Scientific asylum offered as Trump-era policies push US researchers to flee
As US researchers grapple with sweeping funding cuts, ideological crackdowns, and mounting political interference under President Donald Trump's second term, a growing number of European universities are offering them what some have dubbed 'scientific asylum.'
At the forefront is Belgium's Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), which has opened 12 postdoctoral positions specifically aimed at attracting international researchers, with a focus on Americans. The initiative comes in response to what the university calls the 'serious and escalating' suppression of research in the United States.
'We see it as our duty to come to the aid of our American colleagues,' said VUB rector Jan Danckaert. 'They're seeing millions in research funding disappear for ideological reasons. American universities and their researchers are the biggest victims of this political and ideological interference.'
Since Trump returned to power in January, US federal agencies including NASA, the CDC, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration have faced budget freezes, hiring cuts, and re-evaluations of projects deemed to promote 'wokeism.' Keywords like 'diversity,' 'climate change,' and 'women's health' are reported to be under scrutiny in federal research funding applications.
The situation has alarmed scientists globally—and opened a door for European institutions.
France's prestigious Pasteur Institute has joined the effort. Its director, Yasmine Belkaid, said she receives daily inquiries from researchers—many of them American or European expats—looking to relocate. 'You might call it a sad opportunity, but it is an opportunity, all the same,' she said.
The French government has responded swiftly. Higher Education Minister Philippe Baptiste urged national research institutions to send proposals for attracting US talent. 'Many well-known researchers are already questioning their future in the US,' Baptiste wrote in an open letter. 'Naturally, we wish to welcome a certain number of them.'
In the Netherlands, Education Minister Eppo Bruins announced plans to launch a dedicated fund to lure international researchers, citing a 'changing geopolitical climate' that is driving top scientific talent to seek more stable environments.
France's Aix-Marseille University has already launched a €15 million programme titled Safe Place for Science, offering three-year placements for over two dozen US-based researchers. Within two weeks of the programme's announcement, the university received about 100 applications, including from researchers at Yale, NASA, and Stanford.
'We wish we didn't have to do this,' said university president Éric Berton. 'We're not looking to poach talent—but we felt our colleagues in the US were going through a catastrophe. We had to act.'
Many applicants specialise in fields now under political scrutiny in the US, such as climate change, public health, and social justice. Applications continue to arrive daily, according to Berton.
The trend echoes a broader shift. European institutions are not only seeking individuals but may soon become a haven for US campuses themselves. Dozens of American universities already operate satellite campuses across Europe. Experts suggest these institutions may expand operations abroad if domestic conditions worsen.
In Brussels, VUB's initiative carries symbolic weight. In 2016, Trump famously described the Belgian capital as a 'hellhole' on Fox News. 'At the time, the statement elicited emotional reactions in Europe,' the university noted. 'This gives additional symbolic meaning to the VUB initiative.'
For many, these efforts represent more than academic opportunity—they're about protecting the integrity of research. Christina Pagel, a German-British professor at University College London, described the US situation as 'not chaos, but coordinated.' She said the administration's actions are aimed at aligning science with state ideology, undermining independence, and suppressing dissent.
As the US battles over the direction of its science and research sectors, European universities are positioning themselves as refuges for open inquiry and intellectual freedom. And for many American researchers, the message is clear: if you can't work freely at home, Europe is ready to welcome you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Drop scene at Alaska
Alaska has certainly been a pinnacle of political drama. American President Donald Trump announced a meet-up with President Vladimir Putin of Russia, one week before, on Truth Social. Alaska was special because it is cold and far-off and had been a possession of the Russian Empire from 1732 to 1867, and also because the United States is not a party to the Rome Statute, and the ICC, which has issued Putin's arrest warrants. The hearts of the world audience throbbed with the idea of world's two most powerful men meeting in a far-off, snow-clad fairyland, where Zeus Trump was surely going to end the battle of Titanomachy in Tartarus Ukraine with the help of Prometheus Zelensky, subduing Titan Putin with his thunderbolt sanctions to a complete defeat or at least a ceasefire drop-scene. But reality is different from wishfulness. And the reality is that Putin is wining at the warfront. Donetsk, Luhansk and Zaporizhian have been annexed as of 2022; and Crimea as of 2014. Kherson is over two-thirds occupied, and Russian forces are gaining more areas mile-by-mile in their continuous pursuit. Moreover, Putin's narrative of a cultural and historic unification in the people of Ukraine and Russia resounds stronger with the people of the conflict zone than Zelensky's claim that entering NATO and EU is the sovereign right and need of Ukraine. Theoretically, wars end only when both sides perceive that peace is more beneficial for them than continuation of war. And war aims of both sides keep changing based on battlefield outcomes. The domestic political factors also matter; and on the Ukrainian side they are reflected by a war-torn battle zone, with millions of refugees and internally displaced, war deaths in hundreds of thousands, destruction of infrastructure and livelihoods and constant fear of attacks — all things pointing to the people's likely frustration and anger. The Russians on the other side have not lost any area, and their war gains have bolstered their national image and pride as a daunting military power that can stand against NATO and the US. So, while Putin's stature has risen from a strongman to a successful strategist, Zelensky's has dwarfed to that of an opportunist, seeking guarantees from the US and EU, because after billions of dollars of aid and military equipment already given, he has proven to be strategically unviable. Comparing today's Ukraine War with the wars in Vietnam and Afghanistan, it is clear that they were won by indigenous freedom-fighting forces committed to the cause of their nation and land; whereas here the people's commitment seems missing, simply because they feel that they have been drawn into an unnecessary war (resulting in minimal trust in Zelensky as their leader) and that Russia is not an enemy. So, as the war outcomes continually favour Russia, it does not perceive any benefit in ending the war without having the deal it wants. And as the Alaska Summit approached, Trump must have known that Putin was not in the mood to surrender. Rather, he was likely to ask for a deal that ensures Ukraine's disconnection from NATO/EU membership; Russia's keeping of territories it has annexed; and exclusion of any Western guarantees that promise the presence of any Western militaries in Ukraine. Or, going a step further, Putin could also ask for Zelensky's removal and the reinstatement of a pro-Russia regime as was before 2014. Trump also knew that he was to defend a weak Zelensky, one who has already hinted that a settlement involving territorial concessions might be conceivable if backed by Western guarantees. Clearly, Zelensky is not depending upon the resolve of his people or of his fighters, but upon maneuvering the EU and US so as to extract maximum possible benefits and guarantees – one of which would be ensuring his staying in power. But to Zelensky's detriment, neither the EU nor the US is in a position to do him much good. Three days after Alaska, Zelensky was in the White House along with Ursula von der Leyen, Emmanuel Macron, Friedrich Merz, Keir Starmer. The room was decorated with a large map of Ukraine, with all Russian occupied territories painted in red — a clear message of what Zelensky will have to give away. All the guests were repeating one rhetoric — that a ceasefire is required before talks with Putin, and that security guarantees are a must for Ukraine. To that, Trump simply uttered that there would be no ceasefire and that the EU would have to fulfil the security guarantees. But the EU knows well that it cannot go on with the war or any guarantees without US backing. How can they guarantee anything in a war they have utterly lost even with US aid and leadership. Neither the EU nor any of its members has an appetite to fight a war on their own. The truth was that the US had dragged the EU into this war in the first place, as it was their ambition to extend NATO right up to Russian borders, and for that Victoria Nuland was tasked to select a US puppet like Zelensky, who would ask for NATO/EU membership the day he comes to power. So, losing the Ukraine battlefront is a combined defeat for the US, the EU — and rather of the whole West. It is a stamp on the decline of Western hegemony and relevance in global matters. The fact that Europe's strongest people — Ursula von der Leyen, Macron, Merz and Starmer — rushed to the White House and returned empty handed tells the whole story. For now, Putin has said that he is willing to take Luhansk and Donetsk and freeze fighting in the rest of the territories for a peace deal, but it is probable that once that is achieved, he will ask for more and more — until Zelensky is no more on the scene! Because the eventual goal for Russia will be to have a complete pro-Russian regime in Ukraine, one with no will to tilt towards the West. The bigger global shift to be feared here is a wider shift in Europe's security architecture, which was previously totally aligned and subservient to the US against a perceived enemy — Russia. Now that the US has backfooted from its commitment to Europe, the latter may reassess Russia as a security provider rather than an enemy — for security perhaps against the US!
Business Recorder
7 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Trump says will patrol streets of US capital with troops Thursday
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump will patrol the streets of Washington Thursday with police and National Guard troops he has deployed to the US capital, the Republican said in an interview. Trump ordered hundreds of National Guard to deploy in Washington last week as part of what he has called a crackdown on crime in the Democrat-run city, despite statistics showing violence offenses are down. 'I'm going to be going out tonight I think with the police and with the military of course… We're going to be doing a job,' Trump told Todd Starnes, a host for right-wing media outlet Newsmax. Trump hails 'total victory' as US court quashes $464mn civil penalty He spoke one day after his vice president, JD Vance, was greeted by boos and shouts of 'Free DC' – referring to the District of Columbia, the federal district which includes Washington – on his own meet-and-greet with troops deployed in the city. The DC National Guard has mobilized 800 troops for the mission, while Republican states Ohio, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee and West Virginia are sending a total of around 1,200 more. The overwhelmingly Democratic US capital faces allegations from Republican politicians that it is overrun by crime, plagued by homelessness and financially mismanaged. But data from Washington police showed significant drops in violent crime between 2023 and 2024, though that was coming off the back of a post-pandemic surge. In addition to sending troops onto the streets, Trump has also sought to take full control of the local Washington police department, attempting at one point to sideline its leadership. The deployment of troops in Washington comes after Trump dispatched the National Guard and Marines to quell unrest in Los Angeles, California, that was sparked by immigration enforcement raids.
Business Recorder
7 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Trump hails ‘total victory' as US court quashes $464mn civil penalty
NEW YORK: A US court threw out Thursday a $464 million civil penalty against President Donald Trump imposed by a judge who found he fraudulently inflated his personal worth, calling the sum 'excessive' but upholding the judgment against him. Judge Arthur Engoron ruled against Trump in February 2024 at the height of his campaign to retake the White House, which coincided with several active criminal prosecutions that the Republican slammed as 'lawfare.' 'It was a Political Witch Hunt, in a business sense, the likes of which no one has ever seen before,' Trump said on his Truth Social platform Thursday, adding that 'everything I did was absolutely CORRECT and, even, PERFECT.' When Engoron originally ruled against Trump, he ordered the mogul-turned-politician to pay $464 million, including interest, while his sons Eric and Don Jr. were told to hand over more than $4 million each. The judge found that Trump and his company had unlawfully inflated his wealth and manipulated the value of properties to obtain favorable bank loans or insurance terms. Alongside the financial hit to Trump, the judge also banned him from running businesses for three years, which the president repeatedly referred to as a 'corporate death penalty.' On Thursday, five judges of the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court upheld the verdict, but ruled that the size of the fine was 'excessive' and that it 'violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution.' The Eighth Amendment prohibits excessive or cruel punishments and penalties. 'Massive win! State Attorney General Letitia James, who brought the initial case, could now appeal to the state's highest court, the New York Court of Appeals. Following the initial verdict, Trump subsequently sought to challenge the civil ruling as well as the scale and terms of the penalty, which has continued to accrue interest while he appeals. He repeatedly condemned the case and the penalty as politically motivated. His son Don Jr. termed the appellate court ruling a 'massive win!!!' 'New York Appeals Court has just THROWN OUT President Trump's $500+ Million civil fraud penalty! It was always a witch hunt, election interference, and a total miscarriage of justice… and even a left leaning NY appeals court agrees! NO MORE LAWFARE!' he wrote on X. During hearings, conducted without a jury under state law, Trump accused then-president Joe Biden of driving the case, calling it 'weaponization against a political opponent who's up a lot in the polls.' As the case was civil, not criminal, there was no threat of imprisonment. Trump's economic advisor Peter Navarro said at the White House Thursday that 'James is another one that belongs in jail,' referring to the New York attorney general. 'The Democrats really overplayed their hand on this because they thought they could take Donald Trump out,' he said.
