Portland councilor, city administrator spar over proposed homeless budget
PORTLAND, Ore. ( — Tensions erupted at Portland City Hall as a budget work session turned contentious Wednesday.
As Portland's new 12-person City Council works through its first budget approval process, one councilor felt the need to speak her mind, asking tough questions about where the city's responsibilities begin and Multnomah County's end, when it comes to the homeless crisis.
CCSO releases video of deputy stabbing
Frustrations came to a boiling point when District 1 Councilor Loretta Smith challenged City Administrator Michael Jordan as he presented elements of Mayor Keith Wilson's .
'I want to go back to the huge elephant in the room,' Councilor Smith said. 'Why are we currently breaking our own IGA with the county and doing homeless services?'
Her question comes as the city's general fund faces a looming , as estimated in February 2025.
In fall of 2024, the City of Portland and Multnomah County entered a new intergovernmental agreement (IGA) focused on addressing homelessness, which includes a from the city to the county, beginning in FY 2025-26.
Tuberculosis case recorded at Portland middle school
Smith questioned why the Mayor's proposed budget slated additional millions for homeless outreach and shelter services, which the city already pays the county to tackle under the IGA.
'The new Housing Department of Multnomah County says they do all the homeless services,' Smith said. 'And instead, we have $100 million worth of Homeless Services in our budget. I'd say that that would make up the 20% that you're trying to cut off in fall.'
Amid a tight budget session, Smith suggested the money could be used to save some of the more than 180 jobs on the chopping block, most of which are slated to come from the water bureau and permitting department.
'You're saying, 'okay, who's more important, homeless folks or our folks?' And you're pitting those two against each other, and now our folks are going to have to go on the unemployment line,' Smith added. 'You're saying, 'we need you to go in the unemployment line so we can take care of these folks that we're not supposed to be taking care of, and that's done by the Joint office.' — So that is ridiculous and it is unacceptable what you put forward.'
2 of Portland's iconic office buildings are up for sale
Although Administrator Jordan agreed Smith's question was a valid one, he suggested the council could change the proposed budget to fit the agreement.
However, Smith said the buck stops with Jordan and the Mayor.
'That's your responsibility,' Smith responded.
'Councilor, there is no way that we would continue the services that we're trying to continue right now and have it conform to the letter of that IGA,' Jordan said.
'Why do we even have an IGA if we're not going to conform to it?' Smith asked. 'Why is it that you all can break rules and regulations? We can't, our employees can't. You hold their feets to the fire, and I'm going to hold your feet to the fire. So, don't give me a budget that breaks an IGA.'
Second man pleads guilty in $18M real estate fraud case
A handful of Smith's constituents agreed that picking up the county's slack could pose a problem down the line, while others called out her comments.
'I found your line of questioning and the way you approached it towards the city administrator deeply inappropriate,' Said fellow District 1 Councilor Jamie Dunphy.
'It's not the city administrator's budget that we're considering,' Said Councilor Steve Novick of District 3. 'So, I would suggest that if any of us feel the need to yell at anybody about the budget, we should yell at our fellow elected official, the Mayor.'
In response to claims that the Mayor's proposed budget violates the city and county IGA, Mayor Wilson's Office shared the following statement with KOIN 6 News:
'Portland currently faces an unprecedented homeless crisis with 5,398 people living unsheltered and far too many lives lost. Mayor Wilson was elected to tackle this crisis head on, and his strategy relies on collaboration among government agencies, nonprofits, advocates, community leaders, and our partner Multnomah County. The existing intergovernmental agreement (IGA) is a framework for cooperation and does not prevent us from responding to this crisis. We will have opportunities to review and refine the IGA as part of our long-term strategy, but Mayor Wilson's immediate priority remains clear: saving lives and restoring stability for Portlanders.
The homeless crisis has placed extraordinary strain on our community, prompting significant investment in programs that support some of Portland's most vulnerable residents. In his budget message, Mayor Wilson emphasized that every dollar committed to ending unsheltered homelessness is an investment that restores quality of life, eases the burden on our public safety system, and ultimately bolsters our economic potential.
The proposed funding is not as a trade-off against city jobs but as part of a comprehensive effort to generate additional external revenue from our county, metro, and state partners. That extra revenue will strengthen our city's infrastructure and support our residents.'
When asked if the IGA should be altered and if homeless services fall under the county's responsibilities, a representative with Multnomah County Chair Jessica Vega Pederson's office told KOIN 6 News the Chair was too busy to respond.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Statue honoring Lancaster's first Black business owner completed
LANCASTER, Ohio (WCMH) — There is a new statue in the city of Lancaster honoring Scipio Smith, the man who became the city's first Black business owner in the 1800s. The statue is along Main Street, not far from where Smith's tinsmith shop was located. The statue shows Smith holding an open shackle with the day he was emancipated inscribed on it. He was enslaved in Virginia before being brought to Ohio. 'That was his way of showing you can't stop me, even this chain didn't hold me down,' said Michael Johnson, a local historian and the marketing director for the Fairfield County Heritage Association. 'You can't get much more of an underdog than being born a slave and losing your leg as a child.' Johnson found a brief entry about Smith in a history book. He said he'd never seen an entry quite like it, so he dug deeper. Eventually he learned about Smith's history as a slave. Four years after Smith was freed, he founded the AME church in town, which is now Allen Chapel. Italian eatery from Columbus couple behind Chapman's, Ginger Rabbit to open Friday 'To know he was right here, to know he was responsible for this church,' said Evan Saunders, Pastor of Allen Chapel. 'You don't even know the lives he's touched but yet here 2025 we realize he's touching a whole community with that so his legacy still continues to live on.' About two years after opening the church, Smith opened a tinsmith shop in Lancaster. That made him the city's first Black business owner, according to Johnson. 'He was pretty quick to act once he got his freedom. He knew what he wanted,' Johnson said. 'Opened door for other Black business owners.' Johnson wrote about Smith's story. But he wanted to do more to honor the local legend. About two years ago he started fundraising for a statue. It's now completed, full of symbols and Smith's story. 'For me I think statues are celebrations, they are people we should be looking up to, the ideals they represent, and Scipio, you can't beat his work ethic, his faith, his tenacity, the ability to overcome unbelievable obstacles. You can't beat that story,' Johnson said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Suns hire Jordan Ott - why it's no surprise
Yahoo Sports contributing NBA writer Tom Haberstroh and NBA writer Dan Devine discuss Phoenix's choice to be its new head coach and why governor Mat Ishbia's ties to Michigan State may have played a role in the decision. Hear the full conversation on 'The Big Number' and subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube or wherever you listen. View more Video Transcript Look man, when they did that coaching search, and they had a list of like 25 candidates, and I, I literally said, is there one that went to Michigan State? Advertisement cause that person is getting the job. And sure enough, not to discredit Jordan not, he's been around the league for a long time, but like the way that Matt Isa has run this team, selecting Brian Gregory, a former college coach to be his GM. Michigan State assistant coach to be his GM, it reminds me of the Charlotte Hornets under Michael Jordan when he hired Mitch Kupchak, former Chapel Hill guy, uh, UNC guy, Mitch Mitch Kupchak to be his GM and Buzz Peterson, Michael Jordan's roommate at college to be the assistant GM. It just feels like that recipe of of. Of hiring your buddies, hiring your college buddies, isn't necessarily a recipe for success, but it is something you can do as an owner. Advertisement Like, you pay $4 billion for this team. You want to take care of your guys, your buddies, you're more than welcome to do that. That is within your right. I just don't think that that is necessarily a recipe for success. And we've already seen. That Kevin Durant is reportedly gonna be shot this summer and might be on the trade block. It's not the first time that like friends have hired friends into the front office. We just saw over there in in in Utah that Danny Ainge, the CEO of the Utah Jazz, are hiring Austin Ainge, his son, to run the basketball ops for the team. So like keeping things all in the family, that's always been true in the NBA previous to the Jordan not higher. Advertisement The Phoenix Suns went with Monty Williams, who brought them to an NBA Finals. They went with Frank Vogel, who won an NBA championship. They went with Mike Budenhouser, who won an NBA championship. None of that worked, so why not get a guy who went to the same school as you? Like, if, if we're, if we're the, the process of going, like, we need somebody with championship experience, if that's not panning out, then try something different. Who knows? I I don't know, 40 year old guy with some good references and who went to the same school as me. Sure, what the hell? Why not? Let's give it a shot. Devin Booker, you like him? Advertisement Great. Sounds tremendous. Uh, you know, who knows? Uh, the, the, the process and the and the, the approach in the last few years in Phoenix has left something to be desired, a different process. Sure, why not? Tough stuff over there in Phoenix, but, uh, congrats to Jordan not on the, on the gig, uh, curious to see how that goes.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
US Supreme Court to review death row inmate's intellectual disability ruling
By John Kruzel WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on Friday to hear an appeal by Alabama officials of a judicial decision that a man convicted of a 1997 murder is intellectually disabled - a finding that spared him from the death penalty - as they press ahead with the Republican-governed state's bid to execute him. A lower court ruled that Joseph Clifton Smith is intellectually disabled based on its analysis of his IQ test scores and expert testimony. Under a 2002 Supreme Court precedent, executing an intellectually disabled person violates the U.S. Constitution's Eighth Amendment bar on cruel and unusual punishment. The justices are due to hear the case in their next term, which starts in October. Smith, now 54, was convicted and sentenced to death for the 1997 murder of a man named Durk Van Dam in Alabama's Mobile County. Smith fatally beat the man with a hammer and saw in order to steal his boots, some tools and $140, according to evidence in the case. The victim's body was found in his mud-bound Ford Ranger truck in an isolated, wooded area. The Supreme Court's 2002 precedent in a case called Atkins v. Virginia barred executing intellectually disabled people. President Donald Trump's administration backed Alabama's appeal in the case. At issue in Smith's case is whether and how courts may consider the cumulative effect of multiple intelligence quotient (IQ) scores in assessing a death row inmate's intellectual disability. Like many states, conservative-leaning Alabama considers evidence of IQ test scores of 70 or below as part of the standard for determining intellectual disability. Supreme Court rulings in 2014 and 2017 allowed courts to consider IQ score ranges that are close to 70 along with other evidence of intellectual disability, such as testimony of "adaptive deficits." Smith had five IQ test scores, the lowest of which was 72. A federal judge noted that Smith's score could be as low as 69, given the standard of error of plus or minus three points. The judge then found that Smith had significant deficits from an early age in social and interpersonal skills, independent living and academics. The Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the judge's conclusions in 2023, setting aside Smith's death sentence. This prompted Alabama officials to file their first of two appeals to the Supreme Court in the case. In November, the justices threw out the 11th Circuit's decision, saying that the lower court's evaluation of Smith's IQ scores can be read two ways, and requires clarification. Ten days later, the 11th Circuit issued an opinion clarifying that its evaluation was based on "a holistic approach to multiple IQ scores" that also considered additional relevant evidence, including expert testimony. This prompted a second appeal by Alabama officials to the Supreme Court. Alabama in its filing to the Supreme Court argued that the lower courts in the case applied the wrong legal standard in establishing Smith's intellectual disability and urged the justices to take up the appeal to provide clarity on the issue. Friday's action by the court was unexpected. The court had planned to release it on Monday along with its other regularly scheduled orders, but a software glitch on Friday prematurely sent email notifications concerning the court's decision in the case. "As a result, the court is issuing that order list now," said court spokesperson Patricia McCabe. It is not the first time the court has inadvertently disclosed action in sensitive cases. Last year, an apparent draft of a ruling in a case involving emergency abortion access in Idaho was briefly uploaded to the court's website before being taken down. That disclosure represented an embarrassment for the top U.S. judicial body, coming two years after the draft of a blockbuster ruling rolling back abortion rights was leaked.