Why Yoon Suk Yeol supporters want him back
Though 10 days have passed since former President Yoon Suk Yeol was removed from power by the Constitutional Court of Korea's ruling to uphold his impeachment, some of his supporters have continued to take to the streets on behalf of the disgraced ex-leader.
A new slogan that the supporters have recently adopted is, 'Reset Korea, Yoon Again!' in English. In pro-Yoon protests that took place in front of Yoon's apartment in Seocho-gu on Friday as well as a rally of approximately 10,000 people in Gwanghwamun on Saturday, according to an official police estimate, the protesters were heard shouting the two English slogans while claiming Yoon's impeachment was "fraudulent."
In front of Seoul Central District Court, where the first hearing in Yoon's criminal trial on charges of orchestrating an insurrection by declaring martial law Dec. 3 took place on Monday, supporters were also found holding the 'Yoon Again' signs.
The 'Reset Korea, Yoon Again' slogan first appeared in a letter written by former Defense Minister Kim Yong-hyun in prison, revealed by Kim's lawyers at a rally organized by the far-right Liberty Unification Party on April 7. Kim, known to be Yoon's close confidant, is currently detained at the Seoul Dongbu Detention Center for his role in Yoon's botched martial law plot.
'We had to witness the heartbreaking collapse of judicial justice in South Korea due to political manipulation and fraudulent impeachment," wrote Kim. "The outrage and disappointment (I felt) were so overwhelming that I couldn't sleep. But this is not the end, it's a new beginning. We have no more ground to retreat to. We will prevail.'
Kim then concluded the letter with the English words, 'Yoon Again,' which pro-Yoon protesters since adopted.
In front of Seoul Central District Court on Monday morning, 27-year-old pro-Yoon protester Lee Sung-hyun, holding a 'Yoon Again' sign, told The Korea Herald that his continued motivation to speak in favor of the disgraced former president comes from his 'disappointment in Korean society.'
'Public opinion has been shaped to be so unfair toward our one and only President Yoon Suk Yeol. Honestly, I'm so disappointed at how Korean society can be so easily swayed by public opinion and what's being shown in the media,' said Lee. 'Sure, declaring martial law is bad, but we also have to consider what made (Yoon) declare martial law in the first place," according to him.
Adding that he took a day off from work to partake in a rally in front of the court on Monday, he stated that he hopes for Yoon's 'swift return to politics to resolve the current political unrest in Korea.'
Other than Lee, other pro-Yoon protesters claim that Yoon is eligible to run again for president, despite Korea's single-term presidency provision in the Constitution. According to Article 67 of the Constitution, Korea's presidents cannot run for re-election after serving their term under this rule to prevent the concentration of power in one individual and to avoid the risk of dictatorship, reflecting the country's history of overcoming authoritarian rule.
Since Yoon technically did not serve a full term as president due to his impeachment, his supporters have claimed on social media platforms such as X that the single-term presidency rule doesn't apply to Yoon's case. On which grounds such statements are being made, however, are not clearly identified.
According to the Constitutional Court Act, a president who is removed from office following an impeachment ruling is prohibited from holding any public office position for a period of five years after the ruling is made. Based on this law, some protesters argue that Yoon can also return to the presidency after the five-year period.
However, law professor Hwang Do-ssu of Konkuk University, who specializes in constitutional law, told The Korea Herald expressed doubts about such arguments, saying that it is 'an invalid argument.'
'Since he has already been elected president once, the general interpretation there is that it will be considered to be a second term to serve consecutive terms or to return after a break, regardless of whether (Yoon) completed his term or not,' Hwang stated.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
4 hours ago
- Korea Herald
S. Korea-China-Japan cooperation crucial as ‘buffer' as Trump 2.0 roils Asia
APEC summit will serve as springboard for bolstering trilateral coordination, observers say Trilateral cooperation among South Korea, China and Japan has become more essential than ever as a buffer in Northeast Asia fraught with mounting volatility and uncertainty under US President Trump's second term, former high-ranking officials and experts said. Observers from the three countries held the view that Northeast Asia has become the central battleground in the intensifying great-power rivalry between the US and China during a forum hosted by the North-East Asia Research Foundation, a Seoul-based think tank, on Monday. Chung Duck-koo, former minister of trade, industry and energy, underscored that 'further strengthening trilateral relations among South Korea, China and Japan would be highly beneficial,' as Northeast Asia sits at the fault line between the North Korea–China–Russia bloc and South Korea–US–Japan cooperation. 'As a group that intersects both triangular frameworks, our cooperation could serve as a bridge for promoting shared prosperity and safety,' Chung, who serves as the founder and incumbent chair of the NEAR Foundation, said in his opening speech during the forum "The Trump 2.0 Era and its Implications on Northeast Asia." "Such efforts could help ease or neutralize tensions and mitigate sources of conflict in the region." Kim Sung-han, a former national security adviser in the previous Yoon Suk Yeol administration, underscored that "the geopolitical confrontation between North Korea–China–Russia alignment and the ROK–US–Japan partnership is likely to intensify further." The ROK stands for the Republic of Korea, the official name of South Korea. Kim elucidated that the US has been doubling down on its strategic pivot to the Indo-Pacific region from Europe, setting the termination of the war in Ukraine in sight, while curtailing its military engagement in the Middle East. At the same time, China is expected to bolster its strategic partnership with Russia while reinvigorating ties with North Korea. 'In this context, trilateral cooperation among ROK, China and Japan becomes increasingly important to help ease regional tensions and prevent further polarization,' commented Kim, who currently serves as a professor of the Graduate School of International Studies at Korea University. Kim further explained, 'Trump 2.0's foreign policy is likely to push the Northeast Asian order toward a binary confrontation, which could weaken the strategic foundation for trilateral cooperation among ROK, China and Japan." 'Paradoxically, however, in the face of rising tensions, pragmatic and interest-based cooperation among those three countries may become even more necessary,' Kim said. 'As a result, Korea-China-Japan trilateral cooperation could serve as a 'diplomatic shock absorber' that helps ease geopolitical tensions and maintain regional equilibrium.' In his keynote address, Yun Byung-se, former foreign minister under the Park Geun-hye administration, said, 'Dialogue, exchanges and cooperation among South Korea, China and Japan are extremely valuable assets, amid the seismic geopolitical and geoeconomic shifts.' Observers also concurred that the North Korean nuclear challenge underscored the need for tighter Korea-China-Japan cooperation. Yun pointed out that 'North Korea will negotiate from its most advantageous strategic position since the Korean War' if a summit between Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un materializes. 'Depending on the result, another shock may come to the landscape of Northeast Asia,' Yun said. 'Prior coordination between South Korea and the US, and among South Korea, the US and Japan, as well as close consultation with China, will be necessary.' Voicing similar views, Hitoshi Tanaka, former deputy foreign minister in Japan, also underscored that 'especially on pressing issues such as North Korea's nuclear program, close trilateral coordination is imperative.' Observers said this year's Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit — set for late October to early November in Gyeongju, North Gyeongsang Province — will provide a valuable venue to advance trilateral cooperation. 'We understand China's sensitivity regarding Taiwan,' Tanaka said. 'However, just as APEC clearly separates political and security matters, including Taiwan in such frameworks should be considered to demonstrate that economic cooperation can transcend political divides.' The APEC summit will invite leaders from 21 countries in the Indo-Pacific region, including South Korea, the US, China, Japan and Taiwan. 'We hope that the leaders of our three countries — South Korea, China and Japan — will also take advantage of this opportunity to engage in meaningful dialogue,' Chung of the NEAR Foundation said. 'Regardless of the challenges that may arise, South Korea, China and Japan should aim to be in the same boat and remain committed to discussing any issue in depth. In this regard, we must not make the mistake of allowing the past to hinder the future,' Chung added.
Korea Herald
4 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Who is Lee Jae-myung's pick for prime minister, Kim Min-seok?
Rep. Kim Min-seok, who was considered President Lee Jae-myung's "wingman" when they were in the Democratic Party of Korea leadership, has been nominated as his prime minister. As prime minister, Kim would steer Lee's Cabinet and serve as a key adviser. The position requires the National Assembly's confirmation. From as early as August 2024, Kim began raising alarms about former President Yoon Suk Yeol preparing to impose martial law. Kim had argued with conviction that Yoon was not only thinking about martial law, but taking concrete steps to go through with it. Kim was met by skepticism even within the Democratic Party, where a sizeable majority felt that the party was "taking things too far" with the martial law claims. Democratic Party lawmakers were seen distancing themselves from Kim's claims. When Yoon declared martial law on the night of Dec. 3, 2024, Kim's early warnings were revisited. Face of 'new pro-Lee' group Rep. Kim Min-seok, a former star politician who made a stunning return to the spotlight under Lee's Democratic Party, has been at the center of the new pro-Lee Jae-myung group. When Kim ran for a seat on the Democratic Party's supreme council last August, it soon became apparent that he was Lee's preferred choice to serve in the party's top decision-making body, a coveted and prestigious spot. Youngest lawmaker of his time to be elected Kim, the youngest in the batch of lawmakers elected in the 1996 general election, stepped into the limelight as soon as he entered politics. As a young politician, Kim served as chief secretary to former President Kim Dae-jung, when he was the leader of the Democratic Party. Jailed for occupying US-owned building in Seoul Kim was one of some 70 university students to occupy the US Cultural Center near the US Embassy in Seoul in May 1985 in an unarmed protest. Recalling the protest, Kim said in an interview with a local broadcaster in Gwangju on Oct. 12, 2024, that he was one of the first to raise suspicions that the US might have been behind the "massacre in Gwangju." Kim was referring to the series of pro-democracy protests in May 1980 in Gwangju against the then-government under Chun Doo-hwan, a military dictator. In the interview, Kim said that when he was the president of the student council at Seoul National University, he called for "uncovering the truths about the possible US intervention in the Gwangju massacre." "I said something on that scale (in Gwangju) would not have been possible without acquiescence from the US. That's what the US Cultural Center incident is about," Kim said. "It marked the first instance of getting what happened in Gwangju a recognition outside Korea." Kim served two years and eight months in jail for violating the laws on public demonstrations at the time. arin@
Korea Herald
4 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Russia advances to east-central Ukrainian region
Russia said Sunday that its forces had advanced to the edge of the east-central Ukrainian region of Dnipropetrovsk amid a public row between Moscow and Kyiv over peace negotiations and the return of thousands of bodies of soldiers who fell in the war. Despite talk of peace, the war is stepping up with Russian forces grabbing more territory in Ukraine and Kyiv unfurling high-profile drone and sabotage attacks on Russia's nuclear-capable bomber fleet and, according to Moscow, on railways. Russia, which controls a little under one-fifth of Ukrainian territory, has taken more than 190 square kilometers of the Sumy region of northeastern Ukraine in less than a month, according to pro-Ukrainian open-source maps. Now, according to the Russian defence ministry, units of the 90th Tank Division of the Central Grouping of Russian forces have reached the western frontier of Ukraine's Donetsk region and are attacking the adjacent Dnipropetrovsk region. "The enemy does not abandon its intentions to enter the Dnipropetrovsk region," Ukraine's Southern Defense Forces said on Telegram. "Our soldiers are courageously and professionally holding their section of the front, disrupting the occupier's plans. This work does not stop for a minute." Dmitry Medvedev, the deputy chair of Russia's Security Council, said the Dnipropetrovsk offensive showed that if Ukraine did not want to accept the reality of Russia's territorial gains in peace talks, then Moscow's forces would advance further. The pro-Ukrainian Deep State map showed Russian forces very close to the Dnipropetrovsk region, which had a population of more than 3 million before the war, and advancing on the city of Kostyantynivka in the Donetsk region from several directions. A Ukrainian military spokesperson, Dmytro Zaporozhets, said that Russian forces were trying to "build a bridgehead for an attack" on Kostyantynivka, an important logistical hub for the Ukrainian army. Russia on Saturday accused Ukraine of delaying the swap of prisoners of war and the return of the bodies of 12,000 dead soldiers. Ukraine denied those claims. On Sunday, Russia said it was moving bodies towards the border and television showed refrigerated trucks containing the bodies of Ukrainian soldiers on the road in the Bryansk region. Ukraine, officials said, was playing politics with the dead. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy pledged to press on with prisoner exchanges. "The Russian side is therefore, like always, even in these matters, is trying to play some kind of dirty political and information game," he said in his nightly video address. "We believe that the exchanges will continue and will do everything for this. If the Russians do not stand by agreements even in humanitarian matters, it casts great doubt on all international efforts — including those by the United States in terms of talks and diplomacy." Zelenskyy said he had reviewed commanders' reports about areas hit by heavy fighting, including near Pokrovsk, targeted by Moscow for months. He said the situation was "far from easy, but everything depends on the resilience of our units." US President Donald Trump, who says he wants an end to the deadliest conflict in Europe since World War II, on Thursday likened it to a fight between young children and indicated that he might have to simply let the conflict play out. Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Wednesday that he did not think Ukraine's leaders wanted peace, after accusing them of ordering a bombing in Bryansk, western Russia, that killed seven people and injured 115 a day before talks in Turkey. Ukraine, which has not commented on the attack on a Bryansk bridge, has similarly accused Moscow of not seriously seeking peace, citing Russian resistance to an immediate ceasefire. Russia is demanding international recognition of Crimea, a peninsula it annexed from Ukraine in 2014, and four other regions of Ukraine that Moscow has claimed as its own territory. Ukraine would have to withdraw its forces from all of them. Russia controlled 113,273 square kilometers, or 18.8 percent, of Ukrainian territory as of June 7, according to the Deep State map. That is an area bigger than the U.S. state of Virginia. The areas under Russian control include Crimea, more than 99 percent of the Luhansk region, over 70 percent of the Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions, all in the east or southeast, and fragments of the Kharkiv and Sumy regions in the northeast. Putin told Trump on Wednesday that he would have to respond to Ukrainian drone attacks on Russia's bomber fleet and the bombings of the railways. Zelenskyy warned Ukrainians in his video message to be particularly attentive to air raid warnings in the coming days. The US believes that Putin's threatened retaliation against Ukraine over its attacks has not happened yet in earnest and is likely to be a significant, multipronged strike, US officials told Reuters. (Reuters)
