High Court defers judgment in legal row over Athlone asylum seeker centre pending draft legislation
A
High Court
judge has said the Government is obliged to provide alternative accommodation for 'innocent' and 'vulnerable' asylum seekers at risk of
homelessness
while legislation aimed at fast-tracking refugee accommodation is drawn up.
Ms Justice Emily Farrell said on Wednesday she would defer judgment in an application by the State to quash an order that struck down a statutory instrument used to develop emergency accommodation at Lissywollen in
Athlone
, Co Westmeath.
She said she wants to wait for updates and to see draft legislation from the Oireachtas.
The Government intends to remedy a legal issue over the bypassing of environmental assessments for accommodation that has been categorised as having 'emergency' status.
READ MORE
Ms Justice Farrell said there could be consequences and a 'real risk of homelessness for innocent third parties and families who may be vulnerable' staying at the centre if they could not be rehomed.
The judge said that in the interim, there was an obligation on the Minister to attempt to provide alternative accommodation and to show the efforts made to do so.
Ms Justice Farrell said nobody but those granted accommodation last February should be offered accommodation at the centre and no new works should be carried out at the facility, with only essential maintenance to be undertaken.
Lawyers for the State have told the High Court there is a 'serious risk to the dignity and safety' of asylum seekers if the Government is not allowed to use special powers to fast-track refugee accommodation as the system cannot immediately rehouse the 137 residents in the facility.
Earlier this week, Aoife Carroll SC, for the State, asked the court to put a stay on the December quashing of the use of a statutory instrument that had been used to speed up the establishment of the facility at Lissywollen.
[
Minister concedes in High Court challenge to order facilitating asylum-seeker housing in Athlone
Opens in new window
]
Ms Carroll said that while environmental and EU law had been complied with, it had not been entered into record – which amounted to an innocent, procedural error.
The action was taken by Independent Ireland councillor Paul Hogan, who successfully
applied to the court in December for a judicial review
, arguing that the expedited development was unlawful.
The State has conceded the statutory instrument used was 'invalid' and is finalising repairing legislation.
Cllr Hogan is taking the case against the office of the Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth.
A statutory instrument is secondary legislation, made by a Minister, modifying existing laws.
Cllr Hogan successfully claimed the Minister failed to adequately 'screen' the project for potential environmental impacts and that the Minister lacked the expertise to carry out such assessments in an expedited manner.
[
Kinvara residents seek to bring challenge against housing of asylum seekers at hotel
Opens in new window
]
Protests have been held in Athlone
over the plan to further develop accommodation for a possible 1,000 asylum seekers, in up to 150 tents, on a site to the rear of an existing direct provision centre.
Ms Carroll has said amending legislation was presently to come before the Government and was hoped to be passed in November.
Ms Carroll is applying to put a stay on the December order striking down the use of the statutory instrument used by the office of the Minister in expediting the development of the centre.
Ms Justice Farrell on Wednesday said she would adjourn the matter to July 21st to allow for sight of the draft legislation that Ms Carroll has said is 'imminent'.
She said she was conscious of the risk to the residents' safety and dignity should the facility have to be closed.
The judge said the number of people accommodated at the centre should be 'diminished substantially' by July 21st.
In taking the successful judicial review, Cllr Hogan, who secured 4.8 per cent of first preference votes running for Independent Ireland in Longford-Westmeath, claimed the ministerial process was 'unlawful, irrational and a breach of fair procedures'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Budget 2026 ‘won't repeat' cost of living packages of past years, Paschal Donohoe says despite price rises in food and fuel
Mr Donohoe said packages of up to €2.5bn to help with the cost of living were included in past budgets at times when inflation was at five, 10 or 15pc. 'We should not, and I believe will not repeat that again,' he told RTÉ's Morning Ireland. "But we will find other ways, budget by budget, and over four to five budgets, instead, of helping with and responding back to the needs within our society'. He said he is 'absolutely well aware' of the impact of the cost of living: "I see it and I experience that, I know the difficulty it poses for very many in our country.' However, he said there are risks when it comes to funding permanent measures with tax receipts that may not always be available in the future. There are 'challenges' ahead for the Irish economy due to US tariffs, Mr Donohoe said, but we are heading towards those challenges in a 'position of strength'. He was responding to the findings of the latest economic forecast from the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), which factored in a 10pc US tariff. Different scenarios for the Irish economy, where tariffs were and were not permanently applied by the US, have been taken into account by Government, Mr Donohoe said. 'Maintaining a surplus in the public finances remains important while uncertainty over the future of the pharma industry continues. "That is not yet clear and the reason that is not yet clear is President Trump's administration is conducting an assessment of the life science and pharmaceutical sector. 'What we are doing with the European Commission and through the European Commission is making the case for supply chains, making the case for medicine being made and across the world, and the role that Ireland can play in doing that in an affordable way.' Mr Donohoe acknowledged windfall corporation tax income is being used for day-to-day spending and said this highlights the continued need for a budget surplus. "The very reason we have a surplus of just under €9bn is we believe we should not be spending a share of our corporate tax receipts that might not be available to us permanently.' €15bn will be set aside in the Future Ireland Fund by the end of this year and between this money and the running of a budget surplus, Mr Donohoe said the country will be able to 'absorb' a fall in corporate tax receipts. The latest ESRI report forecast 33,000 homes to be built this year, falling short of Government targets. Mr Donohoe said there is a need to 'go all out' to meet an overall target of 300,000 homes built in the lifetime of this Government. "I believe it is doable, but I know it will be demanding. Since 2016, we've built 200,000 more homes in our country. Since 2020 or 2021, a further 100,000 of those 200,000 homes have been built "We saw 60,000 homes commenced last year, but we know it's not enough.'
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Annual review needed if Triple Lock removed, committee will hear
Without the Triple Lock mechanism in place, any future Irish peacekeeping missions should be subjected to an annual review to ensure they align with the UN Charter, an Oireachtas committee has been told. Professor Ben Tonra, of the UCD School of Politics and International Relations, said the Government must establish robust mechanisms to guarantee that overseas missions align with the UN Charter and international law. Legislation to reform the Triple Lock is before the Oireachtas Committee on Defence and National Security for pre-legislative scrutiny. The General Scheme of the Defence (Amendment) Bill 2025 would remove the need for UN Security Council and General Assembly approval when deploying more than 12 members of the Defence Forces overseas when they are serving as part of an international force. Professor Tonra will tell the committee that the Government should consider whether democratic oversight of an overseas missions ends with the initial approval. He said an annual review mechanism could empower the Dáil to monitor ongoing missions to ensure they remain within the scope of peacekeeping, conflict prevention and support for international security. The legislation states that a contingent of the Defence Forces can be dispatched outside the State where there is Government approval along with a resolution passed by the Dáil. However, a subsequent Dáil resolution is not required when deploying a replacement contingent. A Dáil resolution will also not be necessary when the Defence Forces contingent deploying abroad has 50 members or less. Prof Tonra will also suggest that any overseas mission should be subjected to a formal legal review before approval to ensure that it is consistent with the UN Charter and international law. This review could be carried out by the Attorney General or an independent counsel, he said. "With greater flexibility comes greater responsibility. If we are no longer to rely on the Security Council as the gatekeeper of legitimacy, if we are finally to remove the veto given to the five permanent members of the Security Council over Ireland's overseas military deployment, we must establish robust mechanisms of our own," he said. "The Defence (Amendment) Bill 2025 is a significant acknowledgement that Ireland's defence posture is evolving and needs to change in an increasingly volatile region and less stable world. "The Bill's proposals do enhance the flexibility of Government in dealing with an international crisis that requires military forces to underpin peace or guarantee security. "With that flexibility, however, comes greater responsibility "If - as proposed - UN Security Council members are not to serve as gatekeepers to overseas deployment of Irish peacekeepers, then the Government - and opposition parties - are required to step up to specify by what precise mechanism such deployments will continue to reflect Irish foreign policy values and interests," Prof Tonra will say. The draft legislation is being examined over a period of eight weeks, after which a bill will be sent for Government approval.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Will the EU sanction Israel?
The European Union has some lofty goals when it comes to human rights. The EU is said to be 'based on a strong commitment to promote and protect human rights, democracy and the rule of law both within the EU and worldwide'. The bloc's policies comprise the inclusion of human rights clauses in all agreements on trade and co-operation with non-EU countries. There are such clauses in the EU's 'association agreement' with Israel which includes a free trade deal. READ MORE However, do not expect the EU to invoke the clauses to suspend trade with Israel despite its war in Gaza where the death toll has passed 56,000 according to the Hamas -run health authorities. Israel's actions are seen by many in Europe as a disproportionate response to the Hamas attack on October 7th, 2023, when 1,200 people were killed and 251 taken hostage. But, as Pat Leahy and Jack Power report in our lead story , pro-Israel countries, including Germany and Italy, are set to block efforts by Ireland and other member states to take action against Israel over its war in Gaza at today's summit of EU leaders in Brussels. Several member states, also including Austria , the Czech Republic and Hungary , will not agree for the EU to take action despite a recent review of an EU-Israel trade agreement that found Israel was committing human rights violations in conflict with it. Ireland and other countries favour taking action, up to and including suspending the trade agreement with Israel, but officials accept that any move to sanction Israel at the summit would likely be blocked. Several capitals traditionally supportive of Israel opposed the review even being mentioned in a joint statement – or 'conclusions' – that would be signed by all 27 national leaders. It is expected, however, that the conclusion will point to the 'dire' humanitarian situation in Gaza , and diplomats said the focus was likely to be on pressuring Israel to allow aid into the enclave rather than for any sanctions. Taoiseach Micheál Martin said the EU's inability to reach a unified position on the humanitarian crisis in Gaza is a 'huge stain' on the union . At home, the Government published a summary of its proposed legislation to prohibit the sale of Israeli goods produced in the occupied Palestinian territories . As expected, it makes no reference to services being subject to a similar ban. This drew criticism from pro-Palestinian campaigners and Opposition parties. The summary, or 'heads' of the Bill, will now be sent for pre-legislative scrutiny by the Oireachtas foreign affairs committee. Regardless of whether services ends up being included in the Bill, it will be a small gesture by a small country in opposition to how Israel treats the Palestinian people. While the Government hopes other countries might follow suit with similar measures, it will not have the same impact as collective EU sanctions against Israel. Lofty words on human rights notwithstanding, the prospect of this happening seems remote. Best reads How did Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan fare when he filled in for the Taoiseach at Leaders' Questions on Wednesday? Miriam Lord writes that there was 'a new sheriff in town' and 'expectations were modest'. Jack White details how Tánaiste Simon Harris promised an 'expansionary package' in the budget and said the VAT rate for small businesses will be reduced permanently as he addressed Fine Gael's parliamentary party meeting on Wednesday evening. Investors in Israeli bonds approved by the Irish Central Bank risk being legally complicit in genocide in Gaza , a Social Democrats TD has claimed in a letter to its governor. Jack Horgan-Jones and Harry McGee report . Officials first became aware of an error which could lead to Ministers and civil servants owing thousands of euro to the State in 2017, eight years before it became public, the Oireachtas committee on finance was told. Jack Horgan-Jones' reports the story on the meeting . Playbook Minister for Health Jennifer Carroll MacNeill is due to take parliamentary questions in the Dáil from 8.47am. Patrick O'Donovan, the Minister for Culture, Communications and Sport, is up next at 10.23am. Leaders' Questions is at noon. Government business in the afternoon is a second stage debate on the Criminal Justice (Terrorist Offences) (Amendment) Bill 2025 from 1.52pm. TDs have an opportunity to raise topical issues from 5.26pm. A Sinn Féin Bill on transparency and social value in public procurement will be debated from 6.26pm. There will be statements on nursing homes and the care of older people in the Seanad from 11.30am. Senators will debate proposed changes to the Local Property Tax regime from 1.30pm. The Committee on Children will meet the Ombudsman for Children at 9.30am. The Garda Commissioner is due before the public accounts committee (PAC) at 9:30am. The Committee on Defence and National Security is due to continue its pre-legislative scrutiny of the heads of the Defence (Amendment) Bill 2025 – the Government legislation aiming at scrapping the triple lock for overseas troop deployments – at 9.30am. The full Dáil, Seanad and Committee schedules can be found here . EU watches on as Trump changes the world Listen | 41:42
