logo
Fuel to Air India engines ‘cut off before crash'

Fuel to Air India engines ‘cut off before crash'

Kuwait Times6 days ago
NEW DELHI: Fuel control switches to the engines of an Air India flight that crashed shortly after takeoff, killing 260 people, were moved from the 'run' to the 'cutoff' position moments before impact, a preliminary investigation report said Saturday. The report, issued by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), did not offer any conclusions or apportion blame for the June 12 disaster, but indicated that one pilot asked the other why he cut off fuel, and the second pilot responded that he had not.
The Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner was headed from Ahmedabad in western India to London when it crashed, killing all but one of the 242 people on board as well as 19 people on the ground. In its 15-page report, the investigation bureau said that once the aircraft achieved its top recorded speed, 'the Engine 1 and Engine 2 fuel cutoff switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one after another with a time gap of 01 sec'. 'In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why did he cutoff. The other pilot responded that he did not do so,' it said.
The aircraft quickly began to lose altitude. The switches then returned to the 'RUN' position and the engines appeared to be gathering power, but 'one of the pilots transmitted 'MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY'', the report said. Air traffic controllers asked the pilots what was wrong, but then saw the plane crashing and called emergency personnel to the scene.
Civil aviation minister Ram Mohan Naidu Kinjarapu told reporters that investigators probed in a 'mature, transparent' way. 'This is a preliminary report. We want the final report to come in, so let us wait for it,' he said. Earlier this week, specialist website The Air Current, citing multiple sources familiar with the probe, reported it had 'narrowed its focus to the movement of the engine fuel switches', while noting that full analysis will 'take months - if not longer'. It added that 'the focus of the investigators could change during that time'.
The Indian agency's report said the US Federal Aviation Administration had issued an information bulletin in 2018 about 'the potential disengagement of the fuel control switch locking feature'. Though the concern was not considered an 'unsafe condition' that would warrant a more serious directive, Air India told investigators it did not carry out suggested inspections as they were 'advisory and not mandatory'.
Air India was compliant with all airworthiness directives and alert service bulletins on the aircraft, the report said. The investigations bureau said there were 'no recommended actions to B787-8 and/or GE GEnx-1B engine operators and manufacturers', suggesting no technical issues with the engines (GE) or the aircraft (Boeing). The bureau said the investigation was ongoing, and that additional evidence and information had been 'sought from the stakeholders'.
Boeing said in a statement it would 'continue to support the investigation and our customer', adding 'our thoughts remain' with those affected by the disaster. Air India said it was 'working closely with stakeholders, including regulators.' 'We continue to fully cooperate with the AAIB and other authorities as their investigation progresses,' it said in a statement on X. The UN's International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) stipulates that states heading an investigation must submit a preliminary report within 30 days of an accident. US and British air accident investigators have taken part in the probe.
Suresh Mistry, who lost his daughter Kinal in the crash, told AFP his family was still coming to terms with the loss. 'How is possible that there is an internal issue with the flight and nobody knew? Even cars these days indicate when there is a problem. How does it not happen on flights?' he said. Imtiyaz Ali, whose brother was killed along with his wife and two children, said the preliminary report took 'nothing forward' for him. 'And (it) is not even close to a closure,' he said. 'It feels like we are at the same spot, where we were a month ago when the crash happened.'
The plane was carrying 230 passengers - 169 Indians, 53 British, seven Portuguese and a Canadian - and 12 crew. Dozens of people on the ground were injured. One passenger miraculously survived, a British citizen who was seen walking out of the wreckage of the crash, and who has since been discharged from hospital. Health officials in the Indian state of Gujarat initially said at least 279 people were killed, but forensic scientists reduced the figure after multiple scattered and badly burnt remains were identified.- AFP
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fuel Cutoff Mystery: Is the Truth About Air India's Crash Being Covered Up?
Fuel Cutoff Mystery: Is the Truth About Air India's Crash Being Covered Up?

Arab Times

time13 hours ago

  • Arab Times

Fuel Cutoff Mystery: Is the Truth About Air India's Crash Being Covered Up?

MUMBAI, July 18: The captain of Air India Flight 171, which crashed shortly after takeoff in Ahmedabad last month, killing 241 of the 242 people on board, reportedly handed control of the aircraft to his first officer seconds before the disaster, according to information retrieved from the flight's black boxes. Sources familiar with the cockpit voice recordings told Italy's Corriere della Sera that Captain Sumeet Sabharwal told First Officer Clive Kunder, 'The plane is in your hands,' moments before the plane left the runway. While it is not uncommon for a first officer to pilot a flight during takeoff, aviation experts have questioned the timing and circumstances of the handover. Flight data shows the aircraft took off at 1:38pm and remained airborne for just 30 seconds before it lost power and crashed into a residential area, killing 19 people on the ground. The sole survivor on board remains in critical condition. Investigators say the plane's engines lost thrust shortly after takeoff, and that the fuel control switches—critical to maintaining engine power—had been moved from the 'run' position to 'cutoff' within seconds of liftoff. According to India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), both switches were turned off and then switched back on about ten seconds later, but not in time to prevent the crash. The AAIB's preliminary report, released last week, confirmed that no mechanical or maintenance faults were found on the aircraft. However, the cause of the fuel cutoff remains under investigation. The switches are designed with safety locks that require manual lifting to operate, making an accidental flip highly unlikely. Cockpit audio captured in the seconds before the crash suggests rising tension between the two pilots. According to sources briefed on the U.S. assessment of the recordings, First Officer Kunder can be heard repeatedly asking, 'Why did you shut off the engines?' to which the senior pilot vaguely replied, 'I didn't do it.' The exchange, lasting six seconds, has been interpreted by some officials as an indirect admission that the captain may have cut the fuel supply. Flight data further reveals that after the aircraft reached approximately 650 feet, a backup power system—known as the Ram Air Turbine (RAT)—deployed, indicating both engines had lost power. Although the fuel switches were returned to 'run' and the engines attempted to restart, the aircraft lacked the altitude and time to recover. The jet clipped treetops and a chimney before crashing into a nearby medical college, erupting in flames. Aviation experts remain baffled by the switch movement. 'It's absolutely bizarre for the engine cutoff switches to be flipped just after takeoff,' said Terry Tozer, a former airline pilot, speaking to Sky News. 'Unfortunately, the altitude was so low that the engines didn't have time to recover.' The AAIB has yet to identify which pilot flipped the switches, and cockpit audio alone has not definitively clarified the roles each pilot played in the final moments. U.S. officials reviewing the early data believe that as the flying pilot, First Officer Kunder would likely have had both hands on the Dreamliner's controls, suggesting Captain Sabharwal may have been responsible for manipulating the switches. Captain Sabharwal had logged over 15,000 hours of flight time, while Kunder had 3,400. According to colleagues cited in Indian media, Sabharwal had recently taken bereavement leave following his mother's death but had been medically cleared to fly. Some sources have raised questions regarding the mental health history of one of the pilots. Captain Mohan Ranganathan, a prominent Indian aviation safety expert, told The Daily Telegraph that one pilot had previously taken extended medical leave for mental health reasons. However, this has not been confirmed by the authorities, and Air India maintains both pilots were fully certified for duty. India's Civil Aviation Minister, Kinjarapu Ram Mohan Naidu, has urged the public to avoid premature conclusions. 'Let us wait for the final report,' he told reporters. Air India CEO Campbell Wilson echoed that message in an internal memo, stating that while the preliminary report found no mechanical issues, further investigation is required to determine the human factors involved. In response to the crash, Indian aviation authorities have ordered comprehensive checks across Air India's Boeing 787 Dreamliner fleet. The airline operates 33 of the aircraft. The AAIB has not issued any immediate safety recommendations to Boeing or the engine manufacturer, General Electric. The agency criticised elements of the international media for 'selective and unverified reporting,' stating that the investigation remains ongoing and that drawing conclusions at this stage is premature. The final report into the crash is expected within 12 months, in line with international aviation standards.

Air India crash probe focuses on actions of plane's captain
Air India crash probe focuses on actions of plane's captain

Kuwait Times

timea day ago

  • Kuwait Times

Air India crash probe focuses on actions of plane's captain

INDIA: A cockpit recording of dialogue between the two pilots of the Air India flight that crashed last month indicates the captain cut the flow of fuel to the plane's engines, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday. The newspaper cited people familiar with US officials' early assessment of evidence uncovered in the investigation into the June 12 crash of a Boeing 787 Dreamliner in Ahmedabad, India, that killed 260 people. A preliminary report into the crash released by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) on Saturday said one pilot was then heard on the cockpit voice recorder asking the other why he cut off the fuel and 'the other pilot responded that he did not do so.' Investigators did not identify which remarks were made by Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and which by First Officer Clive Kunder, who had total flying experience of 15,638 hours and 3,403 hours, respectively. Kunder, who was flying the plane, asked Sabharwal why he moved the fuel switches to the 'cutoff' position seconds after lifting off the runway, the Wall Street Journal reported. The Journal did not say if there was any evidence that Sabharwal did move the switches, beyond the verbal exchange it cited. But it quoted US pilots who have read the Indian authorities' report as saying that Kunder, the pilot actively flying, likely would have had his hands full pulling back on the Dreamliner's controls at that stage of the flight. India's AAIB, Directorate General of Civil Aviation, Ministry of Civil Aviation, Air India and two unions representing Indian pilots did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment on the Wall Street Journal report. Boeing declined to comment. The AAIB's preliminary report said the fuel switches had switched from run to cutoff a second apart just after takeoff, but it did not say how they were flipped. Almost immediately after the plane lifted off the ground, closed-circuit TV footage showed a backup energy source called a ram air turbine had deployed, indicating a loss of power from the engines. The London-bound plane began to lose thrust, and after reaching a height of 650 feet, the jet started to sink. The fuel switches for both engines were turned back to run, and the airplane automatically tried restarting the engines, the report said. But the plane was too low and too slow to be able to recover, aviation safety expert John Nance told Reuters. The plane clipped some trees and a chimney before crashing in a fireball into a building on a nearby medical college campus, the report said, killing 19 people on the ground and 241 of the 242 on board the 787. In an internal memo on Monday, Air India CEO Campbell Wilson said the preliminary report found no mechanical or maintenance faults and that all required maintenance had been carried out. The AAIB's preliminary report had no safety recommendations for Boeing or engine manufacturer GE. After the report was released, the US Federal Aviation Administration and Boeing privately issued notifications that the fuel switch locks on Boeing planes are safe, a document seen by Reuters showed and four sources with knowledge of the matter said. The circumstantial evidence increasingly indicates that a crew member flipped the engine fuel switches, Nance said, given there was 'no other rational explanation' that was consistent with the information released to date. Nonetheless, investigators 'still have to dig into all the factors' and rule out other possible contributing factors which would take time, he said. Most air crashes are caused by multiple factors, and under international rules, a final report is expected within a year of an accident. The Air India crash has rekindled debate over adding flight deck cameras, known as cockpit image recorders, on airliners. Nance said investigators likely would have benefited greatly from having video footage of the cockpit during the Air India flight. Air India has faced additional scrutiny on other fronts after the crash. The European Union Aviation Safety Agency said this month it plans to investigate its budget airline, Air India Express, after Reuters reported the carrier did not follow a directive to change engine parts of an Airbus A320 in a timely manner and falsified records to show compliance.--AFP

Five dead in Mi-8 helicopter crash in Russia's Khabarovsk Territory
Five dead in Mi-8 helicopter crash in Russia's Khabarovsk Territory

Arab Times

time3 days ago

  • Arab Times

Five dead in Mi-8 helicopter crash in Russia's Khabarovsk Territory

VLADIVOSTOK, July 16, (Xinhua): All five people on board a Mi-8 helicopter that went missing in Russia's Khabarovsk Territory have been confirmed dead, emergency authorities said Wednesday. "Rescuers from the Ministry of Emergency Situations, together with investigators, will examine the crash site, the helicopter wreckage, and search for the flight recorders to determine the cause of the accident," said the ministry. The five victims included three crew members and two technical specialists. The wreckage was discovered on a forested, rocky mountainside near Cape Gadikan, approximately 130 km from the settlement of Okhotsk, making access difficult, TASS news agency reported. The Mi-8 helicopter, operated by the private aviation company APK Vzlet LLC, was flying from Okhotsk to Magadan on Monday. The crew failed to make contact at the scheduled time, and the emergency locator beacon did not activate, said the report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store