
A tiny tribe wanted to shape the future of a famed canyon. Ancient DNA helped.
The elders of the Picuris Pueblo nation, a 300-person tribe in Northern New Mexico, have passed down their history for centuries. They trace ancestral connections to the famed complex of sandstone dwellings and roads at Chaco Canyon, a World Heritage site about 125 miles to the west.
But the small tribe didn't have a 'seat at the table' or much influence when it came to the future of Chaco Canyon and debates about drilling in the area, said Picuris Lt. Gov. Craig Quanchello. Six years ago, the tribe took the unusual step of partnering with an international team of scientists to probe whether analysis of ancient DNA could strengthen their case and more firmly connect them to the community they wanted to shape.
The findings, reported Wednesday in the journal Nature, confirm what the Picuris have always known — a continuous genetic thread connects human remains at Chaco Canyon to Picuris ancestors to modern-day people. The work also provides a possible new model for research involving Indigenous people, in which research is driven by the community.
'We steered this ship, in the hopes that using technology in the Western way, they would now listen,' Quanchello said at a news conference. 'We've always known who we are. Our elders [have] always known we've been here. Come to find out, everything we felt and knew [is] just validated on their terms.'
The study is novel because research on Indigenous communities has often been exploitative. Scientists drop into a community and take samples — sometimes without proper consent — and publish results without consideration of how they might affect tribal members.
The Havasupai tribe in Arizona, for example, sued Arizona State University in 2004 after samples collected for a study of type 2 diabetes were used without permission on other genetic studies. A 2017 genetic study of human remains in Chaco Canyon created a firestorm of criticism, because scientists failed to consult with tribal nations affiliated with the site.
The new study offers an alternate way for such studies to occur, guided by the interests of the tribe.
'I truly believe that DNA can be used to help Indigenous people fight for their rights, their claims and their sovereignty,' said Thomaz Pinotti, a geneticist from the University of Copenhagen who led the work.
Katrina Claw, a Navajo geneticist at the University of Colorado's Anschutz Medical Campus who was not involved in the study, said the tribe's participation is evident in the paper, which discusses the traditional knowledge of the Picuris alongside genetics.
'I think we're entering an era where ethical standards have changed — from 5 years ago, 10 years ago, 20 years ago. It's changing rapidly, which is very positive,' Claw said. 'I like that scientists and researchers are trying to keep up with these changes.'
Picuris is a small tribe today, but this wasn't always the case. Prior to the arrival of European colonizers, there were around 3,000 individuals according to the paper's estimate. Within a century, their population plummeted by 90 percent.
Michael Adler, an archaeologist at Southern Methodist University, began working closely with the Picuris in the early 1990s. He said that Western scientists, including himself, knew embarrassingly little about the tribe's history at the time.
The traditional 'archaeological worldview,' Adler said, was that the Picuris did not follow the ways of the Chacoan people to the west, who built 'great houses' of masonry with hundreds of rooms. Chaco was the center of the Pueblo world from about 850 to 1150. Nearly two dozen tribes have ancestral claims to the site.
But around that same time, the Picaris built subterranean pit houses. Their pottery style was different.
'Even though everyday in class, we tell our students, 'pots aren't people, arrowheads aren't people,' we fall into the same pitfall,' Adler said.
Traditional knowledge, however, was clear that Picuris people had a deep connection to Chaco Canyon. Tribal leaders said that line of evidence was often ignored.
In 2019, Picuris tribal leaders were faced with a dilemma: what to do with human remains that had been exhumed in archaeological excavations that began in the 1960s. Tribal leaders wondered whether genetic analysis could help reveal their ties to Chaco Canyon.
Members of the tribe began meeting with experts in ancient DNA from the University of Copenhagen via Zoom. Undertaking the project was risky, with concerns about how the data and samples might be used. After two years of consultation, they decided to move ahead. Eske Willerslev, an ancient DNA expert at the University of Copenhagen said that the tribe retained the right to call off the research at any point.
'There has unfortunately been a long history of harmful and unethical genomic research with Indigenous communities and Ancestors, and many Indigenous communities have had deep — and justifiable! — concerns about studies of their DNA and the DNA of their Ancestors,' Deborah Bolnick, an anthropological geneticist at the University of Connecticut who was not involved in the research, said in an email.
Bolnick said she hoped to see tribal members directly involved in data collection and analysis, but she praised the current study as refreshing and positive.
Anne Stone, an anthropological geneticist at Arizona State University, agreed. 'I think it's a very deliberative process when a community decides to participate. And given the politics and impact of colonialism — a very brave process. And I think this is a lovely example of a respectful dialogue between both parties.'
In total, scientists analyzed DNA from 16 Picuris individuals who lived 500 to 700 years ago and 13 present-day individuals. They compared those data to the 2017 genetic study of human remains from Chaco Canyon, which had been criticized because tribal communities were not consulted.
Scientists said that they were hesitant at first to use the controversial dataset. They brought the question before Picuris leaders. Those leaders said, 'It's not your call, that's our call,' Adler recalled being told.
Those genomic data show a throughline, from Chaco Canyon to present day Picuris — reflecting traditional knowledge, and giving the Picuris a new line of evidence when trying to make their voices heard.
The research team is quick to say they aren't making an exclusive claim. Other tribes also have genetic ties to Chaco ancestors. But now the Picuris know.
'We have it on their terms, with the science talk,' Quanchello said. 'It not only runs through our land, through our veins, but now through science.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
5 hours ago
- Forbes
Why The ‘Strawberry Moon' Will Be Lowest Until 2043 — And How To Photograph It
Tuesday's full strawberry moon occurs during two-year period known as the 'major lunar standstill" ... More or "lunistice," when a once-in 18.6-year event will create the lowest-hanging full moon since 2006 and until 2043. The full moon is seen here rising behind Stonehenge in England. (Photo by) The full strawberry moon will put on a dramatic show at moonrise on Tuesday, June 10 — low, luminous, and colored orange as it climbs into the southeastern sky. Get to an observing location that looks southeast — preferably low to the horizon — and at the specific time of moonrise where you are (during dusk), you'll see the red-orange orb rise before your eyes. Seen from the Northern Hemisphere, the full moon will rise far to the southeast, move across the sky close to the southern horizon, and set in the southwest close to dawn. It's happening because we're in the midst of a rare two-year period known as the 'major lunar standstill" or "lunistice," when a once-in 18.6-year event will create the lowest-hanging full moon since 2006 and until 2043. Earth's axis is tilted by 23.5 degrees with respect to the ecliptic, the path of the sun through the daytime sky, and, in effect, the plane of the solar system. That's what gives us seasons, and that's why planets are always found close to the ecliptic (hence the misused "planetary alignment" claims despite planets always being somewhat aligned with each other). The moon's orbit crosses the ecliptic twice each month, and when those crossings align with a new or full moon, eclipses can occur — hence the shared root in the words 'ecliptic' and 'eclipse.' While the sun's rise and set points vary throughout the year, changing by 47 degrees — and reaching the extreme points at the solstices — the moon's range is bigger, with that 5-degree tilt giving its rise and set points a 70-degree range near a major standstill, according to Griffith Observatory. Mount Coot-tha Lookout, Brisbane A major lunar standstill is a period when the northernmost and southernmost moonrise and moonset are furthest apart. Unlike a solstice (Latin for "sun stand still"), which lasts for one day, a major lunar standstill lasts for two years. These events are most noticeable during a full moon. Essentially, the swiveling and shifting orbit of the moon — a consequence of the sun's gravitational pull — is tilted at its maximum angle relative to the ecliptic. Every 18.6 years, the tilts combine to cause the moon to rise and set as much as 28.5° north or south of due east and west, respectively. Most people won't notice the major lunar standstill, but if you regularly watch the full moon rise from a particular place, go there — you'll get a shock when the moon rises at an extreme position much farther from where you might imagine it will rise. Imaging a full moon using a smartphone isn't easy, but it is possible to capture something special. First, switch off your flash and turn on HDR mode (if available) to better capture both the moon and the landscape as the light fades during dusk. Don't zoom in because digital zoom only blurs the details. Instead, frame the moon within a landscape for more impact, which is especially effective during this month's unusually far-southeast moonrise. If you use a manual photography app, stick to an ISO of 100 for a clean shot and experiment with slower (but not too slow) shutter speeds. A tripod will help, especially when using slow shutter speeds. However, if you don't have one, you can balance your phone on a wall or ledge. The key is to image it when it's low on the horizon and glowing orange. You've got a short window to capture that color, even with this low-hanging full moon, which will turn bright white as it lifts above the horizon. Wishing you clear skies and wide eyes.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
European Mars orbiter spies crumbling crater 'soaked in layers of Martian history' (photo)
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. A European Mars probe captured a stunning view of a Martian crater that's rich in many of the features that help scientists reconstruct the planet's dynamic history over billions of years. The image, taken in October 2024 using the High Resolution Stereo Camera (HRSC) on the European Space Agency's (ESA) Mars Express orbiter, shows a crumbling crater called Deuteronilus Cavus. It is "soaked in layers of Martian history," having been exposed to volcanic lava flows, erosion from liquid water, repeated freeze-thaw cycles that expanded its edges, and layers of wind-blown volcanic dust settling over time, according to a statement from the space agency. Located in a transitional zone between the planet's rugged southern highlands and smoother northern lowlands, Deuteronilus Cavus is believed to originally have formed following an impact roughly 4.1 to 3.7 billion years ago, when Mars and other planets were being bombarded by huge numbers of asteroids and comets. Over time, the nearly circular 75-mile-wide (120 kilometers) depression has been eroded by water and ice, enlarging it to nearly twice its initial size. ESA shared a fun "recipe" outlining the series of events that shaped the crater, offering valuable insights into the planet's climatic and geological evolution. For example, the presence of clay minerals indicates past interactions between volcanic materials and water, hinting at the possibility of ancient habitable environments, according to the statement. This is further supported by channels cut through the crater's rim, likely formed by surface water flow or the collapse of weakened ground above draining subsurface water. Meanwhile, grooves in the crater rim suggest that ice once formed when Mars' axis tilted more sharply away from the sun than it does now. Related Stories: — Mars: Everything you need to know about the Red Planet — Facts about ESA's Mars Express orbiter — What happened to all the water on Mars? Here's why the debate continues "The linear grooves indicate where boulders frozen into the base of a glacier were dragged along, gouging out the troughs visible today," ESA officials said in the statement. "Around the base of the crater's inner walls, we can see the smooth, tongue-shaped ends of rock-covered glaciers. These 'debris aprons' formed when ice mixed together with rocky debris along the crater walls during a period of glaciation, and slowly crept downslope." The crater's interior also exhibits a mix of rock knobs, mesas, channels and plains, believed to be remnants of a collapsed central peak. Dark volcanic ash covers much of the crater floor, while surrounding wrinkle ridges mark ancient lava flows. "This feature-rich crater has all the ingredients for exploring Mars' varied geological processes, giving us a tantalizing taste of its complex history," ESA officials said in the statement.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Resilience, a Private Japanese Spacecraft, Crash-Landed on the Moon
A Japanese spacecraft has probably crashed on the Moon, the second failed landing attempt for Tokyo-based private firm ispace. The HAKUTO-R Mission 2 (M2) lander — also called Resilience — began its landing sequence from a 100-kilometre-altitude orbit at 3.13am local time on 5 June. The craft was due to land near the centre of Mare Frigoris (Sea of Cold) at 4.17am. The ispace team said at a press conference that it lost contact with M2 when the craft was 192 metres above the Moon's surface and descending faster than expected. An attempt to reboot M2 was also unsuccessful. [Sign up for Today in Science, a free daily newsletter] M2 didn't receive measurements of the distance between itself and the lunar surface in time to slow down and reach its correct landing speed, the team said. 'It eventually slowed down, but not softly enough,' says Clive Neal, who studies the Moon at the University of Notre Dame in Indianapolis, US. He speculates that the failure was probably caused by a systems issue that wasn't identified and addressed during the M1 landing attempt. 'It's something that I believe will definitely be fixable, because getting that close means there's a few tweaks that are going to be needed for the next one,' he adds. If M2 had successfully landed on the lunar surface, the mission would have been the second time a commercial company had achieved the feat and a first for a non-US company. ispace's Mission 1 (M1) probably crashed during a landing attempt in April 2023. Lunar landings are challenging. When M1 crashed, Ryo Ujiie, ispace's chief technology officer said the telemetry — which collects data on the craft's altitude and speed — estimated that M1 was on the surface when it wasn't, causing the lander to free fall. Speaking to Nature last week, Ujiie said the company had addressed the telemetry issue with M2 and modified its software. 'We also carefully selected how to approach the landing site,' he added. Had M2 landed successfully, the craft would have supplied electricity for its cargo, including water electrolyzing equipment and a module for food production experiments — developed by Japan-based Takasago Thermal Engineering and biotechnology firm Euglena. A deep space radiation probe made by Taiwan's National Central University, and the 54-centimetre Tenacious rover were also be on board. The rover, created by ispace's European subsidiary in Luxemburg, was going to be released from the lander to collect imagery, location data and lunar sand known as regolith. Tenacious also carries a small red house made by Swedish artist Mikael Genberg. The craft launched on 15 January from Cape Canaveral, Florida, onboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket. The rocket was also carrying the Blue Ghost Moon lander — developed by Firefly Aerospace, an aerospace firm based in Texas — which landed on the Moon on 2 March. M2 took a longer path to the moon than Blue Ghost, performing a lunar flyby on 15 February and spending two months in a low-energy transfer orbit before entering lunar orbit on 7 May. Ujiie says the path was slower because it was a low-energy trajectory, meaning that less fuel was used to move between Earth and lunar orbit. Richard de Grijs, an astronomer at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia, says there will likely be more private companies trying to land their own crafts on the Moon. 'It seems that the big government players like NASA are quite keen to partner with commercial companies,' he says, because they can develop and launch crafts more cheaply than government bodies. He also expects that more missions will be launched in clusters, like the launch of M2 and Blue Ghost. This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on June 6, 2025.