logo
Your Guide to Buying a Hybrid Car or Truck in 2025

Your Guide to Buying a Hybrid Car or Truck in 2025

Yahooa day ago
Hybrid vehicles—those combining an internal-combustion engine with one or more electric motors to power the wheels—come in all shapes and sizes. Folks seeking a fuel-efficient option are no longer limited to the Toyota Priuses and gas-sipping Hondas of the world, and even those models have come a long way from their humble beginnings a couple decades back.
Regardless of whether or not you're specifically on the hunt for a gas-electric vehicle, chances are one or more will end up on your radar given the proliferation of this type of powertrain throughout the auto industry. We've created this guide to help shoppers of new and used hybrids understand their advantages, the differences between standard gas-electrics and plug-in models, new and used options, and any tax incentives that may be applicable.
Why Consider a Hybrid?
More and more models on the market today either offer a hybrid version or come only in gas-electric form. In the latter case, if that's the car you want, the decision to go hybrid is an easy one.
If, however, you're deciding between gas-only and hybrid models, the choice may be more nuanced. Thanks to fuel-saving features such as regenerative braking and generally smaller, more-efficient engines that can call up an electric assist when needed, most hybrid vehicles use less fuel than comparable models, particularly when driving at lower speeds. On the other hand, at higher speeds, such as in our 75-mph highway fuel-economy test, hybrids tend to underperform their window-sticker value. Depending on how you drive, owning a hybrid has the potential to save you money at the pump and has benefits for the environment. But because of their more complex powertrains, hybrids tend to cost a little more upfront. That means it may take a few years to pay back the price premium.
If you're not into math, the EPA's fueleconomy.gov website offers a helpful comparison tool that will let you compare a hybrid vehicle with its nonhybrid counterpart, taking into account the prices of the two models, how many miles you drive annually, what portion of your driving is in the city, and the price of fuel. It will then spit out a personalized payback period that you can use to help decide. For instance, comparing a 2025 Kia Sportage EX AWD hybrid with the nonhybrid version and leaving the default values alone—15,000 miles per year, with 55 percent of them in the city, at $3.21 per gallon—shows that the $1300 price premium of the hybrid model would take two years to repay. Drive more miles per year, and the payback will happen sooner.
Using less fuel and the accompanying monetary savings aren't the only reasons to opt for a hybrid, however. Hybridized sporty cars prioritize increased output over saving fuel. Examples include monster-power options from Mercedes-AMG and Bentley, as well as the plug-in Ferrari SF90.
If you're looking for a hybrid pickup truck or SUV, it's a similar story with some models, such as many from Toyota, that get gas mileage that's equivalent compared to those of the nonhybrid powertrains they replace but yield more output. So a hybridized four-cylinder can make more power and torque than an unassisted V-6 engine without burning more fuel.
Standard Hybrids vs. Plug-Ins
Assuming you're open to a gas-electric powertrain, you may have one more decision to make. Within the hybrid category are two major sub-types: standard hybrids, which get their power solely from liquid fuel, and plug-in hybrids, which have larger onboard batteries that can be juiced by an external source, much like an EV. Plug-ins, or PHEVs, can also drive substantially further on electric-only power (typically between 15 and 40 miles) than can regular hybrids.
Again, some models come only one way or the other, while popular vehicles such as the Toyota RAV4 can be had with either type of hybrid powertrain. Plug-ins tend to cost more due to their larger battery packs and more powerful electric motors, but they usually also outdo their standard-hybrid counterparts' fuel-economy ratings. You'll have to do the math to determine which makes more sense for you financially.
Regarding charging, whether or not to go for a plug-in has more to do with where you park than how you drive. That high-capacity battery and charging port don't do you any good if you never make use of them. So if you street park or live in an apartment or condo that won't accommodate the installation of charging equipment, a plug-in probably doesn't make sense for you. But if you can plug in overnight at home or during your 9-to-5—preferably both—most if not all of your commute and daily errand-running may be covered by a plug-in's electric-only range.
As long as you're not charging at pricey public stations, the cost per mile is much lower when running on electricity than gasoline. And unlike with an EV, a plug-in still has a fuel tank and gas engine to let you extend its comfortable range without having to worry about where to stop or how long it will take to refuel.
New vs. Used
Choosing between a brand-new or a pre-owned hybrid or plug-in often comes down to budget. Like any used vehicle, a hybrid depreciates—loses some of its value—over time, making the pre-owned route more affordable when comparing similar models. That said, hybrids sometimes hold their value better than nonhybrids. This brings us back to the payback calculation discussed earlier. You mileage and results may vary.
We have separate guides on buying pre-owned and shopping for new vehicles that can help you decide, as well. There's also the option of a certified pre-owned vehicle for those who want the extra peace of mind that a longer warranty provides.
Available Incentives
Should you settle on a new or used plug-in hybrid, there may be some extra savings in your future. PHEVs with a battery capacity above 7 kWh and meeting some other requirements are eligible for a tax break. For new plug-ins, the price cap is an MSRP of $80,000 for trucks and SUVs, or $55,000 for cars; used PHEVs must sell for less than $25,000 to qualify. There are also household income limits for who can take advantage of these credits. The IRS spells everything out clearly in documents for new and used vehicles.
Note that these tax breaks are set to expire on September 30, 2025. If you want to take advantage, you must purchase the vehicle by that date. Your state may offer additional incentives, so be sure to read up on those before making your selection.
Whether your goal is to save fuel, save money, or maximize power, there's a new or used hybrid that's right for you. Follow our advice, and you'll get a good deal on the right gas-electric vehicle to suit your needs and wants.
You Might Also Like
Car and Driver's 10 Best Cars through the Decades
How to Buy or Lease a New Car
Lightning Lap Legends: Chevrolet Camaro vs. Ford Mustang!
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Analysis-US reversal on key climate finding spells uncertainty for business
Analysis-US reversal on key climate finding spells uncertainty for business

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Analysis-US reversal on key climate finding spells uncertainty for business

By Valerie Volcovici WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Trump administration has billed its plan to undo U.S. climate regulation as a way to cut costs for industry, but it may backfire by forcing automakers, utilities, and manufacturers into a future of regulatory uncertainty and litigation risk, according to lawyers and trade groups. Republican President Donald Trump's administration announced on Tuesday a plan to rescind the long-standing finding that greenhouse gas emissions endanger human health, removing the legal foundation for U.S. greenhouse gas regulations. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin said the move, which would end limits on greenhouse gas pollution from vehicle tailpipes, power plants, smokestacks and other sources, would save companies $52 billion in environmental compliance costs. But companies that have already invested heavily in reducing emissions to meet government limits, a move also demanded by many shareholders, are worried the proposal will lead into the regulatory and judicial unknown, lawyers said. "Industries that have GHG standards set by EPA have long been complying with them and don't want them to be stripped away," said Meghan Greenfield, partner with law firm Jenner & Block and former EPA counsel, who represents auto sector clients. "The stability of the regulatory regime is extremely important for industry as a baseline." Repealing the endangerment finding could mean that companies would need to comply with a patchwork of different state laws on climate change rather than one federal standard, said Zach Pilchen, senior counsel at Holland & Knight. "I think what the administration has missed is that most of industry has already retrofitted for regulations," said Camille Pannu, associate law professor at Columbia University. "Industry did want deregulation, but maybe not through this vehicle." One former Trump administration source said during Trump's first term, the EPA had declined to take on the endangerment finding because of strong resistance from industry and the legal risk associated with undermining federal authority on the matter. Three sources in the automaker industry told Reuters privately that the EPA's proposed repeal of vehicle efficiency standards is much broader than anticipated. In addition to tailpipe standards, the proposal would eliminate air conditioning efficiency testing and remove requirements for battery monitoring and battery durability. Albert Gore, executive director of the Zero Emission Transportation Association, said the EPA action to reverse long-settled law comes as "clean" car sales are growing steadily and powering a U.S. battery and vehicle manufacturing boom. Over the last decade, manufacturers announced $197.6 billion in investments in U.S. EV and battery manufacturing facilities, according to the Environmental Defense Fund. "Taking backward steps and adding new regulatory uncertainty harms consumers, unsettles markets, and will complicate ongoing business decisions for auto manufacturers," Gore said. LUKEWARM REACTION Industry groups have been guarded in their reactions to the EPA announcement, mostly saying they will review the proposal and offer comments in coming weeks. Edison Electric Institute, the electric utility industry's main lobby group, said it supported the EPA establishing clear and consistent regulatory policies to drive infrastructure and investment. "It is essential that EPA use its authority to craft flexible regulations that account for impacts to reliability and customer bills," said EEI spokesman Jeremy Ortiz. The power industry is responsible for around a quarter of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and has steadily reduced its carbon output over more than a decade by replacing older coal-fired generators with natural gas, solar and wind. EEI had sided with the EPA, then part of former President Joe Biden's administration, in a 2022 Supreme Court case in which West Virginia challenged the agency's authority to regulate power plants. "Voiding that authority could upend that predictability and uniformity and potentially subject individual GHG emitters to the idiosyncratic whims of individual district court judges," it said in its brief at the time. Auto industry group, the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, welcomed the tailpipe deregulation and said it was digesting the broader proposal to repeal the endangerment finding. The American Petroleum Institute and the American Trucking Associations both cheered the planned repeal of vehicle tailpipe rules. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce had also previously opposed the repeal because of its destabilizing effect on members. "While we did not call for this proposal, we are reviewing it and will consult with members so we can provide constructive feedback to the agency," Marty Durbin, president of the Chamber's energy institute, said on Tuesday.

AMG Critical Materials N.V. Announces Interim Dividend
AMG Critical Materials N.V. Announces Interim Dividend

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

AMG Critical Materials N.V. Announces Interim Dividend

--- AMG Critical Materials N.V. ('AMG', EURONEXT AMSTERDAM: 'AMG') declares an interim dividend of €0.20 per ordinary share, unchanged from the interim dividend of €0.20 per ordinary share in the prior year. The interim dividend of €0.20 per ordinary share, in respect of the period from January 1, 2025 to June 30, 2025, is payable on August 15, 2025 to shareholders of record as of August 7, 2025. The ex-dividend date will be August 6, 2025. Dutch withholding tax will be deducted from the dividend at a rate of 15%. This press release contains inside information within the meaning of Article 7(1) of the EU Market Abuse Regulation. This press release contains regulated information as defined in the Dutch Financial Markets Supervision Act (Wet op het financieel toezicht). About AMG AMG's mission is to provide critical materials and related process technologies to advance a less carbon-intensive world. To this end, AMG is focused on the production and development of energy storage materials such as lithium, vanadium, and tantalum. In addition, AMG's products include highly engineered systems to reduce CO2 in aerospace engines, as well as critical materials addressing CO2 reduction in a variety of other end use markets. AMG's Lithium segment spans the lithium value chain, reducing the CO2 footprint of both suppliers and customers. AMG's Vanadium segment is the world's market leader in recycling vanadium from oil refining residues, spanning the Company's vanadium, titanium, and chrome businesses. AMG's Technologies segment is the established world market leader in advanced metallurgy and provides equipment engineering to the aerospace engine sector globally. It serves as the engineering home for the Company's fast-growing LIVA batteries, NewMOX SAS formed to span the nuclear fuel market, and spans AMG's mineral processing operations in graphite, antimony, and silicon metal. With approximately 3,600 employees, AMG operates globally with production facilities in Germany, the United Kingdom, France, the United States, China, Mexico, Brazil, India, and Sri Lanka, and has sales and customer service offices in Japan ( For further information, please contact:AMG Critical Materials N.V. +49 176 1000 73 14Thomas Swobodatswoboda@ Disclaimer Certain statements in this press release are not historical facts and are 'forward looking.' Forward looking statements include statements concerning AMG's plans, expectations, projections, objectives, targets, goals, strategies, future events, future revenues or performance, capital expenditures, financing needs, plans and intentions relating to acquisitions, AMG's competitive strengths and weaknesses, plans or goals relating to forecasted production, reserves, financial position and future operations and development, AMG's business strategy and the trends AMG anticipates in the industries and the political and legal environment in which it operates and other information that is not historical information. When used in this press release, the words 'expects,' 'believes,' 'anticipates,' 'plans,' 'may,' 'will,' 'should,' and similar expressions, and the negatives thereof, are intended to identify forward looking statements. By their very nature, forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, both general and specific, and risks exist that the predictions, forecasts, projections and other forward-looking statements will not be achieved. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this press release. AMG expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement contained herein to reflect any change in AMG's expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions, or circumstances on which any forward-looking statement is based. Attachment Interim Dividend 2025Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trade deal aside, Mercedes and Porsche see more tariff pain on the way
Trade deal aside, Mercedes and Porsche see more tariff pain on the way

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trade deal aside, Mercedes and Porsche see more tariff pain on the way

Despite the contours of a preliminary trade deal, German automakers Mercedes ( and Porsche ( are still in a world of pain, suffering from the strain of Trump's tariffs and shifting consumer preferences in markets like the US and China. First up, Mercedes. In the second quarter, the luxe carmaker reported revenue fell 10% to 33.15 billion euros ($38.82 billion), on adjusted EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes) of 1.273 billion euros ($1.47 billion) — a drop of 68% from a year ago. Net profit fell nearly 70% to 957 million euros ($1.1 billion) in the quarter. 'A dynamic market environment, volatile tariff policies, challenging competition, particularly in China, and upcoming model changes impacted sales development,' Mercedes said in a statement. As a result, Mercedes cut its 2025 outlook with revenue expected to come in 'significantly below prior year level' compared to 'slightly below' previously. The auto business now sees its return on sales (or margin) dipping to a range of 4%-6% compared to 6%-8% seen previously. On the analyst call, Mercedes CFO Harald Wilhelm said the tariff impact was in the 'mid-triple-digit millions,' adding that the second-half effect would be higher, but still in that range per quarter. Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet Wilhelm said the tariff impact this year would hit margins by 150 basis points (1.5%), despite the new, lowered tariff rate of 15% in place, compared to the 27.5% levied before the preliminary trade deal. The Porsche situation isn't much better. The Stuttgart-based automaker said revenue fell to 18.2 billion euros ($21.04 billion) in the first half of 2025, down 6.7% from a year ago, with EBIT dropping to 1.01 billion euros ($1.17 billion), a third of the 3.06 billion euros ($3.54 billion) reported last year. Porsche said 'extraordinary expenses' hit its EBIT, including 400 million euros ($462.4 million) in tariff costs. As a result, Porsche said its return on sales for the year would dip to a range of 5%-7% for the year, down from the 14.1% it enjoyed in 2024. Likewise, it said revenue would drop to a range of 37 billion-38 billion euros ($42.8 billion-$43.9 billion), down from 40.1 billion euros ($46.35 billion) last year. 'We continue to face significant challenges around the world,' said Porsche CEO Oliver Blume. 'And this is not a storm that will pass.' While the preliminary US-EU deal would see the tariff rate decrease to 15% going forward for the European imported goods, that's still a significant cost for the German automakers. The prior tariff rate was only 2.5%, meaning customers will be paying for the increased costs. Read more: 5 ways to tariff-proof your finances Tariff headwinds also come along the backdrop of shifting consumer preferences in China, the world's largest auto market. Chinese domestic consumers are increasingly shunning products from foreign automakers — once considered the highest quality and most desirable — to domestic producers like BYD and Xiaomi, which have captured the fancy of buyers with styling and features Chinese consumers prefer. In the US, the Germans face another challenge. Slowing EV adoption has hurt Mercedes and Porsche, which had bet heavily on an EV transition that many saw as inevitable during the Biden presidency. Mercedes is no longer taking new orders for its EVs in the US. Porsche is working through high inventories of its Taycan EVs, which means discounting at the dealer level. And now tariff costs on top of that. In the US, Mercedes has price-protected its customers for all model year 2025 vehicles, meaning it has absorbed tariff costs — for now. Porsche announced price increases of 2.3% and 3.6% for its US models in July, on top of earlier price increases coming in the 2025 model year. As Porsche's Blume said, it's a storm — and it will not pass. Pras Subramanian is the lead auto reporter for Yahoo Finance. You can follow him on X and on Instagram. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store