Sava, a spokesperson for Independent Health, told Axios.
Similarly, UnitedHealthcare of Oregon said in a filing that nearly 3% of its planned 19.8% premium increase for small group enrollees next year is due to uncertainty around tariffs, particularly on how they'll affect pharmaceutical prices.
Insurers "don't have any historical precedent or data to project what this is going to mean for their business and health costs," McGough said to Axios. "I think it really makes sense that they're trying to hedge their bets."
Trump hasn't implemented sector-specific tariffs on pharmaceuticals yet but told reporters Monday that they'd come "very soon."
Insurers typically sign multiyear reimbursement contracts with hospitals, but hospitals could ask to renegotiate if their costs skyrocket because of tariffs, Corlette said.
Insurers can't change their premiums throughout the year. But if health plans do overshoot their premium estimates in rate filings, they have to pay enrollees back the difference in rebates.
While there may be a competitive advantage to keeping premiums lower, there isn't really a way for insurers to make up for extra unplanned costs after the fact.
Yes, but: Some insurers indicated that while they're keeping a close eye on tariff-related impacts, they aren't baking them into their premium rates yet.
"There is uncertainty around inflation and the economy due to possible tariffs however we did [not] put anything for this in this filing," Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Northwest's report to Oregon reads.
State regulators can also push back on insurers' premium calculations before they're finalized, McGough noted.
What we're watching: While some states have earlier deadlines, insurers have to submit their 2026 ACA marketplace plan rates to the federal regulators by July 16, and proposed rates will be posted by August 1.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
37 minutes ago
- CNBC
European stocks to open in mixed territory as sentiment dips, traders await central bank moves
London at dawn. Dukas | Universal Images Group | Getty Images Good morning from London, and welcome to CNBC's live blog covering European financial markets and the latest regional and global business news, data and earnings. Futures data from IG suggests a choppy start for European markets, with London's FTSE looking set to open 22 points higher at 8,862, Germany's DAX down 88 points at 23,253, France's CAC 40 lower 32 points at 7,619 and Italy's FTSE MIB dropping 105 points to 39,321. Global market sentiment is becoming more skittish over the conflict between Iran and Israel and the possibility of further U.S. involvement. On Wednesday evening, U.S. President Donald Trump convened his national security advisors in the White House Situation Room for the second time in two days. Earlier, Trump said he had not yet decided whether to give the greenlight to a U.S. strike in support of Israel's ongoing bombardment of Iranian targets. Investors are also weighing the U.S. Federal Reserve's decision to keep interest rates steady, leaving its benchmark rate unchanged in a 4.25%-4.5% range, where it has stood since December. Fed Chair Jerome Powell signaled that the Fed committee will wait to see the impact of Trump's broad-spanning tariffs on inflation before considering any adjustments to monetary policy. Still, the central bank pointed to two interest rate cuts later this year. — Holly Ellyatt The Swiss National Bank (SNB) in Bern, Switzerland, on Thursday, Dec. 12, 2024. Stefan Wermuth | Bloomberg | Getty Images It's a big day for central bank action on Thursday, with monetary policy decisions coming from Turkey, Norway, Switzerland and Britain. The central banks of the latter two countries will be closely watched, with the Swiss National Bank likely to lower its interest rate to zero this week. The Bank of England is expected to hold interest rates, but investors will be waiting to see how policymakers voted and for any guidance on the rate cut trajectory, with most analysts expecting a cut in August. There are no other major earnings or data releases in Europe. U.S. markets are closed for the Juneteenth holiday on Thursday. — Holly Ellyatt
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Hospitals stunned by Senate GOP's Medicaid plan
Hospitals are hoping senators like West Virginia Republican Jim Justice will block a cut to their Medicaid payments. | Francis Chung/POLITICO One of the most powerful lobbies in Washington is redoubling its efforts to avoid a cut to Medicaid payments in the GOP's megabill. Hospital executives weren't happy last month when the House included a provision in its version of the bill freezing a loophole states have used to boost payments to hospitals serving the low-income patients enrolled in Medicaid. Hospitals have long enjoyed deference from lawmakers — since they both care for and employ their constituents. But they were infuriated when Senate Republicans on the Finance Committee released their version of the bill Monday. Their proposal went even further than the House measure in curtailing the ability of states to impose taxes on providers. States have used those taxes to gain a larger federal Medicaid contribution, which they have then directed back to hospitals with higher reimbursements. The Senate's proposal would lower the amount the 40 states that have expanded Medicaid under Obamacare can levy in provider taxes from 6 percent to 3.5 percent. It has hospital lobbyists painting a bleak picture of their financial prospects in a last-ditch effort to change senators' minds. 'No senator wants to be the reason their local hospital shutters its doors, and now is their opportunity to stop that from happening,' said a source familiar with hospital industry thinking, granted anonymity to speak freely on strategy. More than 250 hospital leaders flew into Washington on Tuesday to urge senators to preserve Medicaid as part of an American Hospital Association lobbying campaign. The association spent almost $8.5 million on lobbying in the first quarter of the year, a high water mark dating back almost two decades. 'There are aggressive conversations ongoing … to make sure that all senators recognize the vulnerability that it is going to potentially put all of our hospitals in,' said one stakeholder granted anonymity to speak on strategy, adding that the lobbying push will continue in the states later this week after senators depart Washington for the Juneteenth holiday. Hospitals have long gotten their way on Capitol Hill, as they don't just offer health care to a community but are sometimes its biggest employer. There are signs of encouragement this time around, too, as several influential GOP senators lodged objections to their colleagues' proposal after its release Monday. 'We've got all kinds of concerns,' Sen. Jim Justice ( who had accepted the House's language, said Tuesday. But for now, at least, anxiety is running high. The industry was able to get House Republicans to steer away from cuts to provider taxes. Instead, Republicans there installed a moratorium on any new taxes but allowed current ones to continue. Thirteen state hospital groups said they were okay with that. But the Senate went in another direction, and it has sent hospitals and their allies scrambling. 'The further the cuts that are made, the more devastating it is,' said Shantel Krebs, president and CEO of Avera St. Mary's, a hospital in South Dakota, in a call with reporters Tuesday. The Senate Finance Committee's version of the megabill keeps the moratorium in place, but only if the state is one of 10 that hasn't taken advantage of an Obamacare provision offering federal funds to expand Medicaid to cover lower-middle income people. States that have expanded Medicaid must lower their taxes to 3.5 percent. This would imperil more than 30 states and the District of Columbia that have taxes above 3.5 percent, according to data from the health care think tank KFF. The House version was palatable partly because red-state governors intervened to mitigate the impact, one hospital lobbyist said. 'I would assume there will be just a massive amount of pushback from states, and we'll see whether it moves the needle,' the person said. Hospitals are not used to losing on Capitol Hill. In recent years, they have successfully fought off efforts to lower Medicare payments for their outpatient clinics so they're in line with doctors' offices. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have criticized hospitals for getting paid more for performing the same service. Hospital groups have also successfully fought off a payment cut to safety net hospitals, which serve low-income patients, that lawmakers included in Obamacare. The cut aimed to help pay for the bill. And the Democrats who passed Obamacare in 2010 expected the Medicaid expansion would make the hospitals whole. But Congress has repeatedly passed legislation to block the cuts from taking effect at hospitals' request. Now, the industry is working against a Senate hungry for savings to pay for the megabill, the primary purpose of which is to extend the tax cuts President Donald Trump and a Republican Congress enacted in 2017. It's also up against conservatives' philosophical opposition to the state taxes. Some conservatives close to Trump have argued that states and hospitals are essentially engaged in 'money laundering' when they use provider taxes to boost federal Medicaid contributions and then send the money back to the hospitals. Brian Blase of the conservative Paragon Health Institute posted on X on Monday that even Joe Biden wanted to tackle provider taxes. 'The [Senate Finance] proposal is just a commonsense good government step to restore accountability in Medicaid and focus states on getting value from their programs,' he said. GOP dissent Senate Republicans can lose only three members and still pass the megabill if Democrats remain united in opposition. GOP leaders want to meet Trump's demand that they pass it by July 4. Hospitals listening to the tepid reaction from some in the GOP caucus to the provider tax restrictions see reason for hope. 'From the standpoint of West Virginia, I think the president outlined where he stood, and what's coming out right now could be much different, and so we've got concerns,' Justice said, referencing Trump's repeated pledge to protect Medicaid. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) has largely declined to delve into specifics since the Finance Committee released its plan, but she reiterated her concerns about the provider tax language and said she's still 'asking for many changes.' The most outspoken pushback has come from Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), who spoke with Trump on Tuesday. Hawley told reporters that the Senate language is 'alarming' and 'surprising' and that Trump had told him he was also surprised by the language in the bill. Finance Chair Mike Crapo's decision to go further in curtailing the taxes than the House bill caught GOP senators off guard, after several indicated last week that they expected the Senate's plan would largely match the House's. The two chambers will have to agree on the bill text before Trump can sign it into law. The language Crapo settled on nets the Idaho Republican and Senate Majority Leader John Thune something they are desperately hunting: more savings. Crapo predicted that making changes to the Medicaid language would help give Republicans several hundred billion dollars to work with. Republicans can pass the bill with a simple majority if they adhere to special budget rules that require the bill not increase the deficit within a 10-year window. 'Every spending reduction that we were able to achieve was helpful in achieving the permanence,' Crapo said, referencing GOP plans to make the 2017 tax cuts permanent. The 2017 law, in order to reduce the cost of the measure, set the tax cuts to expire at the end of this year. Crapo added that he was 'not surprised' that there was pushback from his colleagues and that the Medicaid language might not be fully locked in: 'Right now, we're vetting it,' he said. One lobbyist pointed out that hospitals would be happy to make a deal. 'Right now, the Senate bill is so bad for hospitals,' the person argued, 'that if it's softened a little bit, you could … almost neutralize them.'
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Voice of America and Radio Farda's Persian services cover Israel-Iran conflict despite cutbacks
'We've been giving information to Iranians minute by minute about the conflict,' said Golnaz Esfandiani, managing editor of Radio Farda. That includes explanatory stories about Iran's nuclear program and short videos posted on social media, she said. Advertisement Several Iranians have contacted the radio network to express appreciation for reporting that they do not get on Iranian state media, she said. At the same time, families in Iran of five Radio Farda staff members have been pressured by people in the government who want to see the broadcasts stopped, she said. Through the U.S. Agency for Global Media, the Trump administration has sought to dismantle or sharply curtail the government-funded outlets that provide news reports to countries where there isn't a tradition of free press. The administration says these services operate with a liberal bias. Both Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty are fighting the efforts in court. Employees at Voice of America's Persian service were notified in an email last Friday from Crystal Thomas, USAGM's human resources director, that they were being recalled and needed to report to work immediately. Advertisement Kari Lake, who is running USAGM, told Fox News that 'we are ramping up — as we've always planned to do — to meet this historic moment.' One person who got that email was at the office within three hours and worked until midnight, helping to put out a one-hour broadcast, said the employee, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the person was not authorized to speak to the press. About 50 people have returned to work. Voice of America is banned in Iran, but many of its citizens find ways through the internet to bypass the ban. Voice of America's broadcasts — and social media posts — have become a challenge to produce because the administration has canceled subscriptions to news services like The Associated Press, Reuters and Agence France-Presse, said a second employee, who also spoke on condition of anonymity. For the employees, it's a stressful time, putting out urgent news reports without any sense of how long — or whether — they will continue to have a job. 'I'm grateful they've brought back our Persian service to continue their role as a trusted voice covering the region for the Iranian people,' said Patsy Widakuswara, VOA's White House correspondent, who is a plaintiff in the court fight to keep the agency alive. 'But why smash a working system only to cobble it back together when you realize you need it?' Widakuswara asked. 'And how many crises would it take for them to realize that all VOA language services are important — before, after and during breaking news?' Advertisement During video reports posted online this week, a Voice of America anchor explained where Iranian counterattacks were landing in Israel, and how Iranians were trying to send out information about what is happening through social media. The danger for a service like VOA, having been off the air and off social media for more than two months, is that Iranian citizens will become accustomed to looking elsewhere for news, said Tom Kent, a media consultant and former president of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. 'You would hope that people would learn from this that international broadcasting cannot be turned on and off like a light bulb,' said Kent, also a former AP editor. Despite an Israeli airstrike on its headquarters Monday while the Republic of Iran News Network was broadcasting live, the state-run news service is still operating. Radio Farda has stayed on the air despite cutbacks. It also continues to have access to news services like the AP, but those contracts will expire at the end of the month, Esfandiani said. Three people have been brought back from furlough to help cover the war, she said. She said she hopes the conflict lets people who question the service's existence know its value. 'It's an information war, absolutely,' Esfandiani said. 'These countries — Iran, Russia and China — would be very happy if we were gone.' One of the VOA employees called back to work said they have not been told how long it will be for. Despite evidence this week that someone in the administration saw value in what they do, might they still lose their job eventually? Advertisement 'I don't want to think about that,' the person said. The Associated Press' Jon Gambrell and Kamran Jebrelli contributed to this report.
