
One billion Africans being harmed by cooking pollution
The problem, which its report says can be easily solved, causes as much greenhouse gas emissions every year as the aviation industry.
Two billion people across the world still cook on open fires or with rudimentary stoves fed by wood, charcoal, agricultural waste or manure, the IEA report found.
"It is one of the greatest injustices of our time, especially in Africa," IEA head Fatih Birol told AFP, where four out of five households rely on open fires and burning wood.
These fuels pollute the air both indoors and outdoors with fine particles that penetrate the lungs and cause multiple respiratory and cardiovascular problems, the report said.
It also adds to the destruction of forests, natural sinks that trap carbon and help fight global warming.
The IEA estimates that 815,000 premature deaths occur each year in Africa alone due to poor indoor air quality, largely resulting from a lack of access to clean cooking methods.
Women and children suffer the most, spending hours each day searching for fuel and keeping the fire going.
This takes time away from paid employment or education, the report said.
A landmark IEA summit on the issue, held in Paris in May last year raised $2.2 billion in public and private sector commitments, as well as political pledges from 12 African governments.
Since then $470 million has been distributed, with concrete results already being seen, Birol insisted, citing a stove factory under construction in Malawi and an affordable stove programme developed in Uganda and Ivory Coast.
The IEA report assesses the progress made a year after the summit and sets out a roadmap for African countries to be able to use clean cooking methods at low cost before 2040.
Since 2010, nearly 1.5 billion people in Asia and Latin America, particularly in Brazil, India, and Indonesia, have got access to modern cooking stoves and fuels.
But the challenge remains immense in sub-Saharan Africa, where the number of people without access to clean cooking methods continues to grow.
"For once and for ever this problem can be solved with an annual investment of $2 billion per year," Birol said.
He stressed that the figure "is about 0.1 percent of global energy investment, which is nothing".
Alternative solutions are well known: electricity from solar panels, renewable gas and especially liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), a fossil fuel, which, while not ideal, is preferable than the loss of carbon sinks due to tree felling, Birol said.
The IEA said this would prevent 4.7 million premature deaths in sub-Saharan Africa by 2040 and reduce the continent's greenhouse gas emissions by 540 million tons per year, as much as the equivalent of the annual emissions of the global aviation sector.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arab News
2 days ago
- Arab News
A data-driven blueprint for a flourishing Africa
International dialogues on African development remain fixated on redefining success rather than materially enabling its realization. Groundbreaking research across 40 African nations reveals populations consistently excel in nonmaterial dimensions of human thriving, even amid severe economic constraints. Consider Nigeria, ranked fifth globally in nonfinancial flourishing indicators despite its middle-income status. There, a majority of citizens report robust social relationships and exceptional levels of forgiveness, outperforming wealthier nations. Kenya and Egypt follow closely at seventh and 10th, respectively. In Senegal and Ghana, over three-quarters of the population experiences daily enjoyment and laughter — testament to emotional resilience untethered from gross domestic product per capita. Rwanda and Ethiopia demonstrate similar strengths, with populations reporting high social well-being metrics such as feeling respected and engaging in daily learning, despite ranking among the world's least-affluent nations. This divergence is jarring: Sierra Leone, facing heightened food insecurity, ranks 135th in life evaluations globally, yet West African neighbors such as Senegal report surprising levels of optimism about living standards improving. The contradiction exposes a fatal flaw in current development frameworks. While African societies organically cultivate profound human strengths — communal bonds in Nigeria's wazobia tradition, Ubuntu-inspired resilience in Southern Africa, or Ethiopia's dedication to collective learning — the global response offers mere measurement instead of meaningful support. Mauritius' relatively high global life evaluation ranking coexists with its paradoxical stress levels, proving economic stability alone does not guarantee flourishing. This evidence demands a rethink: If 87 percent of Nigerians thrive socially without material abundance, why do development policies prioritize economic metrics over social infrastructure? When Kenya outranks industrialized nations in daily enjoyment, yet places 115th in life satisfaction, it reveals the inadequacy of single-dimension assessments. Africa's organic flourishing, rooted in community, character, and meaning, is not a footnote to development. It is the blueprint. Yet the machinery of international aid remains calibrated to inputs Africa has not requested, ignoring the outputs it demonstrably achieves. The persistent refinement of well-being metrics, while academically rigorous, risks becoming a sophisticated form of inaction. Consider Tanzania, ranked 11th globally in multidimensional flourishing, yet grappling with systemic gaps in housing and education access. Or Nigeria, where nearly half report financial instability despite the nation's fifth-place global ranking in nonmaterial flourishing, 87 percent exhibit exceptional character virtues like forgiveness, and three in four maintain robust social bonds. These divergences expose a troubling reality: Cataloging strengths without addressing corresponding deficits is an analytical dead end. The evidence is unambiguous: Thriving social ecosystems coexist with material deprivation. Kenya, ninth globally in daily learning opportunities, reports only 115th in life satisfaction — a paradox where intellectual curiosity flourishes amid broader systemic challenges. Ethiopia, ranking 121st in educational access, trails Kenya's emotional resilience. These societies do not require more sophisticated scorecards; they need targeted investment aligned with documented needs. Yet the development sector remains seduced by quantification. Mauritius' positive life evaluation masks heightened stress levels, while oil-rich Gabon trails in emotional well-being. At the same time, Algeria's food insecurity rate of just under 20 percent still represents millions denied basic sustenance. In a nutshell, when indices celebrate non-financial flourishing while material suffering persists, they inadvertently sanitize inequality. Documenting African resilience, while valuable, remains an insufficient academic exercise if divorced from concrete action. Hafed Al-Ghwell Africa's organic wisdom, collective dignity, intergenerational support, and joy amid adversity, demands more than documentation. It requires deploying resources toward the specific fissures revealed by the data: financial inclusion for Nigeria's struggling bottom half, educational infrastructure in Tanzania, and healthcare equity from Algeria to Chad. Until then, well-being metrics serve as epitaphs for potential, not blueprints for progress. Documenting African resilience, while valuable, remains an insufficient academic exercise if divorced from concrete action. True partnership requires channeling resources decisively toward priorities defined by African communities themselves. The evidence is unequivocal: Populations are actively constructing well-being frameworks rooted in indigenous philosophies emphasizing communal bonds over individualistic metrics. Yet the transformative power of these organic structures is systematically throttled by deficits in foundational capabilities. Consider food insecure countries, where more than two-thirds consistently report lacking money for food. This crippling economic reality directly impedes the potential of community-driven support networks, however strong their cultural foundation. Endless refinement of well-being indicators, while intellectually engaging, becomes a distraction when basic needs remain unmet for vast segments of the population. The imperative is a fundamental redirection: shifting energy and capital toward enabling African-conceived and African-led solutions. This redirection demands targeted investment in areas proven to underpin dignity and agency, directly addressing the deficiencies quantified in the very surveys critiquing narrow approaches. Chronic underfunding of education, particularly in the humanities essential for ethical reasoning and civic character, must be reversed. The data reveals a continent-wide chasm: Kenya ranks ninth globally for daily learning experiences, reflecting vibrant intellectual engagement, while Algeria languishes at 125th, suggesting systemic barriers to personal development. Financing educational models that intentionally marry skills training with moral and civic development is not a luxury; it is foundational for sustainable, self-directed flourishing. Similarly, investing in physical infrastructure that enhances daily dignity, for example safe housing, reliable sanitation and accessible clean water is non-negotiable. These are not abstract ideals, but tangible requirements highlighted by low rankings in perceived living standards improvement. Such investments directly tackle the environmental 'livability' factors demonstrably linked to well-being. Crucially, this shift necessitates accepting African definitions of success as legitimate policy blueprints, not anthropological curiosities. Mauritius' position as Africa's leader in life evaluations and the consistently high rankings for positive affect across West Africa, measured by, for instance, levels of enjoyment and optimism about the future, are not statistical outliers to be explained away. They are valid, contextually grounded expressions of prosperity emerging from distinct social, cultural, and economic realities. Policies anchored in externally imposed definitions of progress will inevitably falter. Recognizing the strength inherent in communal orientations, as seen in Nigeria's high ranking for experiencing harmony with others, or the resilience reflected in Kenya's unexpectedly high enjoyment ranking despite lower life satisfaction, provides an essential starting point. Prosperity in Africa manifests diversely; policy must reflect this complexity rather than force conformity to foreign — and too often out-of-touch — paradigms. Enabling self-determined priorities means respecting the evidence of what already works within African contexts and scaling it through aligned, substantial resource commitment. The data provides the map; the will to follow it, investing in capabilities and dignity defined from within, is the test of genuine partnership. When Nigeria consistently outperforms advanced economies on core human dimensions, the message is clear: Africa does not need the world to redefine success; it needs the world to respect and resource its pathways to sustainably achieving it.


Leaders
4 days ago
- Leaders
Glitch Forces US Osprey to Make Emergency Landing in Japan
A US Osprey military aircraft made an emergency landing on Thursday in northern Japan, marking the latest in a series of mishaps involving the controversial tilt-rotor plane. The pilot contacted Hanamaki Airport in Iwate Prefecture, reporting a technical glitch that necessitated the emergency landing, according to an airport official who spoke with AFP. Safe Landing and Response Fortunately, the aircraft landed without incident, and the crew did not request emergency medical assistance. Officials from US Forces Japan were unavailable for immediate comment regarding the situation. Television footage from Hanamaki Airport showed several uniformed US military personnel standing outside the parked aircraft. Additionally, national broadcaster NHK aired a video of the Osprey making a vertical landing at the airport. The Hanamaki airport official confirmed that the incident did not disrupt airport operations. Ospreys have the unique capability to take off and land vertically like helicopters while rotating their propellers to fly like planes. However, the aircraft has faced scrutiny due to its history of accidents and deadly crashes. History of Accidents In 2023, an Osprey crash off southern Japan resulted in the tragic loss of all eight people on board. This fatal incident prompted the US military to ground the aircraft worldwide, raising concerns about its safety. In response to the latest emergency landing, regional Japanese military personnel are heading to Hanamaki to investigate the situation further, as confirmed by a defense official speaking to AFP. As the investigation unfolds, the safety of the Osprey remains a pressing concern for both US and Japanese military officials. Short link : Post Views: 20 Related Stories


Arab News
6 days ago
- Arab News
How did a Bangladesh air force fighter jet crash into a school campus?
NEW DELHI: At least 25 children were among the 27 people killed when a Bangladesh Air Force plane crashed into a college and school campus in the capital city of Dhaka on Monday. Here is a look at what happened. HOW DID THE CRASH OCCUR? The fighter aircraft took off at 1:06 p.m. (0706 GMT) from the air force base in Dhaka's Kurmitola for a routine training mission, but experienced a mechanical failure soon after. The pilot attempted to divert the aircraft away from densely populated areas to minimize civilian casualties and damage, but his efforts were unsuccessful and the jet crashed into a building. WHERE DID THE PLANE GO DOWN? The two-story building that the plane rammed into belonged to the Milestone School and College in Dhaka's Diabari area, located about 10 kilometers (six miles) from the air force base. Visuals from the scene showed the mangled remains of the aircraft dented into the side of the building, dismantling its iron grills and creating a gaping hole in the structure. HOW MANY PEOPLE WERE KILLED? The bodies of at least 27 people, including 25 children, a teacher, and the jet's pilot, were pulled out from the debris. More than 100 children and 15 other people were also injured, of whom 78 are still admitted in hospitals with burn injuries. WHICH AIRCRAFT WAS INVOLVED IN THE INCIDENT? The jet was an F-7 fighter aircraft — the final and most advanced variant in China's Chengdu J-7/F-7 aircraft family, according to Jane's Information Group. Bangladesh had signed a contract in 2011 for 16 such planes, and deliveries were completed by 2013. HOW HAVE AUTHORITIES REACTED? The Bangladesh Air Force has formed a high-level investigation committee to probe the cause of the accident. Muhammad Yunus, the head of the country's interim government, has also vowed to 'take all necessary measures' to investigate its cause. In the meantime, the government says it is providing 'all kinds of assistance' to those affected.