U.S. government restricts sports visas for transgender women
Under the policy update, USCIS will consider 'the fact that a male athlete has been competing against women' as a negative factor when evaluating visa petitions in categories such as O-1A for extraordinary ability, EB-1 and EB-2 green cards for highly skilled workers, and national interest waivers.
'USCIS is closing the loophole for foreign male athletes whose only chance at winning elite sports is to change their gender identity and leverage their biological advantages against women,' said USCIS spokesperson Matthew Tragesser.
'It's a matter of safety, fairness, respect, and truth that only female athletes receive a visa to come to the U.S. to participate in women's sports.'
The move aligns with broader efforts by the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump to regulate transgender participation in athletics and follows similar policies enacted at the state level across the country.
The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee last month updated its policy to align with an executive order signed earlier this year by Trump barring transgender women from competing in women's sports.
Trump signed the 'Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports' order in February, a directive that supporters said will restore fairness but critics argue infringes on the rights of a tiny minority of athletes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
18 minutes ago
The costs of Trump's tariffs are starting to add up for Americans. Here's how
Little by little, the costs of U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs are starting to show for American businesses and consumers. News of the tariff impact is mounting, from the Detroit Three automakers (new window) announcing they'll face extra costs this year totalling into the billions, to the stainless steel cookware manufacturer (new window) in Tennessee hit with a $75,000 US tariff bill on one shipment, right down to the coffee shops (new window) considering boosting the price of a cup because of tariffs on Brazil. Until recently, companies have somewhat shielded U.S. consumers from the full effects of the tariffs, either by rushing supplies into the country ahead of Trump's deadlines or absorbing the levies as a cost of doing business. But with tariffs on imports from roughly 100 U.S. trading partners due to rise this week (new window) from their current baseline of 10 per cent, tariff-related costs are headed nowhere but up. Alex Durante, senior economist of the Tax Foundation, a Washington-based policy and advocacy group, says the tariffs are hitting a broad range of U.S. businesses that rely on imports. I think the administration is going to have a really hard time trying to convince the American people that some of the price increases they're seeing are because of other factors not related to the tariffs, Durante said in an interview with CBC News. I just don't think most people are going to be fooled by that, he said. WATCH | Carney's point man on tariffs takes Canada's message to U.S. television: Trump, cabinet deny tariffs costing Americans While on a macro level the U.S. economy is generally chugging along just fine (new window) despite Trump's tactics, there's some fresh data suggesting the tariffs are acting as a drag: Trump and his cabinet members quickly brush aside any evidence that the tariffs are costing Americans, with the president even firing the head of the federal statistics agency (new window) that produces the country's employment report. We have a lot of money coming in, much more money than the country has ever seen, by hundreds of billions of dollars, Trump said Sunday when a reporter asked about tariffs. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer flat-out denied that Trump's tariffs policies are a factor in the jobs slump. I don't read tariff policy into that number, Greer told the CBS program Face the Nation (new window) on Sunday. Enlarge image (new window) Coffee producer Ricardo Rufino Jr. shows off processed coffee beans at Boa Esperanca farm in Braganca Paulista, Brazil, on Monday. The country is facing the prospect of 50 per cent tariffs on its products exported to the U.S., leaving some American coffee shops considering whether they'll have to raise prices. Photo: Associated Press / Andre Penner But if you're willing to look around, you can find plenty of examples of U.S. businesses feeling the pinch. Reuters news agency is compiling examples of how major companies around the world are responding to Trump's tariffs, such as hiking prices and issuing profit warnings. Retailers, big brands raising prices The Reuters tracker (new window) currently shows 22 U.S. companies raising prices, including retail giants (Walmart, Best Buy), footwear brands (Nike, Crocs, Birkenstock) and big-name makers of household goods (Colgate-Palmolive, Procter & Gamble, Clorox). It's hard to imagine many American consumers haven't bought something from those businesses this year. Other big-name U.S. firms have in recent days reported tariff impacts: Tech giant Apple (new window) says it faced $800 million in tariff-related costs last quarter alone, and expects that to rise to $1.1 billion this quarter. says it faced $800 million in tariff-related costs last quarter alone, and expects that to rise to $1.1 billion this quarter. Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway (new window) blames tariffs in part for a 5.1 per cent quarterly decline in revenue in its consumer goods division, which includes brands like Fruit of the Loom. blames tariffs in part for a 5.1 per cent quarterly decline in revenue in its consumer goods division, which includes brands like Fruit of the Loom. Tool manufacturer Stanley Black & Decker (new window) estimates its tariff costs will hit $800 million this year. Those corporate figures don't touch on another trend emerging in the U.S. economy: the downturn in visits by international travellers, dramatically so from Canada (new window) . Perhaps that's not exactly tariff-related, but Trump slamming other nations on trade by describing them as nasty, unfair and ripping off the U.S. is not exactly what you'd call a warm and welcoming tourism ad campaign either. WATCH | Economist says Canada has a better deal on Trump's tariffs than other countries: Higher prices could impact public opinion While some polling (new window) suggests more Americans disapprove of tariffs than approve, the issue does not appear to be a crucial source of public-opinion damage to Trump and the Republicans — at least not yet. That could change if the tariff costs on businesses accumulate so much that consumers can't help but see the impact. We know from the most recent presidential election that voters really disliked seeing higher prices, said Durante. He sees trouble ahead whether businesses pass along all, some or none of the extra tariff costs to consumers. If they're absorbing the price increases, that's less money that they could use to invest in their own businesses and jobs and further production, Durante said. So, even if we don't see the tariffs fully impacting final consumer prices, these are still some pretty harmful effects. Mike Crawley (new window) · CBC News · Senior reporter Mike Crawley has covered Ontario politics for CBC News since 2009. He began his career as a newspaper reporter in B.C., spent six years as a freelance journalist in various parts of Africa, then joined the CBC in 2005. Mike was born and raised in Saint John, N.B. Follow Mike Crawley on Twitter (new window)
Edmonton Journal
18 minutes ago
- Edmonton Journal
Families of October 7 victims sue Meta for $1B for allowing atrocity footage on Facebook
Families of victims of the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas invasion of southern Israel have filed a class-action suit against Facebook parent Meta for failing to block the distribution of footage of the murder, abduction and torment of their loved ones. Article content The lawsuit, filed in Tel Aviv District Court, seeks 4 billion shekels (approximately US$1.1 billion) in damages. This comprises 200,000 shekels (approximately US$58,000) for each October 7 victim whose suffering was documented and shared online; 200,000 shekels to their immediate family members and close friends who saw the footage and 20,000 shekels (approximately US$5,800) for each Israeli exposed to the footage, Calcalist reported on Monday. Article content Article content Article content Article content 'For many hours, in real time and long after the terrorist attack, horrific documentation from the attack (to put it mildly) was disseminated, showing innocent civilians — children, elderly, women, and men — subjected to atrocities that even paper cannot bear to describe,' the plaintiffs' attorneys wrote in the claim, Calcalist reported. Article content The footage included 'murder, extreme violence' and 'abduction of civilians and soldiers, both living and dead,' among other brutal scenes. Article content The plaintiffs are represented by the Givatayim-based law firm of Matri, Meiri, Wacht & Co. Article content The attorneys from the firm argue that the videos were allowed to remain online for weeks in many cases, contradicting Meta's stated policies, Calcalist reported. Article content Article content Mor Baider, one of the lead plaintiffs, discovered his grandmother's death through a Facebook post by the terrorists. Baider's grandmother, Bracha Levinson, was a resident of Kibbutz Nir Oz. Article content Article content 'Grandma was murdered on Facebook,' Baider said during an interview marking the first anniversary of the attack. Article content The plaintiffs say Meta did not activate its live content monitoring systems, deploy its rapid response team or remove the content quickly, 'nor long thereafter (and in fact — to this very day,' according to the claim. Article content 'The Respondent acted contrary to its policy, its commitments, and its obligations, allowing its social networks to serve as a weapon, as an inseparable part of the terrorist attack on the State of Israel,' according to the claim. Article content According to Calcalist, Meta responded: 'Our hearts go out to the families affected by Hamas terrorism. Our policy designates Hamas as a proscribed organization, and we remove content that supports or glorifies Hamas or the October 7 terrorist attack.
CTV News
18 minutes ago
- CTV News
U.S. trade deficit narrows to US$60.2 billion in June
The President Bush, a container vessel operating under the American President Lines (APL) fleet, is moored at the APL Terminal, also known as Global Gateway South, at the port of Los Angeles, Calif., Friday, Aug. 1, 2025. (AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes) The U.S. trade deficit narrowed in June on a sharp drop in consumer goods imports, the latest evidence of the imprint on global commerce President Donald Trump is making with sweeping tariffs on imported goods. The overall trade gap narrowed 16.0 per cent in June to US$60.2 billion, the Commerce Department's Bureau of Economic Analysis said on Tuesday. Days after reporting that the goods trade deficit tumbled 10.8 per cent to its lowest since September 2023, the government said the full deficit including services also was its narrowest since September 2023. Exports of goods and services totaled $277.3 billion, down from more than $278 billion in May, while total imports were $337.5 billion, down from $350.3 billion. The diminished trade deficit contributed heavily to the rebound in U.S. gross domestic product during the second quarter, reported last week, reversing a drag in the first quarter when imports had surged as consumers and businesses front-loaded purchases to beat the imposition of Trump's tariffs. The economy in the second quarter expanded at a 3.0 per cent annualized rate after contracting at a 0.5 per cent rate in the first three months of the year, but the headline figure masked underlying indications that activity was weakening. Last week Trump, ahead of a self-imposed deadline of Aug. 1, issued a barrage of notices informing scores of trading partners of higher import taxes set to be imposed on their goods exports to the U.S. With tariff rates ranging from 10 to 41 per cent on imports to the U.S. set to kick in on Aug. 7, the Budget Lab at Yale now estimates the average overall U.S. tariff rate has shot up to 18.3 per cent, the highest since 1934, from between two and three per cent before Trump returned to the White House in January. (Reporting by Dan Burns; Editing by Andrea Ricci)
