logo
Advocates for kids, seniors, people with disabilities protest Trump's plan to cut Medicaid

Advocates for kids, seniors, people with disabilities protest Trump's plan to cut Medicaid

Yahoo3 days ago

Ashlie Bell-Seibers, a cancer survivor left blind in one eye, gets nervous in front of crowds. Still, she grabbed a microphone on June 3 in front of Nashville's federal building to speak about the children and families in Tennessee she said would be harmed by proposed cuts to Medicaid.
"As a teenager, I was diagnosed with thyroid cancer and without Medicaid, it's very likely I wouldn't be standing before you today," she told the crowd gathered for a protest led by the American Heart Association and sponsored by 11 non-profit organizations in the Volunteer State.
"My family couldn't afford the cancer treatment I needed."
Bell-Seibers credits care, made possible through Medicaid, with allowing her to heal and flourish. She became a first-generation college graduate and broke her family's cycle of poverty. She now works with hundreds of vulnerable families while serving as the director of Family Voices of Tennessee, a program of the Tennessee Disability Coalition.
"The proposed cuts to Medicaid will hurt families across Tennessee directly or indirectly, especially families of children with disabilities," she said. "Their families matter."
The controversy centers on President Donald Trump's proposed tax bill that aims to cut $625 billion from Medicaid, which could push an estimated 7.6 million Americans off coverage, in part by implementing new work requirements for able-bodied adults without children, according to a USA TODAY report. Those who oppose the requirement say it often ensnares people in an unending maze of bureaucratic red tape.
In a social media post, Trump said the legislation, which he calls his "big, beautiful bill," would be "arguably the most significant piece of Legislation that will ever be signed in the History of our Country! The Bill includes MASSIVE Tax CUTS, No Tax on Tips, No Tax on Overtime, Tax Deductions when you purchase an American Made Vehicle, along with strong Border Security measures, Pay Raises for our ICE and Border Patrol Agents, Funding for the Golden Dome, 'TRUMP Savings Accounts' for newborn babies, and much more!"
Bell-Seibers and others said they spoke to give a voice to parents who were unable to attend, either because they are working or caring for children.
Megan Schwalm stood beside Bell-Seibers to help display photos of children whose conditions necessitate costly medical care and whose families depend on the federal money.
Schwalm − president and CEO of the Tennessee Caregiver Coalition − noted that more than 1 million people in Tennessee care for aging parents, children with disabilities, spouses with serious illnesses and loved ones recovering from injuries or navigating end-of-life care.
She said an estimated 53 million Americans provide such unpaid care, contributing about $600 billion in essential labor.
"It's love, yes," she said. "But it's also labor."
"Caregivers are doing this work while sacrificing their own income, careers, health and sometimes even their homes," Schwalm said. "Caregiving is the invisible infrastructure holding our health care system together, and it's under attack."
Schwalm said the proposed bill would end a national "legacy of bipartisan support" and unfairly target caregivers, who sometimes have to leave jobs or reduce hours to care for loved ones at home.
"That is not policy," Schwalm said. "That is cruelty disguised as reform."
An estimated one out of five Tennessee residents are caregivers and many have relied on Medicaid for home health care, respite, transportation and medical supplies, Schwalm said. She said the assistance helps caregivers keep their loved ones at home instead of in costly institutions.
Nicole Lattatin, grassroots manager at the American Cancer Society's Cancer Action Network, said people need health insurance to screen for, detect, treat and survive cancer.
Nearly 43,000 people in Tennessee will be diagnosed with cancer in 2025 and more than 10,000 current Tennessee patients rely on Medicaid, she said.
Her daughters, ages 9 and 13, attended the event wearing blue T-shirts displaying the message "Medicaid Saves Lives," in white letters on the back, while the front proclaimed, "Where you live shouldn't determine if you live."
Some researchers argue that millions of people eligible for Medicaid could lose coverage because they are unable to meet the bureaucratic requirements to prove they are disabled, working or going to school.
Aaron Hawkins, a lung cancer survivor and patient advocate for the American Lung Association,
"I'm one of the lucky ones," he said. "My diagnosis was early. He had surgery but didn't need chemotherapy or radiation. Access to care was vitally, vitally important."
In late 2019, a surgeon removed about two-thirds of one of his lung − at a cost of $117,000.
"My family would have been financially devastated" without access to quality care, he said.
One in four people with lung cancer under the age of 65 rely on Medicaid for access to life-saving treatment and medication, Hawkins said.
Along with proposed Medicaid cuts, the proposed bill also would implement new work requirements for people ages 55 to 64 who receive assistance from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as SNAP. An estimated 42 Americans currently benefit from the program, according to a USA TODAY report.
Those who oppose the requirements include Jeannine Carpenter, Chattanooga Area Food Bank's chief communications officer. She also spoke at the protest, saying one in eight Tennesseans − including one in seven children − face hunger.
The food bank is one of five Feeding America food banks that together care for residents in each of Tennessee's 95 counties.
More than 1.1 million Tennesseans are food insecure, and 45% of their households are eligible for the SNAP food aid program, according to the latest Feeding America report, Carpenter said.
For every meal we provide, SNAP provides eight, she said of the Chattanooga Area Food Bank.
Adults in low-income homes who have SNAP spend an average of $1,400 less on medical expenses, Carpenter said.
"Food is medicine; Food is health care," she said. "Without it, our neighbors will not be healthy."
Schwalm said a caregiver recently told her that SNAP was the only way she could buy groceries while paying for her son's medications.
"When you cut SNAP," Schwalm said, "you're taking away food from families who are already stretched to the breaking point."
Reporter Beth Warren covers health care and can be reached at bwarren@tennessean.com.
This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Nashville protest warns of harm from Trump's proposed cuts to Medicaid, food aid

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump-Musk feud: Are electric vehicles and Tesla at the heart of the breakup?
Trump-Musk feud: Are electric vehicles and Tesla at the heart of the breakup?

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump-Musk feud: Are electric vehicles and Tesla at the heart of the breakup?

The President of the United States of America and one of the world's most influential billionaires are at odds after months of collaboration. The confrontation escalated Thursday with Elon Musk saying Trump would have lost the election without him in a post on X. President Donald Trump in turn referred to his former senior advisor as "the man who lost his mind" in a Friday morning ABC News phone interview. Republican Trump allies are now also speaking out against Musk. Musk's breakup with the administration has been public and is well-documented, with Trump and the Tesla CEO trading calculated jabs like pro boxers. The underlying reason behind the sudden intense feud is a serious cause of concern for some American car buyers. "Clean Coal" has been a popular buzzword for not one but two presidential campaigns for Donald Trump. So, Elon Musk's initial choice to stand beside a global warming skeptic as the CEO of a clean energy and automotive company was puzzling to say the least. At first, Musk's involvement with the administration was seen by many as mutually beneficial, since the CEO could potentially reap the benefits of government contracts for Tesla and SpaceX. The general public quickly soured to the idea of the eccentric CEO playing a key role in the administration. By April 8, Tesla stock had nosedived 41.50% from its January 2 share price. Tesla dealers have been attacked and vandalized while other Americans have staged peaceful protests against Musk's involvement in government and role at the Department of Government Efficiency. So, why would a guy who once wore a "Trump Was Right About Everything" hat suddenly publicly oppose his new bill? The short answer is, the two don't see eye to eye on the automotive industry's most controversial powertrain option. The One, Big, Beautiful Bill could decimate Tesla. President Donald Trump's stance and actions against EV adoption in America includes: Supporting the One, Big, Beautiful Bill, which suggests phasing out a federal EV tax credit that would benefit thousands of Tesla buyers Claiming former President Joe Biden's EV mandate "would kill 40% of the auto industry's jobs", according to Ordering the shut down of many federal electric vehicle chargers and pausing massive federal EV fleet purchases, according to Elon Musk (and Tesla's) stance and actions for EV adoption in America: Elon Musk bio says "Tesla's mission has been to accelerate the world's transition to sustainable energy" Musk claimed "the world does need electric cars" during a 60 Minutes interview and factory tour, asserting that Tesla has a crucial role in the future of EVs Tesla has collaborated with Ford, GM, Stellantis, Rivian, Volkswagen, Honda, Acura, Hyundai, Kia, Toyota and more to provide Tesla Supercharger access to EVs, making them easier to charge for American drivers Tesla stock recently plummeted in response to the feud between Trump and Musk. The President has also threatened Musk's government contracts amidst the dispute. The bill appears to be the focal point of the rift, but the two clearly have different ideas on what America's future should be. President Donald Trump and Elon Musk may have been able to join forces over their mutual stances on certain conservative points and a hatred of bureaucracy, but their White House tag team was short-lived. The One, Big, Beautiful Bill directly undermines some of the actions Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency have taken since the two united. Trump is 78 years old and expresses a desire to bring America back to a golden age of manufacturing before globalism outsourced American jobs and created a reliance on foreign trade. He also speaks about returning the country to an age where mining and drilling for fossil fuel production were prioritized over environmental concerns. Musk, on the other hand, is a 53-year-old futurist who strives to make humans a multi-planetary species and has made a fortune from innovation and technological disruption. At a glance, the issue seems to be about the One, Big, Beautiful Bill attacking Tesla's bottom line but the two polarizing figures are fundamentally different in terms of future aspirations. Based on Trump's falling out with several former members of the first Trump administration and Musk's known adversarial nature in the private sector, this could be the end for, arguably, the most fascinating duo of 2025. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Donald Trump vs Elon Musk: Could Tesla, EVs be at the art of the feud?

Scott Galloway sends strong message to Elon Musk about Bill Gates
Scott Galloway sends strong message to Elon Musk about Bill Gates

Miami Herald

time31 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Scott Galloway sends strong message to Elon Musk about Bill Gates

Podcaster and New York University professor Scott Galloway is well-known for his provocative opinions and smart takes on business, finance and government. That fact includes Galloway's unconventional view on how Social Security ought to be run. It also involves some sharply critical words he recently spoke about Tesla CEO Elon Musk. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Galloway, who earns $16 million annually, contends that wealthy individuals, including himself, should not receive Social Security benefits. He advocates for means-testing to determine eligibility, ensuring that the program primarily supports those who depend on it for financial security in retirement. He highlights an imbalance in the system, pointing out that an employee at the company he owns, ProfG Media, earning $160,000 annually contributes $9,000 to Social Security, which amounts to 6% of their income. However, because Social Security taxes are capped at $160,000, someone earning millions - such as himself - still pays only $9,000, despite making exponentially more. Related: Scott Galloway warns Americans on 401(k), US economy threat Galloway sees Social Security as a safety net meant to prevent seniors from falling into poverty, rather than a mechanism for transferring wealth from younger generations to retirees who, collectively, are the most financially well-off generation in history. He argues that substantial reforms are necessary to reduce costs significantly. He believes that political leaders have avoided addressing the issue due to the risks involved, noting that older voters have managed to secure increasing financial benefits for themselves. Galloway asserts that this trend must end and that, by his math, approximately one-third of seniors should not be receiving Social Security. Appearing on a YouTube broadcast of Piers Morgan Uncensored, Galloway explained his view that a number of Musk's actions, such as spearheading the shutting down of USAID, were not to be respected. "Somehow we've decided in America that innovation and money replaces - or obviates, or excuses - depravity." Galloway said. "Or cutting off aid to HIV positive mothers, deciding what veterans should get benefits, cutting off SNAP payments, which have shown to have a positive net return when people run out of money for food at the end of the month." "I mean, I think one of the wonderful things about being an American and quite frankly, for me what it means to be a man and what I try to teach my boys, is the whole point of prosperity is such that you can protect people," he added. More on retirement: Dave Ramsey sounds alarm for Americans on Social SecurityScott Galloway warns Americans on 401(k), US economy threatShark Tank's Kevin O'Leary has message on Social Security, 401(k)s Galloway criticized Musk's behavior, arguing that wealth and success should not excuse problematic actions. According to Galloway, when someone publicly makes offensive gestures such as apparent Nazi salutes, is largely absent from their children's lives, or reportedly struggles with substance abuse, it raises serious concerns. He questions whether such a person should be considered an aspirational figure for young men. Galloway urges people to reflect on how money and status can distort public perception, noting that Musk's achievements - whether in aerospace or autonomous vehicles - are remarkable. However, he challenges the idea that these accomplishments justify moral failings, asking whether society should overlook unethical behavior simply because someone is a visionary or the richest person in the world. Related: Dave Ramsey warns Americans on Social Security Galloway discusses Musk's behavior and mentions billionaire Bill Gates as an example of an immensely wealthy person who is putting his money toward philanthropy and making the world a better place. "Does that mean unlike Bill Gates, he's not using his billions to help people?" Galloway asked. "He's not planting trees the shade of which he won't sit under. I think this is an individual who has literally come off the tracks ... and is using his immense power to get people elected." "Too many of us excuse what is abhorrent behavior," Galloway added. "I think his legacy is not going to be an EV or putting rockets into space. I think it's going to be unnecessary death, disease, and disability of the world's most vulnerable. That is not what it means to be an innovator. It's not what it means to be an American. It's not what it means to be a man." Related: Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary sends strong message on Social Security The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Florida attorney general loses appeal to overturn order blocking immigration law
Florida attorney general loses appeal to overturn order blocking immigration law

Miami Herald

time31 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Florida attorney general loses appeal to overturn order blocking immigration law

A judicial appeals panel has upheld a temporary injunction blocking the enforcement of a new state law criminalizing undocumented immigrants when they arrive in Florida — notching another victory for immigration advocates in a case that has drawn Florida's attorney general into conflict with a Miami federal judge. The Friday afternoon ruling by a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Atlanta keeps in place a lower court order temporarily preventing police and prosecutors from making arrests and pursuing charges under Florida's SB-4, signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis in February. The law makes it a crime for immigrants to enter the state of Florida if they have been deported or denied entry into the country, or eluded immigration officers when coming into the United States. 'This is a difficult case, and this order does not finally resolve the issues,' states the order, issued by judges Jill Pryor, Kevin Newsom and Embry Kidd. The unsuccessful appeal at the heart of Friday's ruling was brought by Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, who sought to stay the temporary injunction. Uthmeier has argued that District Court Judge Kathleen Williams overstepped in April when, responding to a lawsuit brought by several undocumented Florida residents who said the law was unconstitutional, she blocked the enforcement of the law. Williams initially issued a restraining order preventing the enforcement of SB-4, and then ordered a broader temporary injunction after learning that state police had continued to make arrests — including an American citizen. Uthmeier's attorneys argued that while Williams' order had bound them from enforcing the law, it didn't apply to 'independent' law enforcement agencies like the Florida Highway Patrol. The attorney general was so adamant in his position that, days later, he wrote a letter to law enforcement agencies telling them he didn't think Williams' order was legitimate — leading the judge to initiate contempt proceedings. In their Friday ruling, the judges waded into the legal skirmish, writing that Uthmeier 'may well be right that the district court's order is impermissibly broad. But that does not warrant what seems to have been at least a veiled threat not to obey it.' A spokesman for Uthmeier's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The American Civil Liberties Union, whose attorneys have worked on the case, celebrated the ruling as a significant victory, not just in Florida but around the country as red states move to implement strict immigration laws. 'This ruling is not just a legal victory — it's a resounding rejection of cruelty masquerading as policy,' said Bacardi Jackson, executive director of the ACLU of Florida. The case, brought by the Florida Immigrant Coalition, the Farmworker Association of Florida, will continue on before Judge Williams, who has yet to issue her ruling on whether Uthmeier will be held in contempt of court.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store