
Doctor reveals four foods to avoid if you're one of the millions of Brits who suffers from heartburn
Dr Kunal Sood, a US-based anaesthesiologist, says avoiding chocolate, tomatoes, spicy food, and coffee can prevent heartburn—a burning sensation in the chest caused by stomach acid flowing back into the oesophagus.
It's a painful condition which troubles one in four UK adults, and can also be a symptom of a far more serious condition.
Dr Sood warned that recurrent instances of heartburn may be a sign that you have gastro oesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
'Typical symptoms include heartburn, sour taste, persistent cough or hiccups, hoarse voice and bad breath,' he said in a video posted on TikTok to his 2.7million followers.
Previously a study found chocolate increases acid exposure which makes reflux more likely.
Similarly, another found many GERD patients self-reported that eating tomatoes worsened reflux.
Other researchers have found capsaicin, the component in chillies which gives the vibrant salad fruits their heat, can trigger heartburn in some people.
However, the symptoms, which can be worse after eating or lying down, can also be triggered by smoking, stress and even pregnancy, he warned.
Doctors have previously warned that drinking coffee, particularly first thing in the morning, can lead to the condition.
As well as avoiding these foods, he recommended trying to eat 'smaller and more frequent meals'.
This is backed up by a study which found larger meals increased risk of reflux when compared with smaller, more frequent meals.
He also advised keeping a food diary to help those suffering identify which foods are triggering their heartburn.
Other things you can do to prevent heartburn are sleeping on your left side, drinking less alcohol, and avoiding eating right before bed, he shared.
It follows a study in 2023 found that sleeping on your left side at night can reduce your risk of acid reflux.
Meanwhile a systemic review found there is some evidence drinking alcohol increases your risk of GERD.
Similarly, another study found eating dinner a couple of hours before sleeping increased risk of the condition.
In the comment sections, several social media users wrote about their struggles with heartburn.
One user wrote: 'I let mine go too long and ended up with stomach ulcers that became worse and had to go on medication.'
Meanwhile another commented: 'I have GERD, it's so annoying.'
Dr Sood was reacting to a video posted two years ago by @paleaverse that amassed 2.1 million views.
In that video, Palesa Phooko, a 23-year-old medical student, shared she had an acid reflux/heartburn problem.
Earlier this month, heartburn sufferers were offered a test in a bid to catch the earliest possible signs of a deadly cancer.
The 'sponge on a string' test available on the high street sees individuals swallow a special pill containing a sponge the size of a 1p coin.
It aims to spot a condition called Barrett's oesophagus, which occurs when stomach acid rises up the food pipe causing heartburn and damaging tissue.
In some cases, the damaged tissue may have abnormal changes, which may one day become cancer.
While the sponge on a string test has been offered in hospitals and other clinical settings for years, this is the first time it will be offered in a high-street setting.
The NHS says if the two-year pilot is successful the initiative could be rolled out to more parts of the country.
Professor Peter Johnson, NHS national cancer director, said: 'For the majority of people with persistent reflux, these quick and easy heartburn health checks will provide peace of mind that you aren't at increased risk of cancer.
'For those who do find out they have Barrett's oesophagus, regular follow-up checks will be put in place so any further cell changes can be spotted early.'
If worrying sings are detected patients can have treatments to have the cells removed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
2 minutes ago
- The Guardian
If we're serious about protecting pregnancies, we need to stop spraying pesticides
As a biochemist trained in environmental health, I was relieved to see coverage of pesticide exposure and pregnancy risk (Exposure to a mix of pesticides raises risk of pregnancy complications, study suggests, 19 July). But one key detail is missing: food is not the main route of exposure for most women, especially in urban environments. While dietary pesticide levels are regulated, many studies – including urine biomonitoring – have shown less difference in pesticide load between children eating organic and conventional diets in cities than we would expect. Why? Because exposure is happening elsewhere. Pesticides are being sprayed by building managers, neighbours, city governments and businesses – on sidewalks, in apartment hallways, in parks, and even indoors. Many women are exposed without ever handling these chemicals themselves. In fact, a 2020 study found that urban women who used pesticides at home had the same increased risk of birth defects as women exposed to farm drift: a threefold increase in holoprosencephaly, one of the most common birth defects in the US. We must shift the conversation beyond food. These chemicals are in the air women breathe and the homes they live in – often without their knowledge or consent. If we're serious about protecting pregnancies, we need to stop the ShaveOlympia, Washington, US


The Guardian
2 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Parents, beware the devastating consequences of measles
After reading the letters about vaccine misinformation and hesitancy (Measles surge shows why vaccinations are crucial, 20 July), I felt I must write to tell you of one unrecognised cause of the drop in vaccine uptake: when I worked as a community school nursing sister in the 1980s, with 11 state schools and a number of private schools that took up the vaccine service, we had 98% uptake of vaccines in the school setting. This was due to the system of sending letters home to parents requesting their consent and following up by phone, if necessary, by the school office staff. The children came in class batches. Then the local health authority decided that this service should be discontinued and parents were invited to take their child to the local GP surgery for their vaccinations. The uptake plummeted to less than 40% of eligible children due to children not taking the letters home, or parents forgetting or losing the letter – or being unable to take time off to take their child to the surgery. When I asked the GPs at the local health centre what the uptake for the cohort of eligible children was, they looked at their records and were surprised, but reluctant to do anything about it. Health visitors were responsible for, and very successful in, advising new mothers when vaccines were due, where to get them and encouraging uptake. It should be compulsory for all vaccines for preschool children (which includes measles) to be done before a child is admitted to school, as in many other countries. As a midwife, I saw a baby born to a mother who had contact with rubella in early pregnancy. The little girl was born with a body rash, had bilateral cataracts and was totally deaf. She was was very ill. Schools for deaf children may return again for these children if vaccination is not taken up for whatever reason. How StephensLiphook, Hampshire I contracted measles just before the NHS was established. With it came serious ear infections, burst eardrums, etc. There were no vaccines, just ear drops. Over the years the infections and operations continued and now, aged 82, I have no hearing with complications. I beg people to think seriously about vaccination. The consequences of measles can sometimes be devastating. Jean JacksonSeer Green, Buckinghamshire I caught measles aged six in 1953, at a time when parents hoped their children would get it (and chicken pox and mumps) so as to gain immunity. My dad, aged 54, had not had measles as a boy, caught it from me and nearly died. The risk of not vaccinating children is not just to WallLondon


Times
11 minutes ago
- Times
Nurses set to reject pay offer as further strike action looms
Nurses will this week overwhelmingly reject their pay deal, raising the prospect that they will join junior doctors on strike. The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) will warn ministers that they must come back to the table over the summer to avoid a formal strike ballot in the autumn and additional unrest that will further set back NHS recovery. However, public support for doctors' strikes appears to be waning, as ministers accuse them of holding the country to ransom and hospitals report fewer staff joining picket lines. Resident doctors, formerly known junior doctors, are in a five-day walkout after rejecting a 5.4 per cent pay rise, which came after a 22 per cent increase last year. Polling for The Times found that 55 per cent of voters oppose the strike, up from 49 per cent earlier this month, while 32 per cent support it, down four points from the second week of July before the walkouts began. Tom Dolphin, the head of the British Medical Association (BMA), insisted that doctors 'don't want to be on strike', but said the walkouts were necessary because doctors were 'undervalued' and were 'leaving the NHS in large numbers'. He said that pay had to be 'enough to recruit and retain the best doctors'. Ministers have refused to reopen pay talks and negotiations on working conditions collapsed in acrimony last week as ministers accused the BMA of acting in bad faith, while the union said the government had failed to make any concrete offers. • NHS patients told to brace for strikes until Christmas and beyond The BMA is holding out for a full return to 2008 levels of pay and Dolphin said salaries 'reflect the responsibility of these doctors' who were making 'life and death decisions'. He said: 'Even nurses who've had a pretty bad time [are] not as badly off as doctors in terms of lost pay.' Nurses, however, are furious that their 3.6 per cent pay rise this year was lower than doctors' increases for the second year in a row. The RCN is holding an indicative vote on the pay award, which closed on Sunday. The vote is understood to show 'overwhelming' rejection of a deal, with turnout likely to be well over the 50 per cent threshold that would be needed for industrial action. The union is due to announce final results later this week with a call for ministers to return to the table. While the BMA is adamant that headline pay must rise, nurses are thought to be more open to talks on wider pay structures. The RCN has repeatedly complained that nurses can remain on the lowest rung of the NHS pay scale for decades and is expected to press ministers for reforms that would allow them to move up the scale as they gain experience. If no progress is made, a formal strike ballot is likely to be launched in the autumn. A spokesman for the union said: 'The results will be announced to our members later this week. As the largest part of the NHS workforce, nursing staff do not feel valued and the government must urgently begin to turn that around.' It came after ambulance and other hospital staff in the GMB Union voted to reject the 3.6 per cent offer last week, with strike action now being considered. The BMA consultants' committee is also holding an indicative vote over a 4 per cent pay deal it described an 'insult' to senior doctors. Dolphin said the vote was 'a testing of the waters to see where people are', but warned: 'We're certainly very aware already, even before we've done this ballot, the consultants are also very much down on their pay [compared with 2008].' He told Sky News he did not recognise reports that doctors were being paid £6,000 a shift to cover for strikes, but said overtime rates were 'whatever they can manage to negotiate with their employer'.