
North Carolina legislature leaves after passing Helene aid package, but still no budget
The North Carolina legislature wrapped up the chief portion of its annual session Thursday, passing another Hurricane Helene aid package this week after Republican majorities pushed through divisive bills to eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion programs and target transgender rights.
Lawmakers in the ninth-largest state also fell short on completing their primary responsibility — enacting a two-year budget by July 1.
There's no risk of a government shutdown, and House and Senate negotiators will keep meeting to reach budget agreements. Other legislation can be voted on when lawmakers return occasionally, possibly starting next month. More vetoes from Democratic Gov. Josh Stein likely will be waiting.
Chambers remain far apart on 2-year budget
House and Senate Republicans are split on competing budget bills they approved in the spring. Teacher and state employee pay, the scope of tax cuts and vacant government position eliminations are among the disagreements. Each package would spend $32.6 billion in the upcoming fiscal year and $33.3 billion in the next.
'The massive details behind each of our budgets doesn't allow us quick and urgent resolution,' GOP Rep. Donny Lambeth, a chief budget writer, told colleagues Wednesday.
The inability of budget writers to work out a stopgap spending measure that usually contains noncontroversial or critical spending provisions gave fodder to Democrats.
'The people of North Carolina should expect better of us,' Rep. Deb Butler said. 'We have one job and that's to pass a budget, and we haven't done that.'
Any final budget goes to Stein, whose own budget proposal spent more and froze planned income tax cuts. With the GOP one House seat shy of a veto-proof majority, Republicans will seek a final budget that enough Democrats support to override.
Next Helene spending installment finalized
Before adjourning, House and Senate Republicans hammered out another tranche of state funds to assist with Helene recovery in the mountains.
Not including federal aid, the General Assembly already has appropriated or allocated more than $1.6 billion in recovery funds since last September's historic storm.
This latest allotment — approved unanimously and now heading to Stein — moves $700 million to the state's Helene relief fund and appropriates $500 million of that. There's also nearly $1 billion more allocated in federal water and sewer grants and state transportation money with a focus on Helene repairs.
Stein had urged lawmakers this week to set aside their differences 'and get this relief out the door.'
GOP focused on eliminating DEI programs
Cutting diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives were a major priority for GOP lawmakers. State agencies, local governments, public K-12 schools and higher education institutions would be impacted if the bills become law.
Training, staff positions and hiring decisions that incorporate DEI are banned in state agencies under one bill. The legislation also would outlaw those agencies or local governments from using state funds for DEI programs. Two other bills would bar 'divisive concepts' and 'discriminatory practices' across public education in the state.
Republicans have repeatedly said DEI programs have strayed too far from their original goal and create unfair treatment.
'When it's done right, it opens a door for more students to compete fairly,' Sen. Michael Lee, the bill's sponsor, said in committee Tuesday. 'When it's done wrong, it prioritizes identity over ability.'
But Democrats said the legislation will 'chill' state employees' speech and may reverse progress for students of color who weren't historically afforded certain opportunities.
'A multiethnic, diverse society has to learn how to grapple with things that can make you feel uncomfortable,' Rep. Brandon Lofton said on Wednesday. 'This bill puts an end to that.'
Shrimp ban proposal gets loud
It was shrimp that elicited a giant response from the public this week.
A bill pushed by the state Senate would ban shrimp trawling — which uses a cone-shaped net to scoop up the crustaceans — inshore and within a half-mile (.8 kilometers) of coastal North Carolina shorelines.
Proponents say shrimp trawling has negative environmental impacts, such as killing juvenile fish populations and disrupting ecosystems.
But several coastal Republican legislators were outraged, saying the bill would completely devastate North Carolina's shrimping industry. About 75% of North Carolina shrimp are caught inshore, according to the North Carolina Local Food Council.
Hundreds of shrimp industry members and their allies on Tuesday crowded inside and outside the Legislative Building to oppose the bill. A dozen semitrailers — draped with banners like 'NC Seafood for All. No Trawl Ban' — circled the building and blasted their horns for hours.
Bill opponents cheered Wednesday outside a House Republican caucus meeting where members said they decided not to act on the bill.
Many bills get over the finish line, head to the governor
Legislators gave final approval this week to a host of bipartisan bills, such as a measure sought by the governor to require public school districts to pass policies barring students from having cellphones turned on during instructional time. There would be exceptions.
Others were divisive, like a bill prohibiting state funds for gender-affirming care for prisoners and stating there are only two sexes. Another measure would allow private school boards to authorize a trained, permitted adult to carry a handgun on a school's campus for security.
These measures now head to Stein's desk. The governor vetoed three GOP measures last week. No override attempts have yet occurred.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump Cabinet secretary to get swanky new setup as major agency moves headquarters out of D.C.
The Trump administration is moving one federal agency out of D.C. and displacing another – with the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development set to score choice new digs in the progress. Coming out on top in the situation is HUD Secretary Scott Turner, who is set to get an executive suite up on the 19th floor of his gleaming new headquarters when his current 2,700 employees make the move. But the 1,800 National Science Foundation employees who currently occupy the building are in the dark about their own prospects, according to American Federation of Government Employees Local 3403, which represents federal workers it says were blindsided by the move. 'While Secretary Turner and his staff are busy enjoying private dining and a custom gym, NSF employees are being displaced with no plan, no communication, and no respect,' the union fumed. It said the 'callous disregard for taxpayer dollars and NSF employees comes after the Administration already cut NSF's budget, staff and science grants and forced NSF employees back into the office.' The furious union local, which says it got briefed on the plan when it was suddenly announced, lists perks it said Turner is set to garner in his new space. HUD currently occupies a brutalist 1960s building near the Southeast-Southwest freeway in downtown Washington with a long list of upkeep needs. They include a 'dedicated executive suite' for the secretary, an executive dining room, reserved parking for five cars (presumably his security detail), plus 'exclusive use' of an elevator and a 'potential gym for the HUD Secretary and his family.' Also blasting the move was Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California, the top Democrat on the House Science Committee. She slammed the administration for 'kicking dedicated scientists out of their building so HUD Secretary Turner can have a penthouse dining suite' in a blistering statement. 'For an administration so obsessed with claiming that it's cutting spending, how can Trump justify the tax-payer dollars it will take to meet Turner's ridiculous demands, like a gym for his exclusive use or parking spaces for his five cars?' she said. She also asked where the NSF staff would go and what was the plan. 'Once again, science loses, the American taxpayer loses, and our competitors, like China, win.' A HUD press release features an image of the gleaming existing NSF building, which the agency occupied a few years ago. 'The move would unlock several hundred million dollars in taxpayer savings, address serious health and safety threats, enhance the Department's work culture, and present an opportunity for greater collaboration and service to the American people,' it says. Turner talked up the move at a press conference with Virginia Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin, whose state has competed with Maryland and DC over the years to serve as host to the NSF and other federal agencies. The NSF used to have offices in downtown DC before moving to Virginia after the Secret Service took over its prior office space. 'We will work with our friends at [the General Services Administration] to coordinate a staggered and thoughtful relocation process which takes into account the current team and employees of this building and the work they do on a daily basis,' Turner said. He added: 'We are all on the same team.' He also blasted the claims about a posh setup as 'ridiculous and untrue.' 'This is about the posterity and the future of HUD, not just for now, but for those that are coming behind me. My family and I were already blessed before we came so, this is about the HUD employees. This is not about me,' he said. HUD spokeswoman Kasey Lovett told the Daily Mail that contrary to 'sensationalist reporting' no one would be 'displaced' and that there would be a 'staggered and thoughtful approach.' 'There will be a secretary office – just as there is at HUD currently – and every other place of operation with executive staff. There are no plans to "build out" anything more than what is currently there,' she said. The spokeswoman said the move was done for staff safety and did not have 'anything to do with a new space or bells and whistles for the secretary,' although she did not deny that Turner would get the building features the union described. The agency release makes no mention of what would happen to the NSF employees beyond the 'staggered employee relocation plan.' It claims the move 'will save American taxpayers hundreds of millions in deferred maintenance and modernization needs.' HUD's building showed up on a list of government buildings to be disposed of – although numerous buildings fell off the initial draft. A GSA fact sheet now begins with the question: 'The first list was much longer, why is this list shorter?' It responds: 'Due to the overwhelming response that we received after publishing the first list, we are refining our process.' A federal judge has put a temporary pause on massive cuts to research funding that goes out to universities around the country. Universities have sued over Trump administration changes to 'indirect' costs that get awarded to their scientists. One plaintiff, the University of California system, estimates the change will cost it nearly $100 million a year.


Daily Mail
34 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Celebrity enclave at war after 'Taylor Swift tax' threatens to wipe out holiday homes of the wealthy
Swifties, sun-seekers, and second-home millionaires — brace yourselves. Rhode Island just approved a controversial new real estate tax that's got wealthy seasonal residents fuming and threatening to pack up their beach chairs for good. Locals are calling it the ' Taylor Swift tax,' and yes — it could even hit the pop star's Watch Hill mansion. The proposed tax — which would impose fees that could soar into the six-figures for many — would apply to second homes worth $1million or more that aren't used for at least six months a year. Even Barstool Sports founder Dave Portnoy — a self-proclaimed Swiftie — joined the chorus of opposition, warning it could set off a dangerous trend among other Northeastern states. 'We don't like that tax,' Portnoy said. 'Now, I don't have any houses in Rhode Island, but I got some pretty close. I don't like those states getting the ideas.' Lawmakers say it's aimed at generating new revenue from properties often vacant for most of the year. Other famous celebrities who have real estate in Rhode Island and would get hit by the tax include Jay Leno, Conan O'Brien and Judge Judy Sheindlin. But critics argue it unfairly targets families and individuals who have spent decades summering in Rhode Island — and contribute to the economy without draining local resources. Local realtor and lifelong Watch Hill resident Geb Masterson said Rhode Island residents are so angry they're threatening to go elsewhere if the bill becomes law. 'These are people who put very little drain on Westerly and Watch Hill,' Masterson told DailyMail of two communities that will be hit hardest. 'It's just another way to go after the wealthy when the state's funds run dry... It's another nail in the coffin.' The Rhode Island House of Representatives recently greenlit the proposed $13.9 billion state budget that includes the sweeping new real estate tax, which Masterson says residents are furious over. On Wednesday, Rhode Island Gov. Daniel J. McKee put the bill in limbo temporarily, saying he will not sign nor veto the $14.3 billion state budget as it stands because 'it taxes people and raises fees unnecessarily.' 'At this moment in time there wasn't a need to raise taxes on anyone,' he said, not fully ruling out future taxes on part-time residents. Gov. McKee's move isn't the same as a veto and the bill can move forward if revised to his liking. If the budget had been vetoed, the General Assembly would have to go back into session to override the veto, or make amendments to the budget. 'This won't affect just the wealthy, everyone will be affected by this,' Masterson, the Watch Hill resident, said of the potential new tax. 'It's a lot of old families here and for years it was a sort of a quiet sleepy town, most people have been coming here for generations with their parents. 'It' sort of changed a little a little bit, new blood has been coming into the area, the Swifties, which is actually fantastic for our summer tourism industry, because they come to see Taylor's house then they stay the weekend.' Masterson says tourism industry workers will feel the burn if homeowners start to flee the area because of the big tax. 'There's not a lot of winter industry around here so when the summer crowd comes in it's supporting a lot of a lot of people,' he says. 'This will hurt them too if no one is here.' If a law does pass in the future, Swift will face her own six-figure tax on her $17 million Watch Hill estate. Swift has famously owned the mansion in the upmarket beach town since 2013 and spends July 4th there nearly every year. Under the guise of helping Rhode Island's affordability crisis, those who have 'non-primary residences valued over $1 million' will be taxed under the proposal. Overall, homeowners would face an annual surcharge of $2.50 per $500 of assessed value above the first $1 million — meaning a $3 million second home would see a $10,000 yearly fee. Swift and her beachfront estate neighbors would likely get taxed $100,000 and up based on the size of their mansions. The budget also proposes a 63 percent hike in the real estate conveyance tax, which sellers pay upon transferring property. The state says revenue from both tax hikes would go toward affordable housing projects, including the construction of low-income units and expansion of housing tax credits. Kerry Park, a senior vice president Rhode Island Association of Realtors, tells DailyMail that many people who have median priced second homes are going to get hit hard. 'We do have a lot of smaller homes that are near the ocean. Since the pandemic those little tiny places are a lot of money now and if they've been in the family for generations now they're going to have to come up with this annual tax which isn't easy for a lot of those people,' she said. Watch Hill realtor Larry Burns warns the economic backlash of the tax will be brutal. Burns specializes in coastal and luxury properties, and says the impact of the tax will trickle down to longtime residents who are not wealthy, and to local economies. 'Rhode Island economy for the most part is driven by tourism, especially in all in New England especially coastal state like Rhode Island,' he told the Daily Mail. The beaches in Watch Hill are popular among residents who summer in the town 'And it's really going to discourage people from buying second homes here because of the added expense.' He continued: 'There's people like Taylor Swift — people will look at her and think, 'Well, she has so much money she'll never even notice an increase like this.' 'But it's not like the residents here have inexhaustible resources. '$100,000 here might be college education for the year for a kid, or two kids.' Burns added the tax could force many to part with cherished family homes. 'There's a lot of older folks or multigenerational properties where the siblings have inherited the property, and if you keep adding expenses people end up selling because they can't keep up with the cost,' he said. Local business owner James Nicholas, who is the fourth generation of his family to run St. Clair Annex, an ice cream shop down the hill from Swift's estate (yes, she's been in the shop and is lovely), put it best. 'As one of the people who run small businesses that benefit from from summer residents, I'm thinking of others like landscapers, lumber yards, contractors, pool companies who are are relying on these summer visitors,' he said. 'It's not the golden bullet that the people think it is that we're just gonna text rich people and nothing's gonna happen. There's downstream consequences. 'There's a stratum of society that can absorb that cost, but regular people, maybe they don't put an addition on the house, don't you know go to the local restaurants or they don't shop at the local shops as much, taxing them is short sighted thinking.' Whether the tax becomes law down the line remains uncertain, but Burns, the local realtor, says it could go either way.


Daily Mail
34 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Republican says 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' influencing Iran strike coverage as new details emerge from classified briefing
Senators on both sides of the aisle gave mixed reactions after a classified intelligence briefing on Donald Trump 's strikes wiping out Iran 's nuclear sites. CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Secretary of Defense from Pete Hegseth, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Caine, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio briefed lawmakers about Trump's strike on Iran's nuclear sites. Senators had demanded additional information due to conflicting reports over whether Trump totally 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear program after a top-secret intelligence document leaked to CNN said it just set it back a few months. The preliminary report also stated that Iran had moved much of its enriched uranium out of the sites before 30,000-pound 'bunker busters' were deployed by U.S. B-2 bombers. But the White House and Trump are denying any suggestion that the strikes were not successful saying the leaked report selectively left out crucial information and was it is still too early for a full analysis. Trump even blamed Democrats for the leak, being investigated by the FBI, suggesting they should be prosecuted. 'The Democrats are the ones who leaked the information on the PERFECT FLIGHT to the Nuclear Sites in Iran. They should be prosecuted!,' he wrote on Truth Social. Senator Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee blamed 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' for the negative press coverage on the strikes. 'Some Democrats, some in the media seem to have such a case of Trump Derangement Syndrome, that they're rooting for the survival of Iran's nuclear program versus celebrating success of our pilots and their crews, but I think the answers they got in there should be totally satisfactory, Cotton told reporters. Senator Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) said that he was 'happy it's done and over with.' 'I think that Iranian nuclear development is set back years,' he noted. Asked if Iran was still capable of producing a nuclear weapon, Marshall added 'I think it would take years for them to be able to do that, and I don't think they have any interest in doing it right now.' When asked if his Democrat colleagues seemed satisfied with the briefing, Marshall said, 'they seem to be. There seem to be as much pushback today as there was when Soleimani was taken out, so I think they're pretty satisfied.' Yet, some Democrats did not seem to be as satisfied with the briefing as Marshall assumed they were. Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) told a gaggle of reporters that 'we set this program back for months,' further stating 'and that is not obliteration.' Virginia Democrat Tim Kaine told the Daily Mail that he still planned to move forward with his Presidential War Powers Resolution. Over the weekend, Trump directed the U.S. military to deploy a dozen 30,000-pound 'bunker buster' bombs that 'obliterated' Iran's three largest nuclear facilities. 'The strikes were a spectacular military success,' Trump said in a late-night address to the nation from the White House on Saturday. The U.S. military joined forces with Israel to launch military strikes against Iran Saturday using B-2 'bunker bomber' planes. Air Force Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, leaves following a closed briefing on the situation in Iran for members of the U.S. Senate on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 26, 2025 Just before 8:00 p.m. ET Saturday night, Trump posted on his social media site Truth Social confirming the attacks. 'We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of Bombs was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. ' 'All planes are safely on their way home. Congratulations to our great American Warriors. There is not another military in the World that could have done this. Now Is The Time For Peace! Thank you for your attention to this matter.' Trump made the decision to attack Iran's sites 'based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future.' A number of Democrats, particularly those in positions where they deal with issues of National Intelligence were not notified of the attacks before they came. Representative Jim Himes (D-Conn.) and Senator Mark Warner (D-Va.) the top ranking Democrats on the House and Senate Intelligence committees, respectively, did not know about the attacks until after they took place, sources told CNN. Himes, part of the intelligence-heavy Gang of Eight, voiced outrage about being kept in the dark. 'According to the Constitution… my attention to this matter comes BEFORE bombs fall,' he said. CNN also reported that other Democrat members of the Gang of Eight did not get a heads up on the operation. Warner indicated he was 'frustrated' by the delay in being briefed. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, the ranking member on the Senate Foreign Relations committee complained that the president bucked a bipartisan tradition of 'regularly briefing Congress on major national security events.' Meanwhile, other Democrats, including Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), are contended over the weekend that the Iran strikes were ill-advised because the country 'posed no imminent threat' to the U.S.