logo
Can Trump lower prescription drug prices? Here's why U.S. drug costs are so high.

Can Trump lower prescription drug prices? Here's why U.S. drug costs are so high.

CBS News14-05-2025

What to know about President Trump's executive order plans aimed at slashing drug prices
President Trump signed an executive order Monday that will attempt to bring down the cost of some drugs in the United States — but why are drug prices so high to begin with?
On average, Americans pay almost three times as much for prescription drugs as people in other high-income countries like the U.K., Germany or France, according to a 2024 report published by the nonprofit research organization RAND. For some medications, the cost difference is even steeper. A month of insulin, for example, costs about $100 in the U.S., compared to only about $10 in France, RAND found.
In large part, this comes down to price negotiations.
"You're talking about contrasting us with countries that have essentially universal health care, where you have the government that is paying for everything, negotiating for all the drug prices," Dr. Céline Gounder, CBS News medical contributor and editor-at-large for public health at KFF Health News, said Monday. "So when you have one player that's negotiating on behalf of the entire population, you just have a lot more negotiating power."
The closest comparison in the U.S. is likely Medicare, the federal health insurance program for people over 65 years old, Gounder said, but that doesn't cover all Americans. Additionally, the ability for Medicare to negotiate drug prices didn't happen until the Inflation Reduction Act was signed into law in 2022 by President Joe Biden and it only allows for negotiations of "a small fraction of all prescription drugs," Gounder said.
Because the U.S. doesn't have universal health care, "we don't have one negotiator for our drug prices," Gounder said.
Most Americans have private health insurance, and the prices they pay for prescriptions are negotiated through Pharmacy Benefit Managers or PBMs.
In theory, PBMs should help control growth in drug prices due to their ability to negotiate manufacturer rebates and other cost-effectiveness options, according to the Commonwealth Fund, a nonprofit foundation that advocates for health equity.
"But PBMs have financial incentives that may contribute to growth in drug prices, higher patient out-of-pocket costs, and the closing of independent pharmacies in rural areas and low-income neighborhoods," the group notes on its website.
Last year, the Federal Trade Commission called out pharmacy benefit managers — often described as prescription drug middlemen — for benefiting off of inflated drug prices. PBMs wield enormous control over the availability and cost of drugs, the FTC said in a report released in July 2024.
In a more recent January report, the FTC said three major PBMs hiked costs for a wide range of lifesaving drugs, including medications to treat heart disease and cancer. Some prices were marked up by hundreds and sometimes thousands of percent, the FTC found.
Will Trump's executive order help lower drug prices?
It's uncertain if Mr. Trump's executive order can make headway on drug prices, and what drugs would even be affected.
Gounder pointed to a similar effort during his first presidency, which only applied to drugs given by providers in hospitals and clinics through Medicare Part B, that failed.
"The last time he proposed this in 2020, this was contested in the federal courts and did not hold up," Gounder said.
To really change how drug prices are negotiated in the U.S., Congress would need to act, she said.
Plus, "Pharmaceutical companies are among the biggest lobbying presences in Washington, D.C. They are, of course, opposed to this," Gounder said.
The pharmaceutical industry has argued that lower prices will affect innovation and development of new medicines.
"Applying other countries' antiquated approach to how they value — and pay — for medicines will stall investment across America's biotech companies, risk access to vital treatments and cures for millions of American patients, and lead to fewer American jobs," John F. Crowley, president of the advocacy group Biotechnology Innovation Organization, said in a statement Monday.
To change how much influence pharmaceutical companies have would also require an act of Congress in the form of campaign finance reform, Gounder said.
Patients For Affordable Drugs Now, a national patient advocacy organization, said in a statement that several aspects of the Mr. Trump's order raise questions.
"This Executive Order is a step in the right direction, but without additional guardrails, it leaves room for pharmaceutical companies to continue gaming the system at the expense of patients," the statement read. "The reality is: drug companies set high prices in the U.S. because U.S. policy lets them — unlike other high income countries that negotiate lower prices."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Supreme Court Grants Musk-Less DOGE Access to Social Security Data
Supreme Court Grants Musk-Less DOGE Access to Social Security Data

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Supreme Court Grants Musk-Less DOGE Access to Social Security Data

Elon Musk may be persona non grata at the White House, but DOGE lives on. The Supreme Court ruled on Friday that the Department of Government Efficiency should be allowed access to Social Security Administration data, lifting a previously issued injunction that blocked the department from doing so. While the court's majority did not provide a detailed explanation of their ruling, they did write, 'We conclude that, under the present circumstances, SSA may proceed to afford members of the SSA DOGE Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work.' The three liberal justices dissented, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson questioning the urgency of the application and expressing concerns about the potential privacy risks that would result from the ruling. She wrote, 'In essence, the 'urgency' underlying the government's stay application is the mere fact that it cannot be bothered to wait for the litigation process to play out before proceeding as it wishes.' The Trump administration had previously argued that DOGE employees needed access to SSA data in order to halt fraudulent payments, but a federal judge in Maryland ruled that DOGE being granted such access violated federal law and put millions of people's data at risk. Two unions—the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, and the American Federation of Teachers—brought the lawsuit alongside the Alliance for Retired Americans. The groups argued that allowing DOGE broader access to individuals' personal data would violate the Privacy Act and the Administrative Procedure Act. 'The agency is obligated by the Privacy Act and its own regulations, practices, and procedures to keep that information secure—and not to share it beyond the circle of those who truly need it," their lawyers wrote. The data DOGE employees now have access to includes Social Security numbers, medical records, and tax and banking information. In her dissent, Jackson argued that the Supreme Court had 'truly lost its moorings,' by allowing the move and bending its usual standards to accommodate the Trump administration, adding, 'The Court is… unfortunately, suggesting that what would be an extraordinary request for everyone else is nothing more than an ordinary day on the docket for this Administration.'

Rogan reacts live to Elon's 'crazy' Epstein accusation against Trump while interviewing FBI director
Rogan reacts live to Elon's 'crazy' Epstein accusation against Trump while interviewing FBI director

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Rogan reacts live to Elon's 'crazy' Epstein accusation against Trump while interviewing FBI director

Podcaster Joe Rogan was shocked as he read billionaire Elon Musk's wild allegations against President Donald Trump on Thursday. Musk dropped a bomb on social media when he alleged Trump was in the Jeffrey Epstein files after a series of escalating back-and-forth social media messages between him and the president. This accusation occurred as part of a larger tirade against Trump and Republican leaders over the "Big Beautiful Bill." In the episode, which was recorded Thursday but released Friday, a "Joe Rogan Experience" producer interrupted the host's live interview with FBI director Kash Patel to inform him of Musk's Epstein tweet. Watch: Republicans Rally Behind Trump, Continue To Support Musk Amid 'Big, Beautiful' Brawl Rogan read the tweet out loud, "'Time to drop the really big bomb Donald Trump is in the Epstein files, that's the real reason they have not been made public, have a nice day.' "Jesus Christ," he said in shock. Read On The Fox News App "I'm not participating in any of that conversation," Patel said. "Someone should take his phone away," Rogan said as he marveled at Musk's tweet. "Jesus Christ, that's a crazy thing to say. How does he know? Does he know that Donald Trump is in the Epstein files? Does he have access to the Epstein files?" "I don't know how he would," the FBI director said, again insisting he would stay out of the feud. "What the f--- are they doing?" Rogan asked. "I understand he owns Twitter, I think it's bad for your mental health," Rogan said. "I think posting things public all day and arguing with people all day is bad for you." Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture "This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful BIll because it does not include the policies he wanted," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. "The President is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again." The White House said a source familiar with the Epstein matter said it is widely known that Trump kicked Epstein out of his Palm Beach Golf Club. The source also pointed out that the administration released the Epstein files, which included Trump's name, and nothing was new about Musk's revelation. "If Elon truly thought the President was more deeply involved with Epstein, why did he hang out with him for 6 months and say he 'loves him as much as a straight man can love a straight man?'" the source said. Shortly after Musk posted about Trump being in the Epstein file, Trump posted his response to Truth Social. "I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress," Trump said, turning his attention to the "big, beautiful bill" that is before the Senate. "It's a Record Cut in Expenses, $1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. If this Bill doesn't pass, there will be a 68% Tax Increase, and things far worse than that." "I didn't create this mess, I'm just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" the president article source: Rogan reacts live to Elon's 'crazy' Epstein accusation against Trump while interviewing FBI director

Trump responds after Musk's 'Epstein files' allegations
Trump responds after Musk's 'Epstein files' allegations

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump responds after Musk's 'Epstein files' allegations

Trump responds after Musk's 'Epstein files' allegations originally appeared on TheStreet. The Trump–Musk feud has officially gone nuclear. Speaking aboard Air Force One on Friday, President Donald Trump said he has 'no plans' to speak with Elon Musk, after a week of fiery online exchanges that began over Trump's proposed 'big beautiful bill' and quickly spiraled into personal jabs and political threats. Trump didn't mince words when asked if he was still in contact with Musk. 'No, I don't,' he said. 'I hope he does well with Tesla, but we're going to take a look at everything. It's a lot of money.' The president's comments come just days after Musk blasted Trump's sweeping tax and spending proposal, calling it a 'disgusting abomination' and warning it would add $2.4 trillion to the U.S. debt. He also replied 'Exactly' to a post suggesting Trump had retaliated against him personally. Musk later floated the idea of launching a new political party, posting, 'It's time for a new party – one that actually represents the people. Not the far left or far right, but the 80% in the middle!' The falling-out marks a sharp turn from their once-friendly dynamic. Trump had recently appointed Musk to lead the Department of Government Efficiency, a symbolic role that ended with modest results. Bitcoin fell sharply after Trump threatened to cut off Elon Musk's government contracts, intensifying their public feud. The uncertainty rattled markets, leading Tesla shares to drop 14% and dragging crypto sentiment down with them. Investors feared a political crackdown on Musk-linked ventures could spill into broader risk assets like Bitcoin. Trump responds after Musk's 'Epstein files' allegations first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 6, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 6, 2025, where it first appeared.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store