Ohio state rep backs Trump's push for Guardians to change name back to Indians
Trump unleashed two social media posts imploring both teams to make the moves. While he threatened to put the Commanders' RFK Stadium deal in the balance, he said changing the names back was "common sense."
Ohio state Republican Rep. Brian Lorenz appeared to agree with the president.
"You don't mess with Chief Wahoo and expect Cleveland to forget," he wrote in a post on X. "The Cleveland Indians weren't just a team — they were summer nights, family memories, heartbreaks, and miracles.
"We didn't change because fans asked — we changed because elites told us to. Time to bring back what made us us."
Trump first wrote on Truth Social that there was a "big clamoring" for the Commanders to go back to being called the Redskins and the same with the Guardians.
"The Washington 'Whatever's' should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team. There is a big clamoring for this," he wrote. "Likewise, the Cleveland Indians, one of the six original baseball teams, with a storied past.
"Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen. Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them. Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!"
Later in the day, he ratcheted up the pressure.
"My statement on the Washington Redskins has totally blown up, but only in a very positive way," he added. "I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original 'Washington Redskins,' and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, 'Washington Commanders,' I won't make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington. The Team would be much more valuable, and the Deal would be more exciting for everyone.
"Cleveland should do the same with the Cleveland Indians. The Owner of the Cleveland Baseball Team, Matt Dolan, who is very political, has lost three Elections in a row because of that ridiculous name change," Trump added. "What he doesn't understand is that if he changed the name back to the Cleveland Indians, he might actually win an Election. Indians are being treated very unfairly. MAKE INDIANS GREAT AGAIN (MIGA)!"
While Matt Dolan owns a minority stake in the Guardians, it was Paul Dolan who announced the change in 2021.
Cleveland had been known as the Indians since 1915. Dolan previously said the decision to explore the name change came from "an awakening or epiphany" after the death of George Floyd.
Cleveland was nicknamed the Blues in 1902, then the Napoleons and the Naps until 1915 when the organization changed the name to the Indians. The team was known as the Indians through the 2021 season.
Guardians President Chris Antonetti responded to Trump's pressure on Sunday afternoon. He said it wasn't actually something the organization had on its mind.
The team told Fox News Digital they had no further comment.
Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Security tightens as Donald Trump tees off at Turnberry
A major security operation is ramping up as Donald Trump begins a four-day private visit in Scotland. The US president arrived at Prestwick Airport on Friday evening and stayed at his luxury golf resort, Trump Turnberry in South Ayrshire. Wearing a white "USA" cap and accompanied by his second son Eric, he teed off for a round of golf at about 10:00 on his first morning at the resort. Trump is due to meet UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Scotland's First Minister John Swinney over the next few days, as well as opening a second 18-hole course at his estate in Aberdeenshire. The president has said "it's great to be in Scotland" and has praised the leaders of both governments. A number of protests are expected to be held to coincide with the visit, including demonstrations in Edinburgh and Aberdeen later. Questions have already been raised about the scale of the visit and the security implications, with police representatives raising concerns about the costs involved and the impact on staffing. Trump says 'great to be in Scotland', as he lands for four-day trip What do we know about Donald Trump's visit to Scotland? Trump takes time out to open Scottish golf course Journalists, photographers and plane watchers were among the crowds who gathered to see Air Force One touch down at Prestwick just before 20:30 on Friday. Trump was greeted by Scottish Secretary Ian Murray and Warren Stephens, US Ambassador to the UK. The president spoke with journalists before a motorcade made up of more than two dozen vehicles escorted him to Turnberry. A number of roads have been closed in the area while police and military personnel have been carrying out sweeps around the resort. A security checkpoint has been put in place outside the hotel and a large fence has been erected around the course. While security remains tight around Turnberry, some golfers were able to use the Ailsa course from about 07:30 - albeit in windy conditions. Drones and helicopters have also been circling overhead. Trump played his round of golf with three others, including his son Eric, with an entourage that included 15 golf buggies. A round during peak summer season can cost £1,000 at Turnberry. There were no sign of any protesters around the course. Trump waved to photographers who had gathered on a beach dune for a vantage point as he walked to the fourth tee. Trump is expected to meet Starmer and Swinney on Monday while European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen will meet the president on Sunday to discuss transatlantic trade relations. The US president will travel back to Washington on Tuesday and is due to return to the UK for an official state visit in September. In his remarks to the press at Prestwick, Trump said European countries need to "get your act together" on migration, and "stop the windmills", referring to wind farms. In 2019, his company Trump International lost a long-running court battle to stop a major wind power development being built in the North Sea off Aberdeen. Trump argued that the project, which included 11 wind turbines, would spoil the view from his golf course at Menie. Swinney has said his meeting with Trump would present an opportunity to "essentially speak out for Scotland" on issues such as trade and the increase of business from the United States in Scotland. The first minister said he would also raise "significant international issues" including "the awfulness of the situation in Gaza". He urged those set to protest against the president's visit to do so "peacefully and to do so within the law". Visits to Scotland by sitting US presidents are rare. Queen Elizabeth hosted Dwight D Eisenhower at Balmoral in Aberdeenshire in 1957. George W Bush travelled to Gleneagles in Perthshire for a G8 summit in 2005 and Joe Biden attended a climate conference in Glasgow in 2021. The only other serving president to visit this century is Trump himself in 2018 when he was met by protesters including one flying a paraglider low over Turnberry, breaching the air exclusion zone around the resort. He returned in 2023, two-and-a-half years after he was defeated by Biden. Trump will have an official state visit to the UK in September when he and First Lady Melania Trump will be hosted by King Charles at Windsor Castle in Berkshire. It is the second state visit he has been afforded - second-term US presidents are traditionally not offered state visits and have instead been invited for tea or lunch with the monarch, usually at Windsor Castle.
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why the Social Security Administration Loves Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' — Should You?
President Trump campaigned with the promise to end taxes on Social Security. The One, Big, Beautiful Bill (OBBB) is Trump's cornerstone piece of legislation aimed at making that promise a reality. While seemingly welcome news to the near 58 million beneficiaries aged 65 and older (according to the Social Security Administration [SSA]), the pledge isn't exactly as it seems. Check Out: For You: Upon passage of the OBBB, the SSA hailed provisions that it says will benefit Social Security recipients. Here's why the SSA loves the OBBB and what it really means for retired Americans. Why the SSA Loves it According to the SSA, a significant number of beneficiaries depend on monthly Social Security checks for at least half of their income. Knowing this, the SSA is actively highlighting the relief now available to recipients. 'The bill ensures that nearly 90% of Social Security beneficiaries will no longer pay federal income taxes on their benefits, providing meaningful and immediate relief to seniors who have spent a lifetime contributing to our nation's economy,' the SSA said in a press release. Before passage, only 64% of retirees didn't pay taxes on Social Security benefits, according to the White House. Putting more money into the wallets of retirees is a good thing, and the SSA is wise to promote the fact. See Next: Yes, If You're at the Right Income Level The OBBB was a massive piece of legislation, with a reported 900 pages, according to NPR. However, one thing is clear — the OBBB doesn't eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits. Thanks to the Byrd Rule, it wasn't able to do that, according to CBS News. What the OBBB does provide is a new deduction for retirees of $6,000 per person, providing an indirect benefit for individuals on Social Security. The deduction is available to both people who take the standard deduction or itemize. If you're married, both spouses can claim the deduction, but there is a phaseout. 'The deduction will phase out at a 6% rate when modified adjusted gross income exceeds $75,000 for single filers and $150,000 for joint filers. The deduction is fully phased out at $175,000 for single filers and $250,000 for joint filers,' per the Tax Foundation. The deduction isn't indefinite as it ends at the end of 2028. For middle-class retirees, this could be a beneficial, albeit temporary, way to reduce taxes. No, If It Doesn't Impact You It's easy to hear headlines that there's no more taxes on Social Security and think it's a good thing. Unfortunately, there's more beneath the surface. Not all retirees will feel the impact of the new deduction for older Americans. Lower-income retirees will see little to no change, according to the Tax Foundation, 'Those taxpayers are already exempt from taxation on their Social Security benefits.' No, If You're Concerned About Social Security Lasting Trust funds will deplete by 2034, a year sooner than anticipated, according to the SSA. Understandably, some retirees or near-retirees may feel nervous about possible insolvency. The OBBB may worsen the situation. Bobby Kogan, senior director of federal budget policy at the Center for American Progress, said to CBS News that we're already facing an issue with insufficient funds being contributed to the trust fund. And this bill would result in even less money being added to it. The Committee for a Responsible Budget (CRFB) confirmed this concern. 'OBBBA would impact Social Security and Medicare indirectly, mainly by reducing the revenue collected from the income taxation of Social Security benefits, which is deposited into the Social Security and Medicare trust funds,' said the CRFB. This reality may make it necessary for politicians to do something many don't want to see: slashing benefits. This is a key reason why anxious Americans view the changes with apprehension. The OBBB provides some benefits to Americans on Social Security, but they're largely temporary. While the SSA excitedly announced the changes, due diligence is essential to see if it's good for you. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard I'm a Retired Boomer: 6 Bills I Canceled This Year That Were a Waste of Money 10 Used Cars That Will Last Longer Than an Average New Vehicle This article originally appeared on Why the Social Security Administration Loves Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' — Should You? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I Asked ChatGTP What Trump's China Deal Means for the Middle Class — Here's What It Said
Rapidly shifting pieces have been synonymous with President Trump's trade policy — China included, according to AP News. Chinese producers sell more than $400 billion worth of goods in the U.S. annually, per Reuters. In order to help orient ourselves within all the changes right now, here's what ChatGTP said President Trump's latest deal with China means for middle-class finances. Check Out: For You: Tariff Reductions Are Partial, Short-Term Relief Tariffs aren't gone, but middle-class households face partial relief because of tariff reductions. A deal slashed U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods from 145% to 30%, according to Time Magazine. However, an average American family would still face a net hike of $2,300 to $2,800 a year in additional tariff-related costs. Trending Now: Consumer Prices Are Still Elevated Consumers continue to pay higher for everyday items, including electronics, clothing and appliances due to residual tariff burdens. Tariffs work like regressive taxes with those in the middle-class paying a larger share of income, per Bloomberg. Inflation and Reduced Purchasing Power Consumer Price Index (CPI) increases tied to tariffs could hit 1.3% to 2.3%, depending on whether all planned tariffs take effect, per Barron's. This is equivalent to a loss of $1,900 to $3,800 in real purchasing power per household annually. Uncertainty Hinders Business and Hiring Amidst pronounced uncertainty, businesses and consumers alike may be less inclined to make big changes or commitment. 'The stop-start nature of tariff implementation slows corporate investment, especially in manufacturing — limiting job growth and wage pressure. Consumer confidence can waver amid this uncertainty,' ChatGPT said. Risk of Retaliation and Spillover Any potential repercussions don't end just because tariffs end. Chinese retaliatory tariffs on U.S. exports could hit middle-class related industries, including autos, agriculture and manufacturing, leading to layoffs or price hikes. 'Ongoing tit-for-tat risks mean future prices and employment could shift again,' ChatGPT explained. So, What Are Your Next Moves? ChatGPT had four suggestions for what to do right now: Budget for inflation in your essential expenses, including groceries, clothes and electronics. Lock in rates for mortgage and loans sooner rather than later as uncertainty may affect financial markets. Track CPI and Fed signals. These reflect tariff-driven inflation trends. Diversify income streams to guard against local job or wage hits. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 7 Tax Loopholes the Rich Use To Pay Less and Build More Wealth 5 Cities You Need To Consider If You're Retiring in 2025 This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGTP What Trump's China Deal Means for the Middle Class — Here's What It Said Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
