'Opposition reduced itself to opposing everything for political reasons'
In a free-wheeling interview with Rajesh Kumar Thakur, he accused them of misleading the public out of fear of losing ineligible votes.
Excerpts
Opposition parties are united against the SIR exercise being carried out in poll-bound Bihar, accusing your government of using it to drop voters from other parties. What do you have to say?
These are totally untrue and baseless allegations made by the Opposition out of fear and frustration over losing the support of undeserving voters. The SIR, which is now being carried out successfully in Bihar, is not intended to remove people from voting lists but to ensure that voting rights are upheld for genuine voters. The Opposition currently has no agenda other than opposing initiatives that are in the larger interest of the nation or individual states.
Will the removal of voter names under SIR hurt the NDA's poll chances in Bihar?
Absolutely not. It is not designed to prevent anyone from exercising their voting rights but to ensure that only genuine voters participate. The people of Bihar are highly aware and understand the benefits of such an exercise, and they will not be misled by the Opposition. The NDA will not face any negative electoral consequences; in fact, it is the Opposition—which has been exploiting the inclusion of ineligible voters without proper documentation—that is alarmed by SIR.
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has accused your government of 'snatching and stealing' votes through SIR. What is your response?
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi is known for making baseless allegations simply to distract the public. In fact, he was the one who previously advocated for electoral roll revisions after his party's defeat in the Maharashtra Assembly elections. Rahul Gandhi's intention is only to create confusion among the public about every initiative. But the people of Bihar are wise and understand his motives well.
How is the Modi-led NDA gearing up to counter the Opposition in the Monsoon Session starting Monday?
The NDA is fully prepared. Since the government under Prime Minister Narendra Modi works for 'Sabka Saath', 'Sabka Vikas' and through 'Sabka Prayas', there is no issue on which the government is not in the right. The Opposition, which has reduced itself to opposing everything purely for political reasons, will gain nothing by creating an uproar. Rather, we urge them to offer constructive support to the government.
Do you think women voters in Bihar are leaning towards the NDA this time?
Yes, not only women voters but every voter who has witnessed the development and positive changes under NDA rule in Bihar will vote for the NDA. Prime Minister Narendra Modi represents trust for them. The 'Modi Guarantee', under the state leadership of Chief Minister Nitish Kumar—who, along with BJP and other allied parties, has made visible changes in Bihar—is widely trusted. Bihar has become a model of women-led development.
Will there be a discussion on Operation Sindoor in Parliament?
What our leaders have said stands true. The government has been transparent about Operation Sindoor's success. The Opposition is simply trying to manufacture an issue where none exists.
Did US President Trump actually mediate between India and Pakistan during Operation Sindoor, as the Opposition claims?
I'm not able to officially comment on such matters. The Opposition's stance is mere political posturing without any basis. They should stop creating unnecessary uproar and focus on being constructive rather than just opposing for opposition's sake.
Since you oversee the Department of Atomic Energy, how is India tackling emerging challenges in the sector?
India is on track to meet the target of generating 100 GW of nuclear power by 2047, and we are taking all necessary steps toward this goal. In addition to progressing in the civil nuclear energy sector, we are considering converting ten decommissioned thermal power plant sites into nuclear power sites for civilian use, aligning with India's ambition to reach 100 GW of nuclear capacity by 2047.
Are private sector players being actively supported in the nuclear energy sector?
Yes, significant changes are planned through updated regulations and legislation. The government, as announced by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, aims to amend key laws like the Atomic Energy Act and Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act to encourage private sector participation. Organizations such as NPCIL, BHAVINI, and ASHVINI are actively planning new nuclear plants. Indian scientists are developing Bharat Small Modular Reactors (50–300 MW) for retired thermal plants. Under PM Modi's leadership, India strives for self-reliance and global leadership in nuclear energy, aiming to become a developed nation by 2047 with strong private sector growth opportunities.
How is India advancing its space program, and what is the status of key missions like Chandrayaan?
India has become a global space leader with cost-effective, precise missions. Chandrayaan-3's historic South Pole landing and astronaut Shukla's record experiments highlight this progress. Chandrayaan-4 is slated for 2027, reinforcing India's position in space exploration and scientific innovation.
When will India be able to launch its first human space mission, Gaganyaan?
Gaganyaan is now in its final phase, and we are optimistic about launching the crewed mission in 2027. We consider it a historic mission that goes beyond scientific accomplishment—it symbolises our emergence as a global space power built on indigenous technology and fiscal prudence under the visionary leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
How committed is India to promoting research, innovation, and science for the future?
Since PM Narendra Modi took office, India has significantly boosted funding for R&D, allocating over Rs 20,000 crore for private sector innovation. This has transformed India into a global leader in science, technology, and startups. The government's focus on fostering a strong ecosystem has driven scientific progress, improving everyday life and showcasing successes like Operation Sindoor.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
6 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Peddireddi Ramachandra Reddy vows befitting reply to NDA over arrests of party leaders if YSRCP voted to power next term
Punganur YSRCP MLA Peddireddi Ramachandra Reddy has said a befitting response would be given to the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) by exposing the ongoing liquor scandal if YSRCP was voted to power the next term. Mr. Ramachandra Reddy, former Home Minister T. Vanita and former Rajamahendravaram MP Margani Bharat interacted with Rajampeta MP Reddy during mulaqat in Rajahmundry Central Prison, on Wednesday (July 23, 2025). Mr. Ramachandra Reddy's son Midhun Reddy has been arrested in multi-crore liquor scandal. Andhra Pradesh liquor scam: CID police file charge sheet in ACB Special Court Speaking to newsmen after mulaqat, Mr. Ramachandra Reddy has stated; 'The arrest of my son is part of a conspiracy by the NDA. The government earned huge revenue from the liquor sales during 2019-24. Contrary to our liquor policy, the NDA's liquor policy is a scandal that will be exposed if the YSRCP is voted to power next term.' On the arrest of Midhun Reddy, Mr. Ramachandra Reddy has alleged that his son was not being provided basic facilities entitled to sitting Member of Parliament in Rajahmundry Central Prison. The Rajamahendravaram City police on Tuesday (July 22, 2025) imposed Section 144, preventing the gathering of YSRCP supporters at the prison.
Indian Express
6 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Conflict between India & Pakistan ‘was probably going to end up in nuclear war', claims Trump
US President Donald Trump, on Tuesday (July 22), yet again claimed credit for brokering a peace deal between India and Pakistan, stating that his mediation averted a potential 'nuclear war' between the two countries. He also alleged that five planes were shot down in the conflict. 'We stopped wars between India and Pakistan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda,' he said at a reception in the White House with the Congress members. 'They shot down five planes and it was back and forth, back and forth, back and forth. I called them and said, 'Listen, no more trade. If you do this, you're not going to be good…They're both powerful nuclear nations and that would have happened, and who knows where that would have ended up. And I stopped it',' he added. He further claimed that the United States obliterated Iran's nuclear facilities and stopped the conflict between Kosovo and Serbia. 'And a couple of others that we didn't stop a war, but we stopped what probably could have ended up in a war. We do that on the House as compliments of America. Okay, do you think (former US President Joe) Biden would do that? I don't think so. Do you think he ever heard of any of those countries? I don't think so,' the US president said. 'Five jets were shot down,' says Trump Trump, who has repeatedly claimed that the United States mediated and brokered a truce between India and Pakistan, for the first time on Friday said that 'five jets were shot down' during the conflict. However, he did not specify whether the jets were lost by either of the two countries or whether he was referring to combined losses. Speaking at the White House during a dinner he hosted for Republican senators on Friday, Trump said, 'You had India, Pakistan, that was going… in fact, planes were being shot out of the air…four or five. But I think five jets were shot down actually…that was getting worse and worse, wasn't it? That was looking like it was going to go…these are two serious nuclear countries, and they were hitting each other.' 'But India and Pakistan were going at it, and they were back and forth, and it was getting bigger and bigger. And we got it solved through trade. We said 'You guys want to make a trade deal. We're not making a trade deal if you're going to be throwing around weapons and maybe nuclear weapons. Both very powerful nuclear states,' Trump said. He said his administration achieved more in six months than almost any other could accomplish in eight years. 'Something I am very proud of, we stopped a lot of wars, a lot of wars. And these were serious wars,' Trump said. New Delhi has consistently maintained that the two sides halted their military actions following direct talks between their militaries without any mediation by the US. Since May 10, Trump has repeated his claim at least 20 times on various occasions that he 'helped settle' the tensions between India and Pakistan and that he told the nuclear-armed South Asian neighbours that America will do a 'lot of trade' with them if they stopped the conflict. (With inputs from agencies)
The Print
19 minutes ago
- The Print
Jagdeep Dhankhar's abrupt exit says three things about the Modi govt
Any doubts about the circumstances of his exit were removed when Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who is notably prompt and polite on social media, did not post an affectionate goodbye message on X when Dhankhar announced his resignation. In fact, Modi waited till the following day before posting an unusually cool message. Noting that Dhankhar had had many opportunities to serve the country, the Prime Minister wished him good health. An unkind observer might summarise the post as saying 'you got lots of good jobs; now run along'. It's clear that Dhankhar did not leave happily. And that ill-health was not the primary reason for his sudden departure. He was either pushed or he jumped just before he could be pushed. The sequence of events makes this clear. At 5:30 pm, his office was releasing details of his programme for the days ahead. In a matter of hours after that, he suddenly resigned. Yes, it's okay to feel bad for Jagdeep Dhankhar, no matter what your views are on his performance as Chairman of the Rajya Sabha or as Governor of West Bengal before that. No Vice President of India deserves to end his tenure in this strange and abrupt way. It diminishes a senior constitutional office, which is never good for Indian democracy. What does Dhankhar's departure tell us about this government and how it functions? Well, I reckon it tells us three things. Disruptor of plans The first is that Dhankhar clearly committed some cardinal sin—at least in the Prime Minister's eyes. Judging by the organised leaks that have followed his exit, it may have had something to do with the effort to impeach Justice Yashwant Varma, from whose home a large amount of cash was allegedly recovered. As the judge has refused to resign, impeachment proceedings were the logical next step. The Opposition submitted a notice for the removal of Justice Varma and Dhankhar, as the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, accepted it. This seems fairly unexceptionable——except that, according to the leaks, by accepting the Opposition notice, Dhankhar disrupted one of the government's best-laid plans. The plan had been for the government to move against the judge and to use his example to launch a broader attack on the judiciary. By letting the Opposition take the first step, Dhankhar disrupted this scheme. And, as per the leaks, someone in authority reportedly called Dhankhar that evening and berated him. Angry words were exchanged, and Dhankhar was either told to quit or put in a position where he had no other choice. Though this version of events has been systemically circulated, I find it hard to believe. The only two people who could berate the Vice President of India are the people Dhankhar has spent a decade pleasing. Given his behaviour in the recent past, it seems unlikely that he would get angry with them for berating him. He is more likely to have grovelled and said sorry. Moreover, would anyone as powerful as our country's top leaders be so agitated over a relatively minor issue that they would force the Vice President of India out of office? It just doesn't add up. Stranger things have happened in politics, but it's hard to shake the feeling that there was more to Dhankhar's exit. The second lesson from this episode is that no matter how hard you try to please the powers that be, your position is never secure. I know and like Dhankhar—who, contrary to his public image, is actually a sharp and amiable fellow. He's able to laugh at himself and has friends across the political spectrum. Despite the caricature, he is not a humourless Hindutva stormtrooper. He was part of the Chandrashekhar government, later joined the Congress, and only came to the BJP in 2003 when he was in his 50s. The reason he got so far in the Modi era was that he was willing to function as an effective hatchet man for the government. Sent to West Bengal as Governor to create problems for Mamata Banerjee, he performed with admirable zeal, regularly getting into tussles with the state government and throwing obstacles in its way. Most Governors restrain themselves in their public utterances, believing it is improper to criticise the state government or to attack the Chief Minister. Dhankhar saw no need for that. Not only was he vocal about what he regarded as Mamata's failings, but he had no hesitation in travelling around the country to tell people how badly the state was being governed and how unreasonable Mamata was being with him. I once chaired a panel in Mumbai where Dhankhar and Shashi Tharoor were guests. Both Tharoor and I were a little startled by how eager Dhankhar was to rip into Mamata. But because he can be sharp and witty, he pulled it off—dismissing our efforts to suggest he was breaking with the convention that a Governor should rise above politics. In election after election, the BJP has failed to stop the Trinamool Congress. Dhankhar remained the source of its only successful attempts to needle or deter Mamata. That is probably why Modi made Dhankhar Vice President. Till Dhankhar came along, most of us saw the Vice President's role as largely ceremonial. But his tenure was a reminder that the real importance of the office lies in the role of Rajya Sabha Chairman. Once again, Dhankhar did for Modi what he had first done in the Kolkata Raj Bhavan—picking fights with MPs (including a famous exchange with Jaya Bachchan), being unperturbed by allegations that he was biased toward the central government, and breaking with precedent by launching frontal attacks on institutions like the judiciary. I thought that he had performed even better than Modi could have expected, risking his own reputation and stature while cheerfully trampling over all conventions and standards of propriety for the sake of the government. And yet, here we are today. A guy who spent a decade as the government's hitman is suddenly out, and the Prime Minister does not seem at all sorry to see him go. Also read: Report leak, global headlines pinned Air India crash on dead pilots. But nothing adds up India's most opaque government There is a third lesson from Dhankhar's exit; one that we should all have learned by now. When it comes to what is really going on in this government, nobody knows anything. While the search for a Vice Presidential nominee was in progress, political observers and commentators came up with lists of potential candidates. I don't think Dhankhar's name even featured on most of those lists. And even if it did, he was never a front-runner. Most journalists kept looking for potential future Presidential candidates or focusing on identity politics. (As in: which community does the government want to please?) Few people worked out that Narendra Modi had made a shrewd calculation: the job is about managing the Rajya Sabha, so let's find a hatchet man who can do that. It has been the same with Dhankhar's departure. No commentator had noticed that Modi had tired of him or figured out what the Vice President had done to displease his masters. All the theories now doing the rounds are post-facto attempts to find explanations that fit the facts, and frankly, none of them is entirely convincing. Narendra Modi is the only Prime Minister in Indian history to run a government that is so opaque that nobody knows what is really going on or what will happen next. There are no unwitting leaks, and even now, after he has been in office for over a decade, nor does any political commentator have enough insight into how the Prime Minister's mind works. Predictions about cabinet reshuffles are always wrong. Every nominee to a constitutional post is always a surprise. And everyone struggles to find explanations after events have passed us by. Perhaps one day we will find out what Dhankhar did wrong and why he was forced out. Till then, I will feel a little sorry for him. He tried so hard to please his political masters by throwing all conventions to the wind. But somehow, even that was not enough for the powers that be. Vir Sanghvi is a print and television journalist, and talk show host. He tweets @virsanghvi. Views are personal. (Edited by Ratan Priya)
