New expedition will seek to locate Amelia Earhart's lost plane in the Pacific Ocean
The effort, announced Wednesday by the Purdue Research Foundation and Archaeological Legacy Institute, will focus on a "visual anomaly" in satellite and other imagery in a lagoon at Nikumaroro, an island located between Hawaii and Australia. Nikumaroro was previously known as Gardner Island.
A team will travel in November to inspect what is dubbed the Taraia Object to find out if it is Earhart's aircraft.
"What we have here is maybe the greatest opportunity ever to finally close the case," Richard Pettigrew, the institute's executive director, said in a news release. "With such a great amount of very strong evidence, we feel we have no choice but to move forward and hopefully return with proof."
Amelia Earhart at a refueling stop in Khartoum, Sudan, with the Lockheed Electra 10E in which she was attempting a circumnavigational flight of the world, June 13, 1937. On a subsequent stage of the journey, Earhart and Noonan disappeared over the central Pacific Ocean near Howland Island and were later presumed dead.
Getty Images
Earhart and navigator Fred Noonan disappeared over the central Pacific 88 years ago on July 2. Flying a Lockheed 10-E Electra, Earhart was trying to become the first female aviator to circle the world when they vanished.
Various theories have since emerged about their fate. One of them suggests Earhart landed instead of crashed, and was marooned on an island where she died. As the Purdue Research Foundation and Archaeological Legacy Institute note, this idea is called the Nikumaroro hypothesis. The International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery, a nonprofit organization based in Pennsylvania, has collected evidence it says supports the theory.
A field team plans to travel from the Marshall Islands on Nov. 5 and spend five days inspecting the Taraia Object, the foundation and Archaeological Legacy Institute said in its news release. If the effort confirms the plane's identity, excavations will take place next year to try to return what remains of the aircraft.
Earhart worked for Purdue University, and the Purdue Research Foundation helped fund her attempted flight around the world, the news release said.
"Both Earhart and her husband and manager, George Putnam, expressed their intention to return the Electra to Purdue after her historic flight," Steven Schultz, senior vice president and general counsel of Purdue University, said. "Based on the evidence, we agree with ALI that this expedition offers the best chance not only to solve perhaps the greatest mystery of the 20th century, but also to fulfill Amelia's wishes and bring the Electra home."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Researchers develop new technology to destroy hazardous substances in drinking water: 'Will fundamentally alter our approach'
While being able to drink clean water is as easy as turning on the faucet for some, many others struggle with the challenges of contaminated water and poor water quality. However, a team of researchers out of Purdue University has announced a development in water technology that it believes can bridge that gap. According to a news release from the Purdue Research Foundation, professors and students from multiple campuses as well as industry insiders helped create "an energy efficient, ambient temperature solution" that tackles contamination in both residential and industrial applications. As noted by the researchers, testing indicated that the technology effectively destroyed a number of hazardous chemicals. These chemicals ranged from fuel additives to pharmaceuticals. The team sent samples to two third-party testing laboratories in California that confirmed the removal of "forever chemicals," or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances. In 2019, the World Health Organization released a report estimating that more than 2 billion people around the world lack access to safely managed clean drinking water. "Mere access is not enough. If the water isn't clean, isn't safe to drink, or is far away, and if toilet access is unsafe or limited, then we're not delivering for the world's children," said Kelly Ann Naylor, associate director of water, sanitation, and hygiene at UNICEF. Following the success of the water purification technology, Rene Ramirez, founder of Fino Advisors, chose to fund the early-stage development in partnership with the university. This has led to the creation of Frellmann Water Technologies to further develop the technology. According to PitchBook, the company is already in the "generating revenue" stage. Fred Berry, professor at the Purdue Polytechnic Institute's School of Engineering Technology, applauded the success of the development and its potential. "This initiative will fundamentally alter our approach to water treatment, showcasing the powerful outcomes that arise when diverse talents unite," Berry said. The technology will be utilized in multiple Central California locations before potentially becoming available nationwide at a later date. How often do you worry about the quality of your drinking water? Never Sometimes Often Always Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
How do airplane toilets work?
Even in an age where flying is a fairly regular occurrence, there are some things that you never forget about your first journey on an visceral thrill of being pushed back into your seat as the plane accelerates toward take-off, the jitters that accompany your first bout of turbulence, and the SLUUUUURP sound in the lavatory. The alarming noise ensues when you press the 'flush' button in an airplane toilet and the bowl's contents are magically sucked away into oblivion. With the noise and essentially 'clean' bowl as a result, there's clearly some sort of vacuum cleaner-type effect at how do aircraft toilets work? Aerospace engineer Bill Crossley, the head of the School of Aeronautics and Astronautics at Purdue University in Indiana, explains to Popular Science that the answer is as simple as it is ingenious. The system relies on one simple fact. 'When you go up to high altitude and you're flying fast, the pressure outside the cabin is a lot lower than it is inside,' he says. The laws of physics—and specifically the ideal gas law—dictate that the contents of a region with relatively high pressure will tend to flow into a region with relatively low pressure. Flushing the toilet on an airplane opens a valve between the pressurised cabin and a tank that remains at atmospheric pressure. That process creates exactly this sort of pressure differential. In other words, 'when you flush the toilet, you're basically opening a valve to the outside, and the pressure differential sucks away whatever's in the bowl,' Crossley says. The beauty of the system is that it doesn't require vacuum pumps or other complications to create the pressure differential. It simply makes use of the existing difference in pressure between the aircraft's interior and exterior at altitude. Of course, this requires that there is a pressure difference. On the ground, Crossley says, the system uses a vacuum pump. The pump remains in use until the plane reaches an altitude where the atmospheric pressure allows the system to work without it, at which point it is switched off. The idea itself is simple and has remained largely unchanged since it was first patented in 1975. However, retired aircraft engineer Nigel Jones explains that the complexity of the implementation still varies from aircraft to aircraft. Some planes' systems evacuate every toilet to a single tank, while others use multiple smaller tanks. Some use complex piping arrangements, while others opt for simpler configurations. [ Related: How does a composting toilet work? Ditch the flush.] Then there's the Lockheed TriStar, an airliner built between 1968 and 1984 that remains Jones' favorite to this day. The TriStar's toilets were famously arranged in a circle, and they were as idiosyncratic behind the scenes as they were to passengers. '[The TriStar] had a logic system to manage flushing,' he says fondly. 'It had a tank at the front for the forward toilets and another for the five or six toilets at the back. The system had three, I think it was three toilet pumps, and it would flush pumps in turn that the logic box would if say toilet five wanted to flush, the logic box would say, 'Right, it's pump one's turn.' It was incredibly complicated, and all just to flush the toilet.' Some might argue that this system sounds perhaps a little over-engineered. 'We did feel that way every time there was a problem and looking at the pump didn't fix it,' Jones concedes. 'If we had to go in and look at the logic box, we'd have to lie on top of the tank. This was… well, it was not pleasant.' While such complexity may be overkill–and is rarely found in modern airliners–Jones notes that some degree of twisting and turning in the system's piping is important for one simple reason: it slows down the waste. 'It's not a straight run [from toilet to tank], and it can't be,' Jones says. 'The vacuum pressure means that the drawing speed is such that if there were no bends in the pipes, the waste would hit the wall of the tank with considerable force.' How considerable? According to Jones, it would be 'enough that you could potentially break the tank.' Even without such a catastrophic outcome, he notes dryly, 'the noise would be most alarming.' Prior to the advent of the vacuum-based flush, planes used chemical systems similar to those that remain in use today in portable toilets, where the bowl connects directly to a tank full of the dreaded blue liquid. This also explains the origin of the term 'blue ice', which refers to waste that somehow escapes the tank—at high altitude, any such waste freezes immediately, and remains frozen until it returns to the ground, at which point it reveals its true nature to anyone unfortunate enough to cross its path. Such systems are vanishingly rare today, remaining in use only on aircraft large enough for aviation regulations to require the presence of a toilet, but small enough that a vacuum system is more trouble than it's worth. Crossley says that the only planes to fall into this category are small business aircraft, which are sometimes equipped with what he describes as a 'fancy port-a-potty.' On larger planes, he says, the vacuum system really is the only game in town. 'It's everything you want an airplane system to be: first, it's safe; second, it's reliable; and third, it's lightweight.' This story is part of Popular Science's Ask Us Anything series, where we answer your most outlandish, mind-burning questions, from the ordinary to the off-the-wall. Have something you've always wanted to know? Ask us.
USA Today
03-07-2025
- USA Today
Could Amelia Earhart's plane be in this lagoon? New expedition plans to find out
After nearly a century, the disappearance of Amelia Earhart while she was attempting to fly around the world remains one of the greatest unsolved mysteries of the 20th century. For decades, many top-dollar expeditions have attempted to locate Earhart's Lockheed Electra 10E airplane to no avail despite great advancements in technology. But a new expedition may just be what one official described as the "greatest opportunity ever" to finally bookend the enduring mystery. On Wednesday, the Purdue Research Foundation and the Archaeological Legacy Institute announced a joint-effort to locate Earhart's plane in a lagoon off a Pacific island between Australia and Hawaii, where a popular theory suggests Earhart and her navigator, Fred Noonan, may have landed on May 20, 1937. A field team of researchers on Nov. 5 will journey by sea to the island Nikumaroro, part of the Phoenix Islands in the western Pacific Ocean, to determine whether a visual anomaly known as the "Taraia Object," seen in satellite and other imagery in the island's lagoon, is what remains of Earhart's plane. The effort is the latest to try and confirm whether an object captured in satellite or sonar imaging is the missing plane. Last year, an ocean exploration company conducted a deep-sea search within 100 miles of Howland Island, where Earhart and Noonan were last expected to land, after spotting what they believed to be the wreckage of the Electra 10E. It turned out to be a rock formation. But the search team conducting the upcoming expedition on Nikumaroro say they're optimistic, citing a "vast amount of circumstantial evidence" indicating the "Taraia Object" may just be the long lost aircraft. "With such a great amount of very strong evidence, we feel we have no choice but to move forward and hopefully return with proof," said Richard Pettigrew, Archaeological Legacy Institute's executive director, in a statement. "I look forward to collaborating with Purdue Research Foundation in writing the final chapter in Amelia Earhart's remarkable life story.' Evidence suggests Earhart landed on Nikumaroro, researchers say The organizers of the expedition have pointed to the long-running theory that Earhart and Noonan did not crash into the ocean but instead landed on the uninhabited of Nikumaroro and later perished there. Evidence of this theory includes radio bearings that converge on Nikumaroro, an analysis of human bones discovered on the island that are similar to Earhart's bone-lengths, and a number of artifacts including a woman's shoe, a compact case and a medicine vial that have also been discovered there, according to the Purdue Research Foundation. Additionally, a photographic anomaly captured three months after the plane vanished in 1937 appears to show a landing gear on the Nikumaroro reef. More recently in 2020, researchers managed to again spot the "Taraia Object," which has been in the same place on the island's lagoon since 1938. For nearly a century, Earhart's disappearance has been subject to a wide variety of theories, the most widely accepted explanation being that Earhart and Noonan ran out of fuel and crashed in the ocean. Some of the more implausible and disputed theories posit that the flight was part of a secret spy mission, that Earhart assumed another identity or that Earhart and Noonan were captured by a foreign government. The International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery, a nonprofit organization based in Pennsylvania, is responsible for collecting much of the evidence supporting the Nikumaroro hypothesis. The upcoming expedition will depart from Majuro in the Marshall Islands on Nov. 5 and spend five days on Nikumaroro inspecting the "Taraia Object," according to the Purdue Research Foundation. If the initial expedition proves successful, the field team plans to return in 2026 to uncover and help return what remains of Earhart's plane, the foundation said. Who was Amelia Earhart? Earhart was born in Atchison, Kansas, on July 24, 1897. She rode in an airplane for the first time in 1920 and soon began taking flying lessons. Within a year, she obtained a pilot's license and went on to set a women's altitude record, reaching the height of 14,000 feet in October 1922. A decade later, she became the first woman to fly solo across the Atlantic Ocean, journeying from Newfoundland to Northern Ireland. She then ventured on a solo flight across the United States. It was in 1936 that she began planning her most ambitious journey yet – a flight around the world. According to the Purdue Research Foundation, Earhart, who was a visiting adviser and counselor at the university, had prepared for the historic trip with the help of Purdue's then-president Edward Elliott. The university's research foundation also helped fund the Lockheed Electra 10E plane that was specifically outfitted for Earhart's global trip. Earhart had intended to give the plane to Purdue after her historic flight so it could be used to further scientific research in aeronautics, the foundation said. Amelia Earhart's final flight Earhart and Noonan departed from Oakland, California, on May 20, 1937. According to the International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery, they made 29 additional stops, including their last known refuel stop in Lae, Papua New Guinea, on July 2 at 10 a.m. Nearing the end of their historic trip, Earhart and Noonan were due on Howland Island – about 2,500 miles away from Lae and set between Australia and Hawaii – where U.S. Coast Guard cutter Itasca was waiting with fuel. Itasca received intermittent voice messages from Earhart as her signal increased. But neither Earhart nor Noonan knew Morse code, so there was no two-way contact, according to the Smithsonian Institute's analysis of government records. After losing contact, the Navy and Coast Guard searched about 250,000 square miles of ocean in search of Earhart and Noonan. On Jan. 5, 1939, they were declared legally dead. Now, with the joint expedition on the horizon, university leaders and researchers are hopeful they'll be able to definitively answer the question, "What happened to Amelia Earhart?" 'Based on the evidence, we agree with (Archaeological Legacy Institute) that this expedition offers the best chance not only to solve perhaps the greatest mystery of the 20th century, but also to fulfill Amelia's wishes and bring the Electra home," said Steven Schultz, senior vice president and general counsel of Purdue University. Contributing: Jillian Ellison, Lafayette Journal & Courier; Clare Mulroy and Samantha Shafiq, USA TODAY
