
Exclusive: The D.C. restaurant association aims to kill Initiative 82
Widespread restaurant closures. Job and revenue loss. Talent drain. Many are painting a grim picture of D.C.'s dining scene and its future — which is why the Restaurant Association of Metropolitan Washington is calling on legislators to repeal Initiative 82.
Why it matters: I-82, which eliminates the tipped minimum wage, is among the most controversial laws recently passed in D.C. — and now, nearly three years into its implementation, many argue the system isn't working and needs to be reevaluated.
The D.C. restaurant industry is at a "tipping point," RAMW president Shawn Townsend tells Axios, and he's gunning for a return to the traditional tipped minimum wage and its $5.35/hour base pay.
Catch up quick: I-82 was passed by voters and then implemented in May 2023, incrementally raising tipped wages to reach the citywide minimum wage (currently $17.50/hour) by 2027.
The tipped wage is currently at $10, but poised to jump to $12 in its next increase July 1.
Previously, it was common practice in D.C. and much of the U.S. for tipped employees to be paid a lower base salary, assuming tips would meet — and often surpass — minimum wage. If not, businesses are legally required to make up the difference.
Driving the news: Townsend tells Axios that the association plans to call on the DC Council to repeal I-82 before July.
Earlier in the week, Axios spoke with members of a growing coalition of small businesses and hospitality workers about their plans to lobby legislators on a milder measure: A temporary freeze.
By keeping I-82 at the $10 base wage, businesses could keep their doors open, workers in jobs, and allow for an independent impact study, they said. That effort, which RAMW also supports, is still on.
"Everything is still on the table," Townsend says, "but we're going all-in on repeal, and we'll see where [the council] lands."
Reality check: None of the DC Council members have introduced legislation to repeal or freeze I-82 — and according to three councilmembers' offices that Axios spoke with, the topic hasn't even been introduced for discussion.
Plus, I-82 has a tumultuous history — an earlier version was repealed in 2018 — and workers are already enjoying the benefits of higher wages.
"There's not an appetite on the council for a full repeal," Kevin Chavous, chief of communications for Ward 2 councilmember Anita Bonds, tells Axios.
That said, a freeze isn't out of the question. Bonds hosted a public hearing in January with dozens of small business owners and hospitality workers to hear about the impact of I-82.
Soon after, RAMW released a report that a record number of restaurants closed in 2024 — 74 in total — and that DC restaurants face double the sales decline of suburban locations between 2004 and the year prior (16% vs. 8%).
"That's all concerning for us, and why we're taking a closer look," says Chavous. "Maybe a freeze or delaying the next increase. We need to consider all options that will help right now."
Context: The I-82 increase comes at a uniquely turbulent time in D.C. when food and operational costs are spiking, and restaurant patronage is slumping as people worry about spending and job security amid Trump's federal government cuts.
A recent RAMW poll of over 200 full-service restaurants revealed that 44% are considering closing this year — a sliver of the association's 1,500 members, but a "snapshot of what the industry is fearing and facing," says Townsend.
In the same survey, nearly half (49%) said they saw fewer diners, while 47% reported lower sales last year.
What they're saying: "It doesn't cure everything, but I-82 is the only thing the council and mayor can affect," Tony Tomelden, owner of The Pug, tells Axios.
On Wednesday, he announced the coming closure of Brookland's Finest, his decade-old neighborhood pub, citing declining foot traffic, rising food costs, and "the payroll challenges Initiative 82 presented."
"We're ringing in half of what we did pre-pandemic," Tomelden tells Axios. He estimates his payroll costs would increase by roughly $60,000 a year after July's wage increase. "We likely could have cut a lot of staff and made it, but that changes the nature of the place."
Tomeldon says he's more realistic about a freeze than a repeal, "but something has to give."
Between the lines: Workers have long been divided on I-82. Many have voiced support for higher wages for all and the end to a tipping system that can be discriminatory, arbitrary, and one that's historically attracted bad actors who've stolen wages and tips.
And then there are the many whose voices aren't heard — workers without English proficiency or who may be undocumented — who benefit from higher wages.
Other workers argue they make far more than minimum wage with tips, and say they've seen their gratuities and wages go down — especially as restaurants impose service fees to help cover costs.
Zoom in: Yana Tarakanova, a restaurant worker of 12 years who provided testimony at Bonds' hearing, said her shifts were cut by 5-10 hours a week because of changes made after I-82. Service charges also cut down on her tips.
"I do not blame [customers] at all, especially when you are not sure where the fees go," says Tarakanova, who says the businesses are also forced to cut support staff like bussers and food runners.
"It is not profitable, they have to adjust. They are not charities. I don't blame them either."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
13 hours ago
- Axios
Gina Ortiz Jones says there's no time to waste as San Antonio mayor
San Antonio mayor-elect Gina Ortiz Jones tells Axios she's not waiting to be sworn in to start tackling issues like a potential new Spurs arena, an expected budget deficit and the impact of Trump administration policies. Why it matters: The nonpartisan mayor's race became distinctly about politics as it drew money and influence from across Texas and the country. Now that it's over, Ortiz Jones must tackle the reality of everyday issues facing a city on the cusp of pivotal changes. Catch up quick: Ortiz Jones, who had national Democratic backing, beat out Republican Rolando Pablos 54% to 46%, cementing San Antonio as a reliably blue city. The big picture: Ortiz Jones will lead San Antonio at a critical time, as officials seek to gain public support for a new downtown Spurs arena that could be surrounded by a sports and entertainment district. Voters could be asked to weigh in on the project as soon as November. She will also lead the city through the remaining years of the Trump administration, under which San Antonio has lost millions of dollars in federal funding. The city is also expecting a budget deficit. What they're saying: "There's no time to waste, and I'm not going to wait until I am actually in the seat, because I think there's a lot of work and conversations we can have now that will be helpful to ensure (it's) as smooth a transition as possible," Ortiz Jones told Axios on Saturday. When asked about how she can get things done on a City Council poised to have a starker political divide, she said "I think there's going to be a lot that we can agree on ... I'm quite confident that we'll get to six (votes)." State of play: Ortiz Jones, who is the first openly gay woman elected San Antonio mayor, served as the Air Force undersecretary in the Biden administration and was twice the Democratic nominee for the 23rd Congressional District. She grew up on San Antonio's Far West Side. Between the lines: Pablos and his supporters appeared to both outraise and outspend Ortiz Jones in the runoff election, campaign finance reports show. Pablos got a big boost from the Texas Economic Fund, a political action committee run by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott's former political director. Ortiz Jones had help from Fields of Change, a national Democratic PAC, and Emily's List. The bottom line: Ortiz Jones, who takes office June 18, says it was her personal background that helped her break through a crowded mayoral field.


Axios
14 hours ago
- Axios
ABC suspends correspondent for calling Stephen Miller a "world-class hater"
ABC News Senior National Correspondent Terry Moran was suspended after he characterized top Trump aide Stephen Miller as "richly endowed with the capacity for hatred" in a since-deleted post, the network confirmed to Axios Sunday. The big picture: The incident is ammunition for the administration's attacks on and distrust of traditional media. The Trump administration has squeezed legacy media from several angles in its first few months, prompting legal battles over funding and First Amendment rights. Driving the news: An ABC News spokesperson confirmed in a statement to Axios that Moran " has been suspended pending further evaluation." "ABC News stands for objectivity and impartiality in its news coverage and does not condone subjective personal attacks on others. The post does not reflect the views of ABC News and violated our standards," the statement read. Catch up quick: Moran, who in April conducted an at-times testy interview with President Trump marking his first 100 days in office, shared a post to X shortly overnight Saturday calling both Miller, Trump's deputy chief of staff, and the president "world-class" haters. "The thing about Stephen Miller is not that he is the brains behind Trumpism," Moran's post started, according to a screenshot. He continued, saying that Miller's ability to translate Trump-world impulses into policy is not "what's interesting." "It's not brains. It's bile," he said. "Miller is a man who is richly endowed with the capacity for hatred. He's a world-class hater." Moran contended Miller's "hatreds are his spiritual nourishment." What he's saying: Miller, responding to Moran's post, argued that "[f]or decades, the privileged anchors and reporters narrating and gatekeeping our society have been radicals adopting a journalist's pose." Miller has been a driving force behind the president's controversial immigration crackdown and is one of his most-trusted aides. Zoom out: White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt described Moran's rhetoric as "unacceptable and unhinged" on Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures," saying ABC confirmed it would be taking action.


Axios
18 hours ago
- Axios
Tensions erupt in Congress over vote to condemn Boulder attack
What would otherwise be an uncontroversial congressional vote to denounce the Boulder attack is devolving into a contentious partisan feud, Axios has learned. Why it matters: Language praising ICE and labeling "Free Palestine" an "antisemitic slogan" are sparking fury from some Democrats, who see the provisions as a GOP maneuver to force them into a difficult vote. "It's sheer politics," said one senior House Democrat, speaking on the condition of anonymity to offer candid thoughts about a sensitive vote. A second senior House Democrat told Axios: "It's unfortunate that they're using a serious antisemitic terrorist attack as a wedge opportunity to divide Democrats. They knew what they were doing adding something like that in there." "Nice little catch to put Democrats on the board," vented a third House Democrat. State of play: At least 15 people and one dog were injured last week in Boulder, Colo., when a suspect allegedly yelled "Free Palestine" as he threw Molotov cocktails at demonstrators advocating the release of hostages held by Hamas. Rep. Gabe Evans (R-Colo.), along with his fellow Colorado Republicans, have introduced a three-page resolution denouncing the attack, which is scheduled to be voted on next week. The measure labels "Free Palestine" an "antisemitic slogan that calls for the destruction of the state of Israel and the Jewish people." "It's more than unfortunate," the second senior House Democrat said of that clause. "It's very f***ed up." Between the lines: A senior House progressive, asked by Axios whether some of the more pro-Palestinian House Democrats will have an issue with the language in the measure, replied, "Yes." Senior aides to several other progressive House Democrats said their bosses were still mulling how to vote on the bill as of Saturday — with some acknowledging that it will be difficult either way. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), asked about the measure on Friday, told Axios: "I haven't seen the resolution yet." "It's being worked," the first senior House Democrat told Axios of party leadership's internal deliberations around the bill. Yes, but: The language is not likely to stop some of the most pro-Israel House Democrats from voting for the legislation. The second House Democrat who spoke on the condition of anonymity told Axios, "If there's a resolution condemning Boulder, I'm going to vote for that." Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y.) said "Free Palestine" should "mean liberating Palestinians from the oppression of Hamas. Instead, it has come to signify something far more sinister: the destruction of Israel as a Jewish state." "Free Palestine certainly isn't good Shabbos," is how Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.), a Jewish progressive, put it. Zoom in: The "Free Palestine" language is not the only wrinkle for Democrats in the measure — it also expresses "gratitude" to Immigration and Customs Enforcement for "protecting the homeland." That's another provision that some Democratic offices have raised objections to in discussions with leadership, multiple sources told Axios. Democrats have faced rising tensions with ICE in recent months as the agency has carried out the Trump administration's deportation campaign. Zoom out: This would be far from the first time House Democrats have been divided on a vote around antisemitism and Israel. The caucus split almost evenly on the Antisemitism Awareness Act, which, to the frustration of Democrats, codified a definition of antisemitism that included some criticisms of Israel. They have also frequently been divided on votes around supporting and providing aid to Israel amid their ongoing war with Hamas. Democrats believe a bipartisan measure condemning the Boulder attack — introduced by Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) and co-sponsored by Reps. Jeff Crank (R-Colo.) and Jeff Hurd (R-Colo.) — should be the one going to a vote.