Channel migrants: 'Relentless battle against smuggling gangs'
Asylum and refugee campaigners say the government's focus on policing powers is at the expense of devising more safe routes for people genuinely in need.The NCA started its social media action plan with Meta, X, TikTok and YouTube to help build understanding of how organised criminals used their platforms to advertise illegal services and limit gangs' ability to exploit victims and plan dangerous illegal crossings."The criminals offer migrant smuggling services, the supply of false documents and fraudulent assistance with visa applications," Mr Brisley said. "The adverts show photographs of migrants in a boat, using videos of the migrants themselves as an endorsement of the service," the senior manager in the threat leadership command section at the NCA said. He said incentives were offered for family groups, certain nationalities, women and children. "They will also offer discounts if migrants take a video of their journey if it is successful, that they can then use to promote their service," he added.
A lot of the law enforcement activity is also focused on disrupting the physical supply of boating equipment to the Channel coast.The NCA and its partner agencies have focused on nautical equipment being supplied from Turkey via the Balkans to Germany.Dan Barcroft, the organised immigration crime threat lead at the NCA, said one example of that is in Bulgaria, where the authorities have introduced a protocol to stop and seize dangerous small boat equipment at the border."It has forced organised crime groups to take longer and costlier supply routes to try and get around that disruption," he said. "Over 600 boats and engines have been seized."He said equipment was hidden in the back of vans and lorries, and taken on different routes to Germany, avoiding the Bulgarian border.
Law changes
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper says new powers in the the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill will mean "we can step in much earlier to take action on those who are facilitating the boats".However, Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp said it was "a weak bill from a weak government".Border officials will get powers to seize migrants' phones in the search for intelligence about who helped them cross the Channel.Those convicted of acts in preparation of smuggling, such as buying boat parts, face up to 14 years in jail, in an attempt to tackle gangs at a far earlier stage in their preparations, the government says.
A new offence of endangering lives at sea could lead to the prosecution of anyone arriving in the UK on a small and unsafe boat who has been involved in intimidating or coercing others passengers to take part in the journey, or who has refused to be rescued outside of British waters.Asylum and refugee campaigners say the government's focus on policing powers is at the expense of devising more safe routes for people genuinely in need.Enver Solomon, chief executive of the Refugee Council, said the government was right to tackle smuggling gangs."But we are very concerned that by creating new offences, many refugees themselves could also be prosecuted."The Home Office said new measures to tackle people-smuggling gangs have been agreed by the UK and France, with more than £7m of existing funds redirected towards a "stronger" law enforcement response on migrant Channel crossings.The UK has also signed a "road map" agreement with France aimed at bolstering co-operation to tackle people smuggling.British and French representatives are due to meet in May as part of the new agreement to strengthen partnership between the two countries on migration.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
2 hours ago
- Powys County Times
How many asylum seekers are in UK hotels and why are they being housed there?
The subject of asylum seekers being housed in hotels has come into sharp focus after a High Court ruling. On Tuesday, Epping Forest District Council was granted a temporary injunction blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in the Essex town. Here, the PA news agency takes a look at the latest overall data. – How many asylum seekers are in hotels across the UK? The most recent Home Office data showed there were 32,345 asylum seekers being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March. This was down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079. New figures – published among the usual quarterly immigration data release – are expected on Thursday, showing numbers in hotels at the end of June. Figures for hotels published by the Home Office date back to December 2022 and showed numbers hit a peak at the end of September 2023 when there were 56,042 asylum seekers in hotels. – How many hotels are in use for asylum seekers? It is thought there were more than 400 asylum hotels open in summer 2023. Labour said this has since been reduced to fewer than 210. – Why are asylum seekers being housed in hotels? Asylum seekers and their families can be housed in temporary accommodation, known as contingency accommodation, if they are awaiting assessment of their claim or have had a claim approved and there is not enough longer-term accommodation available. The Home Office provides accommodation to asylum seekers who have no other way of supporting themselves on a 'no choice' basis, so they cannot choose where they live. When there is not enough housing, the Home Office can move people to accommodation such as hotels and large sites, like former military bases. In May, the National Audit Office said those temporarily living in hotels accounted for 35% of all people in asylum accommodation. – Is this likely to be a permanent arrangement? Labour has pledged to end the 'costly use of hotels to house asylum seekers in this Parliament' – which would be 2029, if not earlier. Campaigners and charities have long argued that hotels are not suitable environments to house asylum seekers. The Refugee Council said they 'cost the taxpayer billions, trap people in limbo and are flashpoints in communities' and urged the Government to 'partner with local councils to provide safe, cost-effective accommodation within communities'. – What is the Government saying since the legal ruling? Ministers are 'looking at a range of different contingency options' following Tuesday's ruling, according to security minister Dan Jarvis In the immediate aftermath of the judgment, border security minister Dame Angela Eagle repeated criticism of the previous Conservative government, saying Labour had 'inherited a broken asylum system'. She said the Government would 'continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns' around asylum hotels. – What options does the Home Office have now? Last month, amid protests outside the Bell Hotel and more migrants crossing the Channel, an extra 400 spaces were being prepared to house male asylum seekers at RAF Wethersfield in Essex. The former military site, which has a usual capacity of 800 beds, is expected to house more adult men on a short-term basis. The Labour Government scrapped the large site of the Bibby Stockholm barge in Portland, Dorset, earlier this year, while Napier Barracks in Folkestone, Kent, is also due to end housing asylum seekers and be returned to the Ministry of Defence in September. – Why were there protests outside the Bell Hotel? The hotel in Epping has been at the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks after an asylum seeker who was staying there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl – something he has denied and he is due to stand trial later in August. After the High Court's ruling, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage wrote in the Telegraph calling for Epping protests to inspire further action wherever there are concerns about the 'threat posed by young undocumented males' living in hotels. But on Tuesday more than 100 women's organisations wrote to ministers warning that vital conversations about violence against women and girls are being 'hijacked by an anti-migrant agenda' that fuels divisions and harms survivors. The joint statement, including from Rape Crisis England & Wales and Refuge, said: 'We have been alarmed in recent weeks by an increase in unfounded claims made by people in power, and repeated in the media, that hold particular groups as primarily responsible for sexual violence. 'This not only undermines genuine concerns about women's safety, but also reinforces the damaging myth that the greatest risk of gender-based violence comes from strangers.'
Wales Online
3 hours ago
- Wales Online
Council statement over asylum seekers 'misinformation' as bids to buy student halls
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info A council has released a statement to address "misinformation" over its bid to buy up a block of student halls in Bangor. Cyngor Gwynedd is in negotiations about purchasing the Ty Glyn building in the city. The property was once a tax office but later became student halls. The 60 bedroom site has been on the market for £4.5m. It is currently marked as 'Sold STC' (subject to contract) although remains student accommodation at this time. Cyngor Gwynedd are reportedly the ones buying the site which has triggered rumours about their plans. This has led to social media reports that asylum seekers could be housed in the building in the future by the council. It comes at a time when UK Government is under intense pressure to reduce the use of hotels to house asylum seekers. Join the North Wales Live WhatsApp community group where you can get the latest stories delivered straight to your phone In a statement Cyngor Gwynedd said: "Cyngor Gwynedd is in negotiations to buy the Tŷ Glyn building in Bangor for the purpose of meeting the housing needs of Gwynedd residents. The Council has no intention of housing asylum seekers or refugees in this building. "We appreciate the questions residents have raised and remain committed to ensuring open and transparent communication. However, it is important not to speculate or spread misinformation in the community." About 200 hotels were housing more than 30,000 asylum seekers in England and Wales at the end of March 2025, although it is understood less than 100 of those migrants are housed in Wales. This compares to a peak of 56,000 asylum seekers in 400 hotels back in 2023 under the last Conservative government. Senedd member Sian Gwenllian said: "Misinformation of this kind is harmful and risks fuelling unnecessary tension within our community. I urge everyone to pause and think carefully before sharing unverified rumours. My thanks go to Cyngor Gwynedd for their clear statement." Sign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox Find out what's happening near you
South Wales Guardian
4 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
How many asylum seekers are in UK hotels and why are they being housed there?
On Tuesday, Epping Forest District Council was granted a temporary injunction blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in the Essex town. Here, the PA news agency takes a look at the latest overall data. – How many asylum seekers are in hotels across the UK? The most recent Home Office data showed there were 32,345 asylum seekers being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March. This was down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079. New figures – published among the usual quarterly immigration data release – are expected on Thursday, showing numbers in hotels at the end of June. Figures for hotels published by the Home Office date back to December 2022 and showed numbers hit a peak at the end of September 2023 when there were 56,042 asylum seekers in hotels. – How many hotels are in use for asylum seekers? It is thought there were more than 400 asylum hotels open in summer 2023. Labour said this has since been reduced to fewer than 210. – Why are asylum seekers being housed in hotels? Asylum seekers and their families can be housed in temporary accommodation, known as contingency accommodation, if they are awaiting assessment of their claim or have had a claim approved and there is not enough longer-term accommodation available. The Home Office provides accommodation to asylum seekers who have no other way of supporting themselves on a 'no choice' basis, so they cannot choose where they live. When there is not enough housing, the Home Office can move people to accommodation such as hotels and large sites, like former military bases. In May, the National Audit Office said those temporarily living in hotels accounted for 35% of all people in asylum accommodation. – Is this likely to be a permanent arrangement? Labour has pledged to end the 'costly use of hotels to house asylum seekers in this Parliament' – which would be 2029, if not earlier. Campaigners and charities have long argued that hotels are not suitable environments to house asylum seekers. The Refugee Council said they 'cost the taxpayer billions, trap people in limbo and are flashpoints in communities' and urged the Government to 'partner with local councils to provide safe, cost-effective accommodation within communities'. – What is the Government saying since the legal ruling? Ministers are 'looking at a range of different contingency options' following Tuesday's ruling, according to security minister Dan Jarvis In the immediate aftermath of the judgment, border security minister Dame Angela Eagle repeated criticism of the previous Conservative government, saying Labour had 'inherited a broken asylum system'. She said the Government would 'continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns' around asylum hotels. – What options does the Home Office have now? Last month, amid protests outside the Bell Hotel and more migrants crossing the Channel, an extra 400 spaces were being prepared to house male asylum seekers at RAF Wethersfield in Essex. The former military site, which has a usual capacity of 800 beds, is expected to house more adult men on a short-term basis. The Labour Government scrapped the large site of the Bibby Stockholm barge in Portland, Dorset, earlier this year, while Napier Barracks in Folkestone, Kent, is also due to end housing asylum seekers and be returned to the Ministry of Defence in September. – Why were there protests outside the Bell Hotel? The hotel in Epping has been at the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks after an asylum seeker who was staying there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl – something he has denied and he is due to stand trial later in August. After the High Court's ruling, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage wrote in the Telegraph calling for Epping protests to inspire further action wherever there are concerns about the 'threat posed by young undocumented males' living in hotels. But on Tuesday more than 100 women's organisations wrote to ministers warning that vital conversations about violence against women and girls are being 'hijacked by an anti-migrant agenda' that fuels divisions and harms survivors. The joint statement, including from Rape Crisis England & Wales and Refuge, said: 'We have been alarmed in recent weeks by an increase in unfounded claims made by people in power, and repeated in the media, that hold particular groups as primarily responsible for sexual violence. 'This not only undermines genuine concerns about women's safety, but also reinforces the damaging myth that the greatest risk of gender-based violence comes from strangers.'
