Coroner orders probe into Tatyanna Harrison's death reopened, inquest to be held
British Columbia's chief coroner has ordered that the investigation into Tatyanna Harrison's death be reopened and that an inquest into how she died be held.
It comes one day after Harrison's mother and two other families made a public call for inquests into their own loved ones' deaths. All three deaths — Harrison, 20, Chelsea Poorman, 24, and Noelle O'Soup, 13 — involved young Indigenous women and girls.
Harrison was reported missing on May 3, 2022. Her remains were found on a drydocked yacht in Richmond the day prior, but not identified until August.
Police initially said she died of a lethal dose of fentanyl, though a coroner subsequently said her death was a result of sepsis.
2:18
Vigil held for Tatyanna Harrison, Chelsea Poorman and Noelle O'Soup
Her family later retained a licensed forensic pathologist to conduct an independent review, which disagreed with that finding, concluding the cause of death should be listed as 'undetermined.'
Story continues below advertisement
The group Justice for Girls told Media on Monday Harrison's family had to fight for a rape kit to be performed on her remains, even though she was found partially clothed. The kit still has not been processed, the group said.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
Her mother and supporters maintain that the investigation was mishandled and deprioritized by police.
'Every question I had for the coroner, police and RCMP it didn't bring me clarity,' Tatayanna's mother, Natasha Harrison, told media on Monday.
'It has been three years of fighting for basic human rights for Tatyanna, fighting for a fair investigation for my daughter — for three years she hasn't been laid to rest, for three years I haven't been able to properly grieve her loss.'
2:19
VPD releases new information about missing B.C. Indigenous woman
On Tuesday, Chief Coroner Dr. Jatinder Baidwan ordered the case reopened out of an obligation to 'ensure public confidence in the BC Coroners Service and its processes.'
Story continues below advertisement
'An inquest will provide an opportunity for a broad, open and transparent review of the circumstances related to Tatyanna's death, and my hope is that the jury will be able to make meaningful recommendations that will prevent similar deaths from occurring in the future.'
But Baidwan stopped short of calling inquests into all three deaths as families had called for on Monday.
He said investigations into Poorman and O'Soup's deaths remained open and decisions about a future inquest in their cases would be made at a later date.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canada Standard
an hour ago
- Canada Standard
4 ways to support victims
Tough-on-crime rhetoric is reshaping bail laws to correct a perceived imbalance that "tips the scales in favour of the criminals against the victims." But do these changes reflect what victims actually want and need? We argue that victims are positioned as both "sword and shield" in bail reform debates - as a sword, to advocate for more restrictive laws, and as a shield, to defend those laws from criticism. Victims have been a central focus of those arguing in favour of changes to the bail system as they suggest a need to "crack down with tougher rules" to "protect victims" and to stop turning "loose the most violent, rampant criminals into our communities to destroy our families." These concerns culminated in the passage of the federal government's Bill C-48, which introduced additional reverse-onus provisions - shifting the burden onto the accused to demonstrate why they should be released as opposed to the Crown - in cases involving weapons and repeat intimate partner violence. Largely absent from these discussions is the possibility that more restrictive measures may actually have negative consequences for victims. In cases of intimate partner violence, for instance, dual charging policies - when both parties involved in a domestic incident are charged with an offence, even when one person may be primarily the victim and the other primarily the aggressor - risks criminalizing and incarcerating women pre-trial. These victims are also disproportionately Indigenous, Black and racialized. This risks deepening systemic inequalities rather than providing meaningful protection for survivors. Furthermore, victims may hesitate to call the police, knowing that doing so may result in indeterminate detention before trial. Expanding reverse-onus provisions could also lead to false guilty pleas to avoid pre-trial detention. While media coverage on victims' experiences at bail hearings is emotionally compelling and expedient, it does not necessarily reflect what victims want with any accuracy. Certainly, some victims view the bail system as a slap in the face. Others call for a stronger social safety net to address the root causes of crime. Read more: The grieving mother of a murdered teen pleads for a stronger social safety net Our preliminary research exploring how victims are presented in news media amid bail proceedings supports other evidence that victims' voices are often used strategically by politicians and lobbyists to amplify concerns about public safety. News media can be an effective tool to provide education about the causes and consequences of victimization. When it comes to bail, however, victims are often characterized as "ideal types" - people who were subjected to severe violence at the hands of a stranger while engaging in "respectable" activities at the time of the offence. In reality, victims represent a diverse group, with a wide range of needs, identities and experiences that are not always captured in media coverage or political debates. Prior research focuses on the rights of the accused concerning bail reform, yet pre-trial decisions are a pivotal moment for crime victims. They can determine whether those accused of crimes are detained or released with conditions. The Canadian Victims Bill of Rights stipulates victims have the right to be informed of case matters, to express their views and to have their perspectives considered at all stages of the legal process, including at bail. During bail proceedings, justices must record that they have considered victim safety and security when imposing conditions, and victims may receive a copy of a bail order upon request. In practice, however, victims are rarely consulted on how the release of an accused may affect their safety, and are often left unaware of bail outcomes. That's because there's no legal requirement for police or Crown attorneys to inform them. While programs are available to support victims during the pre-trial phase - such as those offered by Victims Services and Victim/Witness Assistance - access can vary widely across jurisdictions. We offer four strategies to create more responsive and equitable bail processes to better support victims: Throughout the criminal legal system, victims' voices are frequently ignored, disbelieved or dismissed. Too often, victims are excluded from the very policy decisions made in their name. While high-profile bail cases tend to dominate media coverage, policy on criminal and legal matters must be guided by evidence, not headlines. Without broader systemic reform, legislation will remain an important but insufficient tool for upholding victims' rights and community safety.
Global News
3 hours ago
- Global News
Calgary police investigate suspicious death downtown on Saturday
The Calgary police homicide unit has been called in to investigate the death of a woman in downtown Calgary on Saturday evening. Police responded to reports of a woman in medical distress around 6:30 p.m. on June 14 in the 1100 block of 12 Avenue southwest. Officers arriving at the scene located the woman; she was transported to hospital where she was declared dead. Police aren't releasing any other details, but said there is no risk to the public. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy An autopsy is scheduled for Tuesday morning and police said more details will be released after that. Investigators ask anyone who may have information about the incident to contact police at 403-266-1234. Tips can also be submitted anonymously by calling Crime Stoppers at 1-800-222-8477 (TIPS), online at or by downloading the Crime Stoppers app — P3 Tips — from the app store. Story continues below advertisement
CBC
5 hours ago
- CBC
Former MP Han Dong settles defamation lawsuit with Global News
Social Sharing Former MP Han Dong has settled his defamation lawsuit against Global News, according to a statement posted to the news organization's website, closing a two-year legal battle that came after the outlet published an article alleging he advised a Chinese diplomat to hold off on freeing two Canadians who were detained in China at the time. On Sunday morning, Global published a statement on its website that said it and "former MP Han Dong have settled Mr. Dong's lawsuit concerning Global News stories that reported on allegations about Mr. Dong." In March 2023, Global published a story alleging Dong advised a senior Chinese diplomat in February 2021 that Beijing should hold off on freeing Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor, two Canadians who were being held by China at the time. Dong denied the allegations and filed a lawsuit against Global, its parent company Corus and several journalists just weeks after the story ran. In the final report of the Public Inquiry into Foreign Interference, Justice Marie-Josée Hogue wrote that classified intelligence "corroborates Mr. Dong's denial of the allegation that he suggested the [People's Republic of China] should hold off releasing Mr. Kovrig and Mr. Spavor. He did not suggest that the PRC extend their detention." In its statement, Global said it "recognizes the findings" of the inquiry's report, including the classified information reviewed by Hogue. The news organization added "the stories published by Global were based on information provided by confidential intelligence sources." "Mr. Dong has always denied the accuracy of this intelligence. In reporting on the sources' allegations concerning Mr. Dong, Global News's intent was to report on matters of significant public interest and to qualify that the allegations were unproven and subject to different interpretations," it said. In a statement to CBC News, Dong confirmed the settlement and said "after two long years, finally my family and I can move on." "I have had a profound appreciation of the privilege of holding a public office and being a member of the Liberal caucus," he said. Dong left the Liberal caucus in March 2023 to sit as an Independent MP. He did not seek re-election in the 2025 federal election in his suburban Toronto riding of Don Valley North after the Liberal Party told him they were going to run a new candidate, Maggie Chi — who later won the riding. WATCH | Dong quits Liberal caucus amid election interference allegations: MP Han Dong quits Liberal caucus amid election interference allegations 2 years ago Duration 2:17 In June 2024, an Ontario Superior Court judge found no documented evidence to support allegations made against Dong in the Global News articles. The judge's comments came as he rejected an application from Corus Entertainment to throw out Dong's lawsuit against the news service, saying it was in the public interest to hear the case. "The matter of Mr. Dong's communications with the Chinese are worthy of the freedom of expression of an open court system," Justice Paul Perell said in his judgment. Perell found the reporter who wrote the story did not see a transcript of the conversation between Dong and the diplomat, derived from the confidential sources, and did not keep all of the notes used as part of the reporting process. The ruling said the notes the reporter did keep, based on conversations with sources, do not contain any reference to Dong advising a Chinese diplomat to "delay" or "hold off" on releasing the two men. Kovrig and Spavor returned to Canada in September 2021, almost three years after they were first detained by China in what was widely seen to be a retaliatory action in response to Canada's arrest of Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou on behalf of U.S. authorities.
