logo
Carbondale to consider referendum for home rule charter update

Carbondale to consider referendum for home rule charter update

Yahooa day ago

Carbondale residents could have the opportunity to vote in November on a referendum modernizing personnel policies in the city's home rule charter.
Carbondale City Council will consider adopting an ordinance during its June 16 meeting to add a referendum question to the Nov. 4 ballot addressing the personnel section of the city's home rule charter, according to Mayor Michele Bannon and a public notice published Friday in The Times-Tribune. If approved, the referendum will ask city voters whether to amend Article IX of Carbondale's home rule charter concerning its municipal personnel system, according to the notice. The charter is the city's governing document.
The potential referendum comes as city officials are working to update their legislation, namely Carbondale's 1974 home rule charter, Bannon said.
'Government always needs to be transparent,' Bannon said. 'We always need to be responsive, and we need to be aligned with the evolving needs of our community.'
Enacted in 1972, Pennsylvania's Home Rule Law increased local autonomy, according to the state Department of Community and Economic Development. Home rule charters transfer the basic authority to act in municipal affairs from state law to a local charter that is adopted and amended by voters, according to the DCED.
The goal in Carbondale is to modernize its charter, clarify outdated language and 'ultimately enhance our operational efficiency within municipal government,' Bannon said.
Elements of Carbondale's home rule charter don't reconcile with each other, Bannon said, which prompted her to speak with city council, their solicitor and members of the public.
'It's obviously clear that we need to make some changes in the charter, so we figured we'd start with personnel, simply because that's the heart and soul of who we are,' she said. 'The city of Carbondale provides service to our residents, so we want to make sure everything is lined up there and … that our staff gives our residents the best service they possibly can.'
Councilman Dominick Famularo, who introduced the ordinance, echoed Bannon.
'The language of our charter is 50 years old, and there are many spots throughout the charter where either the understanding of the passage has changed or the language seemed inappropriate,' Famularo said.
Carbondale last amended its home rule charter in 2004 when residents approved a referendum allowing the mayor to fill the position of managing director if he or she met the qualifications.
Amending the home rule charter has to be done by referendum, Bannon said.
According to the draft ordinance, there would be amendments to three items under the personnel section.
First, appointments and promotions of subordinate officers and employees within departments shall be made by the mayor/managing director, not the department head. That conflicts with other parts of the charter, and the mayor/managing director already handles appointments and promotions, Bannon said.
Second, any employee who files a petition for election of office would have to obtain a positive opinion from the State Ethics Commission and any other relevant agency.
Currently, the charter stipulates that no city employee shall serve as an officer of a political party; any city employee who files a petition for election to a partisan political office and does not withdraw shall be required to take a leave of absence for the duration of the campaign. If not elected, the employee shall promptly be restored to the previously held position without losing any rights, according to the current charter language.
While campaigning for mayor in 2023, Bannon had to take a leave of absence from her longtime position as city clerk. That became an issue for the city, Famularo said.
'She had to leave her position for several months during the campaign, and of course what happens then is we have a gap in leadership in the city,' he said. 'I really don't think that was anyone's intention when they wrote the charter.'
Third, the amendment would remove 'cumbersome language' regarding civil service, Bannon said. According to the proposal, the home rule charter would only say, 'All full-time police and fire employees of the city shall be covered by civil service,' deleting a line saying, 'with the exception of the managing director, the city solicitor, department heads and the city clerk.'
City council will meet June 16 at 6:30 p.m. at City Hall, 1 N. Main St.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk rages against Steve Bannon after call for drug investigation
Elon Musk rages against Steve Bannon after call for drug investigation

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk rages against Steve Bannon after call for drug investigation

Elon Musk's feud with Steve Bannon intensified Tuesday after Bannon suggested President Donald Trump rethink government contracts with Musk's company and appoint a special counsel to investigate the mercurial billionaire's alleged drug use. 'Bannon is such a r——d liar,' Musk raged on his social media platform in the very early morning hours, using a slur for people with intellectual disabilities. 'Dumber than a doorstop.' Musk was replying to comments Bannon made on the debut episode of the 'Sunday Night With Chuck Todd' streaming series. The clip that appeared to get under his skin showed Bannon suggesting Musk has government contracts to thank for adding as much as $150 billion to his net worth and suggested, therefore, U.S. taxpayers should own a share of his SpaceX company. Musk's rant took issue with Bannon's math, but moreso his reasoning. 'If Bannon's dumb as f–k reasoning made any sense, then anyone who bought products from any company would automatically own that company,' he posted before again insulting Bannon's mental capacity. According to Bannon, if any other CEO threatened to decommission one of the rockets his company uses in its work with the government after a personal spat with a U.S. president — as Musk did last week — that executive would be fired. Bannon also told Todd that President Trump should further look into a recent bombshell New York Times story hinting Musk's alleged drug use could be problematic, which Musk flatly denied. 'I think the best way to do it is as a special counsel that can kind of oversee everything,' Bannon said. 'Pull his security clearance for the drugs, temporarily, investigate the whole drug situation.' The Times reported May 30 that Musk was 'using drugs far more intensely than previously known' while campaigning for Trump. His substance use reportedly included ketamine, ecstasy, psychedelic mushrooms and pills that appeared to be the ADHD stimulant Adderall. Bannon, who served in Trump's first administration, has a history of butting heads with Musk, who headed the Department of Government Efficiency in Trump's second administration. Tensions escalated last week when Musk posted a message online suggesting Justice Department records show that Trump's friendship with disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein would present problems for the president. Musk later deleted that post. __________

Steve Bannon says Trump should launch an investigation into Musk for alleged drug use
Steve Bannon says Trump should launch an investigation into Musk for alleged drug use

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Steve Bannon says Trump should launch an investigation into Musk for alleged drug use

Former White House advisor Steve Bannon is urging President Donald Trump's administration to launch a special counsel investigation into Elon Musk – including looking at his alleged drug use. 'I think the best way to do it is as a special counsel that can kind of oversee everything. Pull the security clearance for the drugs, temporarily, investigate the whole drug situation,' Bannon told former Meet The Press host Chuck Todd on his new streaming show, 'Sunday Night With Chuck Todd.' Bannon, referencing a New York Times report that detailed the billionaire CEO's alleged drug use leading up to the 2024 election. Musk allegedly was using ecstasy, psychedelic mushrooms, Adderall and so much ketamine that it caused him bladder issues. He denied the report when asked about it during his final day as a 'special government employee' under Trump. Todd noted that Musk, 'never would have passed a security clearance as just a mid-level staffer,' to which Bannon agreed, saying, 'Zero.' 'Given what the drug use that was on the record,' Todd added. Bannon and Todd went on to discuss Musk's alleged altercation with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in the White House, which Bannon told the Washington Post before the story made international headlines. During the conversation, Bannon claimed that Musk was rumored to be 'micro-dosing' before the fight, according to Mediaite. The apparent fight included Bessent repeatedly shouting 'F*** you!' at Musk within earshot of Trump in the Oval Office. Bannon, a longtime critic of Musk, argued before the fiery fallout between Trump and Musk last week that the billionaire tech mogul does not have the president's best interests in mind. The friendship between two of the world's most powerful men came to a crashing halt last week as Musk disagreed with Trump about his spending bill and the two shared a very public Internet feud. Meanwhile, Trump claimed Elon was 'wearing thin' and he asked him to leave. Musk, for his part, brought bombshell claims to X that Trump is in the 'Epstein files.'

The revolution will be monetized: How Steve Bannon conned the working class
The revolution will be monetized: How Steve Bannon conned the working class

The Hill

time5 hours ago

  • The Hill

The revolution will be monetized: How Steve Bannon conned the working class

Steve Bannon wants you to believe he's a war general for the forgotten man — a blue-collar prophet in cargo pants, ready to torch the global elites on behalf of truckers and farmers. But strip away the flannel and fury, and what you find isn't a populist — it's a financier, a Hollywood operator, and a man worth $20 million LARPing as a coal-dusted crusader for the common man. This is the hustle: Bannon talks like a patriot but lives like a prince. He rails against the globalists while building his own global network. He warns you about the machine even as he becomes a vital gear in it. Let's rewind. Before Breitbart, before the 'War Room' podcast, before the MAGA movement and talk of 'deconstructing the administrative state,' Steve Bannon was something far less revolutionary: a banker. And not just any banker — he was a high-powered executive at Goldman Sachs, the very temple of global finance he now pretends to rage against. He didn't walk picket lines. He walked into boardrooms, advised mergers and helped move capital around like puzzle pieces in the portfolios of the powerful. He got in on the deals most Americans would never even hear about, let alone benefit from. One of those deals? 'Seinfeld.' After leaving Goldman, he began his own firm and worked with Westinghouse to successfully acquire a minority stake in Castle Rock Entertainment, the producer of 'Seinfeld.' As part of that deal, Bannon accepted a stake in the royalties of the show. Translation: every time you laughed at Kramer's entrance, Bannon got richer. While working-class Americans were juggling bills and wondering if they could afford another tank of gas, Bannon was cashing passive income from a sitcom about nothing. And when that well started to run dry, he pivoted to image. He went Hollywood. And he did not go as a writer or director, but as a producer — the shadowy figure behind the scenes, raising money, shaping narratives and angling for influence. He produced a slate of forgettable documentaries with big ambitions and little reach, hoping to strike gold or at least strike a nerve. He sniffed around the Vanity Fair circuit, elbowed his way through the fringes of Los Angeles power-lunch culture, and tried to matter in rooms where creative types mingled with capital. But it didn't stick. He was too blunt, too ideological, too out of place. So he rebranded. When the red carpets didn't welcome him, he found an alternative stage. He embraced Carhartt cosplay, grew out the hair, and declared himself a champion of 'the people.' But make no mistake — he never stopped living like royalty. His personal life was padded by old Goldman money. The bank account never left Bel Air. The Rolex never came off. He wasn't just out of touch with the working class — he was orbiting them from space, occasionally parachuting down to give a speech about sovereignty and struggle, then retreating back to his fortified compound of fine scotch. Deceit and duplicity aren't bugs in Bannon's matrix; they're part of the operating system. Take the infamous 'Build the Wall' scheme, for example. Bannon raised millions of dollars from ordinary Americans, promising every penny would go to the wall Trump couldn't finish. And what happened? The money vanished into private pockets. Luxury expenses. Personal salaries. Bannon was arrested on a Chinese billionaire's yacht, lounging in luxury while federal agents boarded. He was spared only by a last-minute Trump pardon, yet somehow that only added to his legend. Then came the 'supergroup' pitch: a global nationalist alliance, conferences in Hungary, meetings in Rome, and whispered influence over several European populists. Bannon wasn't interested in saving Main Street. He was franchising the culture war, exporting MAGA aesthetics to every corner of the globe — not because he believed in the cause — but because there's always a market for outrage. This is not the story of a man who joined the people. It's the story of a man who studied them, branded them and built a media empire on their backs. He frames everything as a spiritual battle — America versus the elites. But Bannon is the elite. He just speaks rage fluently. So here's the question: if a man tells you he's at war with the empire while still cashing royalty checks from it, do you believe him? Or do you finally see it for what it is? Bannon is not a warrior for the working man. He's a salesman in battle gear, with a podcast mic and a passport full of donor meetings. He doesn't live among the people — he studies them, scripts their anger, then sells it back to them. He's rebranded himself so many times — naval officer, investment banker, Hollywood producer, political strategist — you'd think he was running a hedge fund in identity. And in a way, he is each persona, carefully tailored to meet the moment, each pivot engineered for maximum leverage. The flannel, the Catholic mysticism, the bunker aesthetic — it's all part of the shameless act. Underneath is a Machiavellian tactician who understands power not as something to dismantle, but to inhabit. Part P.T. Barnum, part Pat Buchanan, this is a man who preaches humility while flying private. Steve Bannon isn't leading a rebellion. He is selling one. John Mac Ghlionn is a writer and researcher who explores culture, society and the impact of technology on daily life.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store