Long-term probe into health impact of Melbourne Airport's third runway
Professor Catherine Bennett, a prominent epidemiologist who was part of the inquiry into Australia's COVID-19 response, will lead the panel.
Bennett said the airport has a significant impact – both good and bad – on many people's lives in Melbourne's north-west, and the study would look to measure all of this.
'It's the biggest employer in the area,' she said. 'It's becoming a centre for entertainment. Of course, there are people who are already struggling with aircraft noise, who have worries about what more this might bring.'
Bennett said the study is primarily focused on aircraft noise and the impact it might have on physical and mental health, but could be broadened into other areas of concern, such as air quality.
'We also think there's a lot of concern among some of the action groups, for example, about things that aren't really showing up in the science, but people might be really concerned about.
'We want to hear about that because our recommendations … could include some of those things to allay those concerns,' she said.
The panel has already met with community representatives, councils and schools that are affected by aircraft noise.
Many of the most affected suburbs are in Brimbank City Council, which has lodged an application for a merits review of the government's third runway approval before the federal Administrative Review Tribunal.
The council commissioned its own independent health study in 2022, which found that noise impacts would exceed World Health Organisation guidelines, that children under the flight paths could experience cognitive delays of up to six months, and that the extra noise could cause sleep disturbance, anxiety, depression and cardiovascular disease.
'Council has taken this action due to its concerns about the conditional approval,' a spokesperson said. 'As always, Brimbank Council's priority is to ensure the third runway does not unreasonably compromise the health, wellbeing and amenity of the community affected by Melbourne Airport.'
Shannon Meilak lives in Keilor Lodge, one of the suburbs closest to the airport runway, and is part of the grassroots campaign No Third Tulla Runway.
Meilak said a long-term health study 'is absolutely imperative', but that people were already experiencing health and wellbeing problems from aircraft noise.
Loading
'It's not just about it being noisy and annoying,' she said.
'A lot of people don't realise that there's actually health impacts from excessive exposure to noise.
'These can range from … dementia, to having increased anxiety, blood pressure and hypertension.'
Meilak said there were also community concerns about how extra aircraft noise might depreciate property values.
'We're already seeing people sell up and leave,' she said.
Melbourne Airport's strategy, planning and community manager Justin Portelli said the third runway was 'essential infrastructure that ensures Melbourne remains connected to the rest of Australia and the world, supporting economic growth, jobs, and tourism well into the future'.
He said the study was an important initiative that would provide evidence-based insights into how communities surrounding the airport are affected by aircraft noise.
'As findings from the health study emerge over time, Melbourne Airport will ensure these findings are transparently communicated and considered as part of broader discussions with government and local communities.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
9 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Long-term probe into health impact of Melbourne Airport's third runway
Professor Catherine Bennett, a prominent epidemiologist who was part of the inquiry into Australia's COVID-19 response, will lead the panel. Bennett said the airport has a significant impact – both good and bad – on many people's lives in Melbourne's north-west, and the study would look to measure all of this. 'It's the biggest employer in the area,' she said. 'It's becoming a centre for entertainment. Of course, there are people who are already struggling with aircraft noise, who have worries about what more this might bring.' Bennett said the study is primarily focused on aircraft noise and the impact it might have on physical and mental health, but could be broadened into other areas of concern, such as air quality. 'We also think there's a lot of concern among some of the action groups, for example, about things that aren't really showing up in the science, but people might be really concerned about. 'We want to hear about that because our recommendations … could include some of those things to allay those concerns,' she said. The panel has already met with community representatives, councils and schools that are affected by aircraft noise. Many of the most affected suburbs are in Brimbank City Council, which has lodged an application for a merits review of the government's third runway approval before the federal Administrative Review Tribunal. The council commissioned its own independent health study in 2022, which found that noise impacts would exceed World Health Organisation guidelines, that children under the flight paths could experience cognitive delays of up to six months, and that the extra noise could cause sleep disturbance, anxiety, depression and cardiovascular disease. 'Council has taken this action due to its concerns about the conditional approval,' a spokesperson said. 'As always, Brimbank Council's priority is to ensure the third runway does not unreasonably compromise the health, wellbeing and amenity of the community affected by Melbourne Airport.' Shannon Meilak lives in Keilor Lodge, one of the suburbs closest to the airport runway, and is part of the grassroots campaign No Third Tulla Runway. Meilak said a long-term health study 'is absolutely imperative', but that people were already experiencing health and wellbeing problems from aircraft noise. Loading 'It's not just about it being noisy and annoying,' she said. 'A lot of people don't realise that there's actually health impacts from excessive exposure to noise. 'These can range from … dementia, to having increased anxiety, blood pressure and hypertension.' Meilak said there were also community concerns about how extra aircraft noise might depreciate property values. 'We're already seeing people sell up and leave,' she said. Melbourne Airport's strategy, planning and community manager Justin Portelli said the third runway was 'essential infrastructure that ensures Melbourne remains connected to the rest of Australia and the world, supporting economic growth, jobs, and tourism well into the future'. He said the study was an important initiative that would provide evidence-based insights into how communities surrounding the airport are affected by aircraft noise. 'As findings from the health study emerge over time, Melbourne Airport will ensure these findings are transparently communicated and considered as part of broader discussions with government and local communities.'
The Age
9 hours ago
- The Age
Long-term probe into health impact of Melbourne Airport's third runway
Professor Catherine Bennett, a prominent epidemiologist who was part of the inquiry into Australia's COVID-19 response, will lead the panel. Bennett said the airport has a significant impact – both good and bad – on many people's lives in Melbourne's north-west, and the study would look to measure all of this. 'It's the biggest employer in the area,' she said. 'It's becoming a centre for entertainment. Of course, there are people who are already struggling with aircraft noise, who have worries about what more this might bring.' Bennett said the study is primarily focused on aircraft noise and the impact it might have on physical and mental health, but could be broadened into other areas of concern, such as air quality. 'We also think there's a lot of concern among some of the action groups, for example, about things that aren't really showing up in the science, but people might be really concerned about. 'We want to hear about that because our recommendations … could include some of those things to allay those concerns,' she said. The panel has already met with community representatives, councils and schools that are affected by aircraft noise. Many of the most affected suburbs are in Brimbank City Council, which has lodged an application for a merits review of the government's third runway approval before the federal Administrative Review Tribunal. The council commissioned its own independent health study in 2022, which found that noise impacts would exceed World Health Organisation guidelines, that children under the flight paths could experience cognitive delays of up to six months, and that the extra noise could cause sleep disturbance, anxiety, depression and cardiovascular disease. 'Council has taken this action due to its concerns about the conditional approval,' a spokesperson said. 'As always, Brimbank Council's priority is to ensure the third runway does not unreasonably compromise the health, wellbeing and amenity of the community affected by Melbourne Airport.' Shannon Meilak lives in Keilor Lodge, one of the suburbs closest to the airport runway, and is part of the grassroots campaign No Third Tulla Runway. Meilak said a long-term health study 'is absolutely imperative', but that people were already experiencing health and wellbeing problems from aircraft noise. Loading 'It's not just about it being noisy and annoying,' she said. 'A lot of people don't realise that there's actually health impacts from excessive exposure to noise. 'These can range from … dementia, to having increased anxiety, blood pressure and hypertension.' Meilak said there were also community concerns about how extra aircraft noise might depreciate property values. 'We're already seeing people sell up and leave,' she said. Melbourne Airport's strategy, planning and community manager Justin Portelli said the third runway was 'essential infrastructure that ensures Melbourne remains connected to the rest of Australia and the world, supporting economic growth, jobs, and tourism well into the future'. He said the study was an important initiative that would provide evidence-based insights into how communities surrounding the airport are affected by aircraft noise. 'As findings from the health study emerge over time, Melbourne Airport will ensure these findings are transparently communicated and considered as part of broader discussions with government and local communities.'
West Australian
10 hours ago
- West Australian
COVID-19 variant NB.1.8.1: Everything you need to know about the new dominant strain and how our vaccines will hold up
A new COVID-19 variant is drawing global attention due to its rapid spread worldwide. The variant — NB.1.8.1 — is set to become the dominant strain in Australia. However, because it has mutated from known variants, the nation's vaccines are still expected to offer decent protection. NB.1.8.1 is already the dominant strain in Western Australia, according to wastewater surveillance reports. 'It's taking off pretty quickly,' Deakin University Professor and Epidemiology Chair Catherine Bennett told 'It is related to variants that we've seen, it looks like two of them have kind of combined, but it has some new mutations as well.' These mutations have two key effects. First, the variant appears different enough from previous strains that our immune systems don't immediately recognize it. This means it can evade the immune defences developed through earlier infections or vaccinations, Bennett explained. Second, the mutations improve the variant's ability to bind to receptors in the mucosal linings of the human body. 'It just means if you're exposed, you're more likely to catch it,' Bennett said. 'People just need to be aware of infection where they can, and avoid spreading it where they can — if they've got symptoms, no matter what it is, it's not the time to socialise.' NB.1.8.1 is a descendant from Omicron JN.1 — the same strain targeted by current vaccines. 'It was wise that they invested in vaccines that were trailing along that JN.1 family,' Bennett told 'While the vaccine is not perfectly matched to this sub-variant, there is enough relationship with the JN.1 strain that is in the vaccine, that allows us to still have an effective vaccine.' This winter marks Australia's fifth with COVID-19 — though the worst impacts occurred in 2022, 2023, and 2024. In recent months, Australians have relaxed their attitudes toward the virus, buoyed by a seasonal reprieve from high infection rates — a reprieve that has also lowered overall immunity. That complacency is one of several factors creating a perfect storm for a surge in cases: winter, waning immunity, immune evasion by the new variant, and its high transmissibility. 'All those things lining up together suggest that we might be in for a bigger winter wave, possibly even than we saw last year,' Bennett said. 'It could be the first time in a year that we see COVID really starting to impact people,' she said. Bennett noted that right now, 'is the first time that people in ICU with COVID-19 has dropped to the level it has.' These ICU rates are the lowest since 2021 — but they are expected to rise again this winter. 'The more we can do to help reduce spreading the virus around, then the better off we'll be,' Bennett said. At the height of the pandemic in Australia, deaths from COVID-19 were ten times higher than those from the flu. 'That's dropped, but it is still five times higher than the flu. So COVID-19 is still to be taken seriously,' Bennett said. The World Health Organisation recently evaluated NB.1.8.1 as a 'low risk' variant overall. That classification reflects comparisons with previous, more severe strains, but also considers current levels of population immunity and treatment availability. 'It can still make some people very sick, but it's not more severe than the last strains we've seen,' Bennett said. 'The other thing the World Health Organisation looks at, is whether the treatments we have still work, that our testing measures still work, that all of that is still okay — and it is,' she said. 'Actually having a booster shot at the start of a wave gives you the best coverage you can have through those next six to eight weeks, which is how long a wave will take.' She urged people over 65 to review their vaccination status, and reminded adults over 18 that they remain eligible for boosters. 'It pays to think about whether you've had an infection, and whether actually a booster might not be a bad thing at this stage.'
