Fort Stewart army base shooting raises questions about military gun policies
Soldiers in the area who witnessed the shooting at Fort Stewart in Georgia 'immediately and without hesitation' tackled the shooter to subdue him before law enforcement arrived, Brigadier Gen. John Lubas said at a news conference Wednesday.
But they didn't have firearms to shoot back because of a policy first enacted decades ago to ensure safety by limiting armed members on army bases to military police. The suspect in the shooting, logistics Sgt. Quornelius Radford, used a personal weapon, Lubas said.
Questions about why soldiers didn't have weapons were buzzing online after at least one video of the incident on social media appears to show service members in uniform running to safety amid a lockdown that lasted about an hour, instead of firing back at the shooter.
While some have questioned why many service members in the area during the shooting didn't use weapons to defend themselves, others have questioned whether existing regulations do enough to prevent shootings on bases. The shooting is the latest in a growing list of violent incidents at American military installations over the years — some claiming upward of a dozen lives.
Experts say that there are reasons for long-standing regulations on military bases, despite their limitations.
Department of Defense policy prohibits military personnel from carrying personal weapons on base without permission from a senior commander, and there is a strict protocol for how the firearm must be stored.
Typically, military personnel must officially check their guns out of secure storage to go to on-base hunting areas or shooting ranges, and then check all firearms back in promptly after its sanctioned use. Military police are often the only armed personnel on base, outside of shooting ranges, hunting areas or in training, where soldiers can wield their service weapons without ammunition.
The federal policy leaves little room for local commanders to use discretion about how the policy is enforced. That means the regulation applies even in Georgia, a state with some of the most lax gun regulations in the country, where Fort Stewart is located.
Robert Capovilla, a founding partner for one of the largest military law firms in the country, strongly believes in the Second Amendment. But he said that the strict firearm policies on military bases exist for a reason.
'A lot of these installations are involved in top-secret operations, dealing with top-secret information, and because of that you need a heightened security,' said Capovilla, a former military prosecutor and defense attorney. 'You simply don't want folks walking around a federal installation with personal weapons.'
He said he has traveled to 'nearly every single major military installation' in North America for his work. Whenever he visits an installation, he said armed military police have a visible presence almost constantly on base. He added that he doesn't believe Wednesday's shooting could have been prevented if military personnel had been armed at the time.
Firearms on military bases are more regulated than most states in some ways, according to former military prosecutor and defense counsel Eric Carpenter. But he said that the limitations on gun control on military bases parallel gun policy debates in the public more broadly.
'You don't forfeit all of your rights when you enter the military,' Carpenter said. 'Outside of a military situation, the service member has just as much Second Amendment right as anyone else.'
For example, it could be fairly straightforward for a service member living off-base to bring a weapon onto the military installation, Carpenter said, because a senior commander can't regulate gun ownership off base.
There is also scant legal ground for leadership to confiscate a gun when a service member is exhibiting signs of a mental health crisis or post-traumatic stress disorder, potentially posing a threat to themselves or others. In recent years, those gaps have come under more scrutiny because of mass shootings, he said.
'All those rules aren't going to prevent someone from doing what the guy did today,' Carpenter said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
44 minutes ago
- Fox News
Rural Montana residents predicted bar massacre suspect's violent outburst: 'He will kill you'
ANACONDA, Mont. – ANACONDA, MT: Two residents of the rural Montana town that was rocked by an armed gunman's alleged mass shooting at a local bar said members of the town had long predicted that he would snap. Two men in Anaconda, Montana, who requested anonymity due to the sensitive nature of their comments and the prevailing sentiment in town, told Fox News Digital that Michael Paul Brown was a "loose cannon" whose delusions were well known to residents long before he allegedly murdered four people in cold blood at the Owl Bar last Friday. "I've been to a couple of barbecues with him and what not, and he's always been just kind of a loose cannon," one man said. "We always joked about it. About him, like going nuts and just shooting." "Like I got in a fight with him once and then someone was like, 'You better watch yourself, he might kill you,'" the man said. "So, he was just always kinda not there." The man explained that Brown, who grew up in Anaconda and was an armor crewman in the Army from January 2001 to May 2005 before serving in the National Guard from April 2006 to March 2008, would sometimes share fantastical stories that were well out of the realm of possibility. "He's just a storyteller, you know, just maverick stories," he said. "One of the stories that he told me is how he went and stole some artifact from some place, and then, like, killed a bunch of people and started a civil war." Both men claimed that while the narrative that Brown had been denied access to mental healthcare is popular among some locals and in the media, Brown actually declined the healthcare he may have needed. "This family tried to get him out, and he never accepted it, you know," the first man said, adding that even the owner of the Owl Bar that Brown frequented wanted to get him help. The second added that people "absolutely" tried to help Brown. "He denied service," that man said. "What I understand, there was a couple families that was trying to get him to get [help]." Clare Boyle is Brown's niece and an Anaconda resident. She told KXFL that Brown suffered from PTSD stemming from his time in the army, and from schizophrenia. "Mikee's decline started really heavily when my grandma passed," she told the outlet. "The trauma from losing his last parent broke Mikee." Brown's mom died in 2021. "The VA said he no longer qualified for assistance with obtaining prescriptions and help. The Montana State Hospital wouldn't take him in unless it was a court order," Boyle said. "The only way to obtain a court order was for Mikee to become a harm to himself or others. We warned them that a snap could happen and that he was not of sound mind, and we were still left with no answers and nowhere to turn." "My heart breaks for this town," she said. "There is no amount of apology or words that could ever describe how sorry I am and how I feel for these families, my own included." Boyle has not returned multiple comment requests from Fox News Digital this week. The men also dispelled a rumor that Brown had been denied service at the bar on Thursday, July 31, which some have posited as a motive for the shooting. They said that Brown had carried out the alleged killings with premeditation. "Like I said, he just decided to do that that day, like he didn't get kicked out of the bar or nothing. He just walked in there and shot them," the first man said. "That could have been anybody in there at the time." Meanwhile, the town of 9,000 people remains on edge. "It's a small-town community," the man said. "It hit pretty damn hard. That stuff don't happen out here. So that's got people freaked out about it." Brown is suspected of killing 59-year-old Daniel Edwin Baillie, 64-year-old Nancy Lauretta Kelley, 70-year-old David Allen Leach and 74-year-old Tony Wayne Palm. All of the victims were from Anaconda. Shortly after the massacre, police tracked down a white Ford F-150 associated with Brown but did not locate him. That truck was equipped with outdoor supplies and food. At the time of the manhunt, Brown was described by authorities as "armed and extremely dangerous."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What Those 'Speed Enforced By Aircraft' Signs Are Really For
At some point, you've probably seen one of those "Speed Enforced by Aircraft" signs along the road and wondered if you could ignore it. Some drivers view these signs as nothing more than roadside scarecrows, while others become paranoid and search the sky for any sign of an airplane or helicopter. So, is this a real thing? Are there officers in the sky waiting to write you a ticket? You may be surprised to learn that, like some of the stealthiest cop cars on the road, aircraft-based speed enforcement is definitely real. Here's how it works: One officer is in a helicopter or fixed-wing aircraft, and another is in a patrol car on the ground. The airborne officer measures a vehicle's speed, either by timing how long it takes for it to travel between two painted markings on the ground or by using technology like a Video Speed Measuring (VSM) device. The airborne officer notifies the ground officer when they've spotted a speeder, and the patrol car performs the traffic stop. If you choose to challenge the ticket in court, both officers must show up, as both of their names will be on the citation. So, yes, depending on where you are, there just might be a law enforcement officer in a small airplane or helicopter watching you on the highway and clocking your speed. In some locations, thousands of tickets per year are written this way. This isn't true everywhere, though, as some states have dramatically scaled back their air-based traffic enforcement efforts. Read more: These Are The Dumbest Car Crashes You've Ever Seen Where Are Speed Limits Enforced By Aircraft? Iowa pioneered this type of traffic enforcement when it established the Iowa State Patrol's Air Wing Unit in 1952 with just two pilots and two Piper Super Cub airplanes. It's still active today with five pilots and five airplanes — four Cessnas and an SR-22 CIRRUS. These "Speed Enforced by Aircraft" signs can be found in multiple states, most notably Ohio and Florida. In 2009, Ohio issued 18,000 tickets using airborne traffic enforcement, a five-year high at the time. By 2022, the state was so committed to this method that it upgraded its planes with GPS-enabled VSM systems and cameras, aiming to catch speeders exceeding 100 miles per hour. By September of the following year, the state had issued 2,832 tickets using this method. Florida law enforcement is more likely to patrol highways from the sky on holidays or in certain designated areas on a monthly basis. The state still manages to issue (by some estimates) 45,000 citations a year using aircraft-based enforcement, with 38,000 of those citations going to speeders. The state's 2025 budget even allocated $2.5 million for new law enforcement aircraft. Other states also conduct aircraft-based traffic enforcement, but not to the same extent as Florida. Washington state's air-based program, for example, issues a few thousand citations a year but, like Ohio, has upgraded to VSMs (incidentally, Ohio is among the 10 states that write the most speeding tickets). Pennsylvania has reduced its pilots from 10 to three but still fly patrols several times a week. What Are Your Chances Of Getting A Ticket From A Cop In The Sky? The likelihood of getting caught speeding by an airborne officer depends on where you're driving. If you see a "Speed Enforced by Aircraft" sign in a state like Florida, Ohio, or Washington that actively patrols its roads from the sky, then you may get caught. However, many states have scaled back these sky patrols or discontinued them altogether. California, for example, was another early pioneer of airborne traffic enforcement, experimenting with the practice back in the 1960s. At one point, the state even flew patrols daily. Nowadays, however, California traffic is only occasionally monitored from the sky when the aircraft is already in flight for other reasons. California Highway Patrol officer Daniel Hill told KQED in 2016 that only about 10 out of 1 million tickets a year are issued from the state's airborne patrols. Cost is the main factor that has caused many states to roll back the use of traffic-monitoring aircraft. Fuel alone can cost $150 per hour flown, and that's in addition to the officers' salaries. That's why states like Alabama, New York, and Virginia have mostly discontinued their airborne patrols, with New York even taking down its "Speed Enforced by Aircraft" signs. Your chances of getting caught speeding by an airborne cop in one of these states are pretty low, though of course, the easiest way to avoid getting a ticket is to drive the speed limit. Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
CDC shooter blamed COVID vaccine for depression; union demands statement against misinformation
A Georgia man who had blamed the COVID-19 vaccine for making him depressed and suicidal has been identified as the shooter who opened fire late Friday on the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention headquarters, killing a police officer. The 30-year-old suspect, who died during the incident, had also tried to get into the CDC's headquarters in Atlanta but was stopped by guards before driving to a pharmacy across the street and opening fire, a law enforcement official told The Associated Press on Saturday. The man, identified as Patrick Joseph White, was armed with five guns, including at least one long gun, the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly discuss the investigation. A union representing workers at the CDC said the incident was not random and 'compounds months of mistreatment, neglect, and vilification that CDC staff have endured." It demanded federal officials condemn vaccine misinformation, saying it was putting scientists at risk. Here's what to know about the shooting and the continuing investigation: An attack on a prominent public health institution Police say White opened fire outside the CDC headquarters in Atlanta on Friday, leaving bullet marks in windows across the sprawling campus. At least four CDC buildings were hit, Director Susan Monarez said on X. DeKalb County Police Officer David Rose was mortally wounded while responding. Rose, 33, a former Marine who served in Afghanistan, had graduated from the police academy in March. White was found on the second floor of a building across the street from the CDC campus and died at the scene, Atlanta Police Chief Darin Schierbaum said. He added that 'we do not know at this time whether that was from officers or if it was self-inflicted.' The Georgia Bureau of Investigations said the crime scene was 'complex' and the investigation would take 'an extended period of time." CDC union calls condemnation of vaccine misinformation and tighter security The American Federation of Government Employees, Local 2883, said the CDC and leadership of the Department of Health and Human Services must provide a 'clear and unequivocal stance in condemning vaccine disinformation.' Such a public statement by federal officials is needed to help prevent violence against scientists, the union said in a news release. 'Their leadership is critical in reinforcing public trust and ensuring that accurate, science-based information prevails,' the union said. Fired But Fighting, a group of laid-off CDC employees has said HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is directly responsible for the villainization of CDC's workforce through "his continuous lies about science and vaccine safety, which have fueled a climate of hostility and mistrust.' Kennedy reached out to staff on Saturday, saying 'no one should face violence while working to protect the health of others.' Thousands of people who work on critical disease research are employed on the campus. The union said some staff were huddled in various buildings until late at night, including more than 90 young children who were locked down inside the CDC's Clifton School. The union said CDC staff should not be required to immediately return to work after experiencing such a traumatic event. In a statement released Saturday, it said windows and buildings should first be fixed and made 'completely secure." 'Staff should not be required to work next to bullet holes,' the union said. 'Forcing a return under these conditions risks re-traumatizing staff by exposing them to the reminders of the horrific shooting they endured.' The union called for 'perimeter security on all campuses' until the investigation is fully completed and shared with staff. Shooter had fixation on COVID-19 vaccine White's father, who contacted police and identified his son as the possible shooter, said White had been upset over the death of his dog and also had become fixated on the COVID-19 vaccine, according to the law enforcement official. A neighbor of White told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution that White 'seemed like a good guy' but spoke with her multiple times about his distrust of COVID-19 vaccines in unrelated conversations. 'He was very unsettled, and he very deeply believed that vaccines hurt him and were hurting other people,' Nancy Hoalst, told the Atlanta newspaper. 'He emphatically believed that.' But Hoalst said she never believed White would be violent: 'I had no idea he thought he would take it out on the CDC.'
