Scraping the bottom of the barrel
That is precisely what we have seen politically this week when it comes to the behaviour of our politicians.
As if Leader of the House Chris Bishop's ill-conceived and poorly controlled ramblings at the Aotearoa Music Awards about a Stan Walker performance featuring Toitū Te Tiriti banners and people waving tino rangatiratanga flags weren't enough, the country had to endure even ghastlier behaviour in Parliament on Thursday.
The debate about whether to endorse the recommendation to suspend three Te Pāti Māori MPs really showed New Zealanders the worst of Parliament.
Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke, Debbie Ngarewa-Packer, and Rawiri Waititi have now been barred from the House for seven days, 21 days and 21 days respectively for performing a haka in Parliament during debate last November about the waste of time, energy and money that was the Act party's contentious Treaty Principles Bill.
Their intimidatory behaviour towards Act MPs then was at the core of the complaints considered by the Privileges Committee. Despite efforts by Opposition parties to reduce the length of the recommended suspensions, the government on Thursday ratified the committee's recommendations for punishments which, in the case of Ms Ngarewa-Packer and Mr Waititi, are the most severe ever handed down to MPs.
While there can be little doubt that the behaviour of the three MPs last November was threatening and failed to meet the standards of Parliament, the severity seems unnecessarily vindictive.
Interestingly, an RNZ poll of just over 1000 people, with a margin of error of 3.1 %, now shows that most respondents – 37% – think the punishment is 'about right" while 36.2% consider it too harsh.
It is 'too lenient" in the minds of 17.2% of those surveyed. Of Labour Party supporters, 8% believe it should have been tougher, as do 3.8% of Green Party followers and, surprisingly, 9% of Te Pāti Māori supporters.
The poll shows 54.2% of respondents either support the penalties or think they were too weak, a reflection of the government's view.
While the impromptu haka by the three was seen by some as unacceptable and a breach of parliamentary protocol, it was Ms Ngarewa-Packer's foolish mimicry of shooting Act MPs which was the worst and most intimidatory action that day.
The second she put her two fingers together, made the pretend gun and pointed it at Act leader David Seymour and colleagues marked the start of this whole sorry saga – though of course it can also be argued the real start came with the introduction of Mr Seymour's divisive Bill, allowed to happen by a prime minister too focused on stitching up a coalition deal with him at the top.
The inciting incidents, the response and the reactions this week leave a stain on the reputation of Parliament. Some of the grandiloquence in the House on Thursday was vituperative and unwarranted.
NZ First leader Winston Peters went way too far when he likened Mr Waititi's moko to scribbles, though he did apologise after the Speaker's intervention. Mr Waititi also stepped over the line by bringing a noose into the House.
It was a bit rich for Mr Peters to tell RNZ it was a sad day in Parliament when he played a significant role in making it that.
Parliament is no place for shrinking violets. We have seen that time and time again. It has had more than its share of biffo and nastiness over the years, which never led to suspensions anywhere near the length of those rubberstamped this week.
Let us hope we don't see the like of this miserable drama again. Saw that coming
It was always going to be a case of 'this town ain't big enough for the both of us".
The implosion in recent days of United States President Donald Trump's simpering friendship with Elon Musk, the world's richest man, has been both highly predictable and highly amusing.
Mr Musk has become increasingly caustic and is now calling for Mr Trump to be impeached. In turn, the president wants all Mr Musk's government contracts to be cancelled.
When two such massive egos meet, there can only be one winner. Who that will ultimately be remains to be seen.
In the meantime, let's be honest, the feud provides some much-needed light relief.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Spinoff
24 minutes ago
- The Spinoff
The Weekend: Oh no, it's starting to feel like 2021…
Madeleine Chapman reflects on the week that was. Usually I try my best not to think about being in lockdown for four months in 2021. It feels like a fever dream now but for a period there a whole million Aucklanders were collectively losing their minds and it felt like no one else, including the government, noticed or cared. And underneath the desperate chaos there was a genuine anger. It was anger at being condescended to, asked to 'do more' without any assurance that help was on the way. But that 2021 lockdown began four whole years ago (in August, even) and most of us are happy to leave it there. So I was surprised to find myself feeling nostalgic while reading Anna Rawhiti-Connell's satirical diatribe as the government's anger translator. A short, aggressive call to New Zealanders to toughen up and get to work. Evidently others felt something too as it's the most-read article of the week but why did it hit such a nerve? I think it's because there's a nihilistic humour in thinking you can simply talk people into doing anything, especially when it's virtually impossible for that thing to be achieved. I guess that's just politics 101 but Anna yelling at all of us to pull ourselves up by our bootstraps while also pointing out that most people can't afford boots really did echo the 2021 calls to just-stay-home-for-maybe-a-long-time-we're-not-sure-just-keep-doing-it-thanks. A tsunami emergency alert and a pandemic lockdown are very different circumstances but New Zealanders feeling deeply frustrated at being told to 'just deal with it' – whether it's Covid restrictions, an unaffordable cost of living or a hostile job market – is always the same. Being called dropkicks by the deputy prime minister is kind of funny when people are feeling secure in their jobs and homes. It's a lot less funny when many feel like they're the ones being constantly kicked. At any rate, it has never served a government well to try to shift blame or responsibility for the country's ills onto the people. Labour has still not recovered its support in Auckland after 2021. How many 'just suck it up and sort it out' calls will be one too many for New Zealanders? The stories Spinoff readers spent the most time with this week 'Fake news. No one's flush enough to waste a whole block of butter on lubing up a goat ' 'A couple of years ago, we had a Tūī in our neighbourhood singing Super Mario music. It was both hilarious and horrifying…'
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
The Government says it's fixing the cost of living, so what happens if voters don't believe it?
It was clearly designed to assuage fears, fanned by the Opposition, that the Government had put the entire Crown infrastructure build on ice, leading to the mass exodus of construction labour to Australia. The tactic isn't an unfair one. All Governments indulge in the vice of reannouncing things to focus attention on them. A billion or so dollars spent on a road earns the Government a few hundred bites of the PR cherry, or so the political arithmetic goes. So no, the tactic wasn't unfair or even ridiculous - but nor was Labour's criticism that a fair whack of the projects were funded by the last Government. (Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop's riposte that Labour might have funded some of the projects, but it certainly didn't do a good job of delivering them, was equally true.) This early success evaporated on Monday, when Luxon held one of the most bizarre press conferences since taking office. Alongside Finance Minister Nicola Willis, he spoke for more than 10 minutes to mark the first anniversary of the Government's tax package coming into effect. He listed every other cost-of-living policy the Government had implemented since taking office. Finance Minister Nicola Willis and Trade Minister Todd McClay spoke about US tariffs yesterday. Photo / Mark Mitchell Again, there's nothing inherently wrong with reannouncing something old. Former Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern liked to mark anniversaries too. Some years, she'd put out a press release celebrating the fact that superannuation payments were increasing in line with wages - despite the fact that this annual increase is written into primary legislation. But Monday's announcement, coming as voters' economic sentiment bounces along the bottom and the country seems on the verge of rioting over the butter price, seemed vacuous. There was something ever so faintly Soviet about a Government thinking that, simply by telling voters it had a policy to fix their problems, they'd believe those problems were being fixed. There are two obvious pathways for how the next few months might pan out. The Government is clinging to several good forward economic indicators: business confidence surveys report okay-ish vibes from firms and suggest something of a recovery next year; the primary sector, far from being the villain of the butter crisis, is driving an export-led recovery in the regions; the Reserve Bank is likely to continue cutting interest rates, spurring investment and growth in 2026, giving Luxon an economic tailwind of good vibes and rising house prices in election year. The snow will soon melt, the ground will thaw, and New Zealanders may spend their summer holidays contemplating having endured the worst of it. Luxon and his colleagues may return to work in January, set the election date and wonder what on earth they were so worried about in winter. That's one scenario, sure. There's another. For every positive data point, there is an equally negative one. The Reserve Bank's GDP tracker suggests what every New Zealander feels in their bones: the economy has been shrinking, and could shrink further. A small recession, measured by the glib but powerful two-negative-quarters definition, could be on the cards. The most recent ANZ business confidence survey showed residential construction intentions tanking, to use the words of the bank's economists. If things continue to follow that negative trajectory, another scenario opens up: one of panic, as the once-distant prospect of a first-term defeat becomes more plausible. If the economy continues to worsen, and National's polling materialises into gloomy party vote numbers, don't entirely rule out a leadership change. A change is not 'on' - you'd be a fool to put money on it — but you'd also be a fool to bet against it. There's no real affection for Luxon in the caucus room, and National has little patience for underperformance, particularly from its leaders. Luxon's intense self-belief could count against him. He does not seem to observe that, of all his frontbenchers, he is the one who is struggling the most. Despite the whole Cabinet fighting fires on every front, National's ministers do a decent job of rebuffing their Labour opposite numbers during Question Time. Health Minister Simeon Brown has come under the most pressure, but has so far survived in the House. Chris Bishop seems unbothered by Kieran McAnulty and seemed to be enjoying himself on Thursday when he answered finance questions on behalf of Willis, who was away (the caucus enjoyed it too). Willis herself never breaks a sweat debating her opposite number, Barbara Edmonds. FBI director Kash Patel visited Wellington to open a new office. Photo / Ola Thorsen Luxon is the most challenged of the lot and was devoured, degustation-style, by Chris Hipkins in the debating chamber this week. Hipkins, who can excel in the House when he wants to, wasn't even trying a particularly sophisticated line of questioning. He resorted to a past Luxon tactic of using each supplementary question to list another case of something going terribly wrong in the economy - migration to Australia, construction jobs, board director remuneration - and then asking the Prime Minister what he thinks about it. Luxon should be able to answer questions like that easily, but could not. His belief in the power of political marketing is so fundamental that he undervalues the importance of backing up that marketing with substance; even more than most prime ministers, he's too quick to answer every question with a canned line and not quick enough to respond by substantively dismantling the question and defending himself. He seems to think this doesn't matter. He's disdainful of Question Time, or of anything that happens in Wellington. But it does matter - and you could tell from the ashen faces behind Luxon as he answered Hipkins' questions that the backbench is worried. If the economy doesn't turn around meaningfully, there's a chance the Government could be in serious trouble, however scary they think a Labour-Green-Te Pāti Māori Government might be. Slumps such as this one are difficult for centre-right governments. They're instinctively anti-intervention. When the public demands 'something must be done', centre-left governments have no shortage of ideas for that 'something'. The National benches regularly look despondent during Question Time - as pictured here in March. Photo / Mark Mitchell For the right, recovery comes from automatic stabilisers like benefits doing their job, before the fiscal part of the Government gets out of the way of the monetary side, allowing the reduction of interest rates to encourage firms to borrow and invest. It's a less politically attractive recovery because it involves substantially less ribbon-cutting, but that doesn't make it any less sensible a strategy. Ultimately, however much a government tries to pump-prime an economy back to life with fiscal policy, eventually private firms will need to pick up some slack too - and that means low interest rates. Luxon, to his credit, has been explicitly articulating this as his vision for the economic recovery. Last month, he successfully rebuffed one of Hipkins' questions, noting that the construction sector was 'hit hard because of high interest rates. High interest rates happened because Government spending was out of control, and you let inflation get out of control'. Not bad. Grim economic times will always be tough for a government, but they needn't be as tough as these. Back in 2012, net migration to Australia was even higher than it is now and the unemployment rate, in September of that year, was higher than at any point in the past 25 years. Yet that economic malaise failed to find its way into politics. National's party vote polling peaked at 48.8% in October 2012, rising - strangely - in tandem with the unemployment rate. Prime Minister John Key's popularity was unassailable. A government can be popular when an economy is under strain. But that appears to require the public to have faith that the government has a plan to make things better. Voters don't have that faith currently and, after this week, who could blame them?
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Letters: If the Govt is serious about helping Kiwibank then it should bank with them
If the Government is serious about helping Kiwibank compete with BNZ, ASB, ANZ then it should give Westpac 12 months' notice that it will take the government banking away from it. Give it instead to Kiwibank which would process the pay for teachers, nurses, police, supperannuitants. This would be a massive shot in the arm for Kiwibank and be the lifeline it so desperately needs to compete with our big brother bankers across the ditch. Glen Stanton, Mairangi Bay. We need to come together not drift apart I am sure I am not alone in expressing my dismay that multiple Islamic groups and Imams have complained that they were 'not consulted' before Minister Mitchell's quite outstanding achievement in launching the religious accord recently announced. How extraordinary that any religious leaders would refuse to participate in an accord designed to establish and ensure nationwide religious tolerance for all who wish to adhere to the common goals, values and understanding within the community. Worse than that - their only reaction was to complain. How tiresome. Did any of those complaining ever say, 'What a great idea - that sounds interesting - we would like to learn more!' Or even, 'Thank you for the initiative, Minister? Once again, a tiny segment of our multi-ethnic society has chosen to distance itself from the significant majority, from reality and from common decency - and to what gain? They merely earned a tired sigh from the rest of the country and a 'Well we should have expected that', rather than the option of a gentle nod of approval and appreciation from the other 98% of the population. Which was what could have happened had they not immediately defaulted to victim status as so many other segments of our multicultural and multi-ethnic community used to do. Fortunately, most of these segments have chosen to grow and move on as New Zealand continues to lead the world in tolerance, dedication to peace, and cultural development. I will say it on everyone else's behalf: Thank you Minister Mark Mitchell, and your officials, and those religious leaders who put peace and tolerance first, for making such an appropriate and meaningful contribution across our society. This initiative will benefit all thinking and considerate New Zealanders throughout our country. Roger Hawkins, Herne Bay. Standard electricity plans A big thank you to Raphael Franks for the Herald series on electric power. Everyone, including the Electricity Retailers and Generators Association, agrees that choosing the best electricity plan is difficult even for electricity retailers. With each individual retailer inventing their own confusing set of plans, choosing the best plan is impossible. The Electricity Authority (EA) must create a set of 3 standard retail plans that all gentailers must use in place of a multitude of plans that nobody can understand. It is time for actual competition in the electricity market. John Caldwell, Howick. Auckland's housing Thank you Christine Fletcher and Troy Churton for warning us of the tactics of the Minister for Housing, Chris Bishop, to turn our beautiful Auckland into a future slum city. As a minister, he should be more concerned as to why there are countless blocks of already built, empty, bankrupt apartments Our well-experienced local government representatives are not speaking 'hyperbole'. They know the Auckland Unitary Plan. Although unpopular, it was years in the making and it allows more than enough intensification. In the last 12 months 40,000 people have moved out to live in Christchurch. Minister Bishop should be questioning why. Yet he is hell bent on riding roughshod over the unitary plan, ignoring the community, to have more high-rise blocks of housing built with no off-street parking. He returns to the Hutt and leaves Auckland in chaos. Jsn O'Connor, Hauraki Passports Hobson's Pledge and their ilk will be delighted at Brooke van Velden's announcement demoting te reo on New Zealand passport covers — typical as it is of this coalition's peevish, vindictive and, at times seemingly childish, racism. They would be less pleased at the reasoned and pointed Herald editorial on the subject, in defense of the cultural value of te reo in Aotearoa. You have to wonder where van Velden and her colleagues have been while a years-long renaissance in tikanga Māori and te reo has been blooming to the benefit and enrichment of our society, culture and environment. Peter Beyer, Sandringham. FBI office We should be absolutely horrified that this Government has allowed the FBI to set up an office in Wellington particularly as there seems to have been considerable secrecy about it. Kash Patel, the Director of the FBI, was reported to be in New Zealand but the Government was not prepared to inform us till the office had been set up. Patel also seemed to be immediately at odds with the Government about why this office is here, claiming that one of the reasons is to keep an eye on the Chinese Communist Party. As the latter is one of our major trading partners, the Government had to try to hastily bluff its way out of a very embarrassing situation. Sadly, this is probably only the first of many future occasions where the USA will try to interfere in our democracy. Sue Rawson, Papamoa Beach Palestine state Sir Keir Starmer has told UK parliamentarians that 'statehood is the inalienable right of the Palestinian people'. Palestinians have been waiting 100 years for this. Historians know that Britain was the governing power of what was then Palestine in 1917, and author of the 1917 Balfour Declaration which backed the establishment of a Jewish homeland on Palestinian territory. Good to know that MPs in Britain are catching up with history. Pauline Doyle, Napier A quick word I get it, better to be safe than soggy, but if these emergency alerts keep interrupting people's sleep, the only real tsunami will be the tidal wave of New Zealanders disabling emergency notifications entirely. Huw Dann, Mt Eden. How do you stay current on the electoral role when you are homeless and don't even have a letterbox? Bill Irwin, Nelson. There has obviously been an ongoing culture of alcohol abuse within our Navy for a lengthy period of time if it requires a stern mandate from no less than the admiral in command to rein it in. But why has it got to this level? Like naughty children, if steps are not taken to curb bad behaviour, then it can get quickly out of hand and, in the Navy's case, it obviously has. Take a leaf from the US Navy, which almost overnight made its ships alcohol free. Problem, at least whilst on board, solved. Paul Beck, West Harbour. The comment that most urban dwellers have spent time on a farm may have been true many years ago but it is not now. I live in an urban area surrounded by farming on the Coromandel Peninsula and the interaction between farmers and local urban dwellers on their farms is nearly non-existent for the majority of town people. To suggest that large-city people have access to farms is extremely unlikely. The disconnect between farming and the majority of New Zealanders being city folk is a major issue. City folk generally will not understand farming and that is a problem when a large portion of our national income is derived from farming. Paul Graves, Whitianga. Congratulations to Christine Fletcher for calling out Chris Bishop. Finally, a councillor standing up for Auckland. Bishop is right when he says the simple answer to housing availability is to build more houses. But what makes him think that his 'planning reforms' will achieve that? Auckland already has an over-supply of residential zoned land available for development. Adding to that will not achieve anything. If Chris Bishop wants more houses, as Minister for Housing why doesn't he just get Kainga Ora to build them? John Burns, Balmoral. While the cellphone alert of the tsunami risk worked well, further 'peace of mind', in-depth, informative, official and real-time information updates were hard to find or they were patchy and, in some cases, useless and unreliable. For example an inoperative link to a NZ regional map of tsunami escape routes. The relevant site continued to display 'Not operative' messages. Missing currently is a useful reliable and accessible one-stop website with a real-time update of all 'developing risks to public safety' ... and now! Larry Mitchell, Rothesay Bay.
