NZNO Backs People's Pay Equity Select Committee
Representing a third of the pay equity claims scrapped by the Coalition Government, NZNO is throwing its full support behind the People's Select Committee on Pay Equity.
Members of the New Zealand Nurses Organisation Tōpūtanga Tapuhi Kaitiaki o Aotearoa (NZNO) had 12 pay equity claims being progressed across the health sector including aged care, primary health care, hospices, Plunket, community health and laboratories when the scheme was gutted on 6 May.
These claims covered almost 10,000 nurses, health care assistants, allied health workers and administration staff. A further 35,000 NZNO Te Whatu Ora members had their pay equity review halted by the changes, meaning their pay would again fall behind.
NZNO Primary Health Care Nurses College chair Tracey Morgan says it was devastating to the 5000 primary health care members that their claim was scuppered without warning or legitimate reason.
"It was antidemocratic and an attack on women for the Government not to have consulted the workers whose lives they were changing. Primary and community health care nurses, like their hospice, Plunket and aged care counterparts, accepted lower wage increases in their collective agreements on the understanding they were likely to receive pay equity settlements.
"Now they can have their say through the People's Select Committee on Pay Equity.
"The committee of 10 former women MPs from across the political spectrum are strong wahine who helped establishment the previous system to address the gender discrimination which has kept down their wages their whole working lives."
Most New Zealanders - 68 percent - believe the Government should have consulted on the changes, a new poll released today found.
Tracey Morgan says NZNO urges all its members to submit their views to the Select Committee so they can be heard when it meets in August.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Spinoff
an hour ago
- The Spinoff
The Spinoff Essay: A bit of pain
'I'm lucky; I've had it for only five years or so.' David Hill on living with chronic pain. The Spinoff Essay showcases the best essayists in Aotearoa, on topics big and small. Made possible by the generous support of our members. I ache. I'm sore, nearly all the time. I'm one of the estimated 900,000 New Zealanders who suffer from chronic pain. Chronic or neuropathic pain is usually defined as pain that's lasted for more than three months. I'm lucky; I've had it for only five years or so. Multiple thousands of Kiwis have suffered for decades, or their entire life. More statistics. Over 40% of people in the UK are thought to suffer, at various times and to various degrees. (The US estimates almost 50%.) For over-75s in Britain, the figure lifts to 65%. About 80% of this is back and neck pain. In Aotearoa, a 2018 report from research group Sapere suggested that chronic pain costs our health system some $2 billion annually, plus another $15 billion in lost production and benefit costs. Utterly predictably (think housing, working conditions, $60 for a GP visit, $75 for a physio session), it affects lower socio-economic groups more. Oh, and (think trad Kiwi male stereotypes this time), women are more likely to report it than men. In my case, it's cervical spondylosis with foraminal narrowing and radiculopathy. I like to roll out the phrase so I can watch listeners' eyes cross as they wonder how much time I've got left. English translation: my neck is stuffed. Age, plus bad posture at the keyboard, means the cushioning discs between cervical vertebrae have worn thin. Bone spurs have formed. My mobility is limited; I get deep pain in the neck and between shoulder blades, plus intermittent giddiness. I've gone into detail because, like most sufferers – and I dislike that word – I usually don't say much about it. People with chronic pain get little sympathy. Who wants to hear about an ailment that goes on and on, especially when it usually comes with no bandages, slings, plaster, other visible signs of affliction? Like Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Long Covid, it's easily seen, even by some health professionals, as self-pitying, even malingering. ' Whatever happened to 'pull yourself together'?' I heard one sceptic sniff, after an acquaintance had vented over his months of continuing hip and leg discomfort. It's the least telegenic of ailments; if we do appear on screen, we're usually caricatured as boring old whingers who need to snap out of it. ' It's all in your head,' is another common dismissal. True. Also stupid. Of course it's in the head, because that's where the brain's pain receptors are. We don't register any injury or discomfort till those receptors fire. Trouble is, if the pain continues for more than a few hours, your pre-frontal cortex starts assessing the sensation in terms of what it may mean long-term, and begins reinforcing the synapses associated with stress and discomfort. The brain's 'pain switch' gets stuck in the ON position, and your body becomes convinced of its distress. Neurologist William Davies notes that 'pain carves a path directly between the realms of mind and body'. It's called Control Sensitisation: just as Pavlov's dogs slobbered when a bell rang, almost any tug or tension for a chronic pain sufferer sends those brain receptors into power drive. It means that pain can become a habit, and like many unpleasant habits, it's hard to get rid of. A cycle of discomfort – sleep deprivation – stress – more discomfort and more stress can become established. Withdrawal and depression may follow, with the symbolic Black Dog liable to squat and crap on any of your days. So yes, it is all in the head, and it's utterly genuine. There have been some curious associated discoveries. Women's limbic system responds to pain more than men's, so women often experience greater emotional distress, while the fact that men's pre-frontal cortex is more affected means they may see the issue primarily as a problem to be analysed. And chronic pain may be exacerbated by apparently unassociated events; Brexit, the Covid pandemic, even the Trump presidency saw a rise in reported cases. You're right: the Orange Roughy can indeed become a pain in the arse. Bad news for the next few years. Chronic pain victims make unrewarding patients, even to sympathetic doctors – and not all are. Symptoms are frequently vague and diverse. We're the unwell who can sometimes seem well. Our GPs ask questions, refer us to specialists who ask more questions, at $2 per syllable, rule out nastier possibilities if you're lucky (and that is indeed a help), and usually intone variations on the theme of 'y ou'll have to live with it'. I sympathise with them, actually: as with Chronic Fatigue or Long Covid, we seldom give them the satisfaction of finding a specific cause. So chronic pain is a formless and often unresponsive condition. It can take a long time to get a diagnosis, and it seldom comes with any clear path of action. It can be treated, but seldom cured – whatever that last word may mean. What are the treatments? Painkillers, anti-inflammatories of course, though all of them, except perhaps paracetamol, come with potential side effects. A TROUP (Trends and Risks of Opioid Use for Pain) study in the US found that 22-26% of people prescribed opioids for non-malignant chronic pain ended up misusing their drugs. Distraction, meditation, exercise, diet, therapy, physio and chiropractic, the analytical and shared talk of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy are other courses of action – and action is an early step to taking some degree of control. The New Zealand Pain Society (you'll find them online) offers sensible, practical programmes and resources. Complex Chronic Illness Support, also online, can help as well. Our local hospital used to run chronic pain workshops, where physio, dietitian, psychiatrist, counsellor would reassure attendees that they weren't malingerers; it was a genuine ailment, and here was a list of things that might help. They're the only workshops I've ever attended where some participants stood up every 10 minutes and lay down in the aisle for a bit. They were enormously valuable for their collegial quality, finding that you weren't the only sufferer. They've been discontinued – more funding cuts at Whatu Ora, I gather. Alan Gordon in his book The Way Out estimated that in 2021, there were 1.2 billion chronic pain sufferers worldwide. The number is rising: we're living longer and hurting for longer periods. Other contributing factors include people expecting to be pain-lite and becoming more inclined to seek help when we're not, plus our living in an increasingly isolated society, where loneliness aggravates almost any condition. The outlook isn't great. The future, for me at any rate? Keep learning – in the most positive sense of the verb – to live with it. Take unexpected solace from the fact that on good days, the world can seem brighter and more rewarding than it did before my neck started to pack up. And wonder if assault with the nearest deadly weapon might be a pretty reasonable response to anyone who tells me that it's all in my head.
Otago Daily Times
3 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Public-private healthcare opportunities identified
A strategic report focused on the future of public health services in Otago Central Lakes has identified six potential opportunities for public-private collaboration. The Otago Central Lakes strategic health report was sent to Health Minister Simeon Brown in February by the steering group, which was comprised of Southland MP Joseph Mooney, Health New Zealand, the Central Otago and Queenstown Lakes District Councils, rural health providers, iwi, including kaupapa Māori health providers, Act MP Todd Stephenson and Waitaki MP Miles Anderson. Mr Mooney said the group's objective was to "expedite planning and investment in health services and infrastructure in Otago Central Lakes" — Central Otago District Mayor Tamah Alley said 70% of New Zealanders who lived two or more hours from a hospital resided in that region. The report said health service improvements were required to meet the current and future populations' needs. On a peak day, the district's combined population, which included visitors, was 168,000 — expected to nearly double by 2054, it said. "There is a reputational risk to all of Aotearoa New Zealand if adequate healthcare services are unavailable to deal with international visitor illness or injury." The report identified opportunities to increase public health services by partnering with the private sector, but Mr Anderson said the project was "not asking for public funds". The "early stage" public-private partnerships included in the report, which were "ready for collaboration", are: • The Southern Lakes Public Hospital — the location of which is to be determined — which is a proposed privately financed facility with full public hospital services and future capacity to become a regional hospital. • Lakeview Te Taumata Clinic (Queenstown), a private surgical hospital expected to open in 2027, with opportunities for maternity care and workforce development. • Integrated Care Hub (Wānaka), a planned day surgery with potential space for publicly funded after-hours services. • Wānaka Health Precinct, a private surgical hospital designed with capacity to integrate public services. • Aged-care facilities (Clyde), which are under construction, have the potential to expand into a full suite of publicly funded services for older people in Central Otago. • Securing land and investors in Central Otago for future public health infrastructure, based on the outcomes of the other projects. Additionally, the trust was exploring "innovative mobile modular units" which could be used as consultation rooms, clinics or staff accommodation and wanted to find land to host them in areas where they were needed, the report said. The $2 million funding was required to "complete the groundwork" for community consultation, clinical design and planning process, and technical assessments and detailed business cases Health New Zealand could work with — it already had $400,000 seed funding, it said. Subject to Mr Brown's support, a working group would be established to work with Health New Zealand to progress the proposed solutions — community engagement and consultation would follow.
Otago Daily Times
3 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Scraping the bottom of the barrel
Just when you think things can't get any worse, they often do. That is precisely what we have seen politically this week when it comes to the behaviour of our politicians. As if Leader of the House Chris Bishop's ill-conceived and poorly controlled ramblings at the Aotearoa Music Awards about a Stan Walker performance featuring Toitū Te Tiriti banners and people waving tino rangatiratanga flags weren't enough, the country had to endure even ghastlier behaviour in Parliament on Thursday. The debate about whether to endorse the recommendation to suspend three Te Pāti Māori MPs really showed New Zealanders the worst of Parliament. Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke, Debbie Ngarewa-Packer, and Rawiri Waititi have now been barred from the House for seven days, 21 days and 21 days respectively for performing a haka in Parliament during debate last November about the waste of time, energy and money that was the Act party's contentious Treaty Principles Bill. Their intimidatory behaviour towards Act MPs then was at the core of the complaints considered by the Privileges Committee. Despite efforts by Opposition parties to reduce the length of the recommended suspensions, the government on Thursday ratified the committee's recommendations for punishments which, in the case of Ms Ngarewa-Packer and Mr Waititi, are the most severe ever handed down to MPs. While there can be little doubt that the behaviour of the three MPs last November was threatening and failed to meet the standards of Parliament, the severity seems unnecessarily vindictive. Interestingly, an RNZ poll of just over 1000 people, with a margin of error of 3.1 %, now shows that most respondents – 37% – think the punishment is 'about right" while 36.2% consider it too harsh. It is 'too lenient" in the minds of 17.2% of those surveyed. Of Labour Party supporters, 8% believe it should have been tougher, as do 3.8% of Green Party followers and, surprisingly, 9% of Te Pāti Māori supporters. The poll shows 54.2% of respondents either support the penalties or think they were too weak, a reflection of the government's view. While the impromptu haka by the three was seen by some as unacceptable and a breach of parliamentary protocol, it was Ms Ngarewa-Packer's foolish mimicry of shooting Act MPs which was the worst and most intimidatory action that day. The second she put her two fingers together, made the pretend gun and pointed it at Act leader David Seymour and colleagues marked the start of this whole sorry saga – though of course it can also be argued the real start came with the introduction of Mr Seymour's divisive Bill, allowed to happen by a prime minister too focused on stitching up a coalition deal with him at the top. The inciting incidents, the response and the reactions this week leave a stain on the reputation of Parliament. Some of the grandiloquence in the House on Thursday was vituperative and unwarranted. NZ First leader Winston Peters went way too far when he likened Mr Waititi's moko to scribbles, though he did apologise after the Speaker's intervention. Mr Waititi also stepped over the line by bringing a noose into the House. It was a bit rich for Mr Peters to tell RNZ it was a sad day in Parliament when he played a significant role in making it that. Parliament is no place for shrinking violets. We have seen that time and time again. It has had more than its share of biffo and nastiness over the years, which never led to suspensions anywhere near the length of those rubberstamped this week. Let us hope we don't see the like of this miserable drama again. Saw that coming It was always going to be a case of 'this town ain't big enough for the both of us". The implosion in recent days of United States President Donald Trump's simpering friendship with Elon Musk, the world's richest man, has been both highly predictable and highly amusing. Mr Musk has become increasingly caustic and is now calling for Mr Trump to be impeached. In turn, the president wants all Mr Musk's government contracts to be cancelled. When two such massive egos meet, there can only be one winner. Who that will ultimately be remains to be seen. In the meantime, let's be honest, the feud provides some much-needed light relief.
