Hawaii man, Vietnam veteran honors fallen heroes in Washington, D.C.
Here's how Memorial Day impacts the city of Honolulu's hours
Combat medic veteran Allen 'Doc' Hoe visited the USAA Poppy Wall of Honor, which offers a space of remembrance and reflection to honor the 600,000 service members who lost their lives in service to the country.
An American flag traveled with him, but it is not the average American flag.
It's the flag he's had since his time in combat, when he lost 18 members of his battalion after they were overrun by a regiment of the North Vietnamese Army in May 1968.
Download the free KHON2 app for iOS or Android to stay informed on the latest news
His son, 1st Lieutenant Infantry Officer, Nainoa K. Hoe, carried the flag with him when he served in Iraq in 2005.
'This flag went to my son and he was carrying it the day he was killed in combat in Mosul, Iraq. I am very proud of this incredible young man,' Doc said.
This year, the Poppy Wall of Honor features a special dedication to Nainoa, and Doc will be there to not only honor his legacy but also share his story with visitors from across the country.
Officials said Doc's American flag will also be on display for visitors to see through Memorial Day weekend.
Check out more news from around Hawaii
While in D.C., Doc also spent time visiting the Vietnam War Memorial, where 'he laid down poppy pins for all of his fallen brothers and sisters who were lost in combat in his service career.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
State Treasurer's office seeks to return 6 Purple Hearts found in unclaimed safe deposit boxes
The State Treasurer's office currently has more than 50 safe deposit boxes with a variety of military medals they hope to reunite with their recipients, the department said. The treasury said military medals can be difficult to return because neither the military nor the federal government keeps a comprehensive list of awardees. Advertisement The state says it has six unclaimed Purple Hearts it is hoping to return to the families of the service members who earned them. Massachusetts State TreasurerÕs office The office said it is hoping to return the Purple Hearts to the families of these six men who they believe are the recipients of the medals. Anyone who recognizes a name is asked to call the State Treasurer's office at 617-367-0000. Joseph Arruda: A World War II staff sergeant from New Bedford and South Dartmouth, Arruda served in the Asiatic–Pacific Theatre of Operations with the 129th Infantry Regiment. He died in 1998, and his daughters are the owners of the safe deposit box. The box likely went unclaimed in 2011 and was turned over to the treasury in 2019. Arruda's discharge papers are also in the box. Thomas P. Flynn: A World War I veteran from Worcester, Flynn was a sergeant in Company G with the 101st infantry. His Purple Heart is engraved with his name. Flynn, a Worcester firefighter, died in 1976 and his wife, Mary, who owned the safe deposit box, died in 1992. James S. Mooney: Mooney served in the US Marines during the Vietnam War. His Purple Heart was also engraved. The treasury department had no further information about him. Robert Boquist: Born in Stoneham, Boquist served in the Army during the Korean War and later lived in Rutland. He died in 2003, and his son, who owned the safe deposit box, died in 2016. Edward T. McCabe: A World War II veteran from 1941 to 1945, McCabe was born in Worcester and later lived in Framingham. He died in 1982. His two children owned the safe deposit box but have both since died. McCabe's Purple Heart is also engraved. William C. Bemis: Bemis was killed in action during World War II. The state treasury said it is believed his Purple Heart was in a fire in his family's home in the 1960s. The safe deposit box was owned by his nephew. Emily Sweeney of the Globe staff contributed to this report. Nick Stoico can be reached at
Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
National Park Peak Set to Be Renamed
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Teton County Board of County Commissioners is proposing to change the name of Mount Woodring in Wyoming's Grand Teton National Park to Raven Peak, due to concerns about the mountain's namesake being charged with sexual assault in the 1930s. Newsweek reached out to the press office of the National Park Service and the U.S. Geological Survey via email for comment. Why It Matters Mount Woodring was named after the park's first superintendent, Samuel T. Woodring. Woodring was charged with assaulting and attempting to commit rape against an 11-year-old girl in 1934, according to court documents. The charges were dismissed a year later because the parents of the girl did not want to put their daughter through the trauma of testifying, the name change proposal form states. The name change was proposed by the Teton County Board of County Commissioners, which said that "the name Mount Woodring is offensive." The board said that there was a "need to adopt a new name at the earliest possible opportunity." Mount Woodring was included in the U.S. Geological Survey's list of "upcoming proposals of interest" last year. Mount Woodring of the Grand Tetons Peaks in Grand Tetons National Park. Mount Woodring of the Grand Tetons Peaks in Grand Tetons National Park. htrnr/Getty Images What To Know The Teton County Board of County Commissioners has suggested the name Raven Peak, as "ravens are commonly found in the Tetons, they are considered intelligent birds, and the raven is considered significant in most Native American cultures." The board said it felt that it was important to name the peak after an animal and not a person, because "the reputation of a person can change with the passage of time, whereas the status of a raven is not likely to change as years pass." "The hope is that Raven Peak will have staying power that helps to make it a fitting name," the proposal said. In its original letter to the U.S. Board on Geographic Names, there was also another possible name mentioned: Equality Peak. However, after listening to public feedback, the board found that there was "overwhelming support for the name Raven Peak," while the name Equality Peak was deemed "controversial" and met with "considerable opposition" by some members of the public. President Donald Trump has been an active proponent of historical monuments and military bases keeping their original names, signing an executive order in March titled "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History." The administration wrote in the order: "Over the past decade, Americans have witnessed a concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation's history, replacing objective facts with a distorted narrative driven by ideology rather than truth." It added: "This revisionist movement seeks to undermine the remarkable achievements of the United States by casting its founding principles and historical milestones in a negative light." Earlier this year, he signed an executive order changing the name of Alaska's highest peak, Denali, back to its original name, Mount McKinley and renamed the Gulf of Mexico the "Gulf of America." What People Are Saying The Teton County Board of County Commissioners, in its letter: "Ravens live in our community and in Grand Teton National Park year-round and exhibit incredible intelligence, play an important role in our ecosystem, are adaptable – thriving at high and low elevations, often performing impressive acrobatic maneuvers – and are known to be highly social and playful. It is our community's sentiment that Raven Peak is an appropriate name for the mountain where these remarkable birds live and play." What Happens Next The final decision for the name change lies with the U.S. Board on Geographic Names, although Trump is able to override the board's authority should he decide to.
New York Times
8 hours ago
- New York Times
My Partner and I Aren't Excited to Move In Together. Is That Bad?
My partner and I have been seeing each other for two and a half years. We're planning to move in together next year, and if all goes well, to get married the year after that. The problem: Neither of us is super excited about moving in together. I like living alone, and I'm concerned about losing my independence. My girlfriend is concerned about having to deal with my small quirks. We've even discussed looking for a two-bedroom apartment, so we can have defined spaces to be alone. Make no mistake, we love each other deeply. And we recognize that there are many benefits to moving in together, such as advancing our relationship. Do we have a problem? BOYFRIEND I think you have the opposite of a problem: Through good communication, you and your girlfriend have identified an issue that was probably awkward to raise and to discuss. But you did it. Well done! To me, this bodes well for your relationship. And since there is no single answer here, let's consider a few options. Regardless of which apartment you plan to live in — hers, yours or one you haven't found yet — you can experiment now, in your current spaces, by designating zones and blocks of time in which you can be alone. Healthy couples are rarely together 24/7, and scheduling time and space for independence can be an important part of caring for yourself and your relationship. Now, this may be easier to pull off in a larger apartment, as you suggest, but you can still try it now. Let me add that there is no one way to advance your relationship, as you put it — and it certainly doesn't require shared real estate. I know a happily married couple who have lived in separate apartments in the same building for 30 years! This may not be your aim, but keep talking about what's working and what isn't. That's the important thing. It seems to me that you and your girlfriend are off to a healthy start. A Guest With Pre-Wedding Jitters Our adult son's girlfriend is transgender. This is not an issue for us. But we are all invited to our nephew's wedding, and his branch of the family is socially conservative. I have heard passing remarks from them over the years that indicate potential transphobia. The bridegroom's family has never met our son's girlfriend, nor do they know she is trans, but everyone has deep affection for our son. Do we owe the bridegroom or his parents any warning? Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
