Ferguson rolls out ‘scary' list of cuts, favors broadening business sales tax list
Senate President Bill Ferguson (D-Baltimore City) laid out $1 billion in potential service cuts that he said "scare me because they're very real and being contemplated" as lawmakers struggle with the budget. (File photo by Bryan P. Sears/Maryland Matters)
The leader of the Maryland Senate unveiled $1 billion in new budget cuts Friday that he said could be considered as state leaders contemplate continued uncertainty in the federal budget.
Senate President Bill Ferguson (D-Baltimore City) said the legislative session now entering its final three weeks 'is continuing to be the most uncertain session that I have ever experienced in this role and in the 15 years I've served in the legislature.'
Lawmakers are moving closer to finalizing a fiscal 2026 budget that must address a projected $3 billion structural budget gap as well hundreds of millions in lower-than-expected revenues announced earlier this month.
They got a rare bit of good news when it appeared Congress would be able to avert a potential federal government shutdown at midnight Friday. A new report by Moody's Ratings ranks Maryland at the most risk from federal budget actions.
Gov. Wes Moore (D) proposed a budget with $2 billion in cuts and a tax modernization plan that would cut taxes modestly for 60% of Marylanders, while raising taxes on the state's highest earners.
Lawmakers are expected to tinker with Moore's proposal, and recently added a plan for a possible 2.5% tax on services between some businesses.
The Senate president said his chamber will expand Moore's $2 billion in cuts by as much as $500 million, and warned of more if there are additional spending and employee reductions at the federal level.
Ferguson showed reporters a graphic of 10 possible budget cuts of about $100 million each, what he called '10 illustrative, real examples, things that we are actively contemplating incorporating into' a potential budget.
They include three Medicaid cuts that would net $100 million each: Dropping coverage for more than 11,000 people; cutting dental care for every Medicaid recipient; and eliminating Medicaid coverage for pregnant women who earn 264% of the federal poverty level.
Another nearly 37,000 people could lose food stamp benefits, 36,000 could see unemployment claims go unpaid and more than 114,000 households would lose home energy assistance.
The list also included several public safety measures, including releasing more than 1,500 inmates or closing either Spring Grove Hospital or Clifton T. Perkins. Both offer forensic psychiatry services to people charged with crimes, including violent offenses.
'As we face these difficult choices, these are just 10 examples of how you get to the next billion,' Ferguson said. 'We have got to figure out a path towards sustainable revenues as well. And so that is … the balanced approach that we are going to continue to try to take.'
Ferguson, who has said he has a 'high bar' for raising taxes, was asked if the chart was meant as a scare tactic to boost acceptance of a coming increase.
'All of those cuts certainly scare me. And they scare me because they're very real and being contemplated,' Ferguson told reporters.
'We are constitutionally required to balance our budget. We will, and we are going to make additional cuts. We are at the place now where we are talking about core service provision of the social safety net that's impacted if we just had a cuts only approach,' he said. 'And so yes, it is scary, and we know that … this is what we should be counting on government to be able to provide. And I believe most Marylanders agree.'
One revenue source under consideration is a tax on some services between businesses. The current proposal – late-filed bills in the House and Senate — includes a 2.5% sales tax on business-to-business services including accounting, consulting and tech services. Tech services and consulting would pay 66% of the tax under the current proposal.
Business leaders voiced their opposition during hearings Wednesday. But Ferguson said he believes some version of the tax will be included in the final budget plan for fiscal 2026.
He added his chamber is looking at excluding independent contractors, sometimes called '1099 employees.' Other changes could come to sole proprietorship businesses or specific industries that are disparately impacted. He did not give an example.
A plan could emerge for a services tax that applies to more businesses, but at a lower rate.
'I would love to find a way to have a broader base and a lower rate, which I think is a more efficient tax approach,' Ferguson said. 'But we have to figure out how far we can get in cuts, and then what the gap would be, to see what we're going to need in order to be sustainable moving forward.'
The legislature is also facing growing public outcry over spiking utility costs that are expected to shoot up again in the summer.
Utility companies and regulators were grilled Wednesday by two committees seeking answers. Ferguson said days earlier that the hearing was about finding options for immediate rate relief and was not meant to 'create scapegoats and bogeymen' to deflect ire away from lawmakers.
Solutions remain elusive.
'We are looking for any possible solution to get money into the hands of ratepayers to help with the burden of increased energy costs,' Ferguson said.
But he acknowledged the challenge 'because I'm not sure that there is a short-term solution. We know that we have to make decisions today that allow for longer-term solutions, getting more Maryland-made energy so that we have greater predictability, reliability and affordability and energy. But we are looking forward to putting some measures in the budget this year that will at least get some level of resources to ratepayers who are really struggling.'
Ferguson was asked if the relief would be meaningful.
'I think anything is meaningful, and it's in the eye of the beholder,' he said. 'We'll do whatever we can that is fiscally responsible for the long term … financial health of the state to help ratepayers however we can, while building for the future.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
17 minutes ago
- Axios
Poll: Rep. Gabe Evans' approval lags behind Trump's
Republican U.S. Rep. Gabe Evans' favorability rating five months into the job is lower than President Trump's among registered voters in the congressman's district, according to a poll released Tuesday. Stunning stat: Evans' favorability (40%) lagged behind Trump's (45%) in Colorado's 8th District, which stretches from the suburbs north of Denver toward Greeley. The big picture: More than half of registered voters in the state's most competitive congressional district would be less likely to vote for a candidate who voted to cut Medicaid funding, per a poll released by Healthier Colorado, a nonprofit that supports expanding the federal safety net program. Why it matters: The poll comes as a major warning for Evans, who's gunning for reelection next year while staunchly defending the "big, beautiful bill" calling for historic reductions in Medicaid spending. Context: The poll, conducted from May 29 to June 4, included 404 registered 8th District voters, per Healthier Colorado. The survey had a margin of error of +/- 4.87% at the 95% confidence interval. State of play: A majority of 8th District voters (53%) share a favorable view of the safety net program, the poll shows, citing the health care access it provides to low-income and vulnerable people. Less than a quarter of respondents (23%) hold an unfavorable opinion of Medicaid. Between the lines: Republicans like Evans are framing the federal spending proposal as a measure to curb fraud and waste in the federal safety net program — but most voters aren't buying that, Healthier Colorado CEO Jake Williams said during a Tuesday press call. What they're saying:"Republicans' plan increases Medicaid spending every single year and makes the program more efficient by cutting out fraud, waste, and abuse," Delanie Bomar, a spokesperson for Evans' reelection campaign, said in a statement.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Pick to Run CFTC Touts Work in Crypto to Lawmakers
(Bloomberg) -- Brian Quintenz, President Donald Trump's pick to lead the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission, told lawmakers he is uniquely qualified to head the derivatives regulator as Congress considers giving it more authority over digital assets. Trump's Military Parade Has Washington Bracing for Tanks and Weaponry NYC Mayoral Candidates All Agree on Building More Housing. But Where? NY Long Island Rail Service Resumes After Grand Central Fire Senator Calls for Closing Troubled ICE Detention Facility in New Mexico California Pitches Emergency Loans for LA, Local Transit Systems The crypto lobbyist and former CFTC commissioner said he is well versed in not just the policy issues that affect farmers and ranchers using futures to hedge price risks but also emerging technologies like blockchain and cryptocurrency. 'Congress should create an appropriate market regulatory regime to ensure that this technology's full promise can be realized, and I am fully prepared to use my experience and expertise to assist in that effort as well in executing any expanded mission should legislation pass into law,' he told lawmakers. The CFTC oversees the multitrillion-dollar derivatives market, financial products that help businesses hedge against price swings in everything from corn to cocoa to foreign currency. The agency's powers could expand if Congress passes legislation to regulate the crypto market, with the CFTC potentially overseeing what's called spot markets for Bitcoin and other digital assets that don't qualify as securities. A House bill calls on the CFTC to work with the US Securities and Exchange Commission on joint rulemaking to hash out details. 'As Congress considers new spot market regulatory authority over the crypto asset markets, I am fully prepared to provide the benefit of this experience to the members of this committee and to Congress as a whole,' he said. Quintenz served as a CFTC commissioner from 2017 to 2021. His career after departing the agency has focused on two industries — crypto and predictions markets. He is global head of crypto policy at a16z, the crypto arm of venture capital fund Andreessen Horowitz, and will resign if confirmed, according to ethics disclosures. He faced questions on Tuesday about his ability to police the prediction markets given his seat on the board of a company that waged a long-running legal battle with the agency. 'I hope you can appreciate that there will be some real questions to your independence in that role,' Senator Cory Booker said at the hearing. 'I can certainly understand,' Quintenz said, who currently serves on the board of directors of Kalshi Inc., the prediction markets platform that lets users place bets on topics as diverse as the winner of the French Open and whether Sabrina Carpenter will have a No. 1 hit this year. If confirmed, Quintenz said he will resign from the firm. Kalshi and the CFTC have clashed over the legality of allowing Americans to bet on the outcomes of elections, but the agency in May asked a court to settle its fight with the firm. Quintenz said he would recuse himself for a year on matters related to Kalshi if he is confirmed. He also said he would bow out of matters relating to Andreessen Horowitz Capital Management or its funds for two years unless he receives a waiver. Quintenz is set to helm an agency in upheaval. Two commissioners departed at the end of May and the two remaining — Acting Chairman Caroline Pham and Commissioner Kristin Johnson — are planning their exits. The regulator is also dealing with the fallout from being forced to drop a high-profile fraud case against an online trading platform. --With assistance from Lydia Beyoud. (Updates with additional details beginning in seventh paragraph.) New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination The SEC Pinned Its Hack on a Few Hapless Day Traders. The Full Story Is Far More Troubling Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again What America's Pizza Economy Is Telling Us About the Real One ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Politico
24 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump is about to kill California's EV rules
President Donald Trump plans to sign a trio of resolutions Thursday to revoke California's nation-leading vehicle emissions standards. Sen. Shelley Moore Capito ( author of a resolution to nix the state's electric vehicle sales mandate via the Congressional Review Act, and Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.) confirmed that the White House has scheduled the signings at 11 a.m. on Thursday. Trump's signature will finalize his administration's months-long effort to thwart California's authority to set stricter electrification rules for passenger vehicles and commercial trucks, along with higher standards for heavy-duty diesel engines. Republican lawmakers promised to quickly roll back Biden-era EPA waivers that give California the power to enforce its rules after Administrator Lee Zeldin announced in February that his agency had sent them for review. That move opened a window of 60 days in session for Congress to vote on resolutions and avoid the Senate filibuster. But Senate sign-off on the maneuver stretched until last month, just days before the CRA deadline, as Senate Majority Leader John Thune and moderate Republicans debated internally over whether to overrule Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough, who — along with the Government Accountability Office — told lawmakers the waivers were not subject to CRA. Trump's EPA revoked an earlier version of California's vehicle emissions rules through an 18-month regulatory process during his first term, but Republicans' vote last month to expedite the rollback through Congress marked the first time waiver approvals have been considered subject to CRA since President Bill Clinton signed the law in 1996. California Attorney General Rob Bonta has promised to fight the decision, saying last month that he plans to sue once Trump signs the resolutions. Spokespeople for Bonta did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Daniel Villaseñor, a spokesperson for California Gov. Gavin Newsom, said the state is ready to defend its rules. 'If it's a day ending in Y, it's another day of Trump's war on California. We're fighting back,' Villaseñor said in a statement. California has maintained a unique ability among states to set stricter-than-federal air quality standards since President Richard Nixon signed the Clean Air Act in 1970. State officials and environmental groups argue the carveout is necessary to combat the region's worst-in-the-nation smog, and the authority has underpinned its climate and environmental protection goals. The revocations would also impact a dozen other blue states that have adopted the rules, though some, including Maryland and Vermont, had moved to delay implementation. Republicans and industry groups argue that the waivers constitute a nationwide electric vehicle mandate because of California's market and the fact that other states do not need EPA approval to follow them. Congressional Democrats have framed the decision to overrule the parliamentarian as akin to destroying the filibuster and have promised to use CRA in the future to undermine Republican priorities, like oil and gas leases, not previously considered reviewable. Josh Siegel contributed to this report.