King Charles beams as he waves at royal fans on the way to church in Sandringham
King Charles was seen smiling and waving at royal fans this morning as he made his way to church in Sandringham.
The monarch, 76, was being driven to St Mary Magdalene Church for the Sunday morning service when he made the warm gesture.
Pictured in the backseat of a blue vehicle, Charles, who is often accompanied at church by Queen Camilla, 77, appeared to be attending the service alone today.
The King looked typically smart in a suit and tie as he waved and beamed at those gathered nearby.
The royal couple last week visited Ottawa, Canada, where Charles, who was diagnosed with cancer in February of last year, addressed the country's parliament.
In the speech, delivered from a throne made of wood from a Windsor oak, the King declared the nation 'strong and free'.
Charles, who was introduced to Parliament as The King of Canada, spoke of his 'deep pride and pleasure' at witnessing 'Canadians coming together in a renewed sense of national pride, unity, and hope'.
Charles's appearance this morning comes after The Mail on Sunday reported that Prince Harry, 40, sought advice from Princess Diana's brother about changing his family name to Spencer.
Sources said the Duke of Sussex actively explored ways to assume his mother's surname – a move that would have involved ditching Mountbatten-Windsor, used by his children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet.
It is understood he discussed the issue with Earl Spencer – whose family seat is Althorp in Northamptonshire – during a rare visit to Britain, but was told that the legal hurdles were insurmountable.
'They had a very amicable conversation and Spencer advised him against taking such a step,' said a friend of Harry.
Nevertheless, the fact that he consulted the Earl over the issue – a proposal that would dismay his brother and father – is a vivid expression of the toxic rift with his family.
Mountbatten-Windsor is the surname available to descendants of the late Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip. It combines the Royal Family 's name of Windsor and the Duke of Edinburgh 's adopted surname.
On their birth certificates, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's children are Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor and Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor.
Royal author Tom Bower has claimed that 'Meghan decided her real object in life was to be Diana'. If the name change had succeeded, Meghan's daughter, who is believed to have met the King only once, would have become Lilibet Diana Spencer, a more fulsome tribute to Harry's late mother.
The move would be particularly hurtful to King Charles, who cherishes the Mountbatten name just as his father did.
A mentor to Prince Philip, the 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma was also a strong influence on his great-nephew, the future King Charles.
Philip adopted the Mountbatten name when he became a naturalised British subject and renounced his Greek and Danish royal title in 1947. The Queen and Philip decided in 1960 that they would like their own direct descendants to be known as Mountbatten-Windsor.
According to the Government, you do not have to follow a legal process to start using a new name, but it suggests on its official website using a 'deed poll' to apply for or to change official documents such as a passport or driving licence.
Names and titles are a highly sensitive subject for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. They were given their Sussex titles by Queen Elizabeth on the day of their wedding in 2018.
Meghan recently insisted her surname is Sussex, correcting a guest on her Netflix cookery and lifestyle programme.
In episode two of With Love, Meghan, which was released in March, the 43-year-old former actress was joined by comedienne Mindy Kaling.
Meghan told her: 'It's so funny you keep saying 'Meghan Markle' – you know I'm Sussex now.'
As Ms Kaling looked confused, the duchess, who has visited the county of Sussex only once, continued: 'You have kids and you go, 'No, I share my name with my children'.
'I didn't know how meaningful it would be to me but it just means so much to go 'This is OUR family name. Our little family name.' '
The Sussexes used the title princess for their daughter, Lilibet, for the first time after her christening in California was announced in 2023.
A spokesman for the couple said: 'The children's titles have been a birthright since their grandfather became monarch. This matter has been settled for some time in alignment with Buckingham Palace.'
The children were subsequently officially named as prince and princess on the Royal Family's official website.
Archie, now aged six, and Lilibet, who turns four on Wednesday, were named as the Prince and Princess of Sussex on the line of succession page of the official Royal Family website. They are sixth and seventh in line to the throne. Previously they were listed as Master Archie Mountbatten-Windsor and Miss Lilibet Mountbatten-Windsor.
The rules governing the titles of royal children were set out by George V – Queen Elizabeth's grandfather – in 1917.
Archie and Lilibet were not prince and princess at birth, because they were not grandchildren of the monarch, but they gained the right to these titles when King Charles acceded to the throne.
During the Sussexes' explosive interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2021, Meghan suggested to the American chat-show host that Archie had been denied his birthright of the title 'prince' by the Palace and that the decision went against protocol.
She spoke of her shock at being told he would not get police protection because he did not have a title, and suggested that the decision was taken because of his mixed race.
'It's not their right to take away,' Meghan said. Asked by Ms Winfrey, 'Do you think it's because of his race?', the duchess replied: 'In those months when I was pregnant, all around this same time, so we [had] the conversation of he won't be given security, he's not going to be given a title. And, also, concerns and conversations about how dark his skin might be when he's born.'
At the time the claims caused shock and bewilderment at Buckingham Palace, with the late Queen subsequently publishing a statement including the memorable phrase, 'some recollections may vary'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Canada to expedite nation-building projects to counter Trump
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said his government will start pushing legislation that would fast-track ambitious national projects to boost Canada's economy, now faced with Donald Trump's outlined his plan on Monday after a meeting - described as "very productive" - with the leaders of Canada's provinces and territories."This has been the best meeting we've had in 10 years," Ontario premier Doug Ford told said his plan is to narrow down a list of so-called "nation building" projects - like pipelines, nuclear reactors and trade corridors - and create a framework in which the projects would be approved in under two years' time. The goal, he said, is to quickly build infrastructure that will make Canada "the strongest economy in the G7," as well as strengthen the country's autonomy and resilience in the future. "This meeting demonstrated how we can give ourselves far more than any foreign government can take away," Carney told meeting marked Carney's first with Canada's premiers since his federal election win in had campaigned heavily on bolstering the country's economy to counter tariff threats from the US, with whom Canada does the bulk of its Trump has imposed tariffs on Canadian steel, aluminium and its auto sector, and said he plans to double levies on steel and aluminium to 50%, starting on Wednesday to "further secure the steel industry in the United States."Carney called the latest tariffs "unjustified and unlawful".He added that Canada's minister for US-Canada trade Dominic LeBlanc will be travelling to the US on Monday evening to resume trade talks. In the meantime, Carney said his government will focus on "projects of national interest" to help Canada sell its resources in more markets, strengthen its security and reduce reliance on other projects can come from provinces or the private sector, and must meet a criteria that includes offering "undeniable benefit" to Canada's economy and having "a high likelihood" of being built successfully. They also must be environmentally clean and sustainable, and a high priority for Canada's indigenous communities, Carney can include anything from highways, railways, ports, airports, pipelines, nuclear projects, clean energy projects and electric transmission lines. Another priority, Carney said, is building infrastructure in the Arctic to secure the territory and cement Canada's sovereignty in the region - where other nations, including China, Russia and the US, are fighting for provinces already have submitted proposals, but Carney did not indicate which, if any, would be premiers - including Alberta's Danielle Smith, who had been highly critical of former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau - appeared unified after their first meeting with said there was "great collaboration" between all leaders, while Smith said she was "encouraged" by Carney's questions remain on whether provinces will find common ground on more contentious projects, like oil and gas Nations leaders also have expressed concern about Carney's plan, saying they fear it will side-step their land and water rights, and have asked for more clarity on how they will be involved.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Oil rises on Iran, Russia and Canada supply concerns
June 3 (Reuters) - Oil prices rose in early Asia trade on Tuesday on concerns about supply, with Iran set to reject a U.S. nuclear deal proposal that would be key to easing sanctions on the major oil producer, and with production in Canada hit by wildfires. Brent crude futures gained 55 cents, or 0.85%, to $65.18 a barrel by 0000 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was up 59 cents, or 0.94%, to $63.11 a barrel, after rising around 1% earlier in the session. Both contracts gained nearly 3% in the previous session after OPEC+ agreed to keep output increases in July at 411,000 barrels per day, which was less than some in the market had feared and the same hike as in the previous two months. Geopolitical tensions supported prices on Tuesday. Iran was poised to reject a U.S. proposal to end a decades-old nuclear dispute, an Iranian diplomat said on Monday, saying it fails to address Tehran's interests or soften Washington's stance on uranium enrichment. If nuclear talks between the U.S. and Iran fail, it could mean continued sanctions on Iran, which would limit Iranian supply and be supportive of oil prices. The ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine continued to stoke supply concerns and geopolitical risk premiums. Adding to supply worries, a wildfire in the province of Alberta in Canada has prompted a temporary shutdown of some oil and gas production, which could reduce supply. According to Reuters calculations, wildfires in Canada have affected more than 344,000 bpd of oil sands production, or about 7% of the country's overall crude oil output. The big jump in oil prices on Monday mostly reflected relief that the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and allies, including Russia, did not go ahead with a larger production hike than in the previous two months. "With the worst fears not panning out, investors unwound their bearish positions they had built prior to the weekend's meeting," Daniel Hynes, senior commodity strategist at ANZ, said in a note.
Times
4 hours ago
- Times
Sarah Vine's battle of the Notting Hill diaries
As Sarah Vine, the ex-wife of the ex-minister Michael Gove, publishes her memoir, it seems clear that the phrase 'With friends like these, who needs enemies?' was made for the Notting Hill set. The book is throwing fresh paraffin on the ashes of Vine's friendship with former-PM David Cameron and his wife Samantha, and things can only get bitter. So, is it coincidence that the former Evening Standard editor and sister of Sam Cam, Emily Sheffield, has now scheduled a big party to clash with Vine's book launch on June 19? Other groups might settle things physically, but this lot believe the only appropriate way to clash is in the diary. Johnson's busy night 'I feel very popular,' says the columnist Rachel Johnson, who is one of the many who will try to keep both sides of Notting Hill happy on this forthcoming night. She even has a third clash: June 19 is also her brother Boris's birthday. At least we can be sure that neither the Camerons nor Michael Gove will be having to decline an invitation for that one. Turquoise blues Reform UK are so good at winning elections that they're keen to rerun them. A number of their new councillors have already resigned and triggered by-elections, at the cost of thousands of pounds — something Reform's Doge squad could perhaps turn their attention to. Even the party's election campaigns are proving chaotic. In Higham Ferrers, North Northamptonshire, they have nominated three candidates for a two-member ward, splitting their own vote and ensuring that at least one of their people goes home disgruntled. Or maybe this is a valiant attempt to avoid yet another by-election. According to Election Maps UK, one of Reform's three nominees will not take their seat if elected, because they have moved to China. All this from the party of common sense. History mystery Academics can never be too careful with their words. The historian Peter Frankopan, author of The Silk Roads, told London's Institut Français that his book was sailing high in the bestsellers list when a historian he respected called him about a 'problem' with the book. 'Is it too popular?' Frankopan whispered, aware that this could be a cardinal sin in academia. 'No,' said the elder. 'You should have called it 'A New World History', not 'A New History of the World'.' Frankopan (not unreasonably) asked: 'Are they so different?'. The don huffed 'It's like night and day!' and hung up. Frankopan still wonders about the difference. Chip out of the blocks Perhaps we do live in an era of gentler politics. After Saturday's TMS mentioned how Will Self and Mark Francois narrowly avoided an on-air fight, my attention was directed to an incident from 20 years ago where the Labour MP Steve Pound and the Tory MP Philip Davies debated the death penalty on Talksport (you read that correctly). The two resorted to fisticuffs, were broken apart and then resumed when out of the studio. A source says that the pair were finally separated by someone who 'displayed more intelligence than either of the respected legislators'. This was Chip, a guide dog who belonged to a producer, who could see that the two MPs were barking.
