US moves to dismantle Google's ad technology in major antitrust push
Google said in its own filing that divestiture of AdX and DFP wouldn't be technically feasible because neither piece of technology is capable of working outside of Google's proprietary infrastructure
AP Washington
The US Justice Department is doubling down on its attempt to break up Google by asking it to give up the underlying technology powering the company's digital ad network. The proposed remedy joins a separate federal effort to separate the Chrome browser from its dominant search engine.
The government's latest proposal was filed late Monday in a Virginia federal court two-and-half weeks after a federal judge ruled that parts of its lucrative digital ad network have been improperly abusing its market power to stifle competition to the detriment of online publishers.
In a 17-page filing, Justice Department lawyers argued that US District Judge Leonie Brinkema should punish Google by ordering the company to offload its AdX business and DFP ad platform, tools that bring together advertisers, who want to market their products, and publishers, who want to sell commercial space on their sites, to bring in revenue.
Not surprisingly, it's an idea that Google vehemently plans to oppose when the penalty phase of the antitrust case known as remedy hearings begins in late September. Google already has vowed to appeal Brinkema's ruling that the technology powering the ad network has been breaking the law, but can't do that until the judge rules on its punishment in a decision expected late this year or early next year.
Google said in its own filing Monday that divestiture of AdX and DFP wouldn't be technically feasible because neither piece of technology is capable of working outside of Google's proprietary infrastructure. The company proposed its own remedies to restore competition, and reiterated its intent to appeal the ruling.
Divestiture is not as simple as selling either the AdX or DFP source code to a willing buyer, Google wrote.
The attempt to tear down Google's ad network comes on top of the Justice Department's ongoing effort to have the company part with its popular Chrome browser and impose other restrictions to curtail the power of its ubiquitous search engine, which another federal judge branded an illegal monopoly in a ruling last August.
The remedy hearings in the search case are scheduled to conclude later this month, with a ruling from US District Judge Amit Mehta expected by Labour Day.
If the Justice Department is able to persuade the two different judges to order its proposed dismantling of Google, it would be the biggest breakup of a US company since AT&T was forced to spin off its phone service into seven separate regional companies more than 40 years ago.
Google's Play Store for apps running on its Android software that powers most of the world's smartphones also was declared an illegal monopoly by a federal jury in 2023 and is battling a judge's order that would require it to overhaul a commission system that generates billions of dollars in annual revenue.
But hobbling its search engine and digital ad network would be far bigger blows because they are the key cogs in a business that generated USD 265 billion in revenue last year.
Google is confronting the breakup threats at the same time the advent of artificial intelligence is changing the way consumers are using technology and seeking information online a shift that could also siphon traffic and money away from a powerhouse that began in a Silicon Valley garage in 1998.
Despite the adversity, Google is still delivering robust financial growth to its corporate parent Alphabet Inc., which is currently valued at USD 2 trillion.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
If Elon Musk and President Donald Trump divorce, who gets Silicon Valley?
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Last year, Elon Musk was the Pied Piper of support for Donald Trump among Silicon Valley power by one, tech billionaires close to Musk who had either backed Democrats or avoided the political scrum put their money and their time behind the former president's bid to reclaim the White House But the meltdown of the relationship between Trump and Musk on Thursday has thrown that cosiness into question. In the coming days, the billionaires who followed Musk to Washington may be forced to decide whose side they are on in this suddenly personal Silicon Valley, what appeared to be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to team up with decision-makers in Washington is looking precarious. Musk was the keystone of the tech industry's relationship with the Trump administration. Without him, it could be up to lesser-known figures, such as venture capitalist David Sacks , a close friend of Musk who has become the Trump administration's artificial intelligence and crypto czar, to maintain those ties."This is a tale as old as time," said Venky Ganesan, a partner at venture capital firm Menlo Ventures. "Like Icarus, Elon is finding out that if you fly too close to the sun, your wax melts and you crash."Even before Musk announced that he was leaving Washington, there were growing questions about what exactly the tech industry's embrace of the Trump White House was yearslong attempt by the Justice Department to break up Google? Still on track. The Federal Trade Commission's pursuit of Meta , Facebook's parent company? That just wrapped up in a Washington courtroom and is now in the hands of a federal judge. Tariffs on imported goods that could hurt device makers like Apple? Trump seems more determined than ever to see them through."Much better to be aligned with principles than personalities," Ganesan added. "A lesson tech titans might want to learn."Representatives for the White House and Sacks did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Musk did not return an email request seeking 2024, many of the tech industry's boldface names threw their support and hundreds of millions of dollars behind Trump, mainly because he promised to back away from regulating the cryptocurrency industry and keep the federal government's hands off artificial capitalist partners Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz surprised many when they announced they were supporting Trump, though Horowitz changed his mind when former Vice President Kamala Harris, a personal friend, entered the race. (He said, however, that their venture firm still endorsed Trump.) Many of their colleagues, such as the tech mogul hosts of the popular All-In Podcast, which includes Sacks, also endorsed them, Trump has kept up his end of the bargain. He has not only pushed for the deregulation of crypto markets, his family's company has jumped headfirst into them. And Trump's domestic policy bill that angered Musk even contains a provision that would block states from regulating tech industry leaders have not had as much luck. At Trump's inauguration, Apple's Tim Cook, Meta's Mark Zuckerberg, Amazon's Jeff Bezos, Google's Sundar Pichai and Musk formed a Mount Rushmore of tech bosses in the crowd behind the new president. Sergey Brin, a Google co-founder who once raced to the airport in San Francisco to protest the travel restrictions of Trump's first administration, was also there. So was OpenAI's Sam Altman, a fellow travel restriction protester. Jensen Huang, CEO Nvidia and relative newcomer to presidential circles, did not attend the inauguration but traveled to Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida to talk AI results have been mixed. For a while, Cook appeared to have talked Trump out of the tariffs on Chinese imports that would have badly hurt Apple. But Trump changed his mind and created a different set of tariffs that directly targeted Apple. Huang has been blocked from selling chips to China over national security concerns but was awarded a license to sell hundreds of thousands of chips in the Middle East in data centre deals that also brought Altman's company to the Secretary Howard Lutnick told a room of AI leaders, lobbyists and lawmakers this week that the administration would invite foreign investment into AI data centres, reversing Biden administration was speaking at an event hosted by Washington AI Network and sponsored by Meta, Amazon, OpenAI, Microsoft and TikTok, where he announced the administration would rename the U.S. Safety Institute to the centre for AI Standards and Innovation to emphasize growth of the industry over regulation."America must lead in AI, and that means embracing innovation while securing our infrastructure," Lutnick said. "The new centre for AI Standards and Innovation will help ensure developers have clear, trusted guidelines -- without unnecessary regulation -- so we can stay ahead in the global AI race."But if Musk's all-out hostility toward Trump continues, it is difficult to say how Trump will treat Musk's companies and Silicon Valley. Until this past year, Trump showed more interest in old industries like steel and cars and was critical of the tech industry's biggest companies -- as well as a few of the smaller ones. Many Trump supporters are still suspicious that Silicon Valley's peacemaking is just opportunism, and would be happy to see him become more rift with Trump could directly affect efforts in Washington to benefit his companies. At the Federal Communications Commission, SpaceX has intensely lobbied for more access to spectrum for its Starlink satellite wireless service. FCC Chair Brendan Carr has been a vocal supporter of Musk's satellite strategy and his business. At a SpaceX launch in November, Carr posted a photo of the launch with the words, "It's time to unleash America's space economy."Musk saw an opportunity after his Starlink satellite service was shut out of the $42.5 billion Broadband Equity Access and Deployment Program created during the Biden administration, which favored fiber internet service over satellite in hard-to-reach rural much of that is up in the air, and Trump has threatened to target the many government contracts held by Musk's companies."This has escalated very quickly, so this rupture absolutely could matter," said Blair Levin, of New Street Research and a former chief of staff to the FCC. Musk's satellite ambitions are tied up in policy debates in federal agencies, Levin said, and "politically it is very easy to tweak things in ways that are very unhelpful to Musk."In an update on the social platform X on Thursday afternoon, Musk posted a video of Trump standing next to a bright red Tesla, parked in front of the White House."Remember this? @realDonaldTrump" Musk wrote.


India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Scared Pakistan closes terror launchpads in...., it was targeted in Operation Sindoor, it is run by...
Scared Pakistan closes terror launchpads in...., it was targeted in Operation Sindoor, it is run by... After India's air strike, the leadership of Pakistan-based terrorist organization Jaish-e-Mohammed is has closed its Bahawalpur headquarters 'Jamia Subhan Allah'. India attacked Jaish-e-Mohammed's Bahawalpur headquarters in Punjab province under Operation Sindoor in early May, in which it was destroyed. Since the Indian attack, it is showing permanently closed on Google Maps. Was targeted in Operation Sindoor The Indian armed forces launched Operation Sindoor in the early hours of May 7 in response to the Pahalgam terror attack on April 22 , in which 26 people were killed. India's retaliatory strikes targeted nine terror infrastructures in Pakistan and PoK, including the Jaish-e-Mohammed headquarters in Bahawalpur. The Jaish infrastructure was destroyed in the precision strike at this location, about 100 km from the Indian border. 10 people from Masood Azhar's family killed In India's action, 10 members of Jaish-e-Mohammed chief Masood Azhar 's family and 4 close associates were killed. Photos and satellite imagery of the site after the attack show that the place was badly damaged. A large part of the building was reduced to rubble and large holes were visible in its Pakistan Tension: Khawaja Asif's statement on Shimla Agreement causes uproar in Pakistan. Training center for Jaish terrorists The complex was displayed as a mosque for public display, but it reportedly served as a training centre for Jaish-e-Mohammed. It played a key role in the recruitment and operational planning of terrorists. Google Maps has now marked the site as permanently closed. This marking is usually done when verified sources report a long period of inactivity and damage to the place.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Not even 100 grand a year! Multibillionaire Jeff Bezos' annual salary will shock you
"World's wealthiest billionaires?" A quick search on Google and one will find Jeff Bezos' name in the third place, just after Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg . Whether it's Forbes or Bloomberg, all of them concur that with a whopping wealth of nearly $227 billion, the Amazon founder is the third richest man in the world. Although he has long been associated with immense wealth, strangely, his salary slip doesn't reflect that at all. In fact, looking at his salary slip, one might even confuse Bezos with any other common man with a moderate income. Do you know how much Bezos takes away at the end of the year? A modest salary For decades, Bezos has maintained a base salary of 80 grand (approximately $81,840) per year, a figure that has remained unchanged since 1998. But why? Why keep a moderate salary despite amazing tonnes of wealth? Turns out, this modest compensation was a strategic decision rather than a financial necessity. Bezos believed that his substantial ownership stake in Amazon, which at times exceeded 10%, provided sufficient incentive to drive the company's success . The power of equity Bezos' salary might not be 'up to the mark' per his worth, but his earnings were not affected by it. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo While his salary was modest, Bezos' wealth was primarily derived from his equity in Amazon. As the company's stock price appreciated, so did the value of his holdings. In 2023, Bezos' net worth increased by approximately $70 billion, largely due to the rise in Amazon's stock value. His approach to compensation is a great learning in terms of the significant role that equity ownership can play in wealth accumulation. Tax implications Apart from earning from his stake in Amazon, Bezos' decision to draw a modest salary also had tax advantages. By keeping his income low, he reduced his taxable earnings, which, in some years, allowed him to pay little to no federal income taxes. For instance, in 2007 and 2011, Bezos reportedly paid no federal income taxes, as his reported income was offset by investment losses. Post-CEO compensation Bezos, who founded Amazon in the 90s, stayed the CEO of the company till 2021. After stepping down as Amazon's CEO in 2021, Bezos continued to receive a salary as Executive Chairman of the Board. This compensation remained consistent at $1.7 million annually, a figure that also remained unchanged for several years. MET Gala 2023: The whopping cost of individual ticket for this grand fashion event will leave you in SHOCK! Find deets inside