Students across the Mid West take part in National Walk Safely to School Day on Friday
More than 150 students from Mt Tarcoola Primary School took part, walking or riding to school on Friday morning.
Principal Paul Luxton gathered with 25 students at Paringa Park, walking together to school while another half dozen students and parents waiting in their front yards joined the group along the way.
On arrival the students were treated to a healthy breakfast of fresh fruit and muffins.
On the importance of the day Mr Luxton said: 'In today's world people don't think they're safe, so kids tend to not to walk to school like they used to. This shows it is easy, there's plenty of safe footpaths and crossing points all along the way.
'It's reassuring for parents to know that their child is walking to school with another child, the good thing is the kids link up and say, 'this is my place. I'm walking past here so I'll walk with them'.'
The community event, now in its 26th year, aims to promote road safety, reduce impacts on the environment and champion the health benefits of regular walking.
Those benefits are not just physical — walking to and from school can have a positive impact on a student's ability to focus in class and their academic performance.
Pedestrian Council of Australia CEO Harold Scruby said: 'Until they are 10, children must always hold the hand of an adult when crossing the road.
'The best exercise for all Australians is walking regularly. Children need at least 60 minutes of physical activity a day. We should encourage them to take a walk before school, during and at the end of their day.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
2 hours ago
- West Australian
Australia ‘very concerned' by Donald Trump's 250 per cent pharmaceutical tariff threat
Australia's Health Minister has admitted he's 'very concerned' by Donald Trump's threat to raise pharmaceutical tariffs as high as 250 per cent and insisted PBS is off limits. Mark Butler has vowed Australia will continue to 'press the case' for the continuation of free trade with America — acknowledging it would be a major blow to Australian patients and producers. US President Donald Trump told CNBC this week he would expand this tariff regime by slapping new tariffs on foreign-made pharmaceuticals. 'It's going to go to 150 per cent and then it's going to go to 250 per cent,' he told the US business news channel. He said the final rate is expected to be announced within the next week or so, with a transitional period to give drug manufacturers time to adjust their supply chains. 'We are very concerned about the latest announcement from the administration around the possibility of pharmaceutical tariffs going as high as 250 per cent over the next couple of years,' Mr Butler told reporters in Melbourne on Thursday. 'That is why we're working so hard to press the case for the continuation of free trade.' Under the $18 billion-dollar Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, the government negotiates with the drug companies to enable Australians to buy life-saving drugs worth thousands of dollars for as little as $25 a script. In a series of letters to 17 drug manufacturers on Friday, Mr Trump had also demanded they negotiate harder with 'foreign freeloading nations' he blamed for higher US drug prices. It comes after a submission was made to the US government March by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) claiming Australia's subsidised medical system was 'egregious and discriminatory'. Mr Butler said the US and Australian pharmaceutical trade relationship benefited both nations. 'America exports more pharmaceuticals to Australia than we do to them. They do it on a tariff-free basis,' he said. 'That's served both of our countries very well and we'll continue to argue the case for a continuation of free trade in pharmaceuticals.' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Australia would continue to support the PBS and spruiked his government's recent legislation in the first sitting black of the 48th Parliament to make PBS medicines even cheaper. 'We support the PBS. It is part of who we are as Australia. We're a sovereign nation, it's something that has produced massive benefits for Australia. It's a proud Labor creation and we are building on it,' he said on Thursday when asked if he was concerned by the latest development of Trump's ever-expanding tariffs. 'That's why we introduced legislation last week to reduce the cost of medicines to $25 that are listed on the PBS.' It comes as Mr Trump's country-specific 'reciprocal' tariffs, first floated on 'Liberation Day' in April, were scheduled to take effect on August 7. The US imposed a 10 per cent baseline tariff on imported goods from Australia which was the lowest rate of other nations.
The Advertiser
4 hours ago
- The Advertiser
'It's a living nightmare': inside the regional wood fire pollution crisis
Lisa Cunial cannot go for a walk in the beautiful wetland behind her house. A few minutes in the garden and she can't breathe. "Gardening is one of my passions," she tells ACM. "It is such a shame." Ms Cunial has lived in Orange in the NSW Central West for more than 25 years. "I used to live out of town as a kid and wonder why all my friends in town were always sick and had asthma," she said. Every year, winter brings the haze of wood fire smoke and she is "always on the cusp of a reaction". "Your sensitivity to the smoke gets worse". Agricultural burn-offs in the surrounding areas exacerbate the problem. After the bushfire season in 2019, she was diagnosed with Reactive Airways Dysfunction Syndrome (RADS), a type of asthma-like condition that develops after high-level exposure to an irritating substance such as corrosive material, gas, vapour or fumes. "I couldn't breathe," she said. "If I come across wood smoke, it impacts me immediately. I cannot get better." Ms Cunial's story is not unique. ACM has spoken to dozens of people from regional Australia dealing with wood heater pollution. Around 10 per cent of Australians use wood heaters as their main source of heating. For some, they have become a "lifestyle" accessory. But the health effects are dire. Wood heaters emit large amounts of fine particulate matter (known as PM2.5) into the atmosphere. These particulates could reach deep into the lungs, causing respiratory issues and asthma symptoms. NSW Health's former top doctor, Kerry Chant, said wood fire heaters were so detrimental to health that she would consider banning them. "Long-term exposure to particulate pollution, especially finer particles (PM2.5), can cause heart and lung disease while brief exposures can aggravate asthma and worsen pre-existing heart and lung conditions," she said. Children, the elderly, and people with existing health issues were most at risk. NSW Health advises that "instead of using a wood-burning heater in your home, consider using heating alternatives that cause less pollution, such as reverse cycle air-conditioning, flued gas or electric heaters". New modelling from the Centre for Safe Air at the University of Tasmania shows the toll of wood fire heater pollution. The modelling estimated long-term exposure to smoke from wood heaters contributed to 729 premature deaths every year in Australia. In regional and rural locations, where it is colder and more people use wood heaters, emissions are highest. Regional locations take out the top five worst areas for wood fire heater pollution. Find out the emissions for your area: Launceston and Hobart in Tasmania, the Adelaide Hills in South Australia, Armidale in the Central West in New South Wales, and Bunbury in Western Australia top the list for wood-heater pollution. Centre for Safe Air director, professor Fay Johnston, told ACM the modelling found the areas with the most wood heater pollution tend to be "cooler places where wood burning is common and where towns and cities are located in valleys and basins that trap air pollution during winter". The most premature deaths associated with wood heaters, however, tend to be in areas with the highest population densities. "Sydney's basin-shaped topography and high urban density result in over 300 earlier-than-expected deaths every year, more than any other Australian city," Professor Johnston said. Professor Johnston said that many people are surprised by the impact of wood heaters. "When it comes to air pollution, many people think of exhaust pipe emissions from cars and trucks, smoke from coal-fired power stations or hazard reduction burns," she said. "It is often a surprise to learn that the health impacts of wood heaters are much greater than any of these sources of pollution in most Australian towns and cities." Melbourne community advocate for clean air, Arabella Daniel, said wood pollution was behind a raft of neighbourhood disputes. "People exposed to wood smoke often don't get empathy from a neighbour who is burning," she said. "Those who complain can often experience sociopathic revenge behaviour and retaliation." Managing wood smoke pollution is the responsibility of local councils, which were either reluctant to deal with the problem or not resourced to police chimney smoke, she said. "We are stuck without a remedy. We need state and federal laws to protect health." In 2023, the ACT Government announced that it would phase out wood heaters in the territory by 2045. Ms Daniel said it was a welcome step, but the timeline "was absolutely not good enough". "We consider this a public health emergency," she said. "There is very little political will. We need a hero to step up." She wants no new installations of wood heaters and a subsidised phase-out replacement program converting to split systems. Canberra University's Environmental Public Health Professor Sotiris Vardoulakis told ACM that "decisive and rapid policy action" was needed on wood heater pollution in Australian cities and towns. "This is a major public health issue in many ways similar to smoking in public places, which needs to be urgently addressed," he said. Prof Vardoulakis said new installation of wood heaters need to be banned in new and existing properties in urban areas and suburbs. Mandating the removal of wood heaters before a property can be sold would also reduce the number of older wood heaters, he said. Targeted financial incentives also need to be considered, particularly for low-income households. Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council is currently reviewing a draft policy that would restrict the installation of wood heaters in some urban areas. For some, any action comes too late. Tasmanian resident Jane (surname withheld) still lives with the trauma from wood fire heaters. She was living in a rural town in north-west Tasmania when friendly relationships with neighbours turned sour after she approached them about their wood heater. "The situation caused a lot of trauma and despair," she said. "I lost work days because I was so sick." She said the smoke intensity coming into her weatherboard house became "alarming". The council would only act if she provided evidence of 10 minutes of footage of the burning. She went to the EPA in Tasmania, which calculated that the emissions from the heater were at dangerous levels, but the council still would not intervene. "Why does it appear that people with wood heaters have all the rights?" she said. "I understand they are cosy, but they are a significant health compromise. How can the government say on one hand smoking kills, but allow heaters to burn 24 hours a day?" Do you know more? Email the journalist: Lisa Cunial cannot go for a walk in the beautiful wetland behind her house. A few minutes in the garden and she can't breathe. "Gardening is one of my passions," she tells ACM. "It is such a shame." Ms Cunial has lived in Orange in the NSW Central West for more than 25 years. "I used to live out of town as a kid and wonder why all my friends in town were always sick and had asthma," she said. Every year, winter brings the haze of wood fire smoke and she is "always on the cusp of a reaction". "Your sensitivity to the smoke gets worse". Agricultural burn-offs in the surrounding areas exacerbate the problem. After the bushfire season in 2019, she was diagnosed with Reactive Airways Dysfunction Syndrome (RADS), a type of asthma-like condition that develops after high-level exposure to an irritating substance such as corrosive material, gas, vapour or fumes. "I couldn't breathe," she said. "If I come across wood smoke, it impacts me immediately. I cannot get better." Ms Cunial's story is not unique. ACM has spoken to dozens of people from regional Australia dealing with wood heater pollution. Around 10 per cent of Australians use wood heaters as their main source of heating. For some, they have become a "lifestyle" accessory. But the health effects are dire. Wood heaters emit large amounts of fine particulate matter (known as PM2.5) into the atmosphere. These particulates could reach deep into the lungs, causing respiratory issues and asthma symptoms. NSW Health's former top doctor, Kerry Chant, said wood fire heaters were so detrimental to health that she would consider banning them. "Long-term exposure to particulate pollution, especially finer particles (PM2.5), can cause heart and lung disease while brief exposures can aggravate asthma and worsen pre-existing heart and lung conditions," she said. Children, the elderly, and people with existing health issues were most at risk. NSW Health advises that "instead of using a wood-burning heater in your home, consider using heating alternatives that cause less pollution, such as reverse cycle air-conditioning, flued gas or electric heaters". New modelling from the Centre for Safe Air at the University of Tasmania shows the toll of wood fire heater pollution. The modelling estimated long-term exposure to smoke from wood heaters contributed to 729 premature deaths every year in Australia. In regional and rural locations, where it is colder and more people use wood heaters, emissions are highest. Regional locations take out the top five worst areas for wood fire heater pollution. Find out the emissions for your area: Launceston and Hobart in Tasmania, the Adelaide Hills in South Australia, Armidale in the Central West in New South Wales, and Bunbury in Western Australia top the list for wood-heater pollution. Centre for Safe Air director, professor Fay Johnston, told ACM the modelling found the areas with the most wood heater pollution tend to be "cooler places where wood burning is common and where towns and cities are located in valleys and basins that trap air pollution during winter". The most premature deaths associated with wood heaters, however, tend to be in areas with the highest population densities. "Sydney's basin-shaped topography and high urban density result in over 300 earlier-than-expected deaths every year, more than any other Australian city," Professor Johnston said. Professor Johnston said that many people are surprised by the impact of wood heaters. "When it comes to air pollution, many people think of exhaust pipe emissions from cars and trucks, smoke from coal-fired power stations or hazard reduction burns," she said. "It is often a surprise to learn that the health impacts of wood heaters are much greater than any of these sources of pollution in most Australian towns and cities." Melbourne community advocate for clean air, Arabella Daniel, said wood pollution was behind a raft of neighbourhood disputes. "People exposed to wood smoke often don't get empathy from a neighbour who is burning," she said. "Those who complain can often experience sociopathic revenge behaviour and retaliation." Managing wood smoke pollution is the responsibility of local councils, which were either reluctant to deal with the problem or not resourced to police chimney smoke, she said. "We are stuck without a remedy. We need state and federal laws to protect health." In 2023, the ACT Government announced that it would phase out wood heaters in the territory by 2045. Ms Daniel said it was a welcome step, but the timeline "was absolutely not good enough". "We consider this a public health emergency," she said. "There is very little political will. We need a hero to step up." She wants no new installations of wood heaters and a subsidised phase-out replacement program converting to split systems. Canberra University's Environmental Public Health Professor Sotiris Vardoulakis told ACM that "decisive and rapid policy action" was needed on wood heater pollution in Australian cities and towns. "This is a major public health issue in many ways similar to smoking in public places, which needs to be urgently addressed," he said. Prof Vardoulakis said new installation of wood heaters need to be banned in new and existing properties in urban areas and suburbs. Mandating the removal of wood heaters before a property can be sold would also reduce the number of older wood heaters, he said. Targeted financial incentives also need to be considered, particularly for low-income households. Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council is currently reviewing a draft policy that would restrict the installation of wood heaters in some urban areas. For some, any action comes too late. Tasmanian resident Jane (surname withheld) still lives with the trauma from wood fire heaters. She was living in a rural town in north-west Tasmania when friendly relationships with neighbours turned sour after she approached them about their wood heater. "The situation caused a lot of trauma and despair," she said. "I lost work days because I was so sick." She said the smoke intensity coming into her weatherboard house became "alarming". The council would only act if she provided evidence of 10 minutes of footage of the burning. She went to the EPA in Tasmania, which calculated that the emissions from the heater were at dangerous levels, but the council still would not intervene. "Why does it appear that people with wood heaters have all the rights?" she said. "I understand they are cosy, but they are a significant health compromise. How can the government say on one hand smoking kills, but allow heaters to burn 24 hours a day?" Do you know more? Email the journalist: Lisa Cunial cannot go for a walk in the beautiful wetland behind her house. A few minutes in the garden and she can't breathe. "Gardening is one of my passions," she tells ACM. "It is such a shame." Ms Cunial has lived in Orange in the NSW Central West for more than 25 years. "I used to live out of town as a kid and wonder why all my friends in town were always sick and had asthma," she said. Every year, winter brings the haze of wood fire smoke and she is "always on the cusp of a reaction". "Your sensitivity to the smoke gets worse". Agricultural burn-offs in the surrounding areas exacerbate the problem. After the bushfire season in 2019, she was diagnosed with Reactive Airways Dysfunction Syndrome (RADS), a type of asthma-like condition that develops after high-level exposure to an irritating substance such as corrosive material, gas, vapour or fumes. "I couldn't breathe," she said. "If I come across wood smoke, it impacts me immediately. I cannot get better." Ms Cunial's story is not unique. ACM has spoken to dozens of people from regional Australia dealing with wood heater pollution. Around 10 per cent of Australians use wood heaters as their main source of heating. For some, they have become a "lifestyle" accessory. But the health effects are dire. Wood heaters emit large amounts of fine particulate matter (known as PM2.5) into the atmosphere. These particulates could reach deep into the lungs, causing respiratory issues and asthma symptoms. NSW Health's former top doctor, Kerry Chant, said wood fire heaters were so detrimental to health that she would consider banning them. "Long-term exposure to particulate pollution, especially finer particles (PM2.5), can cause heart and lung disease while brief exposures can aggravate asthma and worsen pre-existing heart and lung conditions," she said. Children, the elderly, and people with existing health issues were most at risk. NSW Health advises that "instead of using a wood-burning heater in your home, consider using heating alternatives that cause less pollution, such as reverse cycle air-conditioning, flued gas or electric heaters". New modelling from the Centre for Safe Air at the University of Tasmania shows the toll of wood fire heater pollution. The modelling estimated long-term exposure to smoke from wood heaters contributed to 729 premature deaths every year in Australia. In regional and rural locations, where it is colder and more people use wood heaters, emissions are highest. Regional locations take out the top five worst areas for wood fire heater pollution. Find out the emissions for your area: Launceston and Hobart in Tasmania, the Adelaide Hills in South Australia, Armidale in the Central West in New South Wales, and Bunbury in Western Australia top the list for wood-heater pollution. Centre for Safe Air director, professor Fay Johnston, told ACM the modelling found the areas with the most wood heater pollution tend to be "cooler places where wood burning is common and where towns and cities are located in valleys and basins that trap air pollution during winter". The most premature deaths associated with wood heaters, however, tend to be in areas with the highest population densities. "Sydney's basin-shaped topography and high urban density result in over 300 earlier-than-expected deaths every year, more than any other Australian city," Professor Johnston said. Professor Johnston said that many people are surprised by the impact of wood heaters. "When it comes to air pollution, many people think of exhaust pipe emissions from cars and trucks, smoke from coal-fired power stations or hazard reduction burns," she said. "It is often a surprise to learn that the health impacts of wood heaters are much greater than any of these sources of pollution in most Australian towns and cities." Melbourne community advocate for clean air, Arabella Daniel, said wood pollution was behind a raft of neighbourhood disputes. "People exposed to wood smoke often don't get empathy from a neighbour who is burning," she said. "Those who complain can often experience sociopathic revenge behaviour and retaliation." Managing wood smoke pollution is the responsibility of local councils, which were either reluctant to deal with the problem or not resourced to police chimney smoke, she said. "We are stuck without a remedy. We need state and federal laws to protect health." In 2023, the ACT Government announced that it would phase out wood heaters in the territory by 2045. Ms Daniel said it was a welcome step, but the timeline "was absolutely not good enough". "We consider this a public health emergency," she said. "There is very little political will. We need a hero to step up." She wants no new installations of wood heaters and a subsidised phase-out replacement program converting to split systems. Canberra University's Environmental Public Health Professor Sotiris Vardoulakis told ACM that "decisive and rapid policy action" was needed on wood heater pollution in Australian cities and towns. "This is a major public health issue in many ways similar to smoking in public places, which needs to be urgently addressed," he said. Prof Vardoulakis said new installation of wood heaters need to be banned in new and existing properties in urban areas and suburbs. Mandating the removal of wood heaters before a property can be sold would also reduce the number of older wood heaters, he said. Targeted financial incentives also need to be considered, particularly for low-income households. Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council is currently reviewing a draft policy that would restrict the installation of wood heaters in some urban areas. For some, any action comes too late. Tasmanian resident Jane (surname withheld) still lives with the trauma from wood fire heaters. She was living in a rural town in north-west Tasmania when friendly relationships with neighbours turned sour after she approached them about their wood heater. "The situation caused a lot of trauma and despair," she said. "I lost work days because I was so sick." She said the smoke intensity coming into her weatherboard house became "alarming". The council would only act if she provided evidence of 10 minutes of footage of the burning. She went to the EPA in Tasmania, which calculated that the emissions from the heater were at dangerous levels, but the council still would not intervene. "Why does it appear that people with wood heaters have all the rights?" she said. "I understand they are cosy, but they are a significant health compromise. How can the government say on one hand smoking kills, but allow heaters to burn 24 hours a day?" Do you know more? Email the journalist: Lisa Cunial cannot go for a walk in the beautiful wetland behind her house. A few minutes in the garden and she can't breathe. "Gardening is one of my passions," she tells ACM. "It is such a shame." Ms Cunial has lived in Orange in the NSW Central West for more than 25 years. "I used to live out of town as a kid and wonder why all my friends in town were always sick and had asthma," she said. Every year, winter brings the haze of wood fire smoke and she is "always on the cusp of a reaction". "Your sensitivity to the smoke gets worse". Agricultural burn-offs in the surrounding areas exacerbate the problem. After the bushfire season in 2019, she was diagnosed with Reactive Airways Dysfunction Syndrome (RADS), a type of asthma-like condition that develops after high-level exposure to an irritating substance such as corrosive material, gas, vapour or fumes. "I couldn't breathe," she said. "If I come across wood smoke, it impacts me immediately. I cannot get better." Ms Cunial's story is not unique. ACM has spoken to dozens of people from regional Australia dealing with wood heater pollution. Around 10 per cent of Australians use wood heaters as their main source of heating. For some, they have become a "lifestyle" accessory. But the health effects are dire. Wood heaters emit large amounts of fine particulate matter (known as PM2.5) into the atmosphere. These particulates could reach deep into the lungs, causing respiratory issues and asthma symptoms. NSW Health's former top doctor, Kerry Chant, said wood fire heaters were so detrimental to health that she would consider banning them. "Long-term exposure to particulate pollution, especially finer particles (PM2.5), can cause heart and lung disease while brief exposures can aggravate asthma and worsen pre-existing heart and lung conditions," she said. Children, the elderly, and people with existing health issues were most at risk. NSW Health advises that "instead of using a wood-burning heater in your home, consider using heating alternatives that cause less pollution, such as reverse cycle air-conditioning, flued gas or electric heaters". New modelling from the Centre for Safe Air at the University of Tasmania shows the toll of wood fire heater pollution. The modelling estimated long-term exposure to smoke from wood heaters contributed to 729 premature deaths every year in Australia. In regional and rural locations, where it is colder and more people use wood heaters, emissions are highest. Regional locations take out the top five worst areas for wood fire heater pollution. Find out the emissions for your area: Launceston and Hobart in Tasmania, the Adelaide Hills in South Australia, Armidale in the Central West in New South Wales, and Bunbury in Western Australia top the list for wood-heater pollution. Centre for Safe Air director, professor Fay Johnston, told ACM the modelling found the areas with the most wood heater pollution tend to be "cooler places where wood burning is common and where towns and cities are located in valleys and basins that trap air pollution during winter". The most premature deaths associated with wood heaters, however, tend to be in areas with the highest population densities. "Sydney's basin-shaped topography and high urban density result in over 300 earlier-than-expected deaths every year, more than any other Australian city," Professor Johnston said. Professor Johnston said that many people are surprised by the impact of wood heaters. "When it comes to air pollution, many people think of exhaust pipe emissions from cars and trucks, smoke from coal-fired power stations or hazard reduction burns," she said. "It is often a surprise to learn that the health impacts of wood heaters are much greater than any of these sources of pollution in most Australian towns and cities." Melbourne community advocate for clean air, Arabella Daniel, said wood pollution was behind a raft of neighbourhood disputes. "People exposed to wood smoke often don't get empathy from a neighbour who is burning," she said. "Those who complain can often experience sociopathic revenge behaviour and retaliation." Managing wood smoke pollution is the responsibility of local councils, which were either reluctant to deal with the problem or not resourced to police chimney smoke, she said. "We are stuck without a remedy. We need state and federal laws to protect health." In 2023, the ACT Government announced that it would phase out wood heaters in the territory by 2045. Ms Daniel said it was a welcome step, but the timeline "was absolutely not good enough". "We consider this a public health emergency," she said. "There is very little political will. We need a hero to step up." She wants no new installations of wood heaters and a subsidised phase-out replacement program converting to split systems. Canberra University's Environmental Public Health Professor Sotiris Vardoulakis told ACM that "decisive and rapid policy action" was needed on wood heater pollution in Australian cities and towns. "This is a major public health issue in many ways similar to smoking in public places, which needs to be urgently addressed," he said. Prof Vardoulakis said new installation of wood heaters need to be banned in new and existing properties in urban areas and suburbs. Mandating the removal of wood heaters before a property can be sold would also reduce the number of older wood heaters, he said. Targeted financial incentives also need to be considered, particularly for low-income households. Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council is currently reviewing a draft policy that would restrict the installation of wood heaters in some urban areas. For some, any action comes too late. Tasmanian resident Jane (surname withheld) still lives with the trauma from wood fire heaters. She was living in a rural town in north-west Tasmania when friendly relationships with neighbours turned sour after she approached them about their wood heater. "The situation caused a lot of trauma and despair," she said. "I lost work days because I was so sick." She said the smoke intensity coming into her weatherboard house became "alarming". The council would only act if she provided evidence of 10 minutes of footage of the burning. She went to the EPA in Tasmania, which calculated that the emissions from the heater were at dangerous levels, but the council still would not intervene. "Why does it appear that people with wood heaters have all the rights?" she said. "I understand they are cosy, but they are a significant health compromise. How can the government say on one hand smoking kills, but allow heaters to burn 24 hours a day?" Do you know more? Email the journalist:
Perth Now
6 hours ago
- Perth Now
Big problem with essential Aussie scheme
Health Minister Mark Butler says he is looking at recommendations to speed up medicine approvals amid pressure from lobbyists both within Australia and in the US. Medicines Australia has repeatedly highlighted that Australia lags behind comparable countries in listing new medicines on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) – a list of federally subsidised medicines. It takes an average of 466 days from when the Therapeutic Goods Administration approves a medicine to when it becomes affordable on the PBS, according to the peak body. This is much longer than in the UK and Canada, for example. The lengthy timeline has also angered the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), which has framed the PBS as a 'non-tariff trade barrier' that harms American companies in representations to the Trump administration. Lengthy PBS listing times is among PhRMA's core criticisms. Mr Butler said on Thursday he would look at Medicines Australia's recommendations to make the 'approvals system quicker'. Powerful pharmaceutical lobbyists in the US have accused Australia of 'freeloading' on the high prices paid by American consumers. Martin Ollman / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia 'We're getting an enormous number of new medicining coming on to the market,' he told the ABC. 'We're living through a turbocharged period of discovery bringing more and more new medicine, so making sure that we can assess them and approve them very quickly to get them into patients as quickly as possible is something I've said is a real priority for us this term.' Because the PBS compels drugmakers to negotiate prices with the federal government, PhRMA has accused Australia of 'freeloading' on US-funded research and development. Meanwhile, American consumers pick up the bill, according to the lobby group. 'The medicines industry, understandably, given their interest, want to make prices higher as well, so there will be a bit of a debate about how we do that,' Mr Butler said. 'But I'm very much on the page of getting medicines more quickly into our system, our PBS system. 'It's a terrific system and we're trying to make medicines cheaper at the same time for Australians.' PhRMA has explicitly urged the Trump administration to 'leverage ongoing trade negotiations' to influence Australia's PBS policies. Mr Butler has echoed Anthony Albanese and fellow senior government ministers in ruling out any 'compromise' on the system as part of tariff talks. For the moment, Donald Trump's concern with the sector appears to be largely focused on bringing down prices in the US rather than punishing allies for having cheaper medicines. A RAND Corporation report found that Americans pay nearly four times more than Australians for medicines and about three times more than the average in other developed economies. The answer, according to the US President, is to make pharmaceuticals in the US. In a warning shot to firms, Mr Trump this week threatened to slap tariffs of up to 250 per cent on foreign-made products. With Australian pharma exports to the US worth more than $2bn in 2024, it would hit producers Down Under hard. Exports are mostly blood products and vaccines but also include packaged medicines and miscellaneous products, such as bandages. 'We'll be putting (an) initially small tariff on pharmaceuticals,' Mr Trump told US business news channel CNBC. 'In one year, 1½ years maximum, it's going to go to 150 per cent and then it's going to go to 250 per cent because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country.' He did not say what the initial rate would be, but earlier in the year he said duties on the sector would start from 25 per cent. Mr Trump last week wrote to 17 major pharmaceutical companies demanding they lower their prices for American consumers and bring them in line with prices overseas.
