Supporters of Bangladesh's ex-Premier Khaleda Zia rally to call for a general election
DHAKA, Bangladesh (AP) — Tens of thousands of students and youths from a leading Bangladeshi political party rallied in the capital, Dhaka, on Wednesday, calling for a general election in December as discontent grows with the interim government appointed after the ouster of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina in August.
Activists from three groups linked to the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, or BNP, headed by former Prime Minister Khaleda Zia gathered on the streets outside its party headquarters, under heightened security.
Wednesday's rally was held after weeks of political tensions after interim leader and Nobel Peace laureate Muhammad Yunus threatened to quit and the influential military chief publicly declared his support for an election in December.
Zia, who has been suffering from ill-health for several years, recently returned to Bangladesh after four months of medical treatment in London, putting further pressure on Bangladesh's interim government to call an election.
'We have come here to respond to the call for the unity of the young people. We want democracy, we want election. Next election should be held soon, not later than December,' Jahangir Hossain, a student activist, told The Associated Press. 'We are united for democracy.'
Hasina, Zia's archrival, has been in exile in India since she was toppled last year by a mass uprising. Her party, the Awami League, was also banned by the interim government.
The BNP's acting chairman, Tarique Rahman, Zia's elder son, was expected to address the rally later on Wednesday by video link from London, where he is in exile.
The interim government has been shaken by a series of protests, including by civil servants, primary school teachers and employees at the national revenue service in recent weeks. Many, including New York-based Human Rights Watch, accuse the government of failures in prosecuting organized crime figures responsible for killing and injuring hundreds of people. The rights group in a statement this month blamed the interim administration for legislative initiatives that undermine fundamental freedoms,
Business bodies have also criticized Yunus over the weakness of the economy and labor unrest.
When Yunus came to power, he promised to make reforms in areas including the election law, women's rights and general administration, but the process has been slow and his critics believe he is using delaying tactics to remain in power.
The 10 months of rule under Yunus also marked a visible rise of influence by Islamists in the Muslim-majority country, which is governed largely by a secular constitution and legal system. A fatigued military, which has been out of barracks since July last year to maintain law and order, is unhappy because of the delay in returning to democracy.
The BNP recently met with Yunus and reiterated its demand for an election in December, saying that if Yunus quits, the country will find an alternative leader. But Yunus' associates later said he was staying.
Yunus promised to hold an election by June 2026, depending on the extent of reforms it has undertaken. The BNP, which is hopeful of forming the next government with the absence of Hasina's Awami League, said the pace of implementation of reforms should not be an excuse to delay the election and argued that the reform is a continuous process.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-Global economy's 'sugar rush' defies trade drama
By Francesco Canepa FRANKFURT (Reuters) -For all the drama surrounding U.S. President Donald Trump's trade tariffs, the world economy is holding up better than many had expected. The latest data from the United States, China and, to a lesser extent, Europe are showing resilience and the global economy as a whole is still expected to grow modestly this year. This is in part due to U.S. buyers and foreign sellers bringing forward business while many of the import duties unveiled by U.S. President Donald Trump remain suspended. While that effect may prove short-lived, Trump's decision to pause tariffs and some glimpses of progress in trade talks, particularly between the United States and the European Union, have fuelled cautious optimism. "We are seeing a bit of a sugar rush in industry, with manufacturers bringing forward production and trade," said Holger Schmieding, an economist at investment bank Berenberg. "The other thing is that we have evidence that Trump pedalled back on tariffs. The bet in markets and to some extent in the economy is that he barks but doesn't bite." Investment banks and institutions generally expect the United States to avoid a recession this year and the global economy to keep growing. The International Monetary Fund downgraded its global GDP growth forecast by just 0.5 percentage points last month to 2.8%. This is roughly in line with the trend over the past decade and a far cry from the downturns experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic, the 2008 financial crisis or even the turmoil that followed the 9/11 terror attacks in 2001. No one is venturing a prediction on where the trade negotiations will eventually settle, particularly with a U.S. president who sees himself as unstoppable. This week alone, separate U.S. courts first blocked and then reinstated Trump's tariffs - creating a degree of legal uncertainty that will do little to facilitate trade deals between the United States and those threatened with the levies. While the EU celebrated "new impetus" in its trade talks with the United States, negotiations with China were "a bit stalled" according to U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. Companies are counting the cost of the ongoing impasse. A Reuters analysis of corporate disclosures shows Trump's trade war had cost companies more than $34 billion in lost sales and higher costs, a toll that is expected to rise as ongoing uncertainty over tariffs paralyses decision making at some of the world's largest companies. Car-makers from Japan's Toyota to Germany's Porsche and Mercedes-Benz are bracing for lower, or lower-than-previously expected profits if they have not given up making predictions altogether, like Volvo Cars and Dutch-based Stellantis. This is likely to result in a hit especially for Japan. The United States is Japan's biggest export destination, accounting for 21 trillion yen ($146.16 billion) worth of goods, with automobiles representing roughly 28% of the total. "While the worst shocks may be over, there's still a lot up in the air," Xingchen Yu, a strategist at UBS's Chief Investment Office, said. "We don't really know what a new normal for tariffs would look like, unfortunately." PAYBACK But so far the global economy has held up pretty well. China's output and exports are resilient as its companies re-route trade to the United States via third countries. Even in Europe, manufacturing activity was at a 33-month high in May, rebounding from a slump induced by more expensive fuel following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Confidence was also buttressed by the prospect of greater fiscal spending in Germany, a missing ingredient for European growth for the past couple of decades. The robustness of the world economy has surprised even professional forecasters. A measure produced by U.S. bank Citi that tracks the degree to which global economic data has surprised to the upside is now at its highest in more than a year. Some of that strength circles back to the tariffs themselves and the attempts by U.S. households and businesses to front-load purchases to beat anticipated price increases later this year. U.S. imports were up around 30% in March from where they were in October. The risk to the upbeat outlook comes from the expected "payback" of those advance purchases, which are unlikely to be repeated and will mean slower activity - in the U.S. and elsewhere - later. Economists still fear a triple whammy in which the front-loaded boost to the goods sector is unwound while U.S. household purchasing power is squeezed by higher prices and companies put off investment and hiring. At the margin, however, this scenario is starting to appear a little less likely after Trump's pause on tariffs. "The balance has slightly shifted towards more optimism, albeit with uncertainty and volatility," ING's global head of macro Carsten Brzeski said. ($1 = 143.6800 yen) (Additional reporting by Dan Burns in Washington, Claire Fu in Singapore, Ellen Zhang in Beijing and Leika Kihara in Tokyo; Editing by Mark John and Jane Merriman) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
BMW, VW, and Mercedes-Benz Hope to Cut a Trump Tariff Deal by June: Report
On Thursday morning, the United States Court of International Trade in New York City blocked President Donald Trump's sweeping tariff package, putting a temporary end to the mechanisms of the ongoing trade war that has rattled the automotive industry across the globe. The court stated that it was not the fallout of President Trump's unorthodox implementation of the tariffs, but rather, they "exceed any authority granted to the president … to regulate importation by means of tariffs." The industry-shaking automotive tariffs were included in the court's ruling, providing at least a temporary reprieve from the 25% tax applied to most imported vehicles. Of course, the Trump administration has already filed to appeal the decision, so automakers are hardly out of the weeds yet. And Germany's big three—the Volkswagen Group, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz—appear well aware of the challenges on the horizon. That's why executives from all three automakers are set to meet with the U.S. Department of Commerce in an effort to hash out a mutually beneficial deal, according to reporting from Reuters. While all three manufacturers operate factories within the continental U.S., the Trump administration has seemingly deemed these as not enough investment. As a result, a series of anonymous sources told Reuters that these impending discussions will hinge on each automaker's willingness to expand North American manufacturing. Mercedes is perhaps the closest to appeasing the Trump administration, as the Stuttgart-based automaker plans to expand production at its Alabama plant. Specifically, the GLC-Class SUV will be added to the assembly line, building on the existing production of GLE-Class, GLS-Class and GLE-Class Coupes in Tuscaloosa. BMW's strongest sellers in the U.S., the X-series SUVs, are also built domestically at its Spartanburg, South Carolina, plant — and the automaker is allegedly considering adding extra shifts to increase production. Similarly, the Volkswagen Group has claimed it will bring Audi production stateside by 2027, adding the four-ringed models to production lines in Chattanooga, Tennessee, and South Carolina. All three automakers declined to comment when asked about the upcoming meetings. The European Commission has been relatively acquiescent in the face of aggressive tariffs and is hoping to steady, if not slash, the level of tariffs encroaching on the 27-nation group from across the Atlantic Ocean. That said, the European Commission has claimed it is ready to strike back should these talks falter. Such offensive action would likely impact German automakers negatively, as BMW and Mercedes-Benz would be subject to tariffs from both ends of the ocean. BMW has previously asked the European Commission to lower the U.S. vehicle import tariff from 10% to 2.5%. Reuters reports that these talks could result in an expansion of the export credit scheme proposed earlier this year by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. Essentially, foreign automakers producing vehicles in the U.S. would receive credits for cars exported to other countries, which would then be deducted from the import tariffs imposed by the federal government. This deal could be nullified by the court's pausing of the tariff scheme, but analysts say that the Trump administration is especially likely to find other mechanisms to apply levies to the automotive industry. "If the ruling did remain in place," Deutsche Bank strategist Jim Reid said to The Guardian, "one option for the administration would be to expand the use of other tariff instruments, like the section 232 on national security grounds, which have been used for autos, steel and aluminum tariffs." You Might Also Like You Need a Torque Wrench in Your Toolbox Tested: Best Car Interior Cleaners The Man Who Signs Every Car
New York Post
38 minutes ago
- New York Post
Ben & Jerry's rips Israel for ‘genocide' in Gaza amid fight with parent company Unilever
Ben & Jerry's stoked controversy on Thursday after its independent board issued a statement labeling the conflict in Gaza a 'genocide' — placing renewed strain on its already tense relationship with parent company Unilever. 'We stand with all who raise their voices against genocide in Gaza—from petition-signers to street marchers to those risking arrest,' the left-leaning ice cream maker's board said in a statement that was first reported by The Wall Street Journal. 'When humanity is at stake, silence is not an option, now is the time to speak truth to power.' Advertisement 4 Ben & Jerry's stoked controversy after its independent board issued a statement labeling the conflict in Gaza a genocide. In Pictures via Getty Images The statement marks one of the most forceful corporate condemnations of Israel's conduct in Gaza since the conflict began, and could further deepen the divide between Ben & Jerry's progressive board and the more cautious multinational that owns it. Ben & Jerry's has long used its brand to champion progressive causes. In 2021, it stopped selling ice cream in Israeli-occupied territories, citing inconsistency with its values — a move that triggered backlash, shareholder divestment and legal disputes with parent company Unilever. Though the matter was settled in 2022, a new lawsuit alleges Unilever has again tried to silence the brand's support for Palestinian rights. Advertisement Unilever on Thursday quickly moved to distance itself from the board's remarks. 'The members of Ben & Jerry's social mission board do not speak for anyone other than themselves,' a Unilever spokesperson told the Journal on Thursday. 'We call for peace in the region and for relief for all those whose lives have been impacted.' Advertisement The response is the latest indication of a longstanding and fraught dynamic between the Vermont-based brand and its London-based owner. 4 An Israeli soldier stands on a tank as it is taking position in front of the northern Gaza Strip on March 18. Getty Images Last month, Unilever said it had no intention of selling Ben & Jerry's — despite a bid by the founders of the popular ice cream brand to buy back the company. Unilever also recently threatened to cut its $5 million annual funding to the Ben & Jerry's Foundation unless it agrees to a fast-tracked audit of its donations, escalating tensions over the brand's progressive activism. Advertisement In March, Ben & Jerry's accused its corporate owner of ousting the ice cream maker's chief executive over the brand's anti-Trump political activism. When Unilever acquired Ben & Jerry's in 2000, the deal included a unique arrangement: the company's independent board retained authority over the brand's social mission and marketing. That unusual structure has led to numerous public clashes in recent years, particularly over the Israel-Palestinian dispute. 4 A woman holding a baby cries as Palestinians check the site of an overnight Israeli strike in the central Gaza Strip on Friday. AFP via Getty Images In legal filings, Unilever has criticized the board's 'decision to continue to embroil B&J's and Unilever in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, one of the most divisive and polarizing topics of our time.' Ben & Jerry's co-founder Ben Cohen made headlines earlier this month when he and other activists disrupted a Senate health committee hearing. As he was removed by security, Cohen shouted: 'Congress is paying to bomb poor kids in Gaza and paying for it by kicking poor kids off Medicaid in the US.' The latest statement comes amid renewed scrutiny of Unilever's ice cream division. Advertisement The company recently announced plans to spin off its ice cream business entirely in order to streamline operations and focusing on higher-growth areas. Analysts have noted that Ben & Jerry's activism — and the backlash it frequently generates — has added complications for the broader Unilever brand. 4 Ben & Jerry's co-founder Ben Cohen was removed by Capitol Police on May 14, 2025, during a Senate Health Committee hearing on the Department of Health and Human Services budget. REUTERS Tensions between the two entities reached a boiling point in 2021 when Ben & Jerry's announced it would stop selling its products in Jewish settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem — citing inconsistency with its values. Advertisement That decision prompted legal and financial consequences for Unilever, which was accused of violating anti-boycott laws in several jurisdictions. The backlash led to lawsuits, sanctions and the withdrawal of hundreds of millions of dollars in Unilever stock, according to a March legal filing by the company. In response, Unilever sold its Ben & Jerry's business in Israel to a local distributor — an effort to ensure continued sales across Israel and the West Bank. Advertisement Ben & Jerry's then sued its parent company, alleging that the sale breached the terms of the acquisition agreement and undermined the board's control over social impact decisions. The Post has sought comment from Ben & Jerry's and Unilever.
