France leaves another military base in Africa
The Port-Bouet military camp, near the capital, Abidjan, had previously hosted the 43rd French Marine Infantry Battalion (43e BIMa). On Thursday, it was returned to the Ivorian Army at a ceremony attended by French Armed Forces Minister Sebastien Lecornu and his Ivorian counterpart, Tene Birahima Ouattara.
The French mission in the African country announced the move in a post on X, calling it a 'historic moment for Franco-Ivorian cooperation.'
'It is a very strong symbolic sequence with the retrocession of this camp to the Ivorian armies. This is being done in exemplary conditions, in full coherence and in full maturity of our relationship,' AFP also quoted Colonel Damien Mireval, the French defense attaché in Abidjan, as saying.
The camp will reportedly be renamed after Thomas Aquinas Ouattara, the first chief of staff of the Ivorian Army.
President Ouattara first announced the withdrawal of approximately 600 French soldiers from his country during his year-end address in December, claiming that the decision is intended to modernize the national armed forces.
Ivorian Defense Minister Birahima Ouattara told French broadcaster RFI in an interview published on Tuesday that the 'military cooperation continues with France,' focused on intelligence and training support from the French government.
The transfer of the military installation to Ivory Coast comes just days after Paris agreed to the complete hand-over of its bases in Senegal to the national army by the end of 2025. Senegal's leader stated in November that he intends to completely remove the former colonial power's military presence.
Late last month, the French Army handed over its remaining base in Chad, which had been France's last foothold in the troubled Sahel region after Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger cut ties with Paris over alleged failure to combat jihadist insurgents. In November, the Chadian government ended military cooperation with its former colonial ruler, declaring the pact redundant.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
a day ago
- Russia Today
Patrice Lumumba is symbol of freedom for all Africa
Patrice Lumumba remains more than a national hero of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DR Congo); his name has come to embody the very essence of African freedom, his daughter, Juliana Lumumba, has said. Speaking to RT, she explained that Lumumba's ideals resonate far beyond the country's borders, uniting a continent in its quest for dignity, sovereignty, and true independence. Juliana Lumumba, the former DR Congo minister of culture, described her father as a 'truly iconic figure' of African dignity, a man who 'symbolizes... liberation, the Africa that he wanted to see independent, standing on its own feet, united.' 'He was not alone. Lumumba is part of a whole galaxy of our founding fathers of independence,' she added. She went on to say that her father's struggle for justice and independence gained global recognition, especially in the former Soviet Union. She pointed to the naming of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia after her father as 'geopolitical continuity' from a country that viewed Lumumba as 'the embodiment of freedom against colonialism and neocolonialism.' Today, she said, Russia has carried this torch forward. The university still bears his name, and continues to produce thousands of African professionals, including many Congolese. Juliana expressed deep gratitude to the Russian people and government for their steadfast recognition of her father's legacy, noting that Russia was among the first to honor Lumumba on his 100th birthday, through a tribute by the country's ambassador to the DR Congo. 'This solidarity, balanced, strong, real, must continue to move even further forward,' she said. Patrice Lumumba was born in 1925 and died in 1961. He was an independence leader and first democratically elected prime minister of the DR Congo following its liberation from Belgian colonial rule in 1960.
Russia Today
5 days ago
- Russia Today
Will the French regime go Soviet?
This may seem trivial but in June 2025 a ridiculous bill has been conceived by the right/center-right Les Republicains party. A bill that sums up just about everything that's wrong with France's system, not just its political system, but even its core cerebral system: prohibiting and punishing content and speech of an 'anti-republican' nature. Many critics of French political circles have – rightly – pointed out this incredible ability of politicians to use the argument of the 'values of the Republic' whenever it suits them without ever explaining what these values are. However, the MPs who came up with this bill made a (minimal) effort in attempting to outline what it entails. Thus, it reads: 'The French Republic is based on fundamental principles: liberty, equality, fraternity, secularism, sovereignty of the people, and the indivisibility of the nation. These values, guaranteed by the Constitution and consolidated by law, constitute the foundation of 'vivre-ensemble' [something purely French that can be understood as 'social harmony'].' What would happen to someone who violates these principles? Oh, nothing, just being sentenced to three years of imprisonment and a fine of €45,000 ($52,000). Beyond the purely vote-catching aspect of such a bill emanating from a right-wing party seeking to appeal to its public worried about the spread of Islam in France, there is something profoundly dystopian about it. All the listed 'fundamental principles' are so vague that anything can be considered a violation of them. France, which has specialized in devising abstruse theories since the end of the 18th century, is based on the absurd triptych 'liberty, equality, fraternity.' However, any sane person understands that this triangle cannot work. 'Liberty' and 'equality' are by definition antagonistic and 'fraternity' is mainly some leftover of a distant Christian morality. The sacrosanct secularism must apply to everyone – except to the Jewish community, something that tends to frustrate the Muslim community and leaves French citizens, who are predominantly atheist but psychologically remain, as the great demographer Emmanuel Todd coined, in a kind of 'zombie Catholicism,' wary. When it comes to the 'sovereignty of the people,' most people understand that it is a joke since politicians wiped their feet on the people's 'no' during the referendum on the European Constitution in 2005. As for the 'indivisibility of the nation,' an umpteenth abstract concept that implies territorial unity, unity of the people, and unity of law, it would be necessary to explain it to the police and firefighters who can no longer go to some territories of the 'Republic' as France is on the verge of becoming a narco-state. But of course, in this maelstrom of abstract stuff, the end of the quote that is the highlight of the show: 'These values [...] constitute the foundation of vivre-ensemble.' Not long ago, during the June heat wave, a water park had to close permanently because it was invaded and trashed by 'young people' the very first day after it opened. With the riots of summer 2023 (never described as 'racial' by the French press though they use the term when it comes to the US) and the chaos following PSG's Champions League victory in 2025, along with the daily attacks and violence, the French people seem to be struggling to integrate the concept of 'vivre-ensemble.' Someone said that the British had problems with ideas but not with facts, whereas for the French it's the opposite. This is absolutely true. The French, especially their elites, live in a completely abstract mental space, which, unfortunately, has tended to colonize the West, particularly through the philosophical movement Les Lumieres and, 200 years later, through the 'French Theory' that eventually lead to the disastrous woke culture. What the right-wing party behind this bill doesn't seem to realize is that with such vague criteria, France could find itself in the kind of judicial system that communist regimes experienced, where any statement could be interpreted to prove that it wasn't 'Marxist-Leninist.' As the joke goes, in the Soviet Union, it was possible to say anything... in your own kitchen. Well, in France, with such a bill, you'll have to choose your words carefully while enjoying your beef bourguignon. The ignorant politicians behind this text should read Arthur Koestler's 'Darkness at Noon': the main character, a Soviet political commissar who has sent many to the Gulag, finds himself purged by the system he contributed to. With an honest judge, it would be easy to charge them with, for example, having violated the principles of 'equality' and 'fraternity' by increasing their salaries at the National Assembly while asking the French people to make an effort because there is no money anymore. Of course, given that the country's prisons are already overcrowded and the state ruined, these MPs obviously have in mind to resort to the ultimate repressive instrument of liberal democracies: hitting the wallet. €45,000 for 'anti-republican' remarks made in public. But the fine will, according to them, be increased to €75,000 if the remarks are made 'in a meeting,' on a social network, or by an individual holding a position of public authority or office. €75,000 for tweeting that there is a problem with uncontrolled immigration? Is calling a bust of Marianne (a symbol of the Republic) ugly considered a crime? Does Brigitte Macron's gender enter into the equation of republican values? But beyond the excesses and abuses such a law could lead to, the Republicans' approach reflects something much more important: the political regime is becoming increasingly oppressive because it is at the end of its tether. Mass immigration has induced such chaos that it is no longer 'manageable,' the working classes are struggling to keep a delusional social system afloat, and more than 50% of voters are now over 50 years old. The country's vital forces no longer have any confidence in their institutions, so they must be constrained. If this law is adopted, the Republic will take care of it, as Macron would say, 'whatever the cost.'
Russia Today
5 days ago
- Russia Today
Liberté, égalité, KGB: Will France ban criticism of the Republic?
This may seem trivial but in June 2025 a ridiculous bill has been conceived by the right/center-right Les Republicains party. A bill that sums up just about everything that's wrong with France's system, not just its political system, but even its core cerebral system: prohibiting and punishing content and speech of an 'anti-republican' nature. Many critics of French political circles have – rightly – pointed out this incredible ability of politicians to use the argument of the 'values of the Republic' whenever it suits them without ever explaining what these values are. However, the MPs who came up with this bill made a (minimal) effort in attempting to outline what it entails. Thus, it reads: 'The French Republic is based on fundamental principles: liberty, equality, fraternity, secularism, sovereignty of the people, and the indivisibility of the nation. These values, guaranteed by the Constitution and consolidated by law, constitute the foundation of 'vivre-ensemble' [something purely French that can be understood as 'social harmony'].' What would happen to someone who violates these principles? Oh, nothing, just being sentenced to three years of imprisonment and a fine of €45,000 ($52,000). Beyond the purely vote-catching aspect of such a bill emanating from a right-wing party seeking to appeal to its public worried about the spread of Islam in France, there is something profoundly dystopian about it. All the listed 'fundamental principles' are so vague that anything can be considered a violation of them. France, which has specialized in devising abstruse theories since the end of the 18th century, is based on the absurd triptych 'liberty, equality, fraternity.' However, any sane person understands that this triangle cannot work. 'Liberty' and 'equality' are by definition antagonistic and 'fraternity' is mainly some leftover of a distant Christian morality. The sacrosanct secularism must apply to everyone – except to the Jewish community, something that tends to frustrate the Muslim community and leaves French citizens, who are predominantly atheist but psychologically remain, as the great demographer Emmanuel Todd coined, in a kind of 'zombie Catholicism,' wary. When it comes to the 'sovereignty of the people,' most people understand that it is a joke since politicians wiped their feet on the people's 'no' during the referendum on the European Constitution in 2005. As for the 'indivisibility of the nation,' an umpteenth abstract concept that implies territorial unity, unity of the people, and unity of law, it would be necessary to explain it to the police and firefighters who can no longer go to some territories of the 'Republic' as France is on the verge of becoming a narco-state. But of course, in this maelstrom of abstract stuff, the end of the quote that is the highlight of the show: 'These values [...] constitute the foundation of vivre-ensemble.' Not long ago, during the June heat wave, a water park had to close permanently because it was invaded and trashed by 'young people' the very first day after it opened. With the riots of summer 2023 (never described as 'racial' by the French press though they use the term when it comes to the US) and the chaos following PSG's Champions League victory in 2025, along with the daily attacks and violence, the French people seem to be struggling to integrate the concept of 'vivre-ensemble.' Someone said that the British had problems with ideas but not with facts, whereas for the French it's the opposite. This is absolutely true. The French, especially their elites, live in a completely abstract mental space, which, unfortunately, has tended to colonize the West, particularly through the philosophical movement Les Lumieres and, 200 years later, through the 'French Theory' that eventually lead to the disastrous woke culture. What the right-wing party behind this bill doesn't seem to realize is that with such vague criteria, France could find itself in the kind of judicial system that communist regimes experienced, where any statement could be interpreted to prove that it wasn't 'Marxist-Leninist.' As the joke goes, in the Soviet Union, it was possible to say anything... in your own kitchen. Well, in France, with such a bill, you'll have to choose your words carefully while enjoying your beef bourguignon. The ignorant politicians behind this text should read Arthur Koestler's 'Darkness at Noon': the main character, a Soviet political commissar who has sent many to the Gulag, finds himself purged by the system he contributed to. With an honest judge, it would be easy to charge them with, for example, having violated the principles of 'equality' and 'fraternity' by increasing their salaries at the National Assembly while asking the French people to make an effort because there is no money anymore. Of course, given that the country's prisons are already overcrowded and the state ruined, these MPs obviously have in mind to resort to the ultimate repressive instrument of liberal democracies: hitting the wallet. €45,000 for 'anti-republican' remarks made in public. But the fine will, according to them, be increased to €75,000 if the remarks are made 'in a meeting,' on a social network, or by an individual holding a position of public authority or office. €75,000 for tweeting that there is a problem with uncontrolled immigration? Is calling a bust of Marianne (a symbol of the Republic) ugly considered a crime? Does Brigitte Macron's gender enter into the equation of republican values? But beyond the excesses and abuses such a law could lead to, the Republicans' approach reflects something much more important: the political regime is becoming increasingly oppressive because it is at the end of its tether. Mass immigration has induced such chaos that it is no longer 'manageable,' the working classes are struggling to keep a delusional social system afloat, and more than 50% of voters are now over 50 years old. The country's vital forces no longer have any confidence in their institutions, so they must be constrained. If this law is adopted, the Republic will take care of it, as Macron would say, 'whatever the cost.'
