Benefit you've never heard of worth £500 for new mums
The Sure Start Maternity Grant is a scheme which offers a one-off payment to those expecting their first child or having multiple births such as twins.
1
The money is designed to help you cover the cost of caring for a newborn.
The amount you receive can also vary depending on how many babies you are carrying, with parents expecting triplets eligible for £1,000.
To qualify for the support, you or your partner must be claiming certain benefits such as Universal Credit, Pension Credit, Child Tax Credit or Income Support.
You must also have no other children under the age of 16, unless you are expecting multiple births.
Other exceptions include caring for someone else's child and the infant was over 12 months old when the arrangement started.
This does include caring for your partner's child.
You may also be able to get a grant if you're adopting or becoming a surrogate parent.
The baby must be less than 1 year old on the date you claim and you must be claiming benefits to qualify.
You don't have to pay the grant back and it does not impact your other benefits or tax credits.
If you are thinking about applying, you must claim the grant within 11 weeks of the baby's due date or within 6 months after the baby's birth.
Carer Support Payment: New benefit for unpaid Scots
How to apply
To apply for the support via post, you will need to fill out a Sure Start Maternity Grant (SF100) claim form.
This form needs to be printed off and then posted to 'Freepost DWP SSMG'. You do not need a postcode or a stamp.
You also need to provide evidence of the pregnancy or childbirth from a health professional, such as a doctor or midwife.
They can either fill in a form MAT B1, which they should already have a copy of or write a statement confirming the pregnancy or childbirth.
You will get a letter about whether your claim is successful within 28 days.
But if you've recently made a new Universal Credit claim, it could take longer.
What help is available for parents?
CHILDCARE can be a costly business. Here is how you can get help.
30 hours free childcare - Parents of three and four-year-olds can apply for 30 hours free childcare a week.
To qualify you must usually work at least 16 hours a week at the national living or minimum wage and earn less than £100,000 a year.
Tax credits - For children under 20, some families can get help with childcare costs.
Childcare vouchers - If your employer offers childcare vouchers you can get up to £55 a week in tax and national insurance savings.
You pay for your childcare before your tax contributions are taken out.
This scheme is open to new joiners until October 4, 2018, when it is planned that tax-free childcare will replace the vouchers.
Tax-free childcare - Available to working families and the self-employed, for every £8 you put in the government will add an extra £2.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TTG
8 minutes ago
- TTG
Lates market fracturing as unrealistic budgets and expectations clash with higher holiday prices
To continue reading this article you must log in. If you've never set a password you may need to register for free here and get unlimited access. For assistance contact support@
The Guardian
40 minutes ago
- The Guardian
My father finally acknowledged my stepmother's cruelty. How do I ask him to reconsider their marriage?
I have a stepmother who my brother and I really despise. She has made our relationship with our dad really hard, and has tried to stop him seeing us at points. She has resented us since we were little. My dad has recently admitted that he thinks she is jealous of us and has a lot of regret for the way we were treated in the past. The trouble lies in the fact that he has said if anything happens to him (ie if he dies first) we would need to make an effort with her will-wise, to ensure we were treated fairly, as he doesn't quite trust she would do the right thing. It feels incredibly hard to acknowledge this and agree when he has essentially admitted he doesn't trust her with his dying wish. I also find it really hard to deal with the fact he is finally acknowledging how cruel she has been, but still insists we have a relationship. It makes me think he's a coward. I really want to bring this up to him, but have no idea how to say: 'Do you not think you should reconsider your marriage, based on the way in which you have shown you don't trust your wife, and believe she is jealous of your children?' Eleanor says: First non-philosophical thing: if you haven't already, I think you should get legal advice about the will. Is it that he might die intestate, and he's hoping you'll all sort it out? Or has he made arrangements, but worries she might challenge them? Legal advice would clarify what can be done now to avoid a horrible tangle later. That's hard – nobody likes to get into the details about their dad's death. Or indeed their own. But it'll be so much harder, emotionally and legally, if your first advice about a possible estate conflict only comes after he's died. To your question. You said you weren't sure how to say what you wanted to say. When we say 'I can't figure out how to say such-and-such', I always think the answer is to just say the such-and-such. You wrote it: 'Do you not think you should reconsider your marriage, based on the ways you don't trust your wife, and believe she's jealous of your children?' A heady thing to say, for sure. But it's not the word choice that makes it heady. You'd be asking your dad why he's still married. You can soften the phrasing, but it's the content of that question that makes us flinch, not the way of asking it. More frightening still is the fact that he might have an answer. Through your (and my) eyes that question is almost rhetorical: why stay married to someone you don't trust and who's mean to your kids? However, the fact that they are still married and that he wants you to have a relationship with her means that, for him, there might well be an answer. He might have considerations on the other side of the scale that outweigh the fact that she's mean to his kids. Maybe he likes her enough. Maybe he doesn't want to be alone. Maybe he thinks he's too old, he's not willing to make the change. Maybe he thinks the conflicts between her and his kids aren't his concern. Maybe what look like obvious dealbreakers to you are just some considerations among many for him. The point is, your real question for him might be an even bigger flinch. Not just 'why won't you act on your judgment?', but 'why isn't it your judgment that you should leave?' It's possible he has bona fide answers – things that, to him, are more important than the way she treats you. It is hard to say which would hurt more: him not being brave enough to act on what he values, or this being exactly what it looks like when he does. I truly don't know which of these it is. I feel for you the same in both cases. I don't know whether you should ask him either question out loud; I don't know how conversations with him tend to go, or whether his answer would make you feel better. I do know that when someone isn't acting on what they say they see, it isn't always that they lack the courage of their convictions. Sometimes they're showing us their convictions through inaction.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Is YOUR name going extinct? Find out with our search tool
The names Jack, Harry and Emily are dying out, according to data that shows how monikers common in the 90s are going out of fashion. Jack, which sat atop the boys' names popularity list every year between 1996 and 2008, last year ranked 22nd, with just 1,711 babies being given the name. This is a fall of more than 4,000 (70 per cent) compared with 10 years ago, marking the biggest decrease of all 6,000-plus boy names. Harry, also once top of the charts, has had tumbled by 3,600 (67 per cent) and now sits 20th, with a continuing downward trajectory. For girls, Emily and Jessica saw the biggest falls in the past 10 years, from 3,991 to 1,170 (-70 per cent) and 2,995 to just 483 (-84 per cent), respectively. Both names were among the most common in the 1990s. The Daily Mail has built a new search tool which shows how your name has risen or plummeted in popularity over the last few decades. To use our interactive below, first select your gender, then search for your name in the box and select it from the dropdown menu. It will then tell you how many babies of your sex and name were born this year and how popular it is, how it has changed from its heyday, and in what years the name reached its peak position in the charts. You can then compare your name against up to five more names of any gender. Our tool comes as official data yesterday crowned Muhammad as the most popular boys' name in England and Wales for the second year running. More than 5,700 boys were given the name in 2024, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS). This represents a significant 23 per cent rise since the year before – the first time it topped the list – when around 4,660 boys were named after the Islamic prophet. It tops our biggest risers list. In 1996, just 441 baby boys were given the name Muhammad. Mohammed entered the top 100 boys' names for England and Wales 101 years ago, debuting at 91st in 1924. Its prevalence dropped considerably in the lead up to and during WW2 but began to rise in the 1960s. That particular iteration of the name was the only one to appear in the ONS' top 100 data from 1924 until Mohammad joined in the early 1980s. Muhammad, now the most popular of the trio, first broke into the top 100 in the mid-1980s and has seen the fastest growth of all three iterations since – seeing a 12-fold increase in the past three decades. Another popular name rising the charts is Arlo, an old English word for 'fortified hill' which saw a rise from 397 in 2014 to 2,220 in 2024 for a total change of 1,823 (459 per cent). Olivia held onto the top spot for girls for the ninth year running, with 2,761 girls being given the name by their parents last year. Despite still being top pick, the name is falling fastly out of fashion – down by 1,963 since 2014 (-42 per cent). Amelia (2,448) also held on to the second spot for the third year in a row, but Isla (2,056) dropped out of the top three after being replaced by Lily (2,185). Names inspired by pop culture have proved popular, with Maeve – which surged in popularity after the 2019 debut of Netflix's Sex Education, starring Emma Mackey as the fiercely intelligent Maeve Wiley – growing the most of all girls' names. Just 61 infants were given the name in 2014, compared to 1,264 last year, a rise of 1,204 – or 1,974 per cent. Otis, the lead from the same show played by Asa Butterfield also saw a rise in popularity at the same time, from 164 in 2014 to 762 in 2024. Hollywood is also a popular inspiration, with Margot (1,243) – a name shared Australian Barbie actress Margot Robbie – has seen steady rises in popularity over the past few years, peaking this year in 28th place, a rise from 44th in 2023. Meanwhile, the Prime Minister appears to have killed off his own name for good. Keir did not appear in the list of names last year. This could mean it has gone extinct completely, although the ONS hides actual figures for names with fewer than three instances.
