Luxon snaps back at 'frickin' Hipkins over claims of 'flop'
Labour revealed just 153 families had received the maximum FamilyBoost rebate, well short of the 21,000 families the Government said would be eligible for the full amount when it was unveiled last year.
Speaking on his way into a Tuesday morning caucus meeting, Luxon rejected Labour's characterisation of the policy as a failure.
"I'm not taking any any lectures from frickin' Chris Hipkins or the Labour Party," he told reporters. "They have no idea what to do. They put us in this mess.
"You can stand on the other side and criticise as much as you like, but I don't see any policy from Labour."
ADVERTISEMENT
Luxon said 60,000 families had received some support from the FamilyBoost policy and another 20,000 would soon be eligible due to recent tweaks to the eligibility settings.
"Isn't that great?" he said. "We have put a programme in place which Labour didn't support, didn't vote, don't back, because they don't back low-and-middle-income working New Zealanders."
The former Labour government extended cheaper childcare to parents of two-year-olds, giving them access to 20 hours a week of free ECE. On taking office, the coalition reversed that policy and instead rolled out its more targeted FamilyBoost scheme — a weekly rebate on childcare costs.
The coalition launched a review of the policy in April, given the unexpectedly low uptake and then expanded the initiative in early July. It said Inland Revenue had initially overestimated the number of eligible families despite best efforts.
Hipkins labels National's policies 'absolute disaster zone'
Responding to Luxon's comments, Labour leader Chris Hipkins said National's refusal to admit the FamilyBoost scheme was "an absolute flop" showed it was completely out-of-touch.
"They're getting really desperate. On a daily basis, they're attacking me and attacking the Labour Party rather than talking about their own track record."
ADVERTISEMENT
Hipkins defended Labour's lack of public policy and said that would all be laid out in full before next year's election.
"We're not even close to an election campaign at the moment," he said. "But, unlike him, when we go into the election campaign next year, I will make sure that the policies that we have, add up."
Labour wanted to see the Government's next Budget before it outlined significant policies which would cost money, Hipkins said, and suggested a lot of policy work was underway in the background.
"The National Party desperately wants to talk about the Labour Party's policy at the moment, because their own policies are turning into an absolute disaster zone."
National also came under criticism when it was in opposition for a paucity of policy heading into the 2023 election year, but it had released elements of its tax plan and several discussion documents indicating a direction of travel.
Finance Minister Nicola Willis: "I view butter as a beautiful, beautiful thing."
The two party leaders also sparred on Tuesday morning over the price of butter which has soared to about $8.60 for a 500g block.
ADVERTISEMENT
Nicola Willis speaks to media on July 7, 2025. (Source: 1News)
In recent weeks, Hipkins has repeatedly drawn attention to the issue, posting on social media last week: "The price of butter is up nearly 50 percent since this time last year. That's it. That's my X post."
Asked what Labour would do about it if in power, Hipkins said the onus was on the coalition: "we're not the government... all we've had from them is tough talk."
Luxon said dairy prices were largely dictated by global commodity prices and New Zealand dairy farmers were reaping the benefits "tremendously".
He said Finance Minister Nicola Willis would be meeting with diary giant Fonterra on Tuesday evening in the context of supermarket competition.
If Willis raised the issue of butter prices "good on her", Luxon said.
Willis, who previously worked for Fonterra, told reporters she would raise the topic in her conversation as she was concerned butter was becoming out-of-reach for many New Zealanders.
ADVERTISEMENT
"I view butter as a beautiful, beautiful thing. I eat too much of it," she said. "When you see it on my piece of toast, it looks like some cheese."
Willis said Fonterra was transparent about how it determined milk prices but it was less clear to her how that then translated to butter.
"What we're talking about here is at the margin — 10 or 20 cents — but 10 or 20 cents really matters when you're a Kiwi family at the supermarket checkout."
She also accused Labour of "crocodile tears", given its lack of proposed solutions.
rnz.co.nz
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
4 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Government report shows homelessness ‘appears' to be outstripping population growth
The report comes around halfway through this Government's term, which has included tightening emergency housing rules, and social and transitional housing initiatives. Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka said although accurate numbers on homelessness were difficult to find, it was 'clear we have a real problem'. 'The Government takes this seriously. All New Zealanders deserve a warm, dry place to stay, and the Government is determined to make progress on this long-running challenge for New Zealand.' Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka says it is clear New Zealand has a real problem with homelessness. Photo / Mark Mitchell Potaka said the Government was seeking advice from officials on further interventions to help rough sleepers, saying 'we are also open to new ideas that will make an enduring difference'. Officials defined homelessness as living situations where people have no way of accessing safe and secure housing. This could include having no shelter at all, living in temporary or uninhabitable accommodation, or staying in a house with others, such as couch surfing. The report estimates people living without shelter are more likely to be older, with more than a quarter aged over 65. Twelve per cent were under 15 years old. Concerns from groups, collated in the report, included people and families sleeping rough, in cars, garages or uninhabitable conditions, or couch surfing during winter. They told researchers there were increasing levels of hopelessness and complex needs because of methamphetamine use, anti-social behaviour and severe mental health concerns. Emergency housing The portion of applications for emergency housing that were declined increased from 4% in March 2024 to 32% in March 2025, the report found. This statistic comes after Potaka's emergency housing policy changes in August 2024, which included limiting discretion and tightening rules to ensure it was only accessed 'where absolutely necessary'. Reasons people were declined included that they could meet their needs another way (34.3%), their circumstances could have been 'reasonably foreseen' (22.5%), they were not eligible for a grant (16.7%) or their situation was not considered an emergency (14.7%). Labour leader Chris Hipkins says the Government has no plan for where people go when they are removed from emergency accommodation. Photo / Mark Mitchell Potaka said more than $550 million was being spent annually across a range of programmes run by multiple agencies, including Transitional Housing, Housing First, Rapid Rehousing and many other support services. The minister argued there was a 37% increase in people living in shelters between 2018 and 2023 when the previous Labour Government was in power and that the Government was also dealing with the large-scale emergency housing 'social disaster' it had inherited from Labour. In January, the Government celebrated reaching its target for reducing the number of people in emergency motels by 75% five years early. But it raised questions over where people went when they left emergency housing. Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka (left) and Prime Minister Christopher Luxon say the Government has spent half a billion dollars helping people in homeless situations. Photo / Mark Mitchell Labour leader Chris Hipkins accused the Government of kicking 'everybody out of emergency accommodation' without having a plan for where they were to go. 'I think every New Zealander living in a main city can walk down the street and see there are more people living on the street, in cars, and that the Government's actions have contributed to that,' he said. 'When you boot everybody out of emergency accommodation ... this is what happens.' The report said for around 14% of people who left emergency housing, officials were not sure where they went. Others went into a mix of social and transitional housing, or received housing support supplements. 'We do know where 85% [of people] have gone and we're really happy that a lot of kids have come out of emergency housing. Those 14% we don't know where they've gone, but they don't have to tell us where they are going,' Potaka said. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon told reporters his Government had spent half a billion dollars helping people in these situations. 'Homelessness is a really complex issue. People often come with a complex set of needs, whether its mental health or addiction. No Kiwi wants to see homelessness.' Luxon said he was proud of 'the fact that we have taken 6000 people off the social state housing list'. 'I'm also really proud that we've got 2100 kids out of motels and into really good homes by prioritising those families.' Julia Gabel is a Wellington-based political reporter. She joined the Herald in 2020 and has most recently focused on data journalism.
RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
Fonterra boss meets with politicians over high butter prices
Fonterra's boss has given media the silent treatment over the sky high price of butter. Both National and Labour's finance spokespeople met with Fonterra's chief executive Miles Hurrell last night, trying to find out why the cost of a block is so steep. But whether the debate leads to a price correction or just more froth and churn from lawmakers is yet to be seen. Russell Palmer reports.
Scoop
5 hours ago
- Scoop
NZ First Signals Change To Foreign Buyers Ban Could Be Announced This Year
, Acting Political Editor NZ First leader Winston Peters says he expects an announcement "soon" clearing the way for wealthy foreign investors to buy high-value houses in New Zealand. But he insists the foreign buyers ban - which prevents most foreigners from purchasing existing houses - will remain in place, unchanged. "We're talking about investment. We're changing those rules and what goes with them. You have to be patient - and we'll tell you what the details are," Peters told reporters on Wednesday. "But the Foreign Buyers Act is not changing." During coalition negotiations, NZ First blocked National's proposal to allow foreigners to buy houses worth more than $2 million, contingent on a 15 percent tax. But Peters - who helped introduce the ban in 2018 as part of the Labour NZ First coalition - later said he was open to revisiting the rules "for the right investor". A spokesperson on Wednesday said discussions were ongoing about the appropriate investment threshold but suggested it would be "substantial". "New Zealand First is pursuing consultation on the matter and is looking at the government being able to make an announcement by the end of the year." Any proposed changes would need to create jobs and benefit the wider economy without disrupting the housing market, the spokesperson said. Speaking later at Parliament, Peters told reporters they would not have to wait very long for an announcement. "I'm not the one totally in control of the answer, but I would imagine by the end of 2025," he said. Peters repeatedly stated that "the foreign buyers ban will remain" but said investment rules could be changed to allow those investing "millions of dollars" to buy a house at a certain cost - "and that cost is not $2 million". "We're talking about investors. They're bringing billions to this economy," he said. "They're not buyers." Back in October, Peters told NewstalkZB he would consider changes for the "right person with the right investment" - but it would need to be far more than "a lousy $20 million". Addressing reporters on Wednesday, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon confirmed the timeline outlined by Peters but declined to shed any light on the "ongoing coalition negotiations". "When we're ready to talk about it, we will," Luxon said. "You've heard what Winston said... and that's a fair reflection of where things are at." Luxon has previously conceded National set its $2m threshold "too low" and suggested $5m or $6m would be more reasonable. ACT leader and associate finance minister David Seymour - who's responsible for the Overseas Investment Act - told reporters he would support any progress on the issue. "I'd be there with bells on, because I think allowing our friends around the world to come to our country, bring their money and live here is generally - there's exceptions - but generally a win-win for New Zealand." In April, the government made changes to the Active Investor Plus Visa - the so-called 'golden visa' - easing the path for wealthy foreigners to gain residency through investment. Immigration New Zealand last month confirmed it had received nearly 200 applications since the changes were introduced.
