Philippines blames China for ships collision in South China Sea
In a statement on Tuesday, it said it would assess how to respond to Beijing's use of military force against civilians.
"Their actions not only posed a grave danger to Philippine personnel and vessels, but also resulted in the unfortunate collision between the two Chinese vessels," the Philippine foreign ministry said in a statement.
Philippine authorities said Monday's accidental collision resulted in visibly heavy damage to the Chinese coast guard and navy ships and possible injuries.
The confrontation near the Scarborough Shoal was the latest flare-up of the long-simmering territorial standoff in the contested waters of the South China Sea.
The United States, a long-time treaty ally of the Philippines, condemned the "latest reckless action by China directed against a Philippine vessel" on Tuesday.
The Chinese coast guard on Monday blamed Philippine vessels for the confrontation and said it was forced to expel the vessels after they intruded into "China's inherent territory," despite warnings.
It did not mention the collision or possible casualties.
Video footage made public by the Philippine coast guard shows a Chinese navy ship with the bow number 164 slamming into the bow of a Chinese coast guard ship while both try to block and force a Philippine patrol ship, the BRP Suluan, away from Scarborough.
The Chinese coast guard ship can be seen using its water cannon.
The video shows the heavily shattered bow of the Chinese coast guard ship, where at least two Chinese personnel were seen standing shortly before the crash.
The Chinese navy ship sustained deep dents and what appeared to be linear cuts on its hull.
BRP Suluan offered medical help by two-way radio to the Chinese coast guard, fearing the collision may have caused injuries to its personnel, but the Philippine coast guard said it received no response.
Gan Yu, a spokesperson for the Chinese coast guard in Beijing, said on Monday that the Philippine vessels intruded into Chinese territorial waters off the shoal, prompting its forces to take "necessary measures, including monitoring, forcing, intercepting and controlling the Philippine vessels to expel them."
The chief of staff of the Armed Forces of the Philippines, General Romeo Brawner Jr., told reporters in Manila that the video footage clearly showed that the Chinese navy ship manoeuvred to ram the BRP Suluan, which had to move to avoid being hit.
As a result, the Chinese navy ship instead hit the Chinese coast guard ship, which was also closely chasing the Philippine vessel, Brawner said.
"China's aggressive actions were very clear in this incident," Brawner said. "They were at fault because of their aggressive manoeuvres. We were there to protect Filipino fishermen in the Scarborough Shoal. That was our only objective because that's our traditional fishing ground."
Asked if China's deployment of military force against civilians was a change in tactic, Brawner said it was.
He said the Philippine military would assess how to respond in consultation with the coast guard and would seek guidance from President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.
"Now they are deploying their PLA navy and this is one symbol of China's aggressiveness,' he said, referring to the People's Liberation Army.
"We'll discuss possible steps and our future tactics to counter China's actions to stop us from getting access (to Scarborough)."
Chinese officials did not immediately comment on Brawner's statement but Gan Yu insisted its forces would be "resolutely safeguarding China's territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fashion Network
2 days ago
- Fashion Network
Is anybody fighting back in this trade war?
By no means does the firm anticipate zero harm. Business confidence is down but not collapsing. Capital spending will be constrained. And while chances of recession are still high, a better outcome remains very plausible. This sort of guarded optimism — or qualified pessimism — is a break from the dark warnings. Christine Lagarde, head of the European Central Bank, told leaders to prepare for a worst-case scenario in which an antagonistic US drags the world into destructive economic conflict. The prime minister of Singapore, a city-state that thrived during the heyday of free trade, couldn't hide his dismay: Tariffs aren't the actions of friends, Lawrence Wong noted. His Canadian counterpart, Mark Carney, declared that relations with the US would be changed forever. Chinese President Xi Jinping has studiously matched American moves but also toned down his rhetoric and actions when appropriate. Washington and Beijing this week extended a pause on higher tariffs for 90 days, the latest in a series of suspensions. India, which has been the subject of some bullish projections as China's economy has slowed, is one of the few economies of significance that hasn't cut a deal with Trump. But Prime Minister Narendra Modi also hasn't gone measure for measure or shown a desire to get even with American businesses. Yes, there has been indignity and hurt feelings. The governor of the Reserve Bank of India dismissed Trump's claim that commerce was dead there. He touted India's contribution to global growth — about 18% compared to around 11% for the US — and insisted the local economy was doing well. This is in the ballpark, based on IMF projections. It also misses the point that in pure size, America dwarfs India. Brazil, a comer that struggles to make good on its potential, is also refusing to bend. President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva loathes dependence on the US and wants to be treated as an equal. But Trump doesn't like a court case against Lula's predecessor for allegedly plotting a coup. Brazil is trying to develop an alternative to the dollar and places great store in commercial ties to the BRICS group of emerging economies. Many of those nations, and aspiring members of the bloc, have cut deals with Trump, or are likely to do so. Brazil will come to some arrangement. So has Trump got away with it? His aides reckoned that access to the American market is too lucrative to pass up, and they may have been right. It would also be naive to conclude there won't be any cost. The global economy has slowed but hasn't crashed, foreigners still purchase US Treasuries and it's a safe bet that the greenback will be at the centre of the financial system for years. But the nations humiliated won't forget this experience. Asia's economies will only get bigger and the siren call of greater integration with China will get louder. Trump's efforts to destroy the existing order may yet prove an own goal. Just not this year. Clayton, who became the top economic official at the State Department, believed that robust trade among the shattered nations of Western Europe was as important as physical rebuilding. The economic dislocation wrought by the conflagration had been underestimated; capitalism could revive the continent and prevent the political implosion of key countries. According to Benn Steil's book The Marshall Plan: Dawn of the Cold War, Clayton insisted that the US 'must run this show.' Trump's team brag about reconfiguring the system that grew from the ideals of the post-war era. The hubris may ultimately prove misplaced.
Euronews
3 days ago
- Euronews
EU urges China to drop sanctions on two Lithuanian banks
The European Union called on China to revoke sanctions imposed on two Lithuanian banks in retaliation for EU penalties on Chinese lenders linked to Russia's war in Ukraine. Beijing announced the measures this week against Urbo Bank and Mano Bank despite the fact that these Lithuanian banks do not operate in China, giving Beijing's move a largely symbolic character. Nonetheless, the tit-for-tat measures underscore the deepening divide between Brussels and Beijing over China's support for Russia in its war on Ukraine. At EU headquarters in Brussels, European Commission spokesperson Olof Gill defended the bloc's sanctions on Chinese banks. China 'must respect the problems we have identified,' Gill said. 'Our sanctions are the centrepiece of our efforts to minimise the effectiveness of the Russian war machine.' He said the Commission does not believe that the Chinese countermeasures 'have any justification or are evidence-based, and therefore we call on China to remove them even now.' EU sanctions on Russia's war in Ukraine The EU's latest Russia sanctions package, adopted in July and effective 9 August, included Heihe Rural Commercial Bank and Heilongjiang Suifenhe Rural Commercial Bank. The bloc accused them of providing crypto-asset services that help Moscow evade restrictions. In explaining its sanctions on the Lithuanian banks, the Chinese Ministry said the EU sanctions on Chinese firms had "a serious negative impact on China-EU economic and trade relations and financial cooperation.' The banks and the government in Lithuania said the sanctions were not expected but would likely have little practical impact. 'According to the preliminary assessment, this decision will not have a significant impact on either the country's financial system or the activities of the banks themselves, since the business models of the mentioned banks are focused on the local market,' the Bank of Lithuania said on Wednesday in a statement. Marius Arlauskas, the head of administration at Urbo Bank, also said that 'since we do not have any business partnerships with Chinese individuals or legal entities, the sanctions will have no impact on the activities of Urbo Bank and the implementation of prudential regulations." Why has China targeted Lithuania? The Baltic nation has drawn China's ire for years. Beijing expelled Lithuania's ambassador in 2021 in response to Lithuania allowing Taiwan to open a liaison office in Vilnius, the Lithuanian capital. China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province and prohibits other countries from having formal ties with Taipei. Taiwan has long sought closer relations with the Baltic states, citing their past experiences under authoritarian rule and embrace of multiparty democracy and liberal values. In 2024, Lithuania expelled Chinese diplomats after a Chinese ship came under suspicion during an investigation into the severing of two undersea data cables. One runs under the Baltic Sea between Lithuania and Sweden.
France 24
3 days ago
- France 24
Solomon Islands says China not influencing diplomatic decisions
China, the United States and Taiwan have all been barred from the annual Pacific Islands Forum in Honiara next month, an event they usually attend. China counts the Solomon Islands among its closest partners in the South Pacific and signed a secretive security pact with Honiara in 2022. It has been accused of agitating behind the scenes to see Taiwan excluded from attending the Forum as an observer. The Pacific bloc's top diplomats met in Fiji on Thursday to discuss the Forum's agenda, and Solomon Islands Foreign Minister Peter Shanel Agovaka said his nation was not influenced by China. "Our focus is not on China or Taiwan. Our focus is on the (Pacific) region," Agovaka told AFP. He expressed frustration and blamed the Forum secretariat for the ban because it was yet to agree on "dialogue partners". Agovaka added that the Forum was "all over the place". New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters had earlier warned that "outsiders" interfering with Forum decisions threatened to split the bloc. Peters did not mention China by name, but said the issue would be raised during the foreign ministers' meeting. "We've got to make sure that every outsider comes here with respect for those of us who are inside the organisation," he said. Agovaka defended the presence of such observers at Forum meetings. "They enhance our meetings," he said. - 'Very perplexing' - Communist China has never ruled Taiwan, but Beijing insists the island is part of its territory and has threatened to use force to bring it under its control. China and Taiwan have long vied for diplomatic influence in the South Pacific and elsewhere, with Beijing spending hundreds of millions of dollars building sports stadiums, presidential palaces, hospitals and roads in Pacific island nations. Peters later described Agovaka's comments as "very perplexing". "At this point in time, when aid from another source or other countries is desperately needed and we're out there trying to get it, if the message is we're not interested in seeing you, how's this going to fall?" he said. Chinese officials described accusations they were agitating behind the scenes as "misinformation". "China has participated in every Forum dialogue, and remains committed and looks forward to continuing such engagement," a spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy in the New Zealand capital said. The annual pre-Forum meeting of foreign ministers is typically a light-hearted affair, although the gathering in Suva on Thursday was noticeably more tense. Several countries did send ministers and others did not engage fully. Nauru's representative left, smoking a cigar, after only one morning session. "We're going to sort things out... we'll get things back on an even keel," Peters said. The Forum will be held in Honiara from September 8-12.
