logo
We Believe Nam Cheong's (SGX:1MZ) Earnings Are A Poor Guide For Its Profitability

We Believe Nam Cheong's (SGX:1MZ) Earnings Are A Poor Guide For Its Profitability

Yahoo14-04-2025

Even though Nam Cheong Limited (SGX:1MZ) posted strong earnings recently, the stock hasn't reacted in a large way. We decided to have a deeper look, and we believe that investors might be worried about several concerning factors that we found.
AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early.
Many investors haven't heard of the accrual ratio from cashflow, but it is actually a useful measure of how well a company's profit is backed up by free cash flow (FCF) during a given period. In plain english, this ratio subtracts FCF from net profit, and divides that number by the company's average operating assets over that period. This ratio tells us how much of a company's profit is not backed by free cashflow.
That means a negative accrual ratio is a good thing, because it shows that the company is bringing in more free cash flow than its profit would suggest. While having an accrual ratio above zero is of little concern, we do think it's worth noting when a company has a relatively high accrual ratio. To quote a 2014 paper by Lewellen and Resutek, "firms with higher accruals tend to be less profitable in the future".
For the year to December 2024, Nam Cheong had an accrual ratio of 1.00. Ergo, its free cash flow is significantly weaker than its profit. Statistically speaking, that's a real negative for future earnings. To wit, it produced free cash flow of RM93m during the period, falling well short of its reported profit of RM785.2m. Notably, Nam Cheong had negative free cash flow last year, so the RM93m it produced this year was a welcome improvement. However, that's not all there is to consider. We can see that unusual items have impacted its statutory profit, and therefore the accrual ratio.
Check out our latest analysis for Nam Cheong
Note: we always recommend investors check balance sheet strength. Click here to be taken to our balance sheet analysis of Nam Cheong.
Given the accrual ratio, it's not overly surprising that Nam Cheong's profit was boosted by unusual items worth RM441m in the last twelve months. We can't deny that higher profits generally leave us optimistic, but we'd prefer it if the profit were to be sustainable. We ran the numbers on most publicly listed companies worldwide, and it's very common for unusual items to be once-off in nature. And, after all, that's exactly what the accounting terminology implies. We can see that Nam Cheong's positive unusual items were quite significant relative to its profit in the year to December 2024. All else being equal, this would likely have the effect of making the statutory profit a poor guide to underlying earnings power.
Nam Cheong had a weak accrual ratio, but its profit did receive a boost from unusual items. For all the reasons mentioned above, we think that, at a glance, Nam Cheong's statutory profits could be considered to be low quality, because they are likely to give investors an overly positive impression of the company. If you'd like to know more about Nam Cheong as a business, it's important to be aware of any risks it's facing. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Nam Cheong (1 is significant) you should be familiar with.
In this article we've looked at a number of factors that can impair the utility of profit numbers, and we've come away cautious. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

With a 41% stake, Food Empire Holdings Limited (SGX:F03) insiders have a lot riding on the company
With a 41% stake, Food Empire Holdings Limited (SGX:F03) insiders have a lot riding on the company

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

With a 41% stake, Food Empire Holdings Limited (SGX:F03) insiders have a lot riding on the company

Significant insider control over Food Empire Holdings implies vested interests in company growth The top 3 shareholders own 50% of the company Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. Every investor in Food Empire Holdings Limited (SGX:F03) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 41% to be precise, is individual insiders. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn). With such a notable stake in the company, insiders would be highly incentivised to make value accretive decisions. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Food Empire Holdings. View our latest analysis for Food Empire Holdings Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index. Less than 5% of Food Empire Holdings is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. If the business gets stronger from here, we could see a situation where more institutions are keen to buy. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Food Empire Holdings. Salim Group is currently the largest shareholder, with 25% of shares outstanding. Sudeep Nair is the second largest shareholder owning 13% of common stock, and Guek Ming Tan holds about 12% of the company stock. Interestingly, the bottom two of the top three shareholders also hold the title of Chief Executive Officer and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively, suggesting that these insiders have a personal stake in the company. To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company. While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily. While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions. It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Food Empire Holdings Limited. It has a market capitalization of just S$971m, and insiders have S$400m worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently. The general public-- including retail investors -- own 30% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders. Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 26%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company. While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Food Empire Holdings (1 is a bit unpleasant!) that you should be aware of before investing here. If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Individual investors own 40% of Thakral Corporation Ltd (SGX:AWI) shares but private companies control 52% of the company
Individual investors own 40% of Thakral Corporation Ltd (SGX:AWI) shares but private companies control 52% of the company

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Individual investors own 40% of Thakral Corporation Ltd (SGX:AWI) shares but private companies control 52% of the company

Thakral's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public 52% of the company is held by a single shareholder (S S Thakral Trust) Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. Every investor in Thakral Corporation Ltd (SGX:AWI) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 52% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn). Meanwhile, individual investors make up 40% of the company's shareholders. In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Thakral. View our latest analysis for Thakral We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common. There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Thakral's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely. Thakral is not owned by hedge funds. S S Thakral Trust is currently the company's largest shareholder with 52% of shares outstanding. This essentially means that they have extensive influence, if not outright control, over the future of the corporation. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 1.3% and 1.2% of the stock. Kanwaljeet Singh Dhillon, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Unit CEO. While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track. While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances. We can see that insiders own shares in Thakral Corporation Ltd. In their own names, insiders own S$13m worth of stock in the S$192m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but we usually like to see higher insider holdings. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying. The general public-- including retail investors -- own 40% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders. We can see that Private Companies own 52%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research. I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Thakral you should know about. If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Discovering Fanli Digital TechnologyLtd And 2 Other Noteworthy Global Penny Stocks
Discovering Fanli Digital TechnologyLtd And 2 Other Noteworthy Global Penny Stocks

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Discovering Fanli Digital TechnologyLtd And 2 Other Noteworthy Global Penny Stocks

As global markets continue to navigate a complex landscape, U.S. stocks have shown resilience with major indices climbing for the second consecutive week, driven by strong performances in small-cap and technology sectors. Amid these developments, investors might consider exploring opportunities beyond well-known giants, where penny stocks—often representing smaller or newer companies—can present intriguing possibilities. Although the term "penny stocks" may seem outdated, they remain a relevant area of investment that can offer surprising value when backed by solid financial health and potential for growth. Name Share Price Market Cap Financial Health Rating Lever Style (SEHK:1346) HK$1.15 HK$731.9M ★★★★★★ Foresight Group Holdings (LSE:FSG) £4.035 £453.9M ★★★★★★ Angler Gaming (NGM:ANGL) SEK3.66 SEK274.45M ★★★★★★ CNMC Goldmine Holdings (Catalist:5TP) SGD0.43 SGD174.27M ★★★★★☆ Southern Cross Electrical Engineering (ASX:SXE) A$1.63 A$434.95M ★★★★★★ Tasmea (ASX:TEA) A$2.95 A$704.51M ★★★★★☆ Yangzijiang Shipbuilding (Holdings) (SGX:BS6) SGD2.31 SGD9.09B ★★★★★☆ DXN Holdings Bhd (KLSE:DXN) MYR0.505 MYR2.51B ★★★★★★ Bosideng International Holdings (SEHK:3998) HK$4.58 HK$52.24B ★★★★★★ Croma Security Solutions Group (AIM:CSSG) £0.86 £11.84M ★★★★★★ Click here to see the full list of 5,578 stocks from our Global Penny Stocks screener. Let's review some notable picks from our screened stocks. Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★★★ Overview: Fanli Digital Technology Co., Ltd operates an e-commerce shopping guide platform in China, with a market cap of CN¥1.91 billion. Operations: The company's revenue is primarily derived from its Internet and related services segment, which generated CN¥233.11 million. Market Cap: CN¥1.91B Fanli Digital Technology Co., Ltd, with a market cap of CN¥1.91 billion, recently reported a decline in revenue to CN¥53.6 million for Q1 2025 from CN¥64.32 million the previous year, alongside an increased net loss of CN¥13.98 million. Despite its unprofitability and high share price volatility, the company remains debt-free and has not diluted shareholders over the past year. Its short-term assets significantly exceed both short-term and long-term liabilities, providing some financial stability amidst ongoing challenges in achieving profitability within the highly competitive e-commerce sector in China. Click to explore a detailed breakdown of our findings in Fanli Digital TechnologyLtd's financial health report. Examine Fanli Digital TechnologyLtd's past performance report to understand how it has performed in prior years. Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★★☆ Overview: Fangda Special Steel Technology Co., Ltd. operates in the steel industry, focusing on the production and sale of special steel products, with a market cap of CN¥9.55 billion. Operations: Fangda Special Steel Technology Co., Ltd. operates without reported revenue segments, focusing on the production and sale of special steel products. Market Cap: CN¥9.55B Fangda Special Steel Technology, with a market cap of CN¥9.55 billion, reported Q1 2025 earnings showing decreased revenue of CN¥4.35 billion from CN¥5.87 billion a year earlier, yet net income rose to CN¥250.34 million from CN¥93.41 million. The company's short-term assets exceed both its short-term and long-term liabilities, indicating financial stability despite negative operating cash flow and low return on equity at 4.1%. While the management team is relatively new with an average tenure of 0.6 years, the board is experienced with an average tenure of 6.1 years, suggesting strategic continuity amidst leadership changes. Click here to discover the nuances of Fangda Special Steel Technology with our detailed analytical financial health report. Explore Fangda Special Steel Technology's analyst forecasts in our growth report. Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★☆☆ Overview: Sanchuan Wisdom Technology Co., Ltd. manufactures and sells water meters under the San Chuan brand, with a market cap of CN¥4.40 billion. Operations: Sanchuan Wisdom Technology Co., Ltd. has not reported any specific revenue segments. Market Cap: CN¥4.4B Sanchuan Wisdom Technology, with a market cap of CN¥4.40 billion, has faced challenges as evidenced by decreased revenue and earnings over the past year. Despite reporting sales of CN¥213.34 million for Q1 2025, down from CN¥348.53 million a year ago, net income improved to CN¥16.31 million from a marginal profit previously. The company benefits from having more cash than total debt and its short-term assets significantly exceed both short-term and long-term liabilities, indicating strong liquidity management. However, declining profit margins and negative earnings growth remain concerns amidst an unstable dividend track record. Click here and access our complete financial health analysis report to understand the dynamics of Sanchuan Wisdom Technology. Assess Sanchuan Wisdom Technology's previous results with our detailed historical performance reports. Get an in-depth perspective on all 5,578 Global Penny Stocks by using our screener here. Contemplating Other Strategies? Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 22 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include SHSE:600228 SHSE:600507 and SZSE:300066. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store